Delhi Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Pushpanjali Enterprises Private Limited vs Commissioner of Sgst De ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 23/2026 M/S PUSHPANJALI ENTERPRISES PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shailender Verma, Mr. Santanu Kumar Patra, Mr. Subhash Chandra Gupta & Mr. Ashok Kumar Sharma, Advs.versusCOMMISSIONER OF SGST DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Vaishali Gupta, Panel Counsel (GNCTD) with Ms. Ishita Gupta, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBREHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAULORDER% 05.01.2026 CM APPL. 37/20261. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.2. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 23/20263. Since there is an alternate remedy provided under Section 107 of theCentral Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act) against the orderwhich is referred to in the prayer clause, a motion for withdrawal is made with liberty to take recourse to the alternate remedy.4. As such, the petition stands disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.5. Needless to clarify that this Court has not ap...
Smt Soni vs the State Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 15/2026 SMT SONI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajiv Ranjan Mishra and Mr.Mohit Kumar Bhardwaj, AdvocatesversusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel (Crl.) with Ms. Priyam Agarwal, Mr. Abhinav Kumar Arya, Mr. Aryan Sachdeva, Advocates for respondent/State SI Bhanu, Insp. Daljeet. Victim in person with Constable Jyoti, Police Station- North Rohini, Delhi.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJAORDER% 05.01.20261. The present Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 ofthe Constitution of India read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), by the sister of Ms. xxx seeking issuance of a direction in the nature of Habeas Corpus, directing the respondents to produce the corpus of Ms. xxx.2. Mr. Sanjay Lao, the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State, files the copy of the status repor...
Cnh Industrial India Pvt Ltd Formerly Known as New Holland Fiat India ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 5/2026 & I.A. 35/2026 (Ex. from filing of clear copies, typed copies of the documents) CNH INDUSTRIAL INDIA PVT LTD FORMERLY KNOWN AS NEW HOLLAND FIAT INDIA PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Niraj Singh & Ms. Aishani Mohan, Advs.versusSANJAY TRACTORS AND AUTOMOBILES & ORS. .....Respondents Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHANSHANKARORDER% 05.01.20261. The present petition, under Section 29A (5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [the Act], has been filed seeking extension of time for pronouncement the award, for the period up to 15.02.2026.2. The material on record indicates the parties entered into a Dealership Agreement [Agreement] dated 04.12.2012, which was extended from time to time, and the last Agreement was executed on 08.03.2016.3. Thereafter, certain disputes arose between the parties and theRespondent herein filed a petition under Section 9 of the Act beari...
Mohd Tufail & Ors. vs the State of Delhi Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 05th January, 2026 + CRL.M.C. 6/2026 & CRL.M.A. 13/2026 MOHD TUFAIL & ORS. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Amisuddin, Advocate along with petitionersversusTHE STATE OF DELHI NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Satinder Singh Bawa, APP Mr. Ajit Singh Tomar, Advocate along with Respondent No. 2 in person with his father SI Ashish Kumar, PS Kalindi KunjCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINJ U D G M E N T (oral) CRL.M.A. 13/2026 (for exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 6/20261. The present petition has been preferred seeking quashing of FIR No.commission of offence under Sections 308/34 IPC, along with all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties.2. As per averments appearing in FIR, a scuffle took place between the parties, which resulted in injury to respondent No. 2/complainant, leading to registrati...
Raunak Kumar @ Raunak Kumar Chorasia vs the State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 05th January, 2026 + CRL.M.C. 21/2026 RAUNAK KUMAR @ RAUNAK KUMAR CHORASIA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ekram Ali Ansari, Advocate. Petitioner in person through Video ConferencingversusTHE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ashmeet Singh, APP for the State with SI Rohitash Yadav, PS Neb Sarai. Respondent No.2 in person (through V.C.) Wife and mother-in-law of petitionerCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINJ U D G M E N T (oral) CRL.M.A. 32/2026 (exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 21/20261. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 BNSS on behalfof the petitioner seeking quashing of FIR No. 972/2015 registered under Section 365 IPC at P.S. Neb Sarai, Delhi on the ground that the parties have amicably settled their disputes.2. The present FIR was registered on the basis of complaint lodged by Sh.Vijay Kumar Gupta in which he stated that his elder d...
Afsar vs State Govt of Nct Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 1/2026 AFSAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Israel Khan, Advocate.versusSTATE GOVT OF NCT DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ashneet Singh, APP.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINORDER% 05.01.2026 CRL.M.A. 56/2026(exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. BAIL APPLN. 1/20261. The present application has been filed under section 483 of BNSS 2023 by the petitioner for seeking Regular Bail.2. The FIR in question was registered on 04.01.2022 and as per the allegations made by the complainant Azim Ullah, he was robbed at gun-point by three accused persons.3. All the three accused were, eventually, apprehended. However, nothing could be recovered.4. As per the bare allegations, one other co-accused i.e. Yunus @ Gangawas armed with knife whereas the co-accused Sarik was armed with pistol and during the robbery in question, the complainant was threatened with the abovesaid weapons and committed robbery of a sum of...
N S Associates Pvt Ltd vs New Delhi Municipal Council
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 10/2026 & I.A. 36/2026 N S ASSOCIATES PVT LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. M. Tarique Siddiqui, Mr. Sunil Verma, Mr. Abhishek K. Tanwar, Ms. Lakshmi and Mohd. Faisal Khan, Mob: 9811202991 Email: [email protected] DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sunder Khatri, Additional Standing Counsel along with Mr. Naman Khatri and Mr. Ravi Grover,CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNAORDER% 05.01.20261. The present petition has been filed under Sections 29A(4) and (5) ofthe Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking extension of the mandate of Arbitral Tribunal for a period of one year, in the arbitration proceedings pending before the learned Sole Arbitrator.2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that five morewitnesses of the respondent are yet to be examined. Thus, it is submitted that the matter is at the stage of evidence and further evidence has to be condu...
Haripal Singh vs State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 05th January, 2026 + W.P.(CRL) 3/2026 HARIPAL SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Pratap Singh Parmar, Advocate (through V.C.)versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Yasir Rauf Ansari, ASC (Crl.) with Mr. Alok Sharma, Advocate.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINJ U D G M E N T (oral) CRL.M.A. 39/2026 (exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(CRL) 3/20261. The present writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of BNSS seeking issuance of writ in the nature of certiorari.2. The petitioner seeks quashing of Order No.F.18/107/2025/HG/Prisons/ 3737 dated 05.12.2025 whereby his request for grant of parole has been rejected by the competent authority.3. The order of rejection has also been annexed with the petition.4. A perusal of the same would indicate that the prime most reason for rejection is the fact that his co-accused is ...
M/S Conarch Associates Through Its Partner vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
$~4.* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ LPA 3/2026 M/S CONARCH ASSOCIATES THROUGH ITS PARTNER .....Appellant Through: Ms. Priyanka Jain, Advocate.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Ms. Pratima N. Lakra, CGSC with Mr. Shivam Sharma, GP and Mr. S.K. Mishra, Advocate for R-1. Ms. Kanupriya Bhargava and Mr. Pranav Goswami, Advocates for R-2.CORAM:HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIAORDER% 05.01.2026 CM APPL No. 90/2026 (Exemption)1. Exemption is allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The Application stands disposed of. CM APPL No. 91/2026 (Condonation of delay)3. The present Application has been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking condonation of delay in filing the present Appeal.4. For the reasons stated in the Application, the same is allowed.5. The delay of 5 days in filing the present Appeal is condoned.6. The Application stands dispos...
Vipin Kumar Verma vs Secretary Dlsa Shahdara & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 15/2026 VIPIN KUMAR VERMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Manish Kumar Singh and Mr. Anurav Gupta, Advs.versusSECRETARY DLSA SHAHDARA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Cauveri Birbal, Mr. Kamlendu Pandey, Ms. Nishtha Dhall and Ms. Preksha Gaur, Advs for R-1 and 2.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 05.01.2026 CM APPL. 32/2026 (EXEMPTION)1. Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 15/20263. Heard.4. Issue notice.5. Learned counsel for the respondent nos. 1 and 2 appears and accepts notice.6. The petition is against the order dated 05.03.2025 passed by respondent no.1 i.e. District Legal Service Authority, Shahdara (hereinafter to be referred as the DLSA).7. The dispute stems from a road accident which had occurred on14.02.2014, where the petitioner had suffered certain grievous injuries. An FIR was lodged and criminal case was concluded with accept...
- ‹ Prev
- 363
- 364
- 365
- 366
- 367
- 368
- 369
- 370
- 371
- 373
- Next ›
- Last »