Delhi Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mr. Santokh Singh Johal & Anr. vs Government of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 47/2026 MR. SANTOKH SINGH JOHAL & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Nitin Gupta, Mr. Ayush Chauhan, Ms. Tia Sachdeva Advocates.versusGOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 05.01.2026 CM APPL. 113/2026 (for exemption)1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 47/20261. The petitioners in the instant petition prays for the following reliefs:-(a) issue a Writ, Order or Direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the Respondent to register the Gift Deed dated 25th May 2023 and release the Gift Deed dated 25th May 2023 to the Petitioners, in respect of the Unit Nos. 208,209 and 2 10 situated at Rectangle 1, D-4, Saket District Centre, Saket, New Delhi; and(b) pass any other Writ, Order or Direction which this Hon'ble Court deems fit to issue in the facts of the present case and given circums...
Vishal Verma vs Twinkle Vinayak
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ MAT.APP.(F.C.) 446/2025 VISHAL VERMA .....Appellant Through: Mr. Udit Gupta, Adv.versusTWINKLE VINAYAK ....Respondent Through: Dr. Swati Jindal Garg and Ms. Srishti Makol, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK CHAUDHARYHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RENU BHATNAGARORDER% 05.01.20261. The present matrimonial appeal challenges the Order dated 19.12.2025passed by the learned Family Court in Guardianship Petition No.29/2019, thereby disposing of the application of appellant filed under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, read with Section 12 of the Guardian and Wards Act, 1890.2. Vide impugned Order, the learned Family Court passed an ordergranting interim visitation rights to the appellant during the winter vacation of the minor child.3. Learned counsel for the appellant has raised the objection to the orderon the ground of granting supervised visitation rights, unlike in past, when he got unsupervised custody/vis...
Kalpataru Projects International Limited vs Northern Railway
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 4/2026 KALPATARU PROJECTS INTERNATIONAL LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vikrant Bloria, Mr. Sushant Tomar, Mr. Shubham Devrani, Mr. Amit Sagar & Dr. Sunki Mittal, Advs.versusNORTHERN RAILWAY .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ravi Ranjan, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHANSHANKARORDER% 05.01.20261. The present Petition is filed under Section 29-A(5) of theArbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [the Act] seeking extension of time for making and publishing the arbitral award in arbitral proceedings arising out of a Construction Contract Agreement dated 17.09.2021[Agreement], executed between the Petitioner, Kalpataru Projects International Limited, and the Respondent, Northern Railway.2. Owing to the disputes between the parties, the Petitioner invoked the Arbitration by issuing Notice Invoking Arbitration dated 02.05.2023.3. Petitioner had filed a Petition under Section 11 of the Act before this Ho...
Prem Bawa & Anr. vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 7/2026 with CM APPL. 19/2026 PREM BAWA & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Parameesh Takkar, Ms. Richa Takkar, Mr. R.C. Takkar and Mr. Kshitij Suri, Advocates.versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Kapil Dutta, Advocate for R-1. Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Singh, Ms. Rupali Sinha, Advocates for R-2.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 05.01.20261. This Court, vide order dated 2nd January, 2026, had passed a status quo order, which was to operate till today.2. Counsel for the petitioners submits that the status quo order be extended for a further period of two (2) weeks, during which the petitioners shall take appropriate remedies as per law.3. Accordingly, it is directed that the aforesaid status quo order shall continue for a period of two (2) weeks from today, during which period the petitioners shall take appropriate steps in accordance with law.4. In terms of the aforesaid, the...
Raja Babu vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 13/2026 with CM APPL. 28/2026 and CM APPL. 29/2026 RAJA BABU .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Om Srivastava, Advocate.versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Vidhi Jain, Advocate for R- 1/MCD. Mr. Himanshu Kaushik, Mr. Rupender Sharma and Mr. Aaransh Pathak, Advocates for R-2. Mr. Saifi Ahmad, Advocate for R-3CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 05.01.20261. Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.1/MCD submits thatthere is a mismatch between the photographs filed with the petition as well as the complaints which are annexed with the petition. He submits that the complaints refer to property no. E-112, Shaheen Bagh, Okhla, whereas the photographs are in respect of House No. E-192.2. Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.3 on advance notice submits that respondent no.3 is the owner and occupier of property No.E- 192 and not E-112.3. Counsel for the petitioner seeks to wit...
Vivek Gupta vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 10/2026 with CM APPL. 24/2026 VIVEK GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sahil Mann, Advocate.versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Harshit Chopra, Advocate for R-1 and R-2. Mr. Gaganmeet Singh Sachdeva, Mr. Harshpreet Singh Chadha and Mr. Hridyesh Khanna, Advocates for R- 3/DDA. Mr. Vivek Gupta, Advocate for R-4.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 05.01.20261. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has been settled between the petitioner and the respondent no.4. Hence, he seeks to withdraw the present petition.2. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.3. All pending applications stand disposed of. AMIT BANSAL, J JANUARY 5, 2026 Vivek/-This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/01/202...
Nafish Ahmad vs Sharif Ahmad
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RSA 1/2026, CM APPL. 53/2026 (stay) NAFISH AHMAD .....Appellant Through: Ms. Santosh and Mr. Swadesh Kumar, Advocates.versusSHARIF AHMAD .....Respondent Through: NoneCORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAORDER% 05.01.2026 CM APPL.54/2026 (Exemption)1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The Application stands disposed of. RSA 1/20263. Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, has been filed on behalf of the Appellant against theJudgment dated 18.11.2025 by learned District Judge-03, South District,Saket Courts, Delhi in MCA DJ No. 10/2025.4. Learned counsel for the Appellant seeks permission to withdraw the Appeal.5. The Appeal is permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to pursue the remedies, in accordance with law.6. The Appeal is disposed of accordingly with liberty as prayed for. The pending Application also stand disposed of. NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J JANUARY 5, 2026/R...
Shozeb vs State Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 22/2026 SHOZEB .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Nafees Ahmad, Adv.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP for State alongwith Ms. Upasna Bakshi, Adv. and SI Harish Kumar, PS Chandni Mahal, Delhi.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 05.01.20261. By virtue of the present petition under Section 528 of the BharatiyaNagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), the petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.332/2022 dated 27.10.2022 under Sections 324/506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) registered at PS: Chandni Mahal, Delhi and all proceedings emanating therefrom, in view of the Memorandum of Understanding dated 09.12.2025 entered into between the petitioner and the respondent no.2.2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh with better particulars regarding the other dispute(s) inter se the parties herein.3. ...
Sahil Salmani & Ors. vs the State of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 15/2026, CRL.M.A. 26/2026 SAHIL SALMANI & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Manoj Kumar Lohat, Advocate with petitioners in person. Mob-9213630390versusTHE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Raghuinder Verma, APP with Mr. Aditya Vikram Singh, Advocate with PSI Bhanu, PS: North Rohini Mr. Tarun Walia, Advocate for R-2 with R-2 in personCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 05.01.20261. Vide the present petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya NagarikSuraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) (earlier Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973), the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.28/2012 dated 24.01.2012 under Sections 498A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 at P.S. North Rohini, Delhi and all other consequential proceedings emanating therefrom, in view of the Settlement Agreement dated 10.10.2025 arrived at between the petitioners and the respondent no.2 before the Delhi Me...
Union of India Through Secretary Ministry of Defence & Ors. vs Air Cmd ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision : 05.01.2026 + W.P.(C) 40/2026 UNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF DEFENCE & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Nirvikar Verma, SPC and Mr. Mritunjay Jha.versusAIR CMDE ASHOK KUMAR UPADHYAYA RETD 17757 T .....Respondent Through: Mr. Praveen Kumar, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAOHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORAV. KAMESWAR RAO, J. (ORAL) CM APPL. 88/2026 (Exemption)1. Exemption is allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 40/2026, CM APPL. 87/20263. This writ petition lays a challenge to an order dated 21.03.2023passed by the learned Armed Forces Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (Tribunal) in Original Application (OA) No.859/2020 whereby the Tribunal has allowed the OA filed by the respondent herein by giving the following directions:- 5. In view of the aforesaid judicial pronouncements and the parameters referred to above...
- ‹ Prev
- 363
- 364
- 365
- 366
- 367
- 368
- 369
- 371
- 372
- 373
- Next ›
- Last »