Delhi Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Uoi & Ors. vs Anita Devi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-31-2026
$~7, 8, 16 & 17* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI(7) + W.P.(C) 6231/2006 & W.P.(C) 6232-6234/2006ANITA DEVI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Dheeraj Sharma, Adv.(8) + W.P.(C) 8959/2006 URMILA DEVI .....Petitioner(16) + W.P.(C) 15760/2006 & W.P.(C) 15761-15762/2006KASTURI DEVI .....Respondent(17) + W.P.(C) 8868/2008 BHAGWATI DEVI .....PetitionerCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 31.01.20261. Learned counsel appearing for the Respondent/Ms. Anita Devi submits that despite his best efforts, he is unable to contact the Respondent.2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Union of India(UOI) submits that the present Petitions have been listed for hearing after nearly 20 years and that during the pendency of these Petitions, the Applicants, namely Ms. Anita Devi, Ms. Urmila Devi, Ms. Kasturi Devi, Ms. Bhagwati Devi, were not paid family pension on the ground that they had been granted compassionate appointments fol...
Urmila Devi vs Uoi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-31-2026
$~7, 8, 16 & 17* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI(7) + W.P.(C) 6231/2006 & W.P.(C) 6232-6234/2006ANITA DEVI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Dheeraj Sharma, Adv.(8) + W.P.(C) 8959/2006 URMILA DEVI .....Petitioner(16) + W.P.(C) 15760/2006 & W.P.(C) 15761-15762/2006KASTURI DEVI .....Respondent(17) + W.P.(C) 8868/2008 BHAGWATI DEVI .....PetitionerCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 31.01.20261. Learned counsel appearing for the Respondent/Ms. Anita Devi submits that despite his best efforts, he is unable to contact the Respondent.2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Union of India(UOI) submits that the present Petitions have been listed for hearing after nearly 20 years and that during the pendency of these Petitions, the Applicants, namely Ms. Anita Devi, Ms. Urmila Devi, Ms. Kasturi Devi, Ms. Bhagwati Devi, were not paid family pension on the ground that they had been granted compassionate appointments fol...
Afsar Pasha vs National Investigation Agency Through Its Director
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-31-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 8374/2025 AFSAR PASHA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shaikh Saipan, Ms. Prerna Mukherjee, Mr. Md. Arif Hussain & Mr. Mansoor Ali, Advocates.versusNATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rahul Tyagi, SPP for NIA with Mr. Jatin Khatri, & Mr. Vikas Walia, ASPP & Mr. Amit Rohila, Advocate.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 31.01.20261. By way of the present petition, the petitioner assails the order dated17.10.2025 passed by the learned Sessions Court, by which the petitioners application seeking custody parole for the educational needs of his daughters was dismissed.2. During the course of hearing, Ms. Prerna Mukherjee, learnedcounsel for the petitioner, submits that, in lieu of an order granting custody parole for the purposes sought, the petitioner confines his prayer to seeking an enlargement in the frequency and duration of e-mulakat, so as to enable him to attend to...
Innocenti Sa vs Examiner of Trademarks & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgement Delivered on: 31.01.2026 + C.A.(COMM.IPD-TM) 76/2024, I.A. 45128/2024&I.A. 45132/2024 INNOCENTI SA .....AppellantversusEXAMINER OF TRADEMARKS & ANR. .....Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case For the Appellant : Mr. Chander M. Lall, Senior Advocate with Dr. Sheetal Vohra, Mr. Rahul Dwivedi, Mr. Sridharan Rajan Ramkumar, Ms. Annanya Mehan, Mr. Ashutosh & Ms. Sakshi Rathore, Advocates. For the Respondents : Ms. Nidhi Raman, CGSC along with Mr. Mayank Sansanwal & Mr. Om Ram, Advocates for Respondent No.1. Mr. Jayant Mehta, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Kapil Wadhwa, Ms. Apoorva Maheshwari, Ms. Bhavya Gupta & Ms. Priyanshi Bhageria, Advocates for Respondent No.4. + W.P.(C)-IPD 54/2025, CM 223/2025 & CM 224/2025 AUGUST VENTURES PRIVATE LIMITED .....PetitionerversusREGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS .....Respondent Signature Not Verified C.A.(COMM.IPD-TM) 76/2024 & Connected Matters Page 1 of 43 Advocates w...
Pramod @ Parmal vs State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIReserved on: January 19, 2026 % Pronounced on: January 31, 2026 + BAIL APPLN. 3952/2025 PRAMOD @ PARMAL .....Applicant Through: Mr. Abhishek Khari, AdvocateVersusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for State with Ms. Vanshika Singh and Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, Advocates with SI Narender Singh, PS: Crime BranchCORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEJUDGMENT1. By virtue of the present bail application made under Section 483 ofthe Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), the applicant/ accused1 seeks grant of regular bail in proceedings arising from FIR No.233/2024 dated 12.11.2024 filed under Section(s) 20/25/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances, Act, 1985, (NDPS Act) registered at PS.: Special Cell, Delhi.2. As per facts, on 12.11.2024, acting on an intimation, the concerned ASI apprehended two persons namely, Gurpreet Singh @ Gopi and Jaspreet Singh @ Jassu, and after necessar...
Rahul Singh Tolia vs Union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on: 20.01.2026Judgment pronounced on: 31.01.2026Judgment uploaded on: 31.01.2026+ W.P.(C) 18908/2025, CM APPL. 78730/2025, CM APPL. RAHUL SINGH TOLIA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shakti Singh, Adv.versusUNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Arunima Dwivedi, CGSC along with Mr. Abhiraj Singh, GP, Ms. Monalisha Pradhan and Ms. Priya Khurana, Advs. + W.P.(C) 121/2026, CM APPL. 620/2026, CM APPL. DARSHAN GATTANI .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Aakriti Dhawan, Mr. Mayank Jain and Mr. Madhur Jain, Advs.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Akash Vajpai, CGSC along with Mr. Harsh Bajpai, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANJUDGMENTANIL KSHETARPAL, J.1. These Petitions assail the correctness of the Judgment andOrder dated 22.05.2025 [hereinafter referred to as ImpugnedJudgment] passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal W.P.(C) 189...
Kuldeep Singh vs State Govt. of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIReserved on: January 07, 2026 % Pronounced on: January 31, 2026 + BAIL APPLN. 4416/2025 KULDEEP SINGH .....Applicant Through: Mr. Pramod Kumar, Mr. Ajay Yadav, Ms. Kanti Tiwari and Ms. Piyushi Garg, Advs.VersusSTATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for State with Mr. Bhuman Bansal, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEJUDGMENT1. By virtue of the present application under Section 483 of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 20231 read with Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 19732, the applicant seeks grant of regular bail in proceedings arising out of FIR No.176/2021 dated 18.06.2021 registered under Sections 302/304B/498A/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 18603 at PS: Maidan Garhi, Delhi.2. As per FIR, the deceased daughter of the complainant4 after marriage with the applicant as per Hindu rites and customs on 26.04.2021 was residing with him at Plot No.10, Gali No.1, Asola Fate...
Shivam vs State of Nct Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2026
* I N T H E H I G H CO U RT O F DE L H I AT NE W DE L H I Reserved on: January 13, 2026 % Pronounced on: January 31, 2026 + BAIL APPLN. 4367/2025 STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent + BAIL APPLN. 4530/2025 STATE OF NCT DELHI .....RespondentCORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEJUDGMENT1. By virtue of the present bail application(s) under Section 483 of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), the applicant seeks grant of a regular bail in proceedings arising from e-FIR No.80051276/2025 dated BAIL APPLN. 4367/2025 & BAIL APPLN. 4530/2025 Page 1 of 4 27.05.2025 in BAIL APPLN. 4367/2025 and FIR No.21/2025 dated 01.07.2025 in BAIL APPLN. 4530/2025 registered under Section(s) 303(2),317(2)& 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) as also Section(s) 67,74 &78 of the Metro Railways (Operation and Maintenance) Act, 2002 at PS.: Metro Police Station (Netaji Subhash Palace), Delhi.2. As per facts, the said FIR(s) were registered following an incident onthe intervening ...
Darshan Gattani vs Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on: 20.01.2026Judgment pronounced on: 31.01.2026Judgment uploaded on: 31.01.2026+ W.P.(C) 18908/2025, CM APPL. 78730/2025, CM APPL. RAHUL SINGH TOLIA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shakti Singh, Adv.versusUNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Arunima Dwivedi, CGSC along with Mr. Abhiraj Singh, GP, Ms. Monalisha Pradhan and Ms. Priya Khurana, Advs. + W.P.(C) 121/2026, CM APPL. 620/2026, CM APPL. DARSHAN GATTANI .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Aakriti Dhawan, Mr. Mayank Jain and Mr. Madhur Jain, Advs.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Akash Vajpai, CGSC along with Mr. Harsh Bajpai, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANJUDGMENTANIL KSHETARPAL, J.1. These Petitions assail the correctness of the Judgment andOrder dated 22.05.2025 [hereinafter referred to as ImpugnedJudgment] passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal W.P.(C) 189...
Shamaem Ayesha Jawaid vs Union of India Through Its Secretary Ministry ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on: 23.01.2026Judgment pronounced on: 31.01.2026Judgment uploaded on: 31.01.2026+ W.P.(C) 17600/2024 SHAMAEM AYESHA JAWAID .....Petitioner Through: Petitioner in person.versusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND PENSIONS & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. R. V. Sinha with Mr. A. S. Singh, Ms. Shriya Sharma, Advs. for R1. Mr. Ravinder Agarwal, Mr. Manish Kumar Singh, Mr. Vasu Agarwal & Mr. Lekh Raj Singh, Advs. for UPSC.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANJUDGMENTANIL KSHETARPAL, J.:1. Through the present Petition, the Petitioner assails thecorrectness of the order dated 25.04.2023 [hereinafter referred to as Impugned Order] passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal [hereinafter referred to as Tribunal], whereby the Original Application (O.A.) filed by the Petitioner, along with four other Applicants, was dismissed.2. In or...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »