Delhi Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Nand Kishor vs the Registrar of Cooperative Society & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
$~41 to 43 & 53 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 28th January, 2026 Uploaded on: 2nd February, 2026 + W.P.(C) 10532/2021&CM APPL. 18595/2022, CM APPL. 32535/2022, CM APPL. 36129/2024, CM APPL. 64839/2024, CM APPL. 64862/2024, CM APPL. 69047/2025 THE NAVAL TECHNICAL OFFICERS CGHS LTD.....Petitioner Through: versus THE REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES .....Respondent Through: ~42 + W.P.(C) 10652/2022&CM APPL. 30896/2022 MADAN GOPAL AGARWAL .....Petitioner Through: versus REGISTRAR OF CO-OPEARTIVE SOCIETIES & ANR. .....Respondents Through: ~43 + W.P.(C) 19260/2025&CM APPL. 5701/2026 NAVAL TECHNICAL OFFICERS CO-OPERATIVE GROUP HOUSING SOCIETY LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: versus REGISTRAR CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY .....Respondent Through: 53 AND+ W.P.(C) 1147/2026&CM APPL. 5597/2026 NAND KISHOR .....Petitioner Through:versus THE REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETY & ANR. .....RespondentsSignature Not Verif...
Smt. Ramawati Devi vs Smt. Veena Devi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
$~70 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) 215/2026 & CM APPL. 5662/2026 SMT. RAMAWATI DEVI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Siddhant Jain, Advocate.versusSMT. VEENA DEVI .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA ORDER % 28.01.2026 1. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode. 2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition. 3. Keeping in view the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J JANUARY 28, 2026 v/tpThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/01/2026 at 12:21:52...
Ashwani Kumar Singh vs Shipra Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
$~65 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.REV.P.(MAT.) 43/2026 ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Mani Tripathi, Advocate. versus SHIPRA SINGH .....Respondent Through: Mr. Birendra Kr., Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI ORDER % 28.01.2026 CRL.M.A. 2788/2026 (exemption) Exemption granted, subject to just exceptions. Let requisite compliances be made within 01 week. The application stands disposed of. CRL.M.A. 2787/2026 (condonation of delay in filing) By way of the present application filed under section 5 of the Limitation Act 1963, the petitioner seeks condonation of about 5 days delay in filing the revision petition. 1. For the reasons stated in the application, which is duly supported by affidavit, the delay is condoned. 2. The application is allowed. 3. The petition is taken on Board. 4. Application stands disposed-of. CRL.REV.P.(MAT.) 43/2026 & CRL.M.A. 2786/2026 (for stay) 5. By way of the...
Siddhanth Mendiratta vs Madhu Chawla and Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
$~65 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision : 28th January, 2026 + CM(M) 209/2026 & CM APPL. 5588/2026 (for Stay) SIDDHANTH MENDIRATTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajat Wadhwa, Mr. Sahil Kakkar, Ms. Anshika Juneja and Ms. Saumitra Shikhar, Advs.versusMADHU CHAWLA AND ANR .....Respondents Through: None.CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA ORDER (Oral) Rajneesh Kumar Gupta, J. 1. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950, assailing the impugned order dated 01st December, 2025, passed by learned trial court in case bearing No. CS DJ ADJ 803/2019, whereby an application filed on behalf of the petitioner/defendant under Order XVIII Rule 17 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for recalling DW-4 namely Sh. Madan Lal Gupta has been dismissed. 3. Heard. Record perused. 4. Learned counsel for ...
Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, New Delhi vs M/S. Hmbs Textil ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
$~53 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. (COMM) 52/2026, CAV 38/2026 & I.A. 2278-279/2026 MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS, NEW DELHI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shbhranshu Padhi, Adv.versusM/S. HMBS TEXTILES PRIVATE LIMITED .....Respondent Through:CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN ORDER % 28.01.20261. Learned counsel for the petitioner in view of the judgment of this court in Simentech India Private Limited Vs. Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited 2024 DHC 254. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to file before the appropriate commercial court. 2. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. 3. All pending applications stand dismissed.AVNEESH JHINGAN, J JANUARY 28, 2026/PaThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the...
Sh. Pawan @ Himanshu & Ors. vs the State (N.C.T. of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
$~115 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 704/2026 & CRL.M.A. 2799/2026 SH. PAWAN @ HIMANSHU & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Rahul Thakur, Advocate.versusTHE STATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Hitesh Vali, APP for State. SI Pradeep Kumar, PS-Aman Vihar. Mr. Vishal Thakur, Advocate for R-2.CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN ORDER % 28.01.20261. The petitioners have filed this petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [BNSS] (corresponding to Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [CrPC]) seeking quashing of FIR No. 695/2024 dated 04.11.2024, lodged at Police Station Aman Vihar, Delhi, under Sections 498A/406/34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 [IPC], on the ground of settlement. 2. Issue notice. Mr. Hitesh Vali, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No. 2. Mr. Vishal Thakur, learned counsel, accepts notice on behalf of respon...
Rajendra Kumar vs State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
$~39 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 28th January, 2026 + BAIL APPLN. 353/2026 RAJENDRA KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjeev Bhatia, Mr. Sunita and Ms. Komal, Advocates.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP for the State with Insp. Raj Kumar Pal.CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral)1. Applicant seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 026/2025 under Sections 308/318(4)/319/340 BNS, 2023 (corresponding 383/384/385/386/387/388/389/420/416/419/470/471 IPC) registered at P.S. Special Cell on 04.07.2025. 2. The facts in brief are that complainant-Vijay Kumar Kathuria, who is in his seventies, reported about online financial fraud amounting to Rs. 1,38,18,100/-. He revealed that some unknown persons, who were impersonating as IPS Officers from Mumbai Police, had placed him under digital arrest, alleging that the complainant was involved in some money-laundering case. ...
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-1, Delhi vs Smt. Sneh Lata Saw ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
$~66 to 69 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1170/2026 & CM APPL. 5745/2026 + W.P.(C) 1171/2026 & CM APPL. 5746/2026 + W.P.(C) 1173/2026 & CM APPL. 5751/2026 + W.P.(C) 1175/2026 & CM APPL. 5754/2026PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL-1, DELHI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Puneet Rai, SSC.versusSMT. SNEH LATA SAWHNEY L/H OF LATE SH. BHUSHAN LAL SAWHNEY .....Respondent Through: Dr. Rakesh Gupta & Mr. Somil Agarwal, Advocates.CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR ORDER % 28.01.2026 1. All these writ petitions lay challenge to the common order dated 11.06.2025 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench A, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal) dismissing the departments miscellaneous applications seeking to review the order of the Tribunal dated 01.06.2021. 2. Having heard Mr. Puneet Rai, learned counsel for the petitioner, we are of the view that the order o...
Sh. Raj Kumar vs Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on : 22.01.2026 Pronounced on : 28.01.2026 Uploaded on : 28.01.2026+ FAO 82/2021SH. RAJ KUMAR .....Appellant Through: Mr. Rajan Sood, Ms. Ashima Sood and Ms. Megha Sood, Advocates.VersusUNION OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Jitesh Vikram Srivastava, Advocate (SPC)CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI JUDGMENT CM APPL. 7518/2021 1. By way of the present application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 read with Section 151 of The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), the appellant seeks condonation of delay of 1035 days in filing the present appeal. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that after passing of the impugned judgment/order dated 02.08.2017, the appellant could not file the present appeal within the prescribed period. It is submitted that the appellant belongs to an economically weaker section and, due to paucity of funds, wasSignature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:NIJ...
Yogesh Sethi vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
$~52 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.APP.(C) 1/2026 YOGESH SETHI .....Appellant Through: Mr. Vivek Luthra & Ms. Rema Luthra, Advs. (9891246538) versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vikas Chopra, SC, MCD with Mr. Neeraj Kumar, Adv. (9250925371) Mr Dhan Mohan & Ms Tanisha Bhatia, Advs. for R-5 (9811180987) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE MADHU JAIN ORDER % 28.01.2026 1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. CM APPL. 5681/2026 2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of. CONT.APP.(C) 1/2026 & CM APPL. 5682/2026 3. After some hearing, ld. Counsel for the Appellant submits that he wishes to withdraw the present appeal with liberty to seek appropriate remedies. 4. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid.PRATHIBA M. SINGH, JMADHU JAIN, J JANUARY 28, 2026kk/ckThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of th...
- ‹ Prev
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- Next ›
- Last »