Delhi Court September 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sh. Akil @ Aqil & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-27-2019
$~72 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4951/2019 Date of decision:27.09.2019 ........ Petitioners SH. AKIL @ AQIL & ORS. Through Mr. Sharik Ansari, Adv. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. K. K. Ghai, APP for State. STATE & ANR. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) Insp. Pramod Joshi (SHO) CRL.M.A. 37129/2019 (Exemption) 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. This application is, accordingly, disposed of. CRL.M.C. 4951/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.4dated 20/09/2007 registered at Police Station Gokul Puri instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 498A/4of the IPC and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.4. 5. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by the learned APP for the State and respondent CRL.M.C. 4951/2019 Page 1 of 3 no.2 in person. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.6.... Petitioner no.1 and respondent n...
Union of India vs.m/s Jcb India Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-27-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:27. 09.2019 + FAO(OS) (COMM) 44/2019 & CM APPL. 9200/2019 (stay) UNION OF INDIA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Manish Mohan, CGSC with Ms. Manisha Saroha, Advocate. M/S JCB INDIA LTD versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JUDGMENT G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) Caveat No.191/2019 1. Since the learned counsel for the respondent enters appearance, caveat petition stands discharged. CM APPL. 9202/2019 (exemption) 2. Exemption is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CM APPL. 9201/2019 (delay) 3. This application has been filed by the applicant/appellant seeking condonation of 12 days delay in filing the present appeal. FAO (OS) (COMM) No.44/2019 Page 1 of 23 4. The prayer made in the application is not opposed. Delay of 12 days in filing the appeal is condoned. Let the appeal be taken on record.5. The app...
Ram Chander vs.virender Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-27-2019
$~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + RC.REV. 75/2018 Judgment delivered on:27. 09.2019 RAM CHANDER versus VIRENDER KUAMR ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. Nitin Bhardwaj, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. Gibran Naushad, Advocate. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) RC.REV. 75/2018 & CM APPL.7086/2018 APPL.7087/2018 APPL.24690/2018 (for directions) additional (for documents), (stay), CM CM1... Petitioner impugns order dated 04.09.2017, whereby, leave to defend application of the petitioner has been dismissed and an eviction order passed.2. Subject eviction petition was filed by the respondent seeking eviction of the petitioner on the ground of bonafide necessity under section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 from a shop RC.REV. 75/2018 Page 1 of 2 forming part of property No.70, Anand Nagar, Inderlok, Delhi, more particularly, as shown in red colour in...
Dr Poornima Advani & Anr vs.govt of Nct & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-27-2019
$~5 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:27. h September, 2019 LPA2882019 DR POORNIMA ADVANI & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Abhishek Puri, Adv. versus GOVT OF NCT & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ramesh Singh, Standing Counsel, GNCTD with Mr. Chirayu Jain & Mr. for GNCTD. Ishan Agrawal, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (Oral) This Letters Patent Appeal has been preferred by the original 1. petitioner whose W.P.(C) No.9014/2017 was decided by the learned Single Judge vide judgment and order dated 20.08.2018 whereby the value of the e-stamp which is at Rs.28,10,000/- was ordered to be refunded.2. The appellant has never argued before the learned Single Judge about the payment of interest upon the value of the e-stamp. The e-stamp was obtained by the original petitioner voluntarily on 06.07.2016. Thereafter, it was the contention of the appellant (original petitioner) that he lost the sa...
M/S Telecommunications Consultants India Ltd. Vs.m/s Rajat Electricals
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-27-2019
$~A-20 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. 09.2019 O.M.P. (E) (COMM.) 18/2019, I.A. No.13539/2019 (Exemption) M/S TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONSULTANTS INDIA LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ratan K. Singh, Mr. Nikhilesh Krishnan, Mr. Rajeev Gurang, Advocates M/S RAJAT ELECTRICALS versus Through: ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) I.A. No.13539/2019 (Exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. O.M.P. (E) (COMM.) 18/2019 This petition has been filed under Section 27 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) seeking assistance of this Court for summoning the Executive Engineer IV, CHB, 8, Jan Marg, Sector 9D, Chandigarh Housing Board, Chandigarh to depute a responsible officer/clerk to produce original records relating to final handing over of flats to allottees maintained by Civil Division, CHB with attested/certified copy of the same and to appear before Shri...
Parveen Pal & Anr vs.the State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-27-2019
$~58 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. 09.2019 + CRL.M.C. 4919/2019 PARVEEN PAL & ANR ........ Petitioners Through Mr.Himanshu Yadav, Adv. versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.K.K. Ghai, APP for State. Insp.Rajeev PS Geeta Colony. Mr.Ankit Yadav, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL. M.A. 37043/2019 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 4919/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby quashing FIR No.441/2017 dated 08.09.2017, registered at PS Geeta Colony for the offences punishable under Sections 308/3IPC and all other proceedings emanating therefrom. CRL.M.C. 4919/2019 Page 1 of 3 4.5. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final d...
Sanjay vs.banwari Lal & Ors (National Insurance Co Ltd)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-27-2019
$~42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + MAC.APP. 806/2019 Decided on:27. 09.2019 SANJAY Through: Mr. Santosh Chaurihaa, Adv. ..... Appellant BANWARI LAL & ORS (NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD ) versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Shantha Devi Raman & Ms. Aishna Jain, Advs. for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J (Oral) CM No.43613/2019 (Condonation of delay) 1.2. For the reasons stated therein, the application is allowed. Application stands disposed off. MAC.APP. 806/2019 & CM APPL. 43612/2019 3. Issue notice.4. Ms. Shantha Devi Raman, the learned Standing Counsel for the National Insurance Co. Ltd., who is present in the Court, accepts notice. A copy of the paper book has been supplied to her. At joint request, the appeal is taken up for disposal.5. The appellant has impugned the award of compensation dated 25.05.2019 passed by the learned MACT, in Suit No.424210/2010 on the ground that against a permanent physical disability of upto 36% in the right low...
M/S Jainson vs.sanjay Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-27-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RC.Rev. 130/2018, CM APPL.13337-13338/2018 & CM APPL185722018 Judgment reserved on :28.08.2018 Date of decision :27. 09.2019 M/S JAINSON Through: Ms. Neha Kapoor, Advocate versus .....Petitioner SANJAY GUPTA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Aneja with Ms. Sonali Chopra, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. The petitioner vide this petition assails the impugned order dated 30.1.2018 of the Rent Controller, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi in RC ARC No.39/2017 vide which the eviction petition filed by Sh. Sanjay Gupta, the petitioner thereof and arrayed as the respondent to the present petition seeking eviction of the tenant M/s Jainson i.e., the petitioner to the present petition, from the tenanted premises E-2(Old Municipal No.8250), , Gopinath Building, Middle Circle, Connaught Place, New Delhi admeasuring 550 Sq.ft shown in red in the site plan annexed to the petition on the ground of bona fide re...
Intertek India Pvt Ltd. Vs.priyanka Mohan
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-27-2019
$~49 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:27. 09.2019 C.R.P. 215/2019 INTERTEK INDIA PVT LTD ........ Petitioner versus PRIYANKA MOHAN ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Ms. Haripriya Padmanabhan, Mr. Suraj and Mr. Shrutanjaya Bhardwaj, Advocates For the Respondent: None. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CM APPL.43411/2019 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. C.R.P. 215/2019 & CM APPL.43410/2019 (stay) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 21.08.2019 whereby the application of the petitioner under Order 7 Rule 11 (d) of the CPC has been dismissed.2. Subject suit was filed by the respondent seeking declaration and C.R.P. 215/2019 Page 1 of 5 damages.3. Respondent/Plaintiff is an ex-employee of the petitioner and was employed as a Business Development Manager with the petitioner-company. Her services were terminated on 25.02.2011.4. Being aggrieved by the ...
Jagdish Chander vs.amarjeet Kaur
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-27-2019
$~57 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + RC.REV. 387/2015 Judgment delivered on:27. 09.2019 JAGDISH CHANDER versus AMARJEET KAUR ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr.V.P.Katiyar, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. Jatan Singh and Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocates. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 27.05.2015, whereby, leave to defend application of the petitioner has been dismissed and an eviction order passed.2. Respondent had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of the petitioner, on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, from Property No.159/113, Tri Nagar, Delhi, more particularly shown in green colour in the site plan annexed with the eviction petition. RC.REV. 387/2015 Page 1 of 3 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner, under instructions from the petitioner who appe...
- ‹ Prev
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Next ›
- Last »