Delhi Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sara Verma & Anr. vs Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
$~R1* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 1248/2005 & CM APPL. 5580/2009, CM APPL. SARA VERMA & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: None.versusGOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh, Ms. Aliza Alam and Mr. Mohnish Sehrawat, Advs. for R-1.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 05.01.20261. The present Writ Petition is filed under Article 226/227 of the constitution assailing the order dated 02.09.2004 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi in O.A. No. 2240/2002.2. The matter was called twice. The Petitioners remain unrepresented.3. Learned counsel representing Respondent No.1 has submittedthat a writ petition was filed by the Director of Education against the impugned order dated 02.09.2004, which was disposed of with liberty to file review application before the learned Central Administrative Tribunal. Subsequ...
Shambhu Prasad Singh vs CBI
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on: 21st August, 2025 Pronounced on: 05th January, 2026 + CRL.M.C. 5230/2025, CRL.M.A. 22609/2025 & 22610/2025 SHAMBHU PRASAD SINGH S/o Late Sh. Anant Prasad Singh, R/O H-17, 2nd Floor, Kailash Colony, New Delhi-110048 .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Pramod Kumar Dubey, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sulalit Singh Sisodia, Ms. Pallavi Garg, Mr. Joy Banerjee, Mr. Prince and Mr. Satyam Sharma, Advocates.versusCBI Thr: Its Director, New Delhi .....Respondent Through: Mr. Anupam S. Sharma, SPP with Ms. Harpreet Kalsi and Mr. Vashisht Rao, Advocates with Inspector Ram Kumar.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAJ U D G M E N TNEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.1. Petition has been filed under Section 528 of the Bhartiya NagarikSuraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C), by the Petitioner/Accused No. 2 Shambhu Prasad Singh for the quashing and setting aside of the common C...
Mr. Sumit Vijay & Anr. vs Major League Baseball Properties Inc. & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIReserved on: 17 September 2025 Pronounced on: 5 January 2026 + LPA 475/2025, CM APPLs. 45526/2025 & 45579/2025 MR. SUMIT VIJAY & ANR. .....Appellants Through: Mr. C.M. Lall, Sr. Adv and Mr. J. Sai Deepak, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rupin Bahl, Mr. Karan Bajaj, Ms. Aastha Arora, Mr. Avinash and Ms. Annanya Mehan, Advs.versusMAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL PROPERTIES INC. & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Urfi Roomi, Ms. Janaki Arun, Mr. Jaskaran Singh, Ms. Angela Arora, Advs. for R-1 Mr. Nidhi Raman, CGSC with Mr. Akash Mishra, Mr. Arnav Mittal and Mr. Mayank Sansanwal, Advs. for R-2CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKARHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLAJUDGMENT% 05.01.2026C. HARI SHANKAR, J.1. The blue jay, a truly beautiful bird, is native to eastern NorthAmerica. Though the appellants before us have sought to contend that the blue jay is also known as the Indian Roller and is the State bird of Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh and ...
Loreal India Private Limited vs Henkel Adhesives Technologies India Pv ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(COMM) 775/2023 LOREAL INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Gaurav Gogia and Ms. Shruti Manchanda, Advocates (through VC).versusHENKEL ADHESIVES TECHNOLOGIES INDIA PVT LTD .....Defendant Through: Mr. Nirupam Lodha and Mr. Gautam Wadhwa, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELAORDER% 05.01.2026 I.A. 33046/20251. This is an application under Order XXIII Rule 3 read with Section 151 ofthe Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 filed jointly on behalf of the plaintiff and the defendant for disposal of the Suit in terms of the settlement arrived at between the parties.2. It is submitted that the terms of the settlement have been recorded in the application itself namely paras 1 to 8, which are reproduced hereunder:-A 1. The Plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as 'first party') has filed the above-mentioned suit for disparagement, dilution, defamation, infringement etc, against the Defendant (hereinafter refe...
Kobelco Trading India Pvt. Ltd.and Anr. vs Ms. Vandana Mishra
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 1821/2025&CM APPL. 58545/2025 KOBELCO TRADING INDIA PVT. LTD. AND ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Kanwal Chaudhary and Mr. Ankit Kumar, Advocates.versusMS. VANDANA MISHRA .....Respondent Through: Ms. Jaya Bajpai, Advocate.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 05.01.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. The present petition has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner under Article 227 of the Constitution of India assailing order dated 31st July, 2025, whereby the application of the respondent/plaintiff under Order XVI Rule 1(2) read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 has been allowed.3. Ld. Counsel for the Petitioner has filed a copy of the order dated 24thNovember, 2025 and the same is taken on record. Vide the said order, the evidence of the respondent/plaintiff has been closed and it also shows that the respondent/plaintiff has dropped two witnesses, namely, M...
Cure Surgicals vs Darshika Orthocare
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 1847/2025 CURE SURGICALS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Divansh Tanwar and Mr. Neeraj Kumar Sharma, Advocates.versusDARSHIKA ORTHOCARE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Akshay Srivastava and Ms. Krati Tiwari, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 05.01.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode. CM APPL. 95/2026 (for withdrawal of the petition) and CM(M) 1847/20252. The present application has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking withdrawal of the present petition as infructuous.3. Keeping in view the submissions made by the learned Counsel for thePetitioner, the application is allowed and the present petition bearing CM(M) 1847/2025 is disposed of as withdrawn. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.4. The date already fixed i.e. 09th April, 2026 stands cancelled. RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J JANUARY 5, 2026/nd/abk...
Roseland Buildtech Pvt Ltd vs Vihaan 43 Reality Pvt Ltd Earlier Known ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIBEFORE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV + C.S. (COMM.) 812/2025 Between:- ROSELAND BUILDTECH PVT. LTD. THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR, MR. NISHANT CHHAJER, REGISTERED OFFICE AT: 510, SOM DATT CHAMBER-II, 9, BHIKAJI CAMA PLACE, NEW DELHl-110066 .....PLAINTIFF (Through: Mr. Tanmaya Mehta and Mr. Palash Singhai, Advs.)versus1. VIHAAN 43 REALITY PVT LTD (EARLIER KNOWN AS KUNJBIHARI DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.) REGISTERED OFFICE AT: CTS NO. C/1361, BL/1, PALI HILL, BANDRA WEST, MUMBAI-4000502. CLE PRIVATE LIMITED(EARLIER KNOWN AS SONATA INVESTMENTS LTD.) REGISTERED OFFICE AT: RAHEJA POINT WING B, 7TH FLOOR, NEHRU R NEAR SHAMRAO VITHAL BANK, VAKOLA, SANTA CRUZ (EAST), MUMBAI- 4000553. SUMMIT CEMINFRA PVT. LTD. REGISTERED OFFICE AT: RAHEJA POINT WING B, 7TH FLOOR, NEHRU RD. NR SHAMRAO VITHAL BANK, VAKOLA, SANTACRUZ (EAST), MUMBAI- 4000554. VALUECORP SECURITIES AND FINANCE LTD. DALAL STREET FORT, MUMBAI - 4000015. ANANT RAJ LIMITED REGISTERED OFFICE AT...
Lakshay Jain vs State Govt. of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
IN THE HIGH COURTOF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on:23.12.2025Judgment pronouncedon:05.01.2026+ BAIL APPLN. 3059/2025 LAKSHAY JAIN .....ApplicantversusSTATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Applicant : Mr. Viraj Datar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ashutosh Lohia, Ms. Shraddha Bhargava and Ms. Mansi Rose Taneja, Advocates. For the Respondent : Mr. Ritesh Kumar Bahri, APP for the State with SI Rohit, PS ANTF/Crime Branch.CORAMHONBLE MR JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANJUDGMENT1. The present application is filed seeking regular bail in FIR No. for offences under Sections 20/22/25 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS).2. Succinctly stated, it is alleged that on 22.08.2023, on the basis SEHGAL BAIL APPLN. 3059/2025 Page 1 of 18of secret information, one Sahil Sharma @ Maxx was apprehended from his grey car bearing No. HR 10 AM 5324, and during search, 1200 grams of Charas, 200 grams of MDMA and 2580 grams of Ganja/Cann...
Ideal Hotels and Industries Limited vs Bhagyauday Investments Private ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(OS) 714/2024 IDEAL HOTELS AND INDUSTRIES LIMITED .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Yashoaj Guglani, Mr. Narender Thakur and Ms. Yamini Thakur, Advs.versusBHAGYAUDAY INVESTMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Manish Kaushik and Ms. Mishal Johari, Advs. for D-1 to 10.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJANORDER% 05.01.2026 I.A.No.93/2026 (under Order XXIII read with Section 151 CPC praying for decree on compromise terms)1. The present application has been filed by the plaintiff and defendant nos.1 to 10 for disposing of the suit in terms of the Settlement Agreement dated 10.12.2025.2. The present suit has been filed by the plaintiff praying for permanent injunction against the defendants. It is stated that defendant nos.1 to 10 are contesting defendants whereas defendant nos.11 to 13 are proforma defendants.3. During pendency of the present suit, the plaintiff and defendant nos. 1 to 10 have arrived at a settlement,...
Guru Sharan Ors vs State of Nct Delhi Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 7614/2024 GURU SHARAN ORS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Gaurav Kapoor and Ms. Priyanshi Chaudhary, Advocates along with petitioners in person.versusSTATE OF NCT DELHI ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahr, APP for State with SI Nasib Singh Counsel (appearance not given) for R- 2 to 5 along with respondent nos. 2 to 5 in person.CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 05.01.2026 CRL.M.A. 97/2026 (for early hearing)1. By way of the present application, the applicant is seeking early hearing of the above-captioned petition.2. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the present application is allowed.3. Accordingly, the present application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 7614/20244. By way of the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of the FIR bearing No. 163/2019, registered at Police Station Inder Puri, New Delhi, for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 308/323/34 of the ...
- ‹ Prev
- 360
- 361
- 362
- 363
- 364
- 366
- 367
- 368
- 369
- 370
- Next ›
- Last »