Delhi Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bal Kishan and Others vs the State Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
$~134 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 722/2026 BAL KISHAN AND OTHERS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Ashish Kumar, Mr. Prashant Yadav, Advocates.versusTHE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for State.CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN ORDER % 28.01.2026 1. The petitioners have filed this petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [BNSS] (corresponding to Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [CrPC]) seeking quashing of FIR No. 257/2021 dated 06.07.2021, registered at Police Station Jafrabad, North East District, Delhi, under Sections 498A/406/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [IPC] and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 [DP Act], alongwith all proceedings emanating therefrom, on the ground of settlement. 2. Issue notice. Ms. Manjeet Arya, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, accepts notice on behalf of the State. Respondent No. 2 ...
Santosh Singh vs the State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
$~82 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.REV.P. 69/2026, CRL.M.(BAIL) 187/2026 SANTOSH SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Dr. Vivek Bhardwaj and Ms. Pinki Singh, Advocates. versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Shubhi Gupta, APP for the State with SI Sanjana, P.S.: Sarojini Nagar. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI ORDER % 28.01.2026 By way of the present petition filed under section 415 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 (BNSS), the petitioner impugns judgment of conviction dated 27.05.2025 passed by the learned JMFC/MM-05, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi District, New Delhi in case FIR No. 20/2012 registered under sections 279/338 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) at P.S.: Sarojini Nagar, Delhi. 2. Issue notice. 3. Ms. Shubhi Gupta, learned APP appears on behalf of the State on advance copy; and accepts notice. 4. The court has heard Dr. Vivek Bhardwaj, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner,...
Sandhya Saxena and Anr vs Air Force Naval Housing Board
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
$~44 & 45 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + C.R.P. 27/2026, CM APPL. 5842/2026, CM APPL. 5843/2026 CM APPL. 5844/2026. SANDHYA SAXENA AND ANR .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Rishi Dewan, Advocate.versusAIR FORCE NAVAL HOUSING BOARD .....Respondent Through: + C.R.P. 28/2026, CM APPL. 5845/2026, CM APPL. 5846/2026 CM APPL. 5847/2026. SANDHYA SAXENA AND ANR .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Rishi Dewan, AdvocateversusAIR FORCE NAVAL HOUSING BOARD .....Respondent Through:CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL ORDER % 28.01.20261. Learned counsel for petitioners seek liberty to withdraw these petitions with liberty to seek appropriate remedy in accordance with law. 2. Accordingly, petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. The aforesaid liberty is granted. 3. Pending applications are rendered infructuous.This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Orde...
Sumit & Ors. vs State of Nct of Delhi Through Sho & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
$~59 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 28th January, 2026 + CRL.M.C. 713/2026&CRL.M.A. 2844/2026 SUMIT & ORS. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Gaur, Advocate. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI THROUGH SHO & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Satinder Sing Bawa, APP with SI Shyam Bir Singh. Ms. Shahina, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral)1. The present petition seeks quashing of FIR No. 0429/2023 dated 10.07.2023, registered at Police Station PS Okhla Industrial Area, Delhi for commission of offences under Sections 323/324/341/506/34 IPC, along with all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 2. FIR had been lodged at the instance of respondent No.2-Mr. Lalit Panchal, arising out of a family dispute. 3. Petitioner Nos. 1 to 3 are real brothers-in-laws of complainant, petitioner No.4 is his mother-in-law, and petition...
Lajpat Arya vs M/S Shine Star Electronics
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
$~75 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision : 28th January, 2026 + CM(M) 222/2026 LAJPAT ARYA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Gaurav Gaur and Ms. Meghna Bali, Advs.versusM/S SHINE STAR ELECTRONICS .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA ORDER (Oral) Rajneesh Kumar Gupta, J. 1. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode. CM APPL. 5728/2026 (for Exemption) 2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CM(M) 222/2026 3. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief: Issue appropriate directions to the Ld. ADJ, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, to pronounce orders within a time-bound period on the Petitioners application under Order XII Rule 6 CPC in CIV DJ/560/2023 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent has been served through his counsel.Signature Not Verified S...
Narendra Sharma vs Gnctd & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
$~77 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1146/2026 NARENDRA SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vakul Sharad Sharma and Mr. Navinder Dhankar, Advocates. versus GNCTD & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Samir Vashisht, Standing Counsel for GNCTD. Mr. Jivesh Kr. Tiwari, CGSC for UoI. Mr. Pritish Sabharwal, Advocate for MCD.CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIA ORDER % 28.01.20261. Heard the learned Counsel for the Parties. 2. This Public Interest Litigation Petition concerns itself with the adequate medical facilities in the District Court Complexes in Delhi so that emergency healthcare may be provided. 3. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner has drawn our attention to Jan Aarogya Mandir Scheme, which has been implemented across Delhi, and has prayed that such facility be established in the District Court Complexes as well. It has also been stated that though the District Court Complexes have some facilit...
Karmyogi Pandit Ram Kishor Tripathi Adhyapak Shikshan Sansthan & Anr. ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
$~90 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1150/2026, CM APPL. 5602/2026 KARMYOGI PANDIT RAM KISHOR TRIPATHI ADHYAPAK SHIKSHAN SANSTHAN & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Ms. Priti Kumari, Mr. Pankaj Kumar Ray, Advs. versusNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anuj Kapoor, Mr. Shivom Sethi, Mr. Nandeesh Nanda, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH ORDER % 28.01.20261. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following prayers: a. issue a writ of certiorari or any other suitable writ or order quashing the impugned Withdrawal Order dated 29.05.2025 issued by NRC; and/or b. issue a writ of mandamus or any other suitable writ or order directing respondent No.2 to issue order of restoration of recognition of D.El.Ed course with intake of 50 seats (one basic unit); and/or c. issue a writ of mandamus or any other suitable writ or or...
Arjun Nagia @ Nitin vs the State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
$~69 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 364/2026 & CRL.M.A. 2855/2026 ARJUN NAGIA @ NITIN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sauraj Prakash Sharma, AdvocateversusTHE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State with IO/SI Satwant Singh, PS Cyber CellCORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA ORDER % 28.01.2026 1. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No.45/2025 of PS Crime Branch for offence under Section 21/25/29 NDPS Act. 2. Broadly speaking, the allegation against the accused/applicant is that on the basis of his disclosure statement, he led the police party to the house of co-accused Sonia, from where he got recovered 14 gm MDMA. The threshold of commercial quantity is 10 gm MDMA. 3. Learned counsel for accused/applicant submits that co-accused Sonia has already been granted bail by the Court of Sessions. It is contended that the MDMA was planted on the accused/applicant. 4. It is not dispu...
Zimalaya Drugs Pvt Ltd vs Dabur India Limited
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
$~66 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 28th January, 2026 + CM(M) 210/2026, CM APPL. 5590/2026 & CM APPL. 5591/2026 ZIMALAYA DRUGS PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravinder Kumar Yadav, Ms. Arti Anupriya, Mr. Kartikey, Mr. Paras Juneja, Ms. Kritika Yadav and Mr. Naman Verma, Advocates. versusDABUR INDIA LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Manish Kumar Mishra, Ms. Akansha Singh, Ms. Saloni Raghuvanshi and Mr. Saransh Saini, Advocates.CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA ORDER (Oral) Rajneesh Kumar Gupta, J. 1. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950, assailing the order dated 20th May, 2025 passed by the trial court in CS(COMM) 1868/2019, whereby the application filed by the petitioner/defendant under Order VIII Rule 1 A (3) read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking pe...
A K Construction Company vs National Highways Authority of India, Thro ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
$~104 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1192/2026 and CM APPL. 5856/2026, CM APPL. 5857/2026 , CM APPL. 5855/2026 A K CONSTRUCTION COMPANY .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Nalin Kohli, Senior Advocate with Ms. Nimisha Menon , Mr Parmod Kalirana Advocates.versusNATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA, THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Santosh Kumar, Standing Counsel with Ms. Dharitry Phookan and Mr. Devansh Malhotra Advocates for R-1.CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV ORDER % 28.01.20261. After some brief submissions, Mr. Nalin Kohli, learned senior counsel for the petitioner, realising that the essential, integral, and material cause of action arises within the jurisdiction of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, seeks liberty to withdraw the instant petition with further liberty to approach the jurisdictional High Court. 2. Accordingly, the liberty, as prayed, is granted. The petition, along with pending applic...
- ‹ Prev
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- Next ›
- Last »