Delhi Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Aarti vs State, Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 5085/2025, CRL.M.A. 39016/2025 & CRL.M.A. 39015/2025 AARTI .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Manisha Parmar, Mr. Rahul Yadav and Mr. Vikrant, AdvocatesversusSTATE, NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State with Inpsector Sandeep, PS New Ashok NagarCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIAORDER% 05.01.20261. The accused/applicant seeks protection from arrest (not grant of anticipatory bail) in case FIR No.534/2025 of PS New Ashok Nagar for offences under Section 318(2)/337/338/336(2)/340(2)/61(2)/3(5) IPC.2. At the outset, learned counsel for accused/applicant seeks permissionto withdraw this bail application, so that she may file a fresh application seeking anticipatory bail. The Bail Application along with the accompanying applications are dismissed as withdrawn. GIRISH KATHPALIA, J JANUARY 5, 2026/as This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from De...
Reeta Gupta vs Nishi Rastogi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.L.P. 1/2026 REETA GUPTA .....Petitioner Through:versusNISHI RASTOGI .....Respondent Through: SI Neeraj, PS Kotwali.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE CHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHAORDER% 05.01.2026 CRL.M.A. 138/2026 and CRL.M.A. 140/20261. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The application stands disposed of. CRL.M.A. 139/20263. This application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act,1963, read with Sections 419 and 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), has been filed on behalf of the appellant seeking condonation of delay of 29 days in filing the appeal.4. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed, and the delay of 29 days in filing the appeal is condoned.5. The application stands disposed of. CRL.L.P. 1/20266. This criminal leave petition under Section 419 of theBNSS has been filed by the original complainant/appellant seeking leave to file an appeal against the impugned judgment da...
Harjit Singh Bedi vs M/S Bodhitree Technologies(P) Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 1/2026 HARJIT SINGH BEDI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rahul Khan, Adv.versusM/S BODHITREE TECHNOLOGIES(P) LTD .....Respondent Through: Mr. Bharat Arora & Mr. Lakshay Raheja, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHANSHANKARORDER% 05.01.20261. The present petition, under Section 29(A) of the Arbitration andConciliation Act, 1996 [the Act] read with Section 151 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, has been filed seeking extension of the time of mandate of the learned Arbitral Tribunal.2. The material on record indicates that the parties entered into an Accounting Service Agreement [Agreement] on 16.01.2018.3. Thereafter, disputes arose between the parties and the Petitionerherein preferred CS (Comm) No.355/2021 before the learned Commercial Court-01 Saket Court, New Delhi [Commercial Court]. Consequently, the Petitioner preferred an application under Section 8 of the Act, which was allowed by the learn...
Vikas Gumber vs Commissioner of Cgst, Anti Evasion Branch, Delhi East
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 11/2026, CRL.M.A. 136/2026 VIKAS GUMBER .....Applicant Through: Mr. Pradeep Jain, Mr. Sambhav Jain and Mr. Pranav Roy Singh, Advocates.versusCOMMISSIONER OF CGST, ANTI EVASION BRANCH, DELHI EAST .....Respondent Through: Mr. Arun Khatri, SSC with Ms. Shelly Dixit, Advocate for CGSTCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 05.01.20261. By virtue of the present bail application, the applicant seeksfollowing reliefs: (i) Set aside / quash the impugned order dated 13.12.2025 passed by the Learned Additional Sessions Judge, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi in Bail Matter No. 2152/25, whereby the Applicants regular bail application was rejected.(ii) Enlarge the Applicant on regular bail in connectionwith File No. GEXCOM/AE/MISC/1330/2022/Pt-3-AE arising out of alleged offences under Section 132 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, on such terms and conditions as this Honble Court may deem fit and proper;(iii...
Bhadra International (India) Pvt Ltd and Ors & Ors. vs Airports Author ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
$~34 & 35* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 2/2026 + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 11/2026CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGANORDER% 05.01.20261. These petitions have been filed seeking extension of the mandate of the Sole Arbitrator by four months with effect from 30.11.2025.2. The Sole Arbitrator reserved the award on 06.08.2025. There was anearlier round of litigation between the parties which is pending by way of a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. On 21.11.2025, the Sole Arbitrator sought certain clarifications from the parties and also an update on the status of the pending litigation.3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the issues involved in the present petition overlaps with those arising in the earlier round of litigation. Hence, an extension of time is sought.4. Reliance is placed upon the judgment of the Supreme Court in RohanBuilders (India) Private Limited v. Berger Paints Indi...
XXX vs State of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.A. 1/2026 & CRL.M.A. 80/2026 XXX .....Appellant Through: Mr. Yogesh Kumar, Advocate.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shoaib Haider, APP for the State. SI Ayushi Sirohi, P.S.: Mansarovar Park, Distt. Shahdara.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 05.01.2026Learned counsel appearing for the appellant (complainant) seeks leave to withdraw the present criminal appeal, with liberty to file before the learned sessions court. The appeal is disposed-of as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed-for; without making any observations on the merits of the matter. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed-of.ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J JANUARY 5, 2026/ak This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/01/2026 at 12:42:03...
Imran Khan @ Imran & Ors. vs the State of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 16/2026, CRL.M.A. 189/2026 IMRAN KHAN @ IMRAN & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Parveen, Advocate with petitioners in person.versusTHE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP with Ms. Vanshika Singh and Ms. Divya Bakshi, Advocates with SI Devendra Singh, SI Ankur, PS: Jafrabad Mr. Girish Khanna, Advocate with R-2CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 05.01.20261. By virtue of the present petition under Section 528 of the BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.720/2022 dated 07.12.2022 registered under Sections 498A/406/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 (DPA) at PS: Jafrabad, Delhi, and all proceedings emanating therefrom, in view of the settlement arrived at between the petitioners and the respondent no.2 on 02.09.2023.2. The present petition is also accompanie...
Manish Mahendru vs State Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 9/2026, CRL.M.A. 16/2026 MANISH MAHENDRU .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rahul L. and Mr. Sahil Khatri, Advs. with petitioner in person.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP with Ms. Upasna Bakshi, Adv. with SI Divya, PS: Model Town Mr. Shivpal Upadhyay, Adv. for R- 2, with R-2 in person.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 05.01.20261. By virtue of the present petition under Section 528 of the BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) (erstwhile Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973), the petitioner seek quashing of FIR No.334/2023 dated 27.04.2023 registered under Sections 498A/ 406 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) at PS: Model Town, Delhi, as also all other proceeding(s) emanating therefrom, in view of the Settlement Deed dated 14.11.2025 arrived at inter se the petitioner and the respondent no.2 herein.2. At the outset, the learned counsel for ...
Deepak Tanwar vs Govt. of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 39/2026 and CM APPL. 86/2026 DEEPAK TANWAR .....Petitioner Through: Petitioner in person.versusGOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sameer Vashisht, Standing Counsel (Civil) GNCTD with Ms.Harshita Nathrani, Advocate.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 05.01.20261. The petitioner, who appears in person, after making brief submissions realises that he has to pursue the alternate remedy available in accordance with law. He, therefore, seeks liberty to withdraw the instant petition.2. Liberty, so prayed for, is granted.3. The instant petition stands dismissed as withdrawn, along with all pending application(s). PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J JANUARY 5, 2026 Nc/mjThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/01/2026 at 11:45:1...
Neeraj Kumar vs Ranjana Shukla
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 12/2026, CRL.M.A. 102/2026 NEERAJ KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Petitioner in person (through VC)versusRANJANA SHUKLA .....Respondent Through: NoneCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 05.01.20261. By virtue of the present petition under Article 226 of theConstitution of India read with Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), the petitioner seeks issuance of appropriate writ/ direction to the learned JMFC, Mahila Court-01, North District, Rohini Courts, Delhi to dispose of the CT. No.3686/2017 filed under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 within a period of 3 to 6 months.2. Petitioner appearing in person through VC submits that since thefiling of the aforesaid case by the respondent, he has been facing various hardships as he is having difficulties in securing employment, international travel, financial hardships, etc. which has ultimately resulted ...
- ‹ Prev
- 363
- 364
- 365
- 366
- 367
- 368
- 369
- 370
- 372
- 373
- Next ›
- Last »