Delhi Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shashikant Dixit vs Renuka Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIReserved on: December 19, 2025 % Pronounced on: January 05, 2026 + RC.REV. 313/2023, CM APPL. 57766/2023 SHASHIKANT DIXIT .....Petitioner Through: Dr. Amit George, Ms. Hitaakshi Mehra, Mr. Nitesh Mehra and Mr. Dushyant Kishan Kaul, Advs.VersusRENUKA SHARMA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Preet Pal Singh, Ms. Tanupreet Kaur and Ms. Medha Navami, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEJUDGMENT1. The petitioner/ landlord1 filed an eviction petition being RC ARC14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 19582 against the respondent/ tenant3 seeking eviction of the property bearing Flat no.313, DDA Tower No. 1, Mount Kailash, East of Kailash, New Delhi4, before the learned Senior Civil Judge-cum-Rent Controller, South-East District, Saket Courts, Delhi5.2. Briefly put, it was the case of the landlord therein that the respondent Hereinafter landlord Hereinafter DRC Act Hereinafter tenant Hereinafter subject premises Hereinafter learned R...
Sh. Vimal Ghai vs Sh. M. P. Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Pronounced on: 05.01.2026+ CRL.M.C. 4782/2024 SH. VIMAL GHAI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, Mr. Ravi Kumar, Advs.versusSH. M. P. SHARMA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Shubham Gupta, Adv.CORAM:-HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJAJUDGMENTRAVINDER DUDEJA, J.1. This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C, seeking to set asidethe impugned order dated 10.05.2024, passed by the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge in Criminal Revision Petition bearing No. Section 311 Cr.P.C for re-examination of the respondent/ complainant. FACTUAL MATRIX2. Respondent/complainant filed a complaint under Section cheque issued by the petitioner towards discharge of his liability was dishonoured with remarks, Payment stopped by Drawer, vide CRL.M.C. 4782/2024 Page 1 of 8 cheque return memo dated 30.06.2020. Petitioner did not make payment despite demand notice dated 28.07.2020.3. Petitioner was summon...
Vidya Parkash Gupta, Age 74 Years, & Ors. vs Sri. Anshu Prakash & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 884/2020 & CM APPL. 34037/2021 VIDYA PARKASH GUPTA, AGE 74 YEARS, & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Poonam, Advocate.versusSRI. ANSHU PRAKASH & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Arunima Dwivedi, CGSC with Ms. Himanshi Singh, Advocate. Mr. R.V. Sinha, Mr. A.S. Singh, Ms. Shriya Sharma and Ms. Jyoti Garg, Advocates for R-2. Mr. Abhishek Chandra Mishra, Ms. Sarita Mehta, Ms. Diksha Belwal and Mr. Aas Mohmad, Advocates for R-3. Mr. Arun Sanwal, Advocate for R-4.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMAORDER% 05.01.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present petition under Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, seeks the following prayers: -(a) Initiate contempt proceeding against the alleged contemnor for willfully and deliberately disobeying the judgment dated 12.2.2020 of this Hon'ble Court passed in the Writ Petition (Civil) 1603 of 2020 and direct them to re-fi...
Daljit Kumar & Ors. vs Sri. Anshu Prakash & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 885/2020 & CM APPL. 34035/2021 DALJIT KUMAR & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Poonam, Advocate.versusSRI. ANSHU PRAKASH & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Himanshu Pathak, SPC with Mr. Chetan Sharma, Advocates for UOI. Mr. R.V. Sinha, Mr. A.S. Singh, Ms. Shriya Sharma and Ms. Jyoti Garg, Advocates for R-2. Mr. Abhishek Chandra Mishra, Ms. Sarita Mehta, Ms. Diksha Belwal and Mr. Aas Mohmad, Advocates for R-3.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMAORDER% 05.01.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present petition under Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, seeks the following prayers: -(a) Initiate contempt proceeding against the alleged contemnor for willfully and deliberately disobeying the judgment dated 12.2.2020 of this Hon'ble Court passed in the Writ Petition (Civil) 1605 of 2020 and direct them to re-fix Salary at par with their Junior Sh. Brij Mohan &...
Nokia Technologies Oy vs Hisense Group Holdings Co. Ltd. & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(COMM) 645/2025 NOKIA TECHNOLOGIES OY .....Plaintiff Through: Ms. Abhilasha Nautiyal, Mr. Shuvam Bhattacharya, AdvocatesversusHISENSE GROUP HOLDINGS CO. LTD. & ANR. .....Defendant Through: Ms. N. Parvati, Mr. Avijit Kumar, AdvocatesCORAM:JOINT REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL) Dr. AJAY GULATIORDER% 29.01.20261. In terms of the directions passed on 05.01.2026 by theHonble Court, respective lists of Confidential / sealed documents of which return has been sought by the plaintiff as also by the defendants has been handed over across the board today. The same be sent to the Dealing Assistant / Branch Head alongwith the copy of this order to return the documents to the plaintiff and defendants respectively in terms of the directions passed by the Honble Court on 05.01.2026, highlighted in para 5 thereof.Dr. AJAY GULATI (DHJS), JOINT REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL) JANUARY 29, 2026/sk This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verifi...
M/S Trends vs Smt. Leelamma Thomas and Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 10537/2019, CM APPL 81714/2025 and CM APPL. 235/2026 M/S TRENDS .....Petitioner Through: Mr.Vikas Mehta, AdvocateversusSMT. LEELAMMA THOMAS AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr.Saurabh Bhargavan, Mr.Chinju Saurabh and Mr.Nikhil S Nair, AdvocatesCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIORDER% 05.01.20261. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the parties havearrived at a settlement before Samadhan, Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre, by way of a Settlement Agreement dated 23.12.2025. The Settlement Agreement filed is taken on record.2. In terms of the Settlement Agreement, the parties have agreed that thesecond party, i.e. respondent no. 1, shall be entitled to withdraw a sum of Rs.3,00,000/- along with the interest accrued thereupon, which was deposited by the petitioner with the Registrar General of this Court in terms of the order dated 27.09.2019. Paragraph 3 of the said Agreement further pro...
Ge Energy Parts Inc vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
$~8 & 9* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of decision: 5th January, 2026. + W.P.(C) 10259/2025, CM APPL. 42653/2025 GE ENERGY PARTS INC .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Tushar Jarwal, Mr. Rahul Sateeja & Mr. Vikrant A Maheshwari,versusASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sunil Aggarwal, SSC, Ms. Priya Sarkar, JSC with Mr. Anugrah Dwivedi & Mr. Utkarsh Shukla, (9) + W.P.(C) 10260/2025, CM APPL. 42656/2025 GE GLOBAL PARTS AND PRODUCTS GMBH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Tushar Jarwal, Mr. Rahul Sateeja & Mr. Vikrant A Maheshwari,versusASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Puneet Rai, SSC with Mr. Ashvini Kumar, Mr. Rishab Nangia & Mr. Gibran, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMARJUDGMENTDINESH MEHTA, J. (Oral)1. Both the Writ Petitions involve common questions of law and facts, Digitally Signed W.P.(C) 10259/2025 & W.P.(C...
Ge Global Parts and Products Gmbh vs Assistant Commissioner of Income ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
$~8 & 9* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of decision: 5th January, 2026. + W.P.(C) 10259/2025, CM APPL. 42653/2025 GE ENERGY PARTS INC .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Tushar Jarwal, Mr. Rahul Sateeja & Mr. Vikrant A Maheshwari,versusASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sunil Aggarwal, SSC, Ms. Priya Sarkar, JSC with Mr. Anugrah Dwivedi & Mr. Utkarsh Shukla, (9) + W.P.(C) 10260/2025, CM APPL. 42656/2025 GE GLOBAL PARTS AND PRODUCTS GMBH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Tushar Jarwal, Mr. Rahul Sateeja & Mr. Vikrant A Maheshwari,versusASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Puneet Rai, SSC with Mr. Ashvini Kumar, Mr. Rishab Nangia & Mr. Gibran, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMARJUDGMENTDINESH MEHTA, J. (Oral)1. Both the Writ Petitions involve common questions of law and facts, Digitally Signed W.P.(C) 10259/2025 & W.P.(C...
Akram vs State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on: 18.11.2025Judgment pronounced on: 05.01.2026Judgment uploaded on: 09.01.2026+ CRL.A. 1039/2025 SAZID .....Appellant Through: Ms. Santosh and Mr. Noor-Ul- Islam, Advs.versusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, APP for the State. Mr. Madan Mohan Bora and Mr. Praveen Kumar, Advs. for the complainant. + CRL.A. 1043/2025 AKRAM .....Appellant Through: Ms. Santosh and Mr. Noor-Ul- Islam, Advs.versusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, APP for the State. Mr. Madan Mohan Bora and Mr. Praveen Kumar, Advs. for the complainant.CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMACRL.A. 1039/2025 & connected matter Page 1 of 24JUDGMENTDR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J1. By way of this judgment, this Court shall be disposing of twoconnected criminal appeals preferred by the appellants, seek setting aside the impugned judgment dated 09.05.2025 and order on sentence dated 24.05.2025 pass...
Sazid vs State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on: 18.11.2025Judgment pronounced on: 05.01.2026Judgment uploaded on: 09.01.2026+ CRL.A. 1039/2025 SAZID .....Appellant Through: Ms. Santosh and Mr. Noor-Ul- Islam, Advs.versusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, APP for the State. Mr. Madan Mohan Bora and Mr. Praveen Kumar, Advs. for the complainant. + CRL.A. 1043/2025 AKRAM .....Appellant Through: Ms. Santosh and Mr. Noor-Ul- Islam, Advs.versusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, APP for the State. Mr. Madan Mohan Bora and Mr. Praveen Kumar, Advs. for the complainant.CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMACRL.A. 1039/2025 & connected matter Page 1 of 24JUDGMENTDR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J1. By way of this judgment, this Court shall be disposing of twoconnected criminal appeals preferred by the appellants, seek setting aside the impugned judgment dated 09.05.2025 and order on sentence dated 24.05.2025 pass...
- ‹ Prev
- 359
- 360
- 361
- 362
- 363
- 365
- 366
- 367
- 368
- 369
- Next ›
- Last »