Delhi Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sh. Manohar & Ors. vs State Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
$~58 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 28th January, 2026 + CRL.M.C. 712/2026 SH. MANOHAR & ORS. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Narender Kr. with Mr. Mr. Vinod and Mr. Vijay Kumar, Advocates. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Satinder Singh Bawa, APP with SI Ajay Chauhan with ASI Rohtash. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral)1. The present petition seeks quashing of FIR No. 566/2023 dated 22.09.2023, registered at Police Station Kalindi Kunj, for commission of offences under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC, along with all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 2. The marriage between petitioner No.1 and respondent No.2 was solemnized on 13.12.2021, as per Hindu rites and ceremonies. 3. It is submitted that on account of some misunderstanding, respondent No.2 reported the matter to the Police which resulted in registratio...
Manoj Kumar Rai vs Union of India and Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
$~80 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1163/2026 MANOJ KUMAR RAI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Aru Prakash and Ms. Sheetal, Advs.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR .....RespondentThrough: Mr. Abhishek Gupta, CGSC with Mr. Shaswat Kumar Pandey, Mr. Dhananjay Singh and Mr. Kumar Kartikeya, Advs.CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIA ORDER % 28.01.2026CM APPL. 5705/2026 1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 1163/2026 3. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 4. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition as and when appointment to the post/ office in question is made.This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order i...
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-1, Delhi vs Smt. Sneh Lata Saw ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
$~66 to 69 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1170/2026 & CM APPL. 5745/2026 + W.P.(C) 1171/2026 & CM APPL. 5746/2026 + W.P.(C) 1173/2026 & CM APPL. 5751/2026 + W.P.(C) 1175/2026 & CM APPL. 5754/2026PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL-1, DELHI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Puneet Rai, SSC.versusSMT. SNEH LATA SAWHNEY L/H OF LATE SH. BHUSHAN LAL SAWHNEY .....Respondent Through: Dr. Rakesh Gupta & Mr. Somil Agarwal, Advocates.CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR ORDER % 28.01.2026 1. All these writ petitions lay challenge to the common order dated 11.06.2025 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench A, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal) dismissing the departments miscellaneous applications seeking to review the order of the Tribunal dated 01.06.2021. 2. Having heard Mr. Puneet Rai, learned counsel for the petitioner, we are of the view that the order o...
Kiyanam Behzad Kaviyanipour & Anr. vs Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
$~103 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1188/2026 KIYANAM BEHZAD KAVIYANIPOUR & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Rahul Chitnis, Mr Hersh Desai, Mr Aditya Khanna, Advocates.versusUNION OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Ms. Iram Majid CGSC with Mr. Shivam Parashar, Mr. Mohd. Suboor, Advs. for UOI. Ms. Nasreen Khatoon, G.P for Union Of IndiaCORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV ORDER % 28.01.2026CM APPL. 5794/2026 (EXEMPTION- FAIR COPIESS) CM APPL. 5795/2026 (EXEMPTION-LEGIBLE COPIES) 1. Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. The applications stand disposed of. W.P.(C) 1188/2026 and CM APPL. 5793/2026 3. The petition bearing no. W. P. (C) 724/2026, filed by the mother of the petitioner was disposed of on 19.01.2026 granting liberty to take appropriate alternate remedy. The order dated 19.01.2026, is extracted as under: CM APPL. 3472-3473/2026 (for exemption)This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the...
Sh Baljeet vs Directorate of Health Services
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
$~84 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1165/2026 SH BALJEET .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Jawahar Raja, Mr. Ishaan Goel and Ms. Meghna De, Advs. versus DIRECTORATE OF HEALTH SERVICES .....Respondent Through: Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, SC, Mr. N. K. Singh, Ms. Aliza Alam and Mr. Mohnish Sehrawat, Advs.CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA ORDER % 28.01.2026 CM APPL.5717/2026 (Exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. Application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 1165/2026 and CM APPL.5716/2026 3. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner stated to be engaged as a Multi Tasking Worker under the Directorate of Health Services and claims to be continuously working since 04.01.2020. 4. It is submitted that although the petitioner was discharging duties of a permanent and perennial nature, he was paid on a piece rate basis unlike regular counterparts who are paid on regular pay scales. 5. Aggrieved by non-regularization and dispa...
Mr. Partap Singh vs Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Developm ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
$~95 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1135/2026, CM APPL. 5580/2026 and CM APPL. 5579/2026MR. PARTAP SINGH .....Petitioner Through: None.versusDELHI STATE INDUSTRIAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: None.CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV ORDER % 28.01.20261. None has appeared for the petitioner despite the matter being called out in second round. 2. Petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution.PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J JANUARY 28, 2026/PThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 31/01/2026 at 14:57:38...
Sudhanshu Yadav vs Delhi Development Authority & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
$~74 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1193/2026 & CM APPL. 5858/2026 (for stay) SUDHANSHU YADAV .....Petitioner Through: Dr. Divya Swamy, Advocate.versusDELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Latika Malhotra, Advocate for DDA. Dr. Divya Swamy, SC for MCD with Mr. Yagyawalkya Singh, Ms. Pragya Patel, Advocates.CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA ORDER % 28.01.2026 1. The Petitioners result for the post of Assistant Section Officer in Delhi Development Authority has been withheld, constraining him to approach this Court. 2. At the outset, counsel for the Respondents raise an objection as to the maintainability of the present petition, contending that the DDA is a notified authority under Section 14 of the Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985 and the dispute raised herein falls within the jurisdiction of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT). It is submitted that, in view of the judgment of the Supreme C...
Sandhya Saxena and Anr vs Air Force Naval Housing Board
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
$~44 & 45 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + C.R.P. 27/2026, CM APPL. 5842/2026, CM APPL. 5843/2026 CM APPL. 5844/2026. SANDHYA SAXENA AND ANR .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Rishi Dewan, Advocate.versusAIR FORCE NAVAL HOUSING BOARD .....Respondent Through: + C.R.P. 28/2026, CM APPL. 5845/2026, CM APPL. 5846/2026 CM APPL. 5847/2026. SANDHYA SAXENA AND ANR .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Rishi Dewan, AdvocateversusAIR FORCE NAVAL HOUSING BOARD .....Respondent Through:CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL ORDER % 28.01.20261. Learned counsel for petitioners seek liberty to withdraw these petitions with liberty to seek appropriate remedy in accordance with law. 2. Accordingly, petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. The aforesaid liberty is granted. 3. Pending applications are rendered infructuous.This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Orde...
Niyaram Behzad Kaviyanipour vs Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
$~98 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1169/2026 NIYARAM BEHZAD KAVIYANIPOUR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rahul Chitnis, Mr Hersh Desai, Mr Aditya Khanna, Advs.versusUNION OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Mukul Singh, CGSC with Mr. Adhiraj Singh, Mr. Aryan Dhaka, Ms. Ira Singh, Advs.CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV ORDER % 28.01.2026CM APPL. 5734/2026 EXEMPTION- FAIR COPIES CM APPL. 5735/2026 EXEMPTION-LEGIBLE COPIES 1. Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. The applications stand disposed of. W.P.(C) 1169/2026 and CM APPL. 5733/2026 3. The petition bearing no. W. P. (C) 724/2026, filed by the mother of the petitioner was disposed of on 19.01.2026 granting liberty to take appropriate alternate remedy. The order dated 19.01.2026, is extracted as under: CM APPL. 3472-3473/2026 (for exemption) 1. Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. The applications stand disposed of.This is a digitally signe...
Adish Jain vs Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
$~70 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1178/2026 CM APPL. 5759/2026 ADISH JAIN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Kumar and Mr. Parveen Gambhir, Advs. versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Puneet Rai, SSC, Mr. Ashvini Kumar and Mr. Rishabh Nangia, JSCs and Mr. Nikhil Jain, Adv.CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR ORDER % 28.01.20261. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to take appropriate remedies in accordance with the law. 2. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 3. Pending applications, if any are also disposed of as infructous.DINESH MEHTA, JVINOD KUMAR, J JANUARY 28, 2026/cdThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 31/01/2026 at 14:53:43...
- ‹ Prev
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- Next ›
- Last »