Delhi Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Abha Singh and Anr vs Central Government Health Scheme & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
$~96 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1151/2026 and CM APPL. 5603/2026ABHA SINGH AND ANR .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Shreyasi kunwar, AdvversusCENTRAL GOVERNMENT HEALTH SCHEME & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms Pallavi Talwar , GP, Advocate for R-1 and 2. Mr. Jaswinder singh, Adv.CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV ORDER % 28.01.20261. The petitioner has to make necessary prayer to set aside the impugned communication, whereby, the benefit has been denied to the petitioner. Such a prayer is not incorporated in the instant petition. 2. The petitioner wishes to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to file afresh. 3. Accordingly, the instant petition, along with the pending application, stands dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty as sought for.PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J JANUARY 28, 2026 aks/ksrThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal ...
Mahipal@Lala vs State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
$~67 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 28.01.2026+ W.P.(CRL) 283/2026 & CRL.M.A. 2772/2026 MAHIPAL@LALA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Tanwar and Ms. Sanjana Gupta, Advocates (DHCLSC)versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Arijit Sharma, Advocate for the State with Inspr. Rajesh Malik and SI Sangeeta, PS S.B. DairyCORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIAJ U D G M E N T (ORAL)1. Petitioner has assailed rejection of his request for grant of first spell of furlough in case FIR No. 881/2014 of PS Shahbad Dairy for offence under Section 6 POCSO Act and Section 506 IPC. Learned counsel for respondent accepts notice.2. Broadly speaking, the furlough request was declined by way of order dated 10.12.2025 on the ground that the petitioner had unsatisfactory jail conduct. The reason behind recording the conduct of the petitionerW.P.(CRL) 283/2026 Page 1 of 3 pages Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,GIRIS...
Paras Ram Sharma vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
$~60 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1189/2026 & CM APPL. 5835/2026 PARAS RAM SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. M.C. Verma, Adv. versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Standing Counsel with Mr Sunil Kumar Jha, Mr Mohd Sueb Akhtar & Mrs Joohu Kumari, Advocates for R-2. Ms. Shobhana Takiar, Standing Counsel for DDA with Mr. Shivam Takiar, Mr. Prateek Dhir, Mr. Kuljeet Singh, Advs. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE MADHU JAIN ORDER % 28.01.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. CM APPL. 5835/2026 (for exemption) 2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. W.P.(C) 1189/2026 3. The present petition has been filed by the Petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, seeking forwarding of the reference under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter the Act) to the concerned District Judge. 4. The notificatio...
Raghubar Prasad vs State Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
$~71 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 708/2026 & CRL.M.A. 2827/2026 RAGHUBAR PRASAD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Praveen Kumar, Advocate (through videoconferencing) with petitioner. versusSTATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Hemant Mehla, APP for the State with SI Mahavir Singh CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA ORDER % 28.01.20261. Petitioner seeks quashing of case FIR No. 341/2021 of Police Station New Friends Colony for offence under Section 279/304A IPC on the ground that the complainant de facto (respondent no.2) has compromised the disputes with the petitioner. 2. On being pointed out that a person lost life in the roadside accident and it is only the deceased who suffered the pain and loss of life, so even if any compensation is accepted by LRs in lieu of settling the disputes, that would be sanctifying blood money, which is not recognized by any civilized society, learned counsel for petiti...
Baldev Singh vs C.B.I.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.A. 567/2001 BALDEV SINGH .....Appellant Through:versusC.B.I. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Atul Guleria, SPP with Mr.Aryan Raksh, Advocatte for CBI.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE CHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHAORDER% 03.02.2026CRL.M.A. 3575/20261. This application has been filed on behalf of therespondent/ CBI seeking correction in the judgment dated28.01.2026.2. For the reasons stated in the application, the same isallowed.3. The name of the Special Public Prosecutor, namely,Mr.Atul Guleria, shall be shown in the judgment as the counsel forthe respondent/ CBI.CHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHA, JFEBRUARY 3, 2026/kdThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/02/2026 at 11:56:17...
Raman Kumar vs Ms Skytex Unmanned Areial Solution Private Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of decision: 28.01.2026 + ARB.P. 397/2025 RAMAN KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. A. Mishra, Mr. Sahil and Mr. Nidish, Advocates.versusMS SKYTEX UNMANNED AREIAL SOLUTION PRIVATELIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Chinmaya Seth, Mr. A.K. Seth and Ms. Palak Mathur, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHANSHANKAR% J U D G E M E N T (Oral)1. The present Petition, under Section 11(6) of the Arbitrationand Conciliation Act, 19961, has been filed seeking the appointment of an Arbitrator for the adjudication of disputes inter se the parties arising out of the Memorandum of Understanding dated 20.12.20222.2. The MoU contains the Arbitration Clause at Clauses 11 and 12,which read as under: 11. Dispute Resolution Any disputes or differences involving this MOU whenever arising shall be resolved mutua ly by the both parties within 30 days of receipt of the written notice that regard from the aggrieved party. F...
Kuldeepak Pandey vs State Govt of Nct of Delhi Through Sho Concern P S ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 1704/2023 KULDEEPAK PANDEY .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Vishalakshi Goel, Advocate (through V.C.)versusSTATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI THROUGH SHO CONCERN P S MANGOLPURI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Astha, Advocate (DHCLSC) with Mr. Megha Singh, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINORDER% 28.01.20261. The present petition seeks quashing of FIR No. 374/2022 dated04.02.2022 registered at P.S. Mangol Puri, Delhi, under Sections 376/506 IPC for the reason that no offence is made out. However, at the very outset, Ms. Vishalakshi Goel, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits thatjudgment has already been pronounced on 27.11.2025 and the accused hasalready been acquitted of all the charges and in view of the abovesaid pronouncement and decision, the present petition does not survive anymore.2. In view of the above statement made by learned counsel for thepetitioner, the present petition is dispos...
Raju vs State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 769/2023, CRL.M.A. 7048/2023 & CRL.M.A. 23313/2023RAJU ..Petitioner Through: Mr. Ujwal Ghai, Advocate.versusSTATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..Respondent Through: Mr. Rahul Tyagi, ASC for the State with SI Shankar, PS Swaroop Nagar.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINORDER% 28.01.20261. Learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State submits that theywould have no objection if the case of the petitioner for remission is considered afresh by Sentence Review Board (SRB) in its next meeting. He also assures that the Board, while considering the case of the petitioner, would keep in mind the exhaustive directions given by learned Coordinate Bench of this Court in Santosh Kumar Singh vs. State (Govt. of the NCT of Delhi), 2025 SCC OnLine Del 10585.2. In view of the above assurance, learned counsel for the petitioner does notpray for any further relief at this juncture.3. Petition is, accordingly, disposed of w...
Rajesh Gupta vs Ram Avtar & Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 119/2020 RAJESH GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Aparajita Jha, Advocate (through Vc).versusRAM AVTAR & ANR .....Respondents Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMAORDER% 24.03.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present petition under Section 11 read with Section 12 of theContempt of Courts Act, 1971 read with Section 151 of the CPC seeks the following prayers: a. try, punish and initiate Contempt proceedings against the Contemnors for having willfully disobeyed order dated 16.07.2012 passed by this Hon'ble Court in OA^P No. 623/2012 and initiate proceedings against the Officers on whose instruction such misleading and false statement were made, showing utter disregard to the orders passed by this Hon'ble court; b. pass such other or further orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case.3. ...
National Skill Development Corporation vs Surya Wires Private Limited ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIJudgment reserved on: 09.01.2026Judgment pronounced on: 28.01.2026+ ARB. A. (COMM.) 11/2025, I.A. 4910/2025 (Delay of 13 days in filing the appeal) & I.A. 6645/2025 (Directions)NATIONAL SKILL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION.....Appellant Through: Mr. Jyoti Kumar Chaudhary, Mr. Ankit Konwar, Mr. Prateek Singh and Ms. Subhashini Kumari, Advocates.versusSURYA WIRES PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. .Respondents Through: Mr. Sudev Singh Juneja, Advocate for Respondent No. 2.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHANSHANKARJUDGMENTHARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J.1. The present Appeal has been filed under Section 37(2)(a) of theArbitration and Conciliation Act, 19961, assailing the Order dated 23.10.20242 passed by the learned Sole Arbitrator in Case No. AC Arbitrator vide the Impugned Order, allowed the Second Application filed by Respondent Nos. 2, 3, 5 and 7, under Section 16 of the Act, and allowed removal of Respondent Nos. 2, 3, 5 and...
- ‹ Prev
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- Next ›
- Last »