Delhi Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Sandhya Finance Ltd. vs Naresh Kumar
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
$~37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 123/2026, I.A. 2568/2026, I.A. 2569/2026 & I.A. 2570/2026M/S SANDHYA FINANCE LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Inderjot Kaur, Adv. (through VC)versusNARESH KUMAR .....Respondent Through: Ms. Monika & Mr. Amandeep Mehra, Advs. (through VC)CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN ORDER % 30.01.20261. This petition is filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of period for concluding the arbitration proceedings. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent has no serious objection to the prayer made. 3. In view of the above, the time period for conclusion of the proceedings is extended by three months. 4. This petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.AVNEESH JHINGAN, J JANUARY 30, 2026 haThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. T...
Sarit Chawla & Anr. vs Leena Gandhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
$~29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 776/2026, CRL.M.A. 3095/2026 & CRL.M.A. 3096/2026 SARIT CHAWLA & ANR. ..Petitioners Through: Ms. Prachi Goel with Mr. Amit Kumar Jha, Advocates. versusLEENA GANDHI ..Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN ORDER % 30.01.2026 1. Petitioners seek quashing of summoning order dated 12.05.2023 and all consequent proceedings arising out of the complaint in question, which have been filed under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881. 2. After hearing arguments for some time, learned counsel for the petitioners, without prejudice to his rights and contentions, does not press the present petition and seeks liberty to take other appropriate remedy in accordance with law. 3. The present petition is, accordingly, disposed of as not pressed. Liberty, as prayed, is granted. 4. All rights and contentions of the parties are reserved. 5. All pending applications also stand disposed of....
Chintu Chauhan vs State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 151/2026 CHINTU CHAUHAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mohd. Arif, Advocate. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ajay Vikram Singh, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN ORDER % 30.01.2026 1. The applicant/accused seeks grant of regular bail in case arising out of FIR No. 480/2025 dated 16.12.2025, registered at P.S. Tigri, for commission of offences under Sections 110/351/3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (corresponding Sections 308/503/506/507/34 of IPC). 2. When the application was taken up on 15.01.2026, it was informed that aggravated offence i.e. 109(1) BNS (corresponding Section 307 IPC) has been added in place of 110 BNS (corresponding Section 308 IPC). 3. The alleged incident took place on 12.12.2025 and, even as per the bare allegation appearing in the FIR, the complainant did not know the alleged assailants, beforehand. However, he claimed that h...
Shri Sanjay Malhotra vs Union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
$~79 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1322/2026 and CM APPL. 6447-6448/2026SHRI SANJAY MALHOTRA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Madhav Khurana, Senior Advocate with Mr. Amit Badesra, Ms. Asees Kaur, Mr. Asif Ahmed, Mr. Utkarsh Routh, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....RespondentsThrough: Dr. B. Ramaswamy, CGSC Mr. Vinay Kaushik, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV ORDER % 30.01.2026 CM APPL. 6449/2026 (for exemption) 1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 1322/2026 and CM APPL. 6447-6448/2026 1. The instant petition is for the following reliefs:- i. Pass an order issuing a writ of certiorari, or any other appropriate writ, setting aside and quashing the Impugned Order dated 04.12.2025, passed by the Respondent No. 1. ii. Pass an order issuing a writ of mandamus, or any other appropriate writ directing Respondent No. 2 to renew the Petitioners...
Ajay Bhardwaj vs Ritu Kaushik
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
$~37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) 237/2026 AJAY BHARDWAJ .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Nachiketa Vajpayee, Advocate (through VC). versusRITU KAUSHIK .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA ORDER % 30.01.2026 1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. CM APPL. 6361/2026 (Exemption) 2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CM(M) 237/2026 3. The present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950, seeks following prayers:-a. Direct the Ld. Principal Judge, Family Court, Tis Hazari Court, Delhi to decide the HMA Case No. 61401 of 2016 (Originally Numbered as HMA Case No. 57248 of 2012) in a time bound manner (Six Months); andb. Pass any other or further order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case in the interest of justice and to meet the ends of justice.4. The present petition is disposed of wi...
Tauseif Khan vs State (N.C.T. of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
$~29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 30.01.2026+ BAIL APPLN. 401/2026 & CRL.M.A. 3103/2026 TAUSEIF KHAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Pushkar Priyadarshi, AdvocateversusSTATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State with IO/Inspector Rajinder Singh, PS Vivek Vihar CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIAJ U D G M E N T (ORAL)1. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 304/2020 of PS Vivek Vihar for offence under Section 302/201/120B/34 IPC.2. Broadly speaking, prosecution case is that in presence of the first informant Poonam, a third gender, another third gender Reshma was killed by way of multiple stabbing by the accused/applicant and his father and brother-in-law. In the FIR, Poonam specifically named all three assailants. Father of the accused/applicant was apprehended on the spot while the accused/applicant and his brother-in-law fled. Knives used by all three assailants were recovered.BAIL AP...
Chandra Prakash Tiwari, Ex SGT642859 vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
$~36 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 468/2023 CHANDRA PRAKASH TIWARI, EX SGT642859 .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Pallavi Awasthi and Ms. Vaibhavi Mittal, Advs. versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: NoneCORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA ORDER % 30.01.2026 1. The subject matter of the writ petition shall lie before the Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT). This writ petition is transferred to the AFT. The record be transmitted forthwith. 2. On receipt of the record, the Registrar, AFT, shall after taking orders of Honble the Chairman, list this petition before the appropriate Bench on 02.03.2026. 3. For statistical purpose, this petition is disposed of.V. KAMESWAR RAO, JMANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J JANUARY 30, 2026/mshThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The...
Mahender vs State of Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
$~53 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 773/2026 MAHENDER .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Yashpal Jolly, Advocate alongwith petitioner in person versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Digam Singh Dagar, APP for the State Respondent no. 2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA ORDER % 30.01.2026 CRL.M.A. 3091/2026 (exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. Application stands disposed of. CRL.M.C. 773/2026 3. By way of the present petition, the petitioner seeks quashing of FIR bearing no. 621/2021, registered at Police Station Sangam Vihar, Delhi, for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 394/395/302/34/174A of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter IPC) and the proceedings emanating thereto. 4. The petitioner and respondent no. 2 are present before this Court and have been identified by their counsels and concerned Investigating Officer (IO) from Police Station Sangam ...
Ameet Sharrma vs Dipaali Sharrma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
$~36 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) 234/2026 & CM APPL. 6328/2026 AMEET SHARRMA .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Anita Sahani, Mr. Shivom Garg and Mr. Tanuj Gulati, Advocates. versusDIPAALI SHARRMA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Mayank Sapra and Ms. Lalima Das, Advocates.CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA ORDER % 30.01.2026 1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. CM APPL. 6329/2026 (Exemption) 2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CM(M) 234/2026 & CM APPL. 6328/2026 (stay) 3. The present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950, seeks following prayers:-1. Declare, and grant deemed admission of the petitioners documents under Order XII Rule 2A CPC; 2. Direct the Learned Family Court to adjudicate all pending procedural applications excluding those rendered infructuous by deemed admission, as a condition precedent to recording of evidence; 3. Set aside or modify the orde...
Rahul @ Kala vs State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
$~61 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 400/2026 & CRL.M.A. 3102/2026RAHUL @ KALA .....PetitionerThrough: Mr. Takshay, Advocate. versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....RespondentThrough: Mr. Raghuinder Verma, APP for the State with Mr. Aditya Vikram Singh, Advocate and SI Satyawan, Special Cell, NR & STF, Delhi CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE ORDER % 30.01.2026 1. The applicant, vide the present application under Section 483 read of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) seeks grant of regular bail in FIR No.435/2024 dated 17.09.2024 registered at PS.: Special Cell under Sections 109(1)/221/132/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) and Sections 25/27 of the Arms Act, 1959. 2. After some arguments, though learned counsel for the applicant seeks to withdraw the present application, however, he submits that it would be in the interest of justice if the FSL Report be called for by the learned Trial Court at the ear...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »