Delhi Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dinesh Sethi vs Commissioner of Ndmc and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RSA 210/2025 DINESH SETHI .....Appellant Through: Appellant through VC.versusCOMMISSIONER OF NDMC AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Piyush Beriwal, Ms. Ruchita Srivastava and Ms. Neha Kamboj, Advs. for R-5. Mr. Neeraj Kumar, Standing Counsel for MCD.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAORDER% 13.03.2026 CM APPL. 15353/20261. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. Application is disposed of. CM APPL. 15352/20263. Application under Order IX Rule 9 read with Section 151 of CPC hasbeen filed on behalf of the Appellant, for recalling of Order dated 18.02.2026, whereby the Appeal was dismissed in default, and to restore the Review Petition to its original number.4. It is submitted that the Court did not inform the Appellant about the listing of his Appeal and he could not appear on the date of hearing, on account of which, the Review Petition got dismissed in default.5. Though, it is not the duty of the Court...
Prakashwati Tandon vs State Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on : 18.12.2025Judgment pronounced on : 05.01.2026+ W.P.(CRL) 4209/2025 & CRL.M.A. 37899/2025, CRL.M.A. PRAKASHWATI TANDON .....PetitionerversusSTATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr. Madhukar K. Sareen, Mr. Harmeet Bhasin and Mr. Raunak Wahi, Advs. For the Respondents : Mr. Anand V. Khatri, ASC for the State with Mr. Aditya Khatri, Adv. with SI Sandeep Yadav, PS V.K. North.CORAMHONBLE MR JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANJUDGMENT1. The present petition is filed against the order dated 18.10.2025 (hereafter impugned order) passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ), Patiala House Courts, New Delhi in Cr. Rev. No. 13/2025.2. By the impugned order, the learned ASJ dismissed the revision petition preferred by the petitioner and upheld the order dated 05.06.2024 in Ct Cases 1866/2022 whereby the learned Magistrate KUMAR W.P.(CRL) 4209/2025 Page 1 of 11 had dismi...
Parvesh Mann @ Sagar Mann vs State Nct of Dellhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on: 19.12.2025Judgment pronounced on: 05.01.2026Judgment uploaded on: 06.01.2026+ CRL.M.C. 9064/2025 & CRL.M.A. 37956/2025 PARVESH MANN @ SAGAR MANN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Avi Kalra, Mr. Prateek Lakra and Ms. Arya Pathak, Advocates.versusSTATE NCT OF DELLHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, APP for State along with Insp. Ravi Tushir, Special Cell NR.CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAJUDGMENTIndex to the JudgmentFACTUAL BACKGROUND ................................................................... 2 SUBMISSIONS BEFORE THE COURT .............................................. 3 ANALYSIS & FINDINGS ...................................................................... 5 The Issue ............................................................................................................. 5 Chronology of Proceedings After Conclusion of Final Arguments &Judgment being Reserved ........
Vinay Kumar@Varun Bidhuri@Binnu vs State (Govt. Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 05.01.2026 + BAIL APPLN. 5025/2025, CRL.M.A. 38678/2025 & CRL.M.A. VINAY KUMAR@VARUN BIDHURI@BINNU .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shakir Shabir, Mr. Vikrant Singh and Mr. Sazid S.R. Shah, AdvocatesversusSTATE (GOVT. NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for State with SI Ravi Yadav, PS Govind Puri CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL)1. The accused/applicant seeks grant of interim bail in case FIR No.2. The only ground on which interim bail for a period of 8 weeks is sought by the accused/applicant is the illness of his wife, for which earlier he was granted interim bail repeatedly by the learned trial court. Bail Application 5025/2025 Page 1 of 3 pagesGIRISH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638,KATHPALIA serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15570996b40f80cbd2eee...
State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi) vs Deepak Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.L.P. 248/2018 STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for State with IO/SI Rekha Chauhan.versusDEEPAK KUMAR .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIAORDER% 05.01.20261. This Criminal L.P. seeks to challenge acquittal of the respondent foroffence under Section 365/34 IPC and Section 395 IPC. The judgmentimpugned in the present petition is dated 15.01.2018. The petition came up for hearing before the predecessor bench on 18.04.2018. Thereafter, till date across so many adjournments, steps were never taken by the State to serve notice of the petition on the respondent. On last date i.e., 15.04.2025, the predecessor bench took a note of defaults of last seven years and explicitly recorded that the prosecution does not seem to be interested in pursuing the matter. Despite that observation, no steps have been taken for issuance of notice to the respondent for t...
M/S D Thakkar Constructions Pvt Ltd vs Container Corporation of India ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 8/2026 M/S D THAKKAR CONSTRUCTIONS PVT LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. S. S. Ray, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Rakhi Ray, Mr. Vaibhav Gulia and Mr. Shubhaankar Ray, Advocates Mob: 9868123374 Email: [email protected] CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. .....Respondent Through: Mr. R. K. Joshi and Mr. Ojusya Joshi, AdvocatesCORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNAORDER% 05.01.20261. The present petition has been filed under Sections 29A(4) and (5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking extension of the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal for a period of six (06) months.2. It is submitted that the present mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal is till27th February, 2026. Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the cross-examination is already complete and the matter is pending for the arguments on behalf of the respondent.3. Thus, the present petition has been filed seeking further...
M/S Sijori International Llp Through Its Partner Sailander Solanki vs ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 9/2026 M/S SIJORI INTERNATIONAL LLP THROUGH ITS PARTNER SAILANDER SOLANKI .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Kirti Mewar and Ms. Kriti Sharma, Advocates (Through VC)versusYOGESH MALIK PROPRIETOR B.S. DWARKA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Kunal Ahlawat, Advocate (Through VC)CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNAORDER% 05.01.20261. The present petition has been filed under Sections 29A(4) and (5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking extension of mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal for a period of six months.2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that rejoinderarguments were advanced by the petitioner/claimant on 24th November, 2025 and revised written submissions have also been filed. It is submitted that the matter was last listed before the Sole Arbitrator on 17th December, 2025 for clarification.3. It is further submitted that the mandate of the learned sole Arbitrator expired on 05th...
Varun Kumar vs Public Information Officer Dda and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 17/2026, CM. APPL.33/2026 VARUN KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Dharma Datta Verma, Adv.versusPUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER DDA AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: None.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 05.01.20261. The grievance of the petitioner pertains to the non-furnishing ofdocuments on the basis of which minimum water charges have been fixed for vacant or unused flats, while normal charges have been levied for flats where water is being supplied.2. The point no.1 of the application dated 07.12.2023 is extracted asunder: 1. Please provide the certified copy of document/order under which minimum charge of water for the flat which is vacant/unused has been fixed and Normal charges for the flats where water is being used by the resident has been prescribed/ fixed, for the area of DA Block, Shalimar Bagh, Delhi-110088 w.r.t. mail dated 22.5.2023 received from Sh.Pardeep Kumar Malhotra EE/MD-3 ( Copy encl...
Veena Arora vs Commissioner Income Tax - 12 Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of decision: 5th January, 2026. + W.P.(C) 22/2026 VEENA ARORA .....Petitioner Through: Dr. Prince Mohan Sinha, Mr. Rajeev Deora, Mr. Shiv Nath Bind, Advs.versusCOMMISSIONER INCOME TAX - 12 DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Indruj Singh Rai, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Sanjeev Menon, Mr. Rahul Singh, Mr. Gaurav Kumar, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMARJUDGMENTDINESH MEHTA, J. (Oral)1. By way of present writ petition, the petitioner has challenged notice under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 issued on 28.03.2025.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner argued that the impugned notice is arbitrary and without any basis.3. Inviting Courts attention towards Annexure A-2 appended to theaforesaid notice, he asserted that except for the excel sheet, which was found at premises of Bhutani Infra Group and Associates in which the petitioners name reflecting a cash transaction of Rs...
Ram Niwas vs State Govt. of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.REV.P. 2/2026 & CRL.M.A. 76/2026 RAM NIWAS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Raj Kumar Ruhil and Mr. Anil Kumar, Mr. Hammad Ali, Ms. Jyoti Shukla and Mr. Sameer, Advocates.versusSTATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Digam Singh Dagar, APP for the State. W/SI Babli, P.S.: Kashmiri Gate Metro. Mr. Dushyant N. And Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 05.01.2026 CRL.M.A. 77/2026 (condonation of 37 days delay in filing) By way of the present application filed under section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 read with section 5 of the Limitation Act 1963, the applicant/petitioner seeks condonation of about 37 days delay in filing the present revision petition.2. For the reasons stated in the application, which is duly supported by affidavit, the delay is condoned.3. The application is allowed.4. The petition is taken on Board. CRL.REV.P. 2...
- ‹ Prev
- 363
- 364
- 365
- 366
- 367
- 368
- 370
- 371
- 372
- 373
- Next ›
- Last »