Delhi Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dinesh Kumar @ Khali vs State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
$~85 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 311/2026 DINESH KUMAR @ KHALI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Siddharth Yadav, Mr. Nitin Kumar Yadav and Mr. Vikas Deep, Advs. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, ASC for the State SI- Satish Kumar, PS: Mangol Puri CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE ORDER % 30.01.2026 1. Pursuant to order passed yesterday by this Court, i.e. 29.01.2026, learned ASC for the State submits the application dated 21.01.2026 for grant of parole has since been received and will also be adjudicated at the earliest, preferably within a period of three weeks. 2. In view thereof, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition. 3. The present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. A copy of the present order be sent to the concerned Jail Superintendent for information and compliance forthwith.SAURABH BANERJEE, J JANUARY 30, 2026/AbThis is a digitally signe...
Aditya vs State Govt Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
$~72 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 362/2026 ADITYA .....Petitioner Through: Petitioner with his counsel Mr. Bhanu Malhotra and Mr. Rishabh Atri, Advs.versusSTATE GOVT NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP for the State along with SI Kaikho Ashune. Complainant and her mother with their counselCORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA ORDER % 30.01.2026 CRL.M.A. 2850/2026, CRL.M.A. 2851/2026 & CRL.M.A. 2852/2026 (exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. Applications stand disposed of. BAIL APPLN. 362/2026 3. By way of the present application, the applicant seeks interim bail for a period of two months in case arising out of FIR bearing No. 581/2025, registered at Police Station Paharganj, Delhi for the commission of offences punishable under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter 'IPC') and Section 6 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 20...
Neeraj Tiwari @ Goldy & Anr. vs the State Govt. of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
$~32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 787/2026 NEERAJ TIWARI @ GOLDY & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Vijay Sharma, Advocate.versusTHE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar Gautam, APP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN ORDER % 30.01.20261. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that though the present petition has been filed seeking quashing of FIR in question on the basis of settlement, it seems that the other side is no longer interested in any settlement. He submits that in view of the abovesaid, the petitioners do not press the present petition. 2. Petition is, accordingly, disposed of as not pressed.MANOJ JAIN, J JANUARY 30, 2026 st/saThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/02/2026 at 11:49:26...
Ajay Gupta vs Vinay Goyal & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
$~47 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) 236/2026, CM APPL. 6355/2026 & CM APPL. 6356/2026 AJAY GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shantanu Aggarwal and Mr. Akash Gupta, Advocates. versusVINAY GOYAL & ANR. .....Respondents Through: None.CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA ORDER % 30.01.2026 1. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode. 2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition. 3. Keeping in view the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J JANUARY 30, 2026/v/tpThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/02/2026 at 11:39:12...
Managing Committee of Anglo Arabic Senior Secondary School Through Its ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA 43/2026, CM Nos.6407/2026, 6408/2026, 6409/2026, 6410/2026 & 6411/2026 MANAGING COMMITTEE OF ANGLO ARABIC SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL THROUGH ITS HONY. SECRETARY & ANR. .....Appellants Through: Mr. Pritish Sabharwal, Ms. S. Singh, Mr. M. Khan & Mr. S. Kumar, Advocates. Versus ZULFIQUAR HAIDER & ANR. .....Respondents Through: None. CORAM: HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIA ORDER % 30.01.2026 1. We have heard the learned Counsel for the Appellants. 2. The learned Counsel for the Appellants, upon being informed that the present Appeal is not maintainable for the reason that the order dated 17.11.2025 under challenge in the present Appeal only issues Notice of the Application, being CM No.71742/2025, seeks permission to withdraw the present Appeal with an observation that learned Single Judge may decide the said Application at the earliest possible. 3. Accordingly, the prese...
Rahul Rawal & Ors. vs State Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
$~38 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 30.01.2026+ W.P.(CRL) 325/2026 RAHUL RAWAL & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Sitesh Narayan Singh and Mr. Sandeep Bahuguna, Advocates.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anand V. Khatri, ASC for State with SI Rahul Rathi and ASI Ramkesh, PS Sangam Vihar. Ms. Divya Das, Advocate for R-2 with R-2 in person.CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIAJ U D G M E N T (ORAL)1. Petitioners seek quashing of case FIR No. 11/2024 of Police Station Sangam Vihar for offence under Section 498A/406/34 IPC on the ground that respondent no. 2 has compromised the disputes with the petitioners.2. Learned ASC accepts notice and submits that State has no objection to this petition since private parties have already settled all disputes and are living together happily.W.P.(CRL) 325/2026 Page 1 of 2 pages Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,GIRISH 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77...
Saleem Ul Rehman @Wasim vs State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
$~86 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 429/2026 SALEEM UL REHMAN @WASIM .....Applicant Through: Mr. Vansh Choudhary, Mr. Irfan Firdous, Ms. Nandini Bindoria, Mr. Nilesh Lohia, Mr. Monis Ali Khan, Mr. Shahreyar Khan, Mr. Waseem Hassan Khan and Mr. Adnan Khan, Advocates.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Tarang Srivastava, APP.CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER % 30.01.2026 CRL.M.A. 3274-75/2026 (for exemption) Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The applications stand disposed of. BAIL APPLN. 429/2026 1. The applicant was granted interim bail by order dated 17.01.2026 for a period of ten days. In the said order, it was noted that the prosecutrix and her family members did not wish to make any submissions other than those advanced by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor. 2. The grounds for grant of interim bail were to enable the applicant to make financial arrangements for the chemotherapy and can...
Shambhu Singh vs State Govt. of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
$~66 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 406/2026 & CRL.M.A. 3116/2026 SHAMBHU SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Raju Sonkar, Advocate via video- conferencing. versusSTATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Richa Dhawan, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI ORDER % 30.01.2026 By way of the present petition filed under section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR No.705/2025 dated 26.09.2025 registered under sections 498-A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 at P.S.: Sarita Vihar, New Delhi. However, the record shows that the petitioner has approached this court directly, instead of first availing the remedies available before the learned Sessions Court. In view thereof, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present anticipatory bail petition, with liberty to approach the learned Sessions...
Raj Kumar Roy vs Reserve Bank of India and Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
$~90 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1308/2026 & CM APPL. 6394/2026 RAJ KUMAR ROY .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kirtiman Singh, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rishabh Dua, Mr. Mani Aneja, Mr. Ritwik Saha, Advs. versus RESERVE BANK OF INDIA AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Nisha Sharma, Ms. Manisha, Singh, Advs. for R-1 Ms. Seema Gupta, Adv. for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH ORDER % 30.01.2026 1. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and the same has been allowed. 2. List for detailed order on 05.02.2026.JASMEET SINGH, J JANUARY 30, 2026/spThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/02/2026 at 13:56:57...
Dr Er Rajainderr Jaina Alias Rajender Jaina vs Rohit Dua
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
$~36 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 122/2026 & I.A. 2563/2026 DR ER RAJAINDERR JAINA ALIAS RAJENDER JAINA .....Petitioner Through:versusROHIT DUA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Jaskaran Singh, Adv. (through VC).CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN ORDER % 30.01.2026 1. This petition is filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of period for concluding the arbitration proceedings. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent has no serious objection to the prayer made. 3. In view of the above, the time period for conclusion of the proceedings is extended by ninety days. 4. This petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.AVNEESH JHINGAN, J JANUARY 30, 2026 JKThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/02/2026 at 12:11:4...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›
- Last »