Delhi Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mr Amrish Gupta vs Gurchait Singh Chima Deceased Through Lr and Widow ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
$~ J-1* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIReserved on: 17th November, 2025 Date of Decision: 28th January, 2026 Uploaded on: 29th January, 2026 + FAO(OS)(COMM)182/2022, CM APPL. 31553/2022 & CM APPL. 48614/2024 MR. AMRISH GUPTA .....Appellant Through: Mr. Ravi Gupta, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Gaurav Rana, Ms. Muskaan Mehra & Ms. Pragya Dahiya, Advs.versusLATE GURCHAIT SINGH CHEEMA GURCHAIT SINGH CHIMA (DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LR AND WIDOW MRS. DALJEET KAUR CHIMA ..... .Respondent Through: Mr. Kanhaiya Singhal, Mr. Prasanna, Mr. Ajay Kumar, Ms. Vaani, Mr. Pulkit Jolly, Mr. Rishabh Bhardwaj, Mr. Kanav Gupta, Mr. Rajat Pandey, Ms. Nivedita Tiwari, Ms. Shatakshi Singh, Mr. Shaswat Tiwari, Ms. Avantika Shankar and Ms. Rhythm Bharadwaj, Advs.CORAM:JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE SHAIL JAINJUDGMENTSHAIL JAIN, J.1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. KUMAR FAO (OS) (COMM) 182/2022 Page 1 of 212. The present appeal has been filed by the appellant under Section 13 ofthe C...
Baby Krutika Sharma Through Her Father Vasudev Sharma vs Govt of Nct o ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 9252/2024 BABY KRUTIKA SHARMA THROUGH HER FATHER VASUDEV SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kunal Gosain, Adv.versusGOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 28.01.20261. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia seeking the following prayers: i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondent No. 2/Senior Wing School take back/permit the Petitioner to continue studying in 2nd class as promoted by the Respondent No. 2 school for the academic session 2024-2025 and in all future academic sessions and continue to provide all such associated benefits as the Petitioner is entitled to till their education is complete.; ii. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus for directing Respondent No. 1 to have an audit done of the Respondent no. 2 , 3 school and Respondent No. 4/Saraswati E...
Chiranji Lal & Ors. vs Uoi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
$~R19* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 138/2007 CHIRANJI LAL & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: None.versusUOI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Mukul Singh, CGSC with Ms. Ira Singh & Mr. Aryan Dhaka, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 28.01.20261. Called twice.2. There is no representation on behalf of the Petitioners.3. Hence, the present Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.AMIT MAHAJAN, J.JANUARY 28, 2026 sk/kb This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/01/2026 at 13:37:27...
The Naval Technical Officers Cghs Ltd vs the Registrar of Cooperative ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
$~41 to 43 & 53* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of decision: 28th January, 2026 Uploaded on: 2nd February, 2026 + W.P.(C) 10532/2021&CM APPL. 18595/2022, CM APPL. APPL. 64862/2024, CM APPL. 69047/2025 THE NAVAL TECHNICAL OFFICERS CGHS LTD.....Petitioner Through:versusTHE REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES .....Respondent Through: + W.P.(C) 10652/2022&CM APPL. 30896/2022 MADAN GOPAL AGARWAL .....Petitioner Through:versusREGISTRAR OF CO-OPEARTIVE SOCIETIES & ANR. .....Respondents Through: + W.P.(C) 19260/2025&CM APPL. 5701/2026 NAVAL TECHNICAL OFFICERS CO-OPERATIVE GROUP HOUSING SOCIETY LIMITED .....Petitioner Through:versusREGISTRAR CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY .....Respondent Through: 53 AND + W.P.(C) 1147/2026&CM APPL. 5597/2026 NAND KISHOR .....Petitioner Through:versusTHE REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETY & ANR. .....Respondents Digitally Signed W.P.(C) 10532/2021 & connected matters Page 1 of 24 Through: Appearances: For Petitioners: Mr. Vi...
Mehdi Hasan vs Government of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 875/2024 MEHDI HASAN .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Aakansha Nehra, Mr. Abul Hasan Khan, Ms. Himangi Arora, Ms. Raj Shakya, Advs.versusGOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak (SC) along with Mrs. K.K. Kiran Pathak, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, Mr. M.S. Akhtar, Ms. Joohu Kumari, Advs. Mr. Vaibhav Agnihotri (ASC-DDA) along with Mr. Vidit Pratap Singh, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTAORDER% 28.01.20261. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition with liberty to assail an order dated 26.06.2025 passed by the Office of the District Magistrate (North).2. The petition is consequently dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. SACHIN DATTA, J JANUARY 28, 2026/ukThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the ...
Rajender Sharma vs Government of India
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
$~R20* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 165/2007 RAJENDER SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: None.versusGOVERNMENT OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 28.01.20261. Called twice.2. There is no representation on behalf of the Petitioner.3. Hence, the present Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.AMIT MAHAJAN, J.JANUARY 28, 2026 sk/kb This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/01/2026 at 13:37:23...
Atul Kumar Sood vs Gurmukh Singh & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
$~38, 40 to 55* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 12305/2023 NARINDER KUMAR SHARMA .....Petitioner + W.P.(C) 13550/2023 INDRAJIT CHOUDHURY .....Petitioner + W.P.(C) 13552/2023 KRITI NATH JHA .....Petitioner + W.P.(C) 13564/2023 VIDHU JINDAL .....Petitioner + W.P.(C) 13569/2023 PARVINDER KUMAR SHARMA .....Petitioner + W.P.(C) 13570/2023 KAILASH CHANDRA JUYAL .....Petitioner + W.P.(C) 13573/2023 ARUN KUMAR MATHUR .....Petitioner + W.P.(C) 13634/2023 AVTAR KRISHAN MATHUR .....Petitioner+ W.P.(C) 13749/2023 BISHAMBER PRASAD GHILDIYAL .....Petitioner + W.P.(C) 13752/2023 BIBEK BHATTACHARJEE .....Petitioner + W.P.(C) 13753/2023 and CM APPL. 71543/2025 RAVI BABU GARG .....Petitioner + W.P.(C) 14538/2023 and CM APPL. 57616/2023 ATUL KUMAR SOOD .....Petitioner + W.P.(C) 14539/2023 and CM APPL. 57633/2023 ROHIT HANDA .....Petitioner + W.P.(C) 14540/2023 and CM APPL. 57705/2023 BHARAT BHUSHAN SHARMA .....Petitioner + W.P.(C) 14541/2023 and CM APPL. 57635/2023 V.K.SHARMA .....Pe...
Mohan Lal Batra vs Gurmukh Singh & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
$~38, 40 to 55* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 12305/2023 NARINDER KUMAR SHARMA .....Petitioner + W.P.(C) 13550/2023 INDRAJIT CHOUDHURY .....Petitioner + W.P.(C) 13552/2023 KRITI NATH JHA .....Petitioner + W.P.(C) 13564/2023 VIDHU JINDAL .....Petitioner + W.P.(C) 13569/2023 PARVINDER KUMAR SHARMA .....Petitioner + W.P.(C) 13570/2023 KAILASH CHANDRA JUYAL .....Petitioner + W.P.(C) 13573/2023 ARUN KUMAR MATHUR .....Petitioner + W.P.(C) 13634/2023 AVTAR KRISHAN MATHUR .....Petitioner+ W.P.(C) 13749/2023 BISHAMBER PRASAD GHILDIYAL .....Petitioner + W.P.(C) 13752/2023 BIBEK BHATTACHARJEE .....Petitioner + W.P.(C) 13753/2023 and CM APPL. 71543/2025 RAVI BABU GARG .....Petitioner + W.P.(C) 14538/2023 and CM APPL. 57616/2023 ATUL KUMAR SOOD .....Petitioner + W.P.(C) 14539/2023 and CM APPL. 57633/2023 ROHIT HANDA .....Petitioner + W.P.(C) 14540/2023 and CM APPL. 57705/2023 BHARAT BHUSHAN SHARMA .....Petitioner + W.P.(C) 14541/2023 and CM APPL. 57635/2023 V.K.SHARMA .....Pe...
Travelport International Operations Limited vs Deputy Commissioner of ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision : 28.01.2026 + W.P.(C) 7633/2025, CM APPL. 34030/2025 TRAVELPORT INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ajay Vohra, Sr. Adv. with Manuj Sabharwal, Mr. Drona Negi and Mr. Devvrat Tiwari, Advs.versusDEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX CIRCLE INT. TAX 3(1)(1), DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Siddhartha Sinha, SSC and Ms. Easha Gurung, JSCCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMARJUDGMENTDINESH MEHTA, J. (ORAL)1. By way of the present writ petition, the petitioner has challenged theorder dated 24.04.2025 passed by the Circle INT TAX 3(1)(1) DEL(hereinafter referred to as the competent authority) whereby the petitioners application under Section 197 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act of 1961) for the Assessment Year (AY) 2025-26 has been decided in the manner that the payer(s) making payment to the petitioner are required to ded...
Ratna Puri vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
$~14 to 16* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 3695/2024 AMEETA PURI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kuriakose Varghese, Mr. Akshat Gogna, Ms. Isha Ghai, Ms. Riya Sara Renchen, Advocates + W.P.(C) 8406/2024 & CM APPL. 34561/2024 AJAY PURI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Manoj Kumar Tyagi SPC with Mr. Shekhar Tyagi and Ms. Prachi Verma Advocates for R-1/UOI Mr. Anurag Ojha, SSC with Mr. + W.P.(C) 8474/2024 & CM APPL. 34912/2024 RATNA PURI .....PetitionerCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBREHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAULORDER% 28.01.20261. Since the Court is not with the petitioners on the aspect of territorial jurisdiction, the counsel for the petitioners, on instructions, made a motion for withdrawal of these petitions.2. The petitions, accordingly, stand disposed of as withdrawn. The petitioners are at liberty to approach the Court having appropriate jurisdiction.3. We make it clear that we have not appreciated the merits of the matters.4. ...
- ‹ Prev
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- Next ›
- Last »