Delhi Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ashutosh Kumar vs State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.A. 301/2025, CRL.M.(BAIL) 558/2025 & CRL.M.A. ASHUTOSH KUMAR .....Appellant Through: Mr. Dhruv Bhagat, Advocate.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Pradeep Gahalot, APP for the State with SI Somika, PS Bindapur. Mr. Vinayak Bhandari, Advocate forDSLSA.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE CHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHAORDER% 28.01.20261. This appeal under Section 415 of the Bharatiya NagarikSuraksha Sanhita, 2023, has been filed on behalf of theappellant/accused in Sessions Case No. 12/2017 on the file ofAdditional Sessions Judge-01 (FTSC) (POCSO), Dwarka Courts,New Delhi, assailing the judgment and conviction dated 26.09.2024as per which he has been found guilty of the offences punishableunder Section 6 read with Sections 5(l) and (m) of the Protection ofChildren from Sexual Offences, 2012. Vide the order on sentence,the appellant has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonmentfor a period of 12 years with payment of...
Iqbal Singh Chhachi (Since Deceased) Thr Lrs vs Sh. Mahender Kumar Gup ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 426/2025 & CM APPL. 13031/2025IQBAL SINGH CHHACHI (SINCE DECEASED) THR LRS.....Petitioner Through: None.versusSH. MAHENDER KUMAR GUPTA AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shekhar Dasi, Mr. M.D. Talha, Mr. Ayush Dassi and Mr. Deepesh Kasana, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 28.01.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. Learned Counsel for the respondents submits that the present petitionhas become infructuous, as the Suit has been decided.3. As no one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner, the matter is passedover and be called again at 02:30 PM.RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, JJANUARY 28, 2026/MRAt 02:40 PM4. At this stage, no one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner, despite apass over.5. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed in default. Pendingapplication(s), if any, also stand disposed of.RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, JJANUARY 28, 2026/...
Vikas Chopra S/O T.D. Chopra vs M/S Vhv Beverages Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 3528/2025 VIKAS CHOPRA S/O T.D. CHOPRA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Adharsh Tripathi, Mr. Vikram Singh Baid and Mr. Ajitesh Garg, Advs.versusM/S VHV BEVERAGES PVT. LTD. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Counsel (appearance not given)CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 28.01.20261. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty to withdraw the writpetition with further liberty to file a fresh petition if occasion arises.2. Liberty, so prayed, is granted.3. The instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn, along with all pendingapplications.PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J JANUARY 28, 2026/SHThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/02/2026 at 12:18:41...
Ex Constable Shashi Dutt Sharma vs Ajay Kumar Bhalla & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 192/2020 & CM APPL. 34587/2021 EX CONSTABLE SHASHI DUTT SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sukh Dev Singh, Advocate.versusAJAY KUMAR BHALLA & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vivek Goyal, Advocate (through Vc).CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMAORDER% 28.01.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present petition under Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt ofCourts Act, 1971 read with Section 151 of the CPC seeks the following prayers: It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble High court may graciously be pleased to initiate contempt proceedings against the respondents for non-compliance of this Hon'ble Court'sorder dated 30.10.2019 passed in WP (C) No.9613/2018 and directthe respondents for correct fixation of pay of the petitioner who is entitled for same pay, grade and increments and MACP which have been drawn by his batch mates i.e. notio...
Shweta Madan vs Competent Automobiles Co. Ltd. & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(COMM) 315/2025 & I.A. 9075/2025, I.A. 9076/2025 SHWETA MADAN .....Plaintiff Through: None.versusCOMPETENT AUTOMOBILES CO. LTD. & ORS. .....Defendants Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNAORDER% 28.01.20261. The present matter has been placed before this Court, as no steps have been taken by the plaintiff for issuance of summons to the defendants.2. None had appeared for the plaintiff before the Joint Registrar (Judicial), when the matter was listed on 23rd January, 2026 or even on 15th December, 2025.3. Clearly, the plaintiff does not seem to be interested in pursuing the present matter.4. Accordingly, the present suit, along with pending applications, is dismissed in default and for non-prosecution. MINI PUSHKARNA, J JANUARY 28, 2026/akThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is do...
Sh. Kaptan Singh vs Navodaya Vidyala Samiti Through Commissioner and A ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 3772/2019 and CM APPL. 49264/2024 SH. KAPTAN SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar, Adv.versusNAVODAYA VIDYALA SAMITI THROUGH COMMISSIONER AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. S. Rajappa, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 28.01.20261. The present Petition has been filed assailing the correctness ofthe order dated 19.03.2019 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi, in O.A. No.3166/2018.2. Learned counsel representing the parties are ad idem that inview of the subsequent development in disciplinary proceedings against the Petitioner, the cause of continuation of the present Writ Petition does not survives.3. Hence, the present Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.AMIT MAHAJAN, J.JANUARY 28, 2026 s.godara/shah/adThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can b...
Namita Dabas & Ors. vs Sujata Guliani
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 526/2025 NAMITA DABAS & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Anand Yadav and Ms. Anita Tomar, Advocates.versusSUJATA GULIANI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Abhinav Singh and Mr. Rishab Mittal, Advocates for GNCTD.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTAORDER% 28.01.20261. Learned counsel for the respondent submits, on instructions from theconcerned Sub-Registrar (who is present in Court today), that the impediment in registering the concerned sale deed is on account of the fact that there are some consolidation proceedings ongoing in Kanjhawala.2. It is noticed that in the same context, this Court vide order dated10.11.2023 in W.P.(C) 12122/2021, titled Okaya Infocom Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr., has issued the following directions: 14. In view of the above, without delving further into the matter, the present petition is disposed-of with the following directions :14.1. Sub-Registrar of Assurances...
Satinder Kumar vs the New India Assurance Company Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5350/2019 SATINDER KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Atul Varma, Advocate.versusTHE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Saurabh Prakash and Mr. Utsav Jain, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULAORDER% 28.01.20261. This writ petition seeks a direction to the Respondent to appoint the Petitioner on compassionate grounds in place of his father, late Shri Chet Singh Dhiryan, who died in harness while serving the Respondent.2. The material facts are not in dispute. Late Shri Chet Singh Dhiryan, an Administrative Officer with the Respondent, died on 18th November, 2004 at the age of about 56 years and 3 months.3. At the relevant time, the Respondent had discontinued the scheme forcompassionate appointment with effect from 1st October, 2002, i.e., prior to the demise of the Petitioners father. In lieu thereof, a new scheme providing for lump sum monetary compensation to the legal heirs of de...
Uoi & Ors. vs Kanhaiya Singh & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIReserved on: 17.12.2025Pronounced on: 28.01.2026+ W.P.(C) 16769/2004 & CM APPL. 5649/2011 UOI & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Vivek Goyal, SPC with Mr.Gokul Sharma and Mr.Aryan Aggarwal, Advs. for UOIversusKANHAIYA SINGH & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. G. Natarajan and Mr. Akshay, Advs. with respondents in person. + W.P.(C) 1541/2012 KANHAIYA SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. G. Natarajan and Mr. Akshay, Advs. with petitioner in person.versusTHE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF MINES & ORS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Nidhi Raman, CGSC with Mr. Akash Mishra and Mr. Arnav Mittal, Advs. for UOICORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLAHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MADHU JAINJUDGMENTNAVIN CHAWLA, J.1. W.P.(C) 16769/2004 has been filed, challenging the Order dated 02.09.2003 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Digitally Signed W.Ps.(C) 16769/2004 & 1541/2012 Page 1 of 24Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereinaft...
Mpb Construction Pvt.Ltd. vs Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ OMP (ENF.) (COMM.) 131/2021, EX.APPL.(OS) 640/2023 MPB CONSTRUCTION PVT.LTD. .....Decree Holder Through: Mr. Ajay Kumar Vali, Mr. Bhaskar Vali, Ms. Pragya Anand, AdvsversusUNION OF INDIA .....Judgement Debtor Through: Ms Manisha Agrawal Narain, CGSC along with Mr Nipun Jain, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASADORDER% 28.01.20261. The present Petition under Section 36 of the Arbitration andConciliation Act, 1996 has been filed by the Decree Holder seeking execution of the Arbitral Award dated 22.06.2019 under which Rs.2,43,66,579/- was awarded to the Decree Holder along with future interest @ 8% per annum till the date of actual payment and Rs.69,500/- along with future interest @ 8% per annum till the date of actual payment was awarded to the Union of India under the counter claim. Therefore, the total amount to be paid to the Decree Holder under the Award was Rs.2,42,97,079/-.2. The said Award was challenged by the Un...
- ‹ Prev
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- Next ›
- Last »