Delhi Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mrs. Irene Promilla Peter & Ors. vs M/S Singh Finlease Pvt. Ltd
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
$~67, 68 and 69 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) 211/2026, CM APPL. 5592/2026 & CM APPL. 5593/2026 MRS. IRENE PROMILLA PETER & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Prashant Gupta, Mr. Sunil Kumar and Mr. Yatin Sharma, Advs. versus M/S SINGH FINLEASE PVT. LTD .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ankur Jain, Adv. for R-1. 68. + CM(M) 213/2026 & CM APPL. 5656/2026 VINCENT ROGGER PETER & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Prashant Gupta, Mr. Sunil Kumar and Mr. Yatin Sharma, Advs. versus M/S SINGH FINLEASE PVT. LTD .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ankur Jain, Adv. for R-1. 69. + CM(M) 214/2026, CM APPL. 5659/2026 & CM APPL. 5660/2026 M/S MAHUA ENTERTAINTMENT PVT. LTD. & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Prashant Gupta, Mr. Sunil Kumar and Mr. Yatin Sharma, Advs. versus M/S SINGH FINLEASE PVT. LTD .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ankur Jain, Adv. for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA ORDER % 28.01.2026 1. This hea...
Jai Prakash vs the Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 711/2026 CM APPL. 3443/2026 JAI PRAKASH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. K. P Singh , Mr. Himanshu Adhana, Mr. Yashvir Maurya , Mr. Varunendra Bahadur Singh, Advs. versus THE UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Adil Hussain Taqvi, SPC with Ms. Nasreen Khatoon, G.P, Ms. Saumya Saxena, Mr. Hamza, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA ORDER % 28.01.2026 1. The learned counsel for the respondents has placed before us the decision taken by the respondents wherein it has been decided to post the petitioner at Ghaziabad. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that taking the statement of the respondents counsel on record, the petition can be disposed of. 3. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of by taking the submission on record. 4. The pending application is also disposed of as having become infructuous.V. KAMESWAR RA...
Darshana Chatterjee vs State Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
$~47 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 28th January, 2026 + W.P.(CRL) 214/2026 & CRL.M.A. 2020/2026 DARSHANA CHATTERJEE .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Puneet Singh Bindra with Mr. Vivek Kadyan and Ms. Charu Modi, Advocates. versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Amol Sinha, ASC for State with SI Kuldeep PS Mangol Puri. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral)1. On the basis of the complaint made by Mrs. Darshana Chatterjee (petitioner herein), FIR No.478/2025 under Section 420/406 IPC was registered by P.S. Mangol Puri. 2. Investigation is underway. 3. The prime grievance of the petitioner herein is to the effect that investigation is not fair, proper and effective as no steps have been taken to recover the cheated amount and to freeze the bank account in question. 4. Admittedly, as per Sakiri Vasu vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Others: (2008) 2 SCC 409, a Magisterial Court can always...
Suraj Singh vs the State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 150/2026SURAJ SINGH .....PetitionerThrough: Mr. Akshay Bedi, Advocate via video-conferencing. Ms. Sukanya Hazarika Advocate via video-conferencing.versusTHE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....RespondentThrough: Ms. Shubhi Gupta, APP for the State with SI Reena, P.S.: Dwarka North.CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI ORDER % 28.01.2026 CRL.M.A. 2814/2026 By way of the present application filed under section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present bail petition submitting, that since chargesheet has now been filed, they would seek liberty to file afresh before the learned Special Judge seeking the same relief. The application is accordingly allowed. Application stands disposed-of.BAIL APPLN. 150/2026 Page 1 of 2 This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR c...
Mukesh Kumar Gupta vs State of Gnct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
$~40 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 431/2026, CRL.M.A. 1699/2026, CRL.M.A. 1700/2026 & CRL.M.A. 1701/2026 MUKESH KUMAR GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shreyas Mehrotra, Mr. Manish Kumar Mishra and Mr. Garvit Sharma, Advocates alongwith petitioner in person.versusSTATE OF GNCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Satinder Singh Bawa, APP for the State with SI Lavkant, P.S. Pandav Nagar.CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN ORDER % 28.01.2026 1. After hearing arguments for some time, learned counsel for petitioner does not press the present petition. 2. He submits that as observed in the impugned order, he would make use of the relevant documents at relevant and appropriate stage. 3. The present petition is, accordingly, disposed of as not pressed. 4. The pending applications also stand disposed of. 5. All rights and contentions of the parties are reserved.MANOJ JAIN, J JANUARY 28, 2026/ss/pbThis is a digitally signed ...
Rajesh Kumar vs State Gnct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
$~37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 254/2026 & CRL.M.A. 2086/2026 RAJESH KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shubham Gupta and Ms. Amrita Pandey, Advocates.versusSTATE GNCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP for the State with SI Deepak Sahu, P.S. Punjabi Bagh.CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN ORDER % 28.01.2026 1. After hearing arguments for some time, learned counsel for applicant, without prejudice to his rights and contentions, seeks to withdraw the present application. 2. He, however, seeks liberty to move application afresh at a later stage if the condition of the applicant further deteriorates. 3. The present application is disposed of as not pressed. 4. The pending application also stand disposed of. 5. Liberty, as prayed, is granted.MANOJ JAIN, J JANUARY 28, 2026/ss/pbThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scan...
Sh Tara Singh vs Delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
$~66 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 867/2026 & CM APPL. 4273/2026 SH TARA SINGH ....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhishek Kukkar, Mr. Kunal Choudhary, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY .....Respondent Through: Ms Manika Tripathy SC for DDA with Mr Aakash Mohar, Mr Saksham Singh, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH ORDER % 28.01.20261. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following reliefs: a) issuance of a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction restraining the respondents from illegally dispossessing the petitioner from his private land situated in Khasra no. 351(2-1), 834/352(2- 1) and 835/352(1- 13) of Village Maidan Garhi, New Delhi; b) Direct Respondent-DDA to conduct a demarcation with the assistance of revenue authorities of the Petitioner's land and the adjacent DDA land (Khasra No. 401) using Total Station Method (TSM); 2. As p...
Shivani Alias Najima Kausar & Anr. vs State Nct of Delhi Through Sho N ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
$~49 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 28th January, 2026 + W.P.(CRL) 217/2026 SHIVANI ALIAS NAJIMA KAUSAR & ANR. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Manvendra Mukul with Mr. J.K. Pandey, Advocates with petitioners in person versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI THROUGH SHO NAND NAGRI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel (Crl.) and Ms. Priyam Aggarwal, Advocate with SI Ravi Poonia, PS Dayal Pur and SI Devender, PS Nand Nagri. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral)1. It is a case of inter-religion love marriage. 2. Both the petitioners have married each other on 07.12.2025 as per Hindu customs and rituals. 3. They both, however, apprehend some threats from their respective family members who, as stated, are against the abovesaid marriage. 4. They, therefore, seek protection so that they are not harmed and their life and liberty is not compromised in any manner whatsoever. They both are, prese...
Aarti vs State Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
$~36 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 237/2026, CRL.M.A. 1943/2026 & CRL.M.A. 1944/2026 AARTI .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Manisha Parmar, Mr. Baljeet, Ms. Anjali and Mr. Rahul Yadav, Advocates.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar Gautam, APP for the State with Insp. Sandeep Kaalkhande.CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN ORDER % 28.01.2026 1. Applicant-Aarti is seeking anticipatory bail in FIR No. 0534/2025 under Sections 318(2)(4)/337/338/336(3)/340(2)/61(2)/3(5) BNS 2023 (corresponding Sections 420/466/467/468/471/120B IPC) registered at P.S. New Ashok Nagar, East District. 2. The abovesaid relief was denied by the learned Court of Sessions and, when the matter was pending before the learned Court of Sessions a Status Report was submitted. Copy thereof has been annexed with the present petition also. 3. According to complainant, he had met accused-Deepak Kumar (already arrested) in MCD o...
Malti Thomas vs Col. Tahir Mustafa
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
$~79 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 142/2026 MALTI THOMAS .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Pratima K. Gupta and Mr. Abhisumat Gupta, Advs. versus COL. TAHIR MUSTAFA .....Respondent Through: Dr. Swaroop George, Mr. Mobashshir Sarwar, Mr.Abhinandan Jain, Mr. Shivam Prajapati, Mr. Abhigyan Dwyvedi and Mr. Takrim Ahsan Khan, Advs.CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA ORDER % 28.01.2026 CM APPl.4948/2026 (Exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. Application stands disposed of. CONT.CAS(C) 142/2026 3. The present petition alleges wilful disobedience / non-compliance of the directions contained in the order dated 31.10.2025, passed in W.P.(C) 16510/2025. The operative directions therein are as under: 6. Without commenting upon the merit of the case, considering that the issue of pension is involved and the petitioner is a super senior citizen, this petition is disposed of directing the respondent to decide the matter arisi...
- ‹ Prev
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- Next ›
- Last »