Delhi Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shabnam vs State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 9020/2025 SHABNAM .....Petitioner Through: Appearance not given.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Hitesh Vali, APP with Ms. Pragati Gupta, Advocate for State. SI Jugnu Tyagi, PS-Dayal Pur.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 05.01.2026 After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw this petition, with liberty to approach the jurisdictional Magistrates Court for appropriate relief in respect of registration of the FIR. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. PRATEEK JALAN, J JANUARY 5, 2026 Bhupi/AD/ This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/01/2026 at 12:00:22...
Amrik Singh Bedi vs Narcotics Control Bureau
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 4381/2025 AMRIK SINGH BEDI .....Applicant Through: Mr. Vikram Hegde, Adv.versusNARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU .....Respondent Through: Mr. Arun Khatri, Sr. SC for NCB alongwith Ms. Shelly Dixit, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 05.01.20261. Learned counsel for the applicant, without adverting to the merits,submits that since the co-accused in the case involving the applicant has already been granted bail recently vide order dated 15.12.2025 passed by the learned Special Judge, National Drugs and Psychotropic Substances, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi (learned Special Judge), i.e. after filing of the present application, he seeks to withdraw the present application with liberty to file afresh before the learned Special Judge.2. Heard. Allowed, with liberty as prayed for. SAURABH BANERJEE, J JANUARY 5, 2026/bhThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from...
Kiran Meena & Anr. vs the State Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 4292/2025 & CRL.M.A. 38596/2025 KIRAN MEENA & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Amit Verma and Mr. Akshay Anand, Advocates via video- conferencing.versusTHE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Rupali Bandhopadhya, ASC for the State with Mr. Abhijeet Kumar, Ms. Amisha Gupta, Advocates and SI Divya, P.S.: Patparganj Industrial Area.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 05.01.2026 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits, that the parties are now happily residing together. In the circumstances, counsel seeks leave to withdraw the present petition. The petition is accordingly disposed-of as withdrawn. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed-of. ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J JANUARY 5, 2026 ds This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloade...
Manoj @ Babu vs the State Govt. of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 05.01.2026 + BAIL APPLN. 5024/2025 & CRL.M.A. 38677/2025 MANOJ @ BABU .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Lovenish Mendiratta, Advocate.versusTHE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ajay Vikram Singh, APP for State with SI Sachin. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL)1. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 855/2025 of PS Karol Bagh for offence under Section 109(1) BNS.2. The injured Sh. Aonkar Nath, identified by IO/SI Sachin is present incourt and submits that the accused/applicant may be granted bail so that they apply for quashing of the FIR, since they are neighbours and after being discharged from hospital, he has recovered fully and there is no medical complication.3. Broadly speaking, the allegation against the accused/applicant is thathe caused stab injury on the chest and abdomen region of the injured. The injured was examined in Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, fro...
No 14682063A Nk Ajay Kumar vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision : 05.01.2026 + W.P.(C) 19836/2025 & CM APPL. 82793/2025 NO 14682063A NK AJAY KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. U.S. Maurya and Mr. S.S. Maurya, Advs.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Major Anish Muralidhar and Major Kanika SharmaCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAOHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORAV. KAMESWAR RAO, J. (ORAL)1. This petition lays a challenge to the order dated 18.12.2025 (impugned order) passed in MA No.5469/2025 in Original Application (OA) No.3685/2025 by the Armed Force Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi(AFT) rejecting the prayer of the petitioner for interim relief challenging his pre mature discharge from the service with effect from 31.12.2025 on account of hypertension and obesity.2. The AFT while dismissing the MA, seeking the prayer for interim relief has observed that the discharge of the petitioner shall be subject to the final outcome of t...
R M Kulshreshtha vs Ntpc Ltd & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
$~2.* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ LPA 1/2026 R M KULSHRESHTHA .....Appellant Through: Mr. Shoeb Shakeel, Mr. Sahim Khan and Mr. Raju Kumar, Advs.versusNTPC LTD & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rajesh Gupta, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIAORDER% 05.01.20261. Learned counsel for the appellant states that he may be permitted to withdraw the appeal with the liberty to approach the learned Single Judge by filing a review petition.2. The appeal is, thus, dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for. DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ TEJAS KARIA, J JANUARY 5, 2026 N.KhannaThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/01/2026 at 12:09:39...
Arti Kohli & Anr. vs State of Nct. of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 05th January, 2026 + CRL.M.C. 8/2026 & CRL.M.A. 15/2026 ARTI KOHLI & ANR. .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Saloni Kumari Singh and Mr. Bhuvnesh Mittal, Advocates (Through VC)versusSTATE OF NCT. OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Raj Kumar, APP Mr. Banamali Shukla, Advocate along with Respondent No. 2 Husband of Respondent No. 2 SI Babita, PS Mukherjee NagarCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINJ U D G M E N T (oral) CRL.M.A. 15/2026 (for exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 8/20261. Petitioners herein seek quashing of FIR No. 453/2016 dated24.04.2016, for commission of offences under Sections 323, 354, 451, 506, 34 of IPC, registered at Police Station Mukherjee Nagar, along with all the consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties.2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the parties have amicably settled all th...
Sh Baljeet Singh & Anr. vs Sh Bijendra Singh & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 2/2026 & CM APPL. 127/2026 SH BALJEET SINGH & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Sahil Monga, Ms. Kanishka Sharma and Mr. Lalit Kumar, Advs.versusSH BIJENDRA SINGH & ANR. .....Respondents Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 05.01.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners under Article 227 of Constitution of India seeking supervisory interference for setting aside theorder dated 18th November, 2025 passed by the learned District Judge-02(West), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in Civ. DJ No. 459/2023, whereby the application filed by the petitioners under Order XIV Rule 5 Civil Procedure Code for framing of an additional issue was dismissed.3. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners wishes to withdraw the present petition.4. Accordingly, the present petition shall stand dismissed as withdrawn. RAJNEE...
Shilpi Rani vs Rajkumar Prajapati & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 8/2026, CRL.M.A. 47/2026, CRL.M.A. 48/2026 & CRL.M.A. 49/2026 SHILPI RANI .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Preeti Singh, Mr. Sunklan Prwal and Ms. Anuradha Anand, AdvocatesversusRAJKUMAR PRAJAPATI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sonu Pandey, AdvocateCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIAORDER% 05.01.20261. The petitioner wife has assailed order dated 05.12.2025 of the learnedtrial court, whereby her request for adjudication of her application under Section 23 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act was declined, holding that the said application would be decided along with application under Section 31 of the Act filed by petitioner wife.2. Learned counsel for respondents, appearing on advance intimation,accepts notice and submits that the respondents have not been supplied paper book and that today, the respondents are held up in performing last rites of their mother who passed away yesterday.3...
Bhadra International (India) Pvt Ltd and Ors & Ors. vs Airports Author ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
$~34 & 35* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 2/2026 + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 11/2026CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGANORDER% 05.01.20261. These petitions have been filed seeking extension of the mandate of the Sole Arbitrator by four months with effect from 30.11.2025.2. The Sole Arbitrator reserved the award on 06.08.2025. There was anearlier round of litigation between the parties which is pending by way of a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. On 21.11.2025, the Sole Arbitrator sought certain clarifications from the parties and also an update on the status of the pending litigation.3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the issues involved in the present petition overlaps with those arising in the earlier round of litigation. Hence, an extension of time is sought.4. Reliance is placed upon the judgment of the Supreme Court in RohanBuilders (India) Private Limited v. Berger Paints Indi...
- ‹ Prev
- 362
- 363
- 364
- 365
- 366
- 368
- 369
- 370
- 371
- 372
- Next ›
- Last »