Delhi Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Achal Kumar Jindal vs State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-28-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on: 27.02.2026Judgment delivered on: 28.02.2026+ CRL.M.C. 321/2026 & CRL.M.A. 1209/2026 & CRL.M.A.ACHAL KUMAR JINDAL .....PetitionerversusSTATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents+ CRL.M.C. 925/2026 & CRL.M.A. 3653/2026 & CRL.M.A.ACHAL KUMAR JINDAL .....PetitionerversusSTATE NCT OF DELHI .....RespondentAdvocates who appeared in this case:For the Petitioner: Mr. Mahesh Jethmalani, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Mohit Mathur, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Pramod Kumar Dubey, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Apoorv Agarwal, Mr. Ravi Sharma, Mr. Manav Goyal, Mr. Abhishek Jaiswal, Mr. Sanchit Agarwal, Ms. Amrita Sony, Ms. Manya Jaiswal, Mr. Anjani Kumar Rai, Mr. Vignesh, Mr. Satyam Sharma, Mr. Priyanshu Raj, Ms. Aparna Iyer, Mr. Gaurav Sarkar, Ms. Priya Singh, Ms. Khushi Arora and Mr. Rupraj Banerjee, Advocates.For the Respondent: Mr. Sanjay Jain, Sr. Advocate with Mr. AkhandCRL.M.C. 321/2026 & Page 1 of 21 Pratap Singh, Mr. Nishan...
All India Institute of Medical Sciences vs Meet Bhadresh Shah & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-28-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIReserved on: 27.02.2026 Date of Decision: 28.02.2026+ LPA 94/2026 & CM APPLs. 12911-12/2026 ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES.....Appellant Through: Mr.Anand Varma, Adv. with Mr.Ayush Gupta, Adv.versusMEET BHADRESH SHAH & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Anushree Kapadia with Mr. Pranay Bhardwaj, Mr. Shivank Singh & Ms. Pragay Jaishwal, Advocates for Respondent No.1. Mr. Farman Ali, CGSC with Ms. Usha Jamnal, GP for UoI. Mr. T. Singhdev, Mr. Abhijit Chakravarty, Ms. Yamini Singh, Mr. Tanishq Srivastava, Mr. Vedant Sood, Mr. Bhanu Gulati & Ms. Ramanpreet Kaur, Advocates for Respondent No.3/NMC. Ms. Charu Mathur, Advocate for Respondent No.4. Mr. Kapil Midha with Ms. Vartika Gautam, Advocates for Respondent No.5.CORAM:HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIADigiltally Signed LPA 94/2026 Page 1 of 20JUDGMENTDEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, C.J.1. By instituting the proceedings of this intra-court appeal...
Ajay Jha vs State Govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-28-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 725/2026 AJAY JHA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ghanshyam Thakur, Advocate.versusSTATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rahul Tyagi, Additional Standing Counsel [M: 9818460146]CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 28.02.2026 CRL.M.A. 6883/2026(Exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(CRL) 725/2026 & CRL.M.A. 6882/2026 (for interim protection)1. This matter has been taken up for hearing today [Saturday] at 05:45P.M. upon urgent mentioning before Honble the Chief Justice.2. The petitioners comprising of husband (petitioner No. 1), wife(petitioner No. 2). their two minor children (petitioner Nos. 3 and 4), and the brother of petitioner No. 1 (petitioner No. 5), have filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, seeking the following reliefs: a) Issue a writ of mandamus directing Respondent Nos.1 to 3 to...
Prl Projects and Infrastructure Limited vs Union of India
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-28-2026
$~1&2* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision : 28.02.2026+ W.P.(C) 2827/2026PRL PROJECTS AND INFRASTRUCTURELIMITED .....PetitionerversusUNION OF INDIA .....Respondent+ W.P.(C) 2836/2026PRL PROJECTS AND INFRASTRUCTURELIMITED .....PetitionerversusUNION OF INDIA .....RespondentPresent: Ms Anusuya Salwan and Ms Nikita Salwan, Advocates for the petitioner. Mr. Ankur Mittal, CGSC Mr. Ankur Saboo Mr. Aviraj Pandey, Advocates and Mr Vinay Kaushik, GP for UOI.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAOHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORAV. KAMESWAR RAO, J. (ORAL)CM APPL. 13746/2026(Exemption) in W.P.(C) 2827/2026 CM APPL. 13771/2026(Exemption) in W.P.(C) 2836/20261. Exemptions are allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The applications stand disposed of.W.P.(C) 2827/2026 & CM APPL. 13745/2026(Stay) W.P.(C) 2836/2026 CM APPL. 13770/2026 (Stay)Signed By:PRADEEP W.P. (C) 2827 and 2836 of 2026 Page 1 of 53. These petitions have been filed ...
Prl Projects and Infrastructure Limited vs Union of India
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-28-2026
$~1&2* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision : 28.02.2026+ W.P.(C) 2827/2026PRL PROJECTS AND INFRASTRUCTURELIMITED .....PetitionerversusUNION OF INDIA .....Respondent+ W.P.(C) 2836/2026PRL PROJECTS AND INFRASTRUCTURELIMITED .....PetitionerversusUNION OF INDIA .....RespondentPresent: Ms Anusuya Salwan and Ms Nikita Salwan, Advocates for the petitioner. Mr. Ankur Mittal, CGSC Mr. Ankur Saboo Mr. Aviraj Pandey, Advocates and Mr Vinay Kaushik, GP for UOI.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAOHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORAV. KAMESWAR RAO, J. (ORAL)CM APPL. 13746/2026(Exemption) in W.P.(C) 2827/2026 CM APPL. 13771/2026(Exemption) in W.P.(C) 2836/20261. Exemptions are allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The applications stand disposed of.W.P.(C) 2827/2026 & CM APPL. 13745/2026(Stay) W.P.(C) 2836/2026 CM APPL. 13770/2026 (Stay)Signed By:PRADEEP W.P. (C) 2827 and 2836 of 2026 Page 1 of 53. These petitions have been filed ...
Associated Broadcasting Company Limited vs Google LLC & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-28-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment delivered on: 28/02/2026+ CS(COMM) 9/2024 & I.A. 260/2024ASSOCIATED BROADCASTING COMPANYLIMITED .....PlaintiffversusGOOGLE LLC & ORS. .....DefendantsAdvocates who appeared in this caseFor the Plaintiff : Mr. Harsh Kaushik, Mr. Shwetank Tripathi, Mr. Deepank Singhal, Ms. Devangini & Mr. Harsh Prakash, Advocates.For the Defendants : Ms. Aishwarya Kane, Advocate for Defendant No. 1.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIAJUDGMENTTEJAS KARIA, JI.A. 21020/2025FACTUAL BACKGROUND:1. The Plaintiff has instituted the present Suit seeking, inter alia,injunction against Defendant Nos. 2 to 5 restraining them from issuing any groundless threat of copyright infringement and declaration that the acts ofCS(COMM) 9/2024 Page 1 of 36 Plaintiff as elucidated in the Plaint do not amount to copyright infringement of the works alleged to be owned by Defendant Nos. 2 to 5.2. In the present Suit, Defendants Nos. 2 to 5 have not fil...
Rakesh Kumar Aggarwal vs Intelectual Property Appellate Board and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-28-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment delivered on: 28/02/2026 + W.P.(C)-IPD 66/2021 & CM APPL. 3710/2017 RAKESH KUMAR AGGARWAL .....PetitionerVersusINTELLECTUAL PROERTY APPLELLATE BOARD AND ANR .....Respondents AND + W.P.(C)-IPD 69/2021 & CM APPL. 3712/2017 RAKESH KUMAR AGGARWAL .....PetitionerVersusINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY APPELLATE BOARD AND ANR .....Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case For the Petitioner : Mr. Varun Dhingra & Ms. Khushi Gupta, Advocates. For the Respondents : Mr. Amit Jain & Mr. Bhavesh, Advocates for Respondent No.2.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIAJUDGMENTTEJAS KARIA, J INTRODUCTION:1. The present Petitions have been filed challenging the order dated10.05.2016 (Impugned Order) passed by Respondent No. 1 in Rectification Application bearing No. ORA/30/2013/TM/DEL filed by Respondent No. 2 in W.P.(C)-IPD 66/2021 and Rectification ApplicationW.P.(C)-IPD 66/2021 & W.P.(C)-IPD 69/2021 Page 1 of 21 bearing No. ORA...
Rakesh Kumar Aggarwal vs Intelectual Proerty Applellate Board and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-28-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment delivered on: 28/02/2026 + W.P.(C)-IPD 66/2021 & CM APPL. 3710/2017 RAKESH KUMAR AGGARWAL .....PetitionerVersusINTELLECTUAL PROERTY APPLELLATE BOARD AND ANR .....Respondents AND + W.P.(C)-IPD 69/2021 & CM APPL. 3712/2017 RAKESH KUMAR AGGARWAL .....PetitionerVersusINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY APPELLATE BOARD AND ANR .....Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case For the Petitioner : Mr. Varun Dhingra & Ms. Khushi Gupta, Advocates. For the Respondents : Mr. Amit Jain & Mr. Bhavesh, Advocates for Respondent No.2.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIAJUDGMENTTEJAS KARIA, J INTRODUCTION:1. The present Petitions have been filed challenging the order dated10.05.2016 (Impugned Order) passed by Respondent No. 1 in Rectification Application bearing No. ORA/30/2013/TM/DEL filed by Respondent No. 2 in W.P.(C)-IPD 66/2021 and Rectification ApplicationW.P.(C)-IPD 66/2021 & W.P.(C)-IPD 69/2021 Page 1 of 21 bearing No. ORA...
Hindustan Lever Ltd. and Anr. vs Rakesh Goyal and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-28-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment delivered on: 28/02/2026 + CS(COMM) 256/2018 HINDUSTAN LEVER LTD. AND ANR. ..PlaintiffsVersusRAKESH GOYAL AND ORS. .....Defendants Advocates who appeared in this case For the Plaintiffs : Mr. Saif Khan & Mr. Shobhit Agrawal, Advocates for P-1. Mr. Abhijit Mittal, Mr. Anukalp Jain, Ms. Shaivya Singh & Mr. Nishtha Nanda, Advocates for P-2. For the Defendants : None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIAJUDGMENTTEJAS KARIA, J1. The present Suit has been filed seeking a permanent injunction againstthe Defendants from engaging in the sale, manufacture, distribution, and advertising of counterfeit fast moving consumer goods (FMCG), such as shampoos and creams, causing infringement of Trade Marks and Copyright, Passing off, tarnishing the reputation, damages, seeking delivery up etc. Signature Not Verified CS(COMM) 256/2018 Page 1 of 182. The Plaintiffs had conducted independent and joint raids at thepremises of the Defendant...
Crystal Crop Protection Ltd vs Assistant Controller of Patents and Des ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-28-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment delivered on: 28/02/2026 + C.A.(COMM.IPD-PAT) 19/2023 & I.A. 20715/2025 CRYSTAL CROP PROTECTION LTD .....AppellantversusASSISTANT CONTROLLER OF PATENTS AND DESIGNS & ORS. .....Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case For the Appellant : Ms. Priyam Lizmary Cherian, Advocate. For the Respondents : Ms. Anubha Bhardwaj, CGSC with Ms. Ananya Shamshery, Advocates for R-1. Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Mr. Shravan Kumar Bansal, Mr. Rishi Bansal, Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Mr. Deepak Srivastava, Mr. Rishabh Gupta, Ms. Shruti Manchanda and Ms. Deasha Mehta, Advocates for R-2.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIAJUDGMENTTEJAS KARIA, J I.A. 20715/2025 INTRODUCTION1. This is an Application filed on behalf of Respondent No. 2 under Rule 6(v)(xii) of Delhi High Court Intellectual Property Division Rules, 2022C.A.(COMM.IPD-PAT) 19/2023 Page 1 of 50 (IPD Rules), Order XLI Rule 27 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CP...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »