Delhi Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kaushal Kumar Yadav & Anr. vs the State of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
$~33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 30th January, 2026 + CRL.M.C. 798/2026 & CRL.M.A. 3157/2026 KAUSHAL KUMAR YADAV & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Ajay Paul, Ms. Geeta Paul and Mr. Ravi Verma, Advocates. versusTHE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Satinder Singh Bawa, APP for the State with SI Pawan Kumar, PS Prashant Vihar. Respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral)1. Petitioners herein seek quashing of FIR No. 415/2025 dated 01.07.2025, registered at P.S. Prashant Vihar, Delhi, under Sections 110/351(2)/3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 (corresponding Sections 308/506 of IPC), along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 2. Both the petitioners are vegetable-sellers and so is the complainant (respondent No.2 herein). 3. On the date of incident, a quarrel had taken...
Delhi Sub Registrar Bar Association & Anr. vs Govt of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
$~75 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1281/2026 DELHI SUB REGISTRAR BAR ASSOCIATION & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Pulkit Thareja, Mr. Deepanshu Garg, Ms. Jannat Garga nd Mr. Nitish Dhalla, Advocates. versusGOVT OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sumit K. Batra, AdvocateCORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV ORDER % 30.01.20261. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that the petitioners raise the issue for the larger public interest. The petitioners, however, are not personally aggrieved by the impugned action. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks liberty to withdraw the instant petition with further liberty to take appropriate recourse in accordance with law. 3. Liberty, so prayed, is granted. 4. The instant petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J JANUARY 30, 2026 Nc/amgThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-veri...
New Modern Buildwell Private Limited vs Deputy Commissioner of Income ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
$~33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1318/2026 CM APPL. 6436/2026 NEW MODERN BUILDWELL PRIVATE LIMITED.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sandeep Sapra, Adv.versusDEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRLCE 16 (1) DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shlok Chandra, Sr. Standing Counsel with Ms. Naincy Jain, Ms. Madhavi Shukla and Mr. Udit D., Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR ORDER % 30.01.2026 1. By way of present petition, the petitioner has challenged the notice dated 30.08.2024 so also the notice and order dated 31.08.2024 for the Assessment Year 2015-16, which according to learned counsel for the petitioner is barred by limitation in light of judgment of Honble the Supreme Court rendered in the case of Union of India & Others v. Rajeev Bansal reported in 2024 SCC OnLine SC 2693 and judgment of this Court rendered in the case of Manju Somani v. Income Tax Officer Ward-70(1) & Ors ...
Vikash vs the Commissioner of Police and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 1315/2026 VIKASH .....Petitioner Through: Counsel (Appearance not given) versus THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Chetanya Puri, SPC with Mr. Anand Awasthi, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN ORDER % 30.01.2026 1. Through the present writ petition, inter alia, the Petitioner assails correctness of the order dated 18.12.2025 (hereafter impugned order), passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal in M.A. No. 4859/2025 in O.A. No. 3217/2023. 2. The Petitioner herein applied for the post of Constable (Executive) Male in Delhi Police, pursuant to recruitment notice issued in the year 2020. 3. On 28.06.2021, the Petitioner appeared for height measurement test where his height was found to be 169.5 cm, which was 0.5 cm short of the required height of 170 cm. 4. The Petitioner had made an application to the Competent ...
Mukesh Devi vs Govt of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.REV.P. 31/2026, CRL.M.A. 1484/2026 & CRL.M.A. 1483/2026MUKESH DEVI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vikas Kumar, AdvocateversusGOVT OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for the State with Inspector Pradeep Singh CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA ORDER % 30.01.20261. The revisionist has assailed order dated 10.11.2025 of the learned CJM, whereby the revisionist was declared proclaimed offender. On being pointed out that the impugned order is an interlocutory order, aimed simply to ensure appearance of the revisionist to face trial/investigation, so the revision petition is not maintainable, learned counsel for revisionist on instructions seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to move appropriate application before the learned CJM. 2. As requested, the petition and the accompanying applications are dismissed as withdrawn.GIRISH KATHPALIA, J JANUARY 30, 2026 rs...
Adarsh Kala Rachnatmak Sangathan Regd vs Delhi Jal Board & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) 101/2026 ADARSH KALA RACHNATMAK SANGATHAN REGD .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Pratishtha Verhwani and Mr. Amit Gupta, Advs.versusDELHI JAL BOARD & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, SC for DJB with Mr. Parvin Bansal, Advs. Mr. Vikas Chopra, SC for MCD with Mr. Neeraj Kumar. Adv.CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA ORDER % 30.01.2026 1. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition as it has become infructuous. 3. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J JANUARY 30, 2026/sds/ikThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/02/2026 at 11:...
Jonty Dhama & Anr. vs State of Nct Ofdelhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
$~46 & 47 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 30th January, 2026 + CRL.M.C. 474/2026 & CRL.M.A. 1915/2026 HARSH BHATI & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Praveen Singhai, Mr. Anil Kumar, Mr. Siddarath Baisoya and Mr. Ujjwal Chauhan, Advocates. versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR ....Respondents Through: Mr. Satinder Singh Bawa, APP for the State with SI Ravi Yadav. + CRL.M.C. 484/2026 & CRL.M.A. 1934/2026 JONTY DHAMA & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Manish Kr. Kasyap and Mr. Namit Dixit, Advocates. versus STATE OF NCT OFDELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Satinder Singh Bawa, APP for the State with SI Ravi Yadav.CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Both these petitions are connected petition and seek quashing of FIR No. 767/2022 dated 03.11.2022, registered at P.S. Govind Puri along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise ...
Naveen Nayyar vs State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
$~41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 292/2026, CRL.M.A. 2382/2026 & CRL.M.A. 2383/2026 NAVEEN NAYYAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. M S Oberoi, Advocate versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar Gautam, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN ORDER % 30.01.2026 1. Applicant seeks regular bail in FIR No. 86/2007 dated 23.02.2007, for commission of offences under Sections 420/34 IPC, registered at P.S. Krishan Nagar. 2. According to learned counsel for applicant, the FIR was registered in the year 2007 and applicant was enlarged on interim bail, subject to deposit of sum of Rs. 11,00,000/-. He deposited such amount and thereafter his bail was regularized. 3. He submits that, in the interregnum, the applicant/accused had been arrested in some other case and was lodged in jail in Punjab and, therefore, he could not appear in the present proceedings, which resulted in issuance of process under Sectio...
Mohd. Ubaid vs Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on : 22.01.2026 Pronounced on : 30.01.2026 Uploaded on : 30.01.2026+ FAO 38/2021 MOHD. UBAID .....Appellant Through: Mr. Rajan Sood, Ms. Ashima Sood and Ms. Megha Sood, AdvocatesversusUNION OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Jitesh Vikram Srivastava, Advocate (SPC)CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI JUDGMENT1. The present appeal is directed against the judgment dated 06.03.2020 passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal, Principal Bench, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal) in Claim Application No. OA (IIu) No. 140/2019, filed under Section 16 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). 2. The Tribunal observed that though the appellant was a bona fide passenger having a valid journey ticket for the journey from Shahdara to Loni, the appellant was travelling on the footboard of the train while holdingSignature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:NIJAMUDDEEN ANSARI S...
Pradeep Kumar Sahu vs State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
$~45 to 47 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 323/2026 PRADEEP KUMAR SAHU .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Arun Saxena and Mr. Govind Shrivastava, Advocates versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, APP for the State with SI Sunil Dev Sihag (46) + BAIL APPLN. 332/2026 SHALINI SHIVHARE .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Arun Saxena and Mr. Govind Shrivastava, Advocates versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, APP for the State (47) + BAIL APPLN. 344/2026 KOMAL PAKHRIYA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Arun Saxena and Mr. Govind Shrivastava, Advocates versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, APP for the StateCORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 31/01/2026 at 13:46...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »