Delhi Court September 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Manoj Kumar Kumar Sanjay Kumar vs.krishan Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-27-2019
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:27. 09.2019 RC.REV. 354/2019 & CM APPL. 26659/2019 & CM APPL. 26660/2019 & CM APPL. 29118/2019 M/S MANOJ KUMAR KUMAR SANJAY KUMAR....... Petitioner versus KRISHAN SHARMA ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr.Vipin Dilawari, Advocate. For the Respondent: Ms.Sonali Malhotra, Advocate. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 13.11.2018, whereby, leave to defend application of the petitioner has been dismissed and an eviction order passed.2. Respondent had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of the petitioner, on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, from bearing Shop No.2, ground floor at IX/5896, Geeta Gali, Subhash Mohalla, RC.REV. 354/2019 Page 1 of 3 Gandhi Nagar, Delhi-31, more particularly as shown in red colour in the site ...
Rishi Pal vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-27-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.REV.P. 776/2019 Judgment Reserved :24. 09.2019 Date of Decision :27. 09.2019 IN THE MATTER OF RISHI PAL Through: Ms. Sunita Arora, Advocate ........ Petitioner STATE Versus Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for State with SI Manoj Kumar, P.S. Malviya Nagar .... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI The present proceedings have been instituted challenging the 1. judgment dated 23.07.2018 passed by the Addl. Special Judge-NDPS/ASJ (South), Saket Courts, New Delhi in Crl. Appeal No.341 of 2017, whereby the conviction and sentence of the petitioner was upheld.2. Earlier, vide judgment dated 25.11.2017 passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate-02 (South District), Saket Courts Complex, New Delhi, the petitioner was convicted in FIR No.12/2008 registered under Sections 279/304A IPC at P.S. Malviya Nagar. The petitioner was sentenced to SI for 2 years for the offence under Section 304A IPC. He was also sentenced SI for 6 months for the o...
Directorate of Education & Ors. Vs.brahampal Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-27-2019
$~37 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment :27. h September, 2019 + W.P.(C) 10481/2019 DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Gaurav Dhingra and Mr. M.K. Gaur, Advocates versus BRAHAMPAL SINGH Through ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM. APPL433402019 (Exemption) 1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 10481/2019 3. The petitioners are aggrieved by an order dated 28.03.2019 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (the Tribunal), by which OA filed by the respondent herein stands allowed.4. Some necessary facts which are required to be noticed for disposal of this writ petition are that the respondent was working as a Trained Graduate Teacher (English) with the Directorate of Education (DOE), Government of NCT of Delhi. Disciplinary proceedings were initiated W.P.(C) 10481/2019 Page 1 of ...
M/S Ajay Auto Spares vs.virender Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-27-2019
$~25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + RC.REV. 76/2018 Judgment delivered on:27. 09.2019 M/S AJAY AUTO SPARES versus VIRENDER KUAMR ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: For the Respondent: Mr. Nitin Bhardwaj, Advocate. Mr. Gibran Naushad, Advocate. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) RC.REV. 76/2018 & CM APPL.7089/2018 (stay), CM APPL.7090/2018 CM APPL.24674/2018 (for directions), CM APPL.39403/2018 (for condonation of delay) documents), additional (for 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 04.09.2017, whereby, leave to defend application of the petitioner has been dismissed and an eviction order passed.2. Subject eviction petition was filed by the respondent seeking eviction of the petitioner on the ground of bonafide necessity under section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 from a shop RC.REV. 76/2018 Page 1 of 3 forming part of property No.70, Anand Nagar, Ind...
Hcl Infotech Limited vs.bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-27-2019
$~A-18 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. 09.2019 + ARB.P. 626/2019, I.A. No.13577/2019 (Exemption) HCL INFOTECH LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Azmat H. Amanullah, Advocate versus BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sameer Aggarwal, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) I.A. No.13577/2019 (Exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. ARB.P. 626/2019 Issue notice. Mr. Sameer Aggarwal, Advocate enters appearance on behalf of the respondent and accepts notice. Mr. Aggarwal submits that while the respondent is not averse to the appointment of an Arbitrator, however the notice invoking Arbitration Agreement dated 10.07.2019 was not addressed to appropriate Authority, which is CMD, BSNL. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although the notice was addressed to General Manager, IT Project Circle, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited, RTC Building I,...
State vs.jeewani & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-27-2019
$~79 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. 09.2019 + CRL.REV.P. 102/2019 STATE ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Hirein Sharma, APP for State. ASI Suphal Ram PS Harsh Vihar. versus JEEWANI & ANR. Through None. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner/state seeks setting aside the order dated 12.09.2018 passed in SC No.2in FIR No.332/2015 registered at Police Station Harsh Vihar.2. The present petition is filed on the ground that the learned Trial Court, while passing the impugned order, ignored and did not look into the statement of the complainant Kapil dated 21.06.2015 and that of the sister of the complainant Smt. Anju dated 21.06.2013, recorded by the Investigating Officer. Ld. Trial Court has also ignored the statement of Rajhans Kumar who is the eye witness and signatory of the site plan and recovery memo and CRL.REV.P.102/2019 Page 1 of 4 of Kavita, both of whom have speci...
U P State Road Transport Corporation vs.ashagar Ali & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-27-2019
$~22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + MAC.APP. 835/2018, CM APPL. 37986/2018, CM APPL. Decided on:27. 09.2019 37988/2018 & CM APPL. 14699/2019 U P STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION..... Appellant Through: Ms. Garima Prashad and Mr. Shadab Khan, Advocates. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Varun Sarin, Advocate for R-1. versus ASHAGAR ALI & ANR CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) 1. This appeal impugns the award of compensation dated 28.03.2018 passed by the learned MACT in MACT No.43on the ground that the appellants, having paid the initially awarded amount of roughly Rs. 99,000/- have been burdened with a larger amount of compensation pursuant to the second round of assessment and adjudication. The latter assessment was occasioned on account of the claimants appeal to this Court when the case was remanded to the learned MACT for reassessment.2. The impugned order has taken into consideration the Disability Certificate issued by the Medical Board ...
The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.air India Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-27-2019
$~A-24 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. 09.2019 O.M.P. (COMM) 400/2019 THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Amit K. Singh, Mr. Apratim Versus Animesh Thakur, Advocates AIR INDIA LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Dhanesh Relan, Ms.Gauri Chaturvedi, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) I.A. No.13340/2019 (delay 90 days in filing) 1. This is an application filed by the petitioner seeking condonation of delay of 90 days in filing the petition.2. The present petition is filed under Section 34(3) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) challenging the majority Award dated 09.04.2019.3. The petitioner has averred in the application that the Majority Award was passed on 09.04.2019 and received by the petitioner on 11.04.2019. The minority Award was passed on 15.06.2019 and was received on 20.06.2019. The period of limitation began to run from 20.06.2019 and as such the O.M.P. (COMM) 400/2...
Sanjiv K Singh & Ors vs.ritu Singh & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-27-2019
$~ * + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:20. 08.2019. Date of Decision:27. 09.2019. RFA3902012 & CM Nos.11623/2014 (for additional documents), 17026/2018 (for directions) SANJIV K SINGH & ORS ..... Appellants Through Mr.N.S.Vasisht with Mr.Vishal Singh & Ms.Jyoti Kataria Bajaj, Advs. versus RITU SINGH & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Sandeep Mittal with Mr.Varun & Benjamin Kumar, Mr.Arjit Ms.Avshreya P.S. Rudy, Advs. RFA4902017 SANJIV K SINGH & ANR ..... Appellants Through Mr.N.S.Vasisht with Mr.Vishal Singh & Ms.Jyoti Kataria Bajaj, Advs. versus RITU SINGH & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Sandeep Mittal with Mr.Varun & Benjamin Kumar, Mr.Arjit Ms.Avshreya P.S. Rudy, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI RFA3902012 & 490/2017 Page 1 of 24 JUDGMENT1 This decision disposes of two connected appeals under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure,1908 preferred by the defendants in Suit No.378/2003, the first assailing the preliminary decree dated 26.05...
Santosh Pandey vs.virender Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-27-2019
$~28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + RC.REV. 264/2018 Judgment delivered on:27. 09.2019 SANTOSH PANDEY versus VIRENDER KUMAR ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Ms. Swathi Sukumar with Mr. Naveen Nagarjuna, Advocates. For the Respondent: Mr. Gibran Naushad, Advocate. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) RC.REV. 264/2018 & CM APPL.23711/2018 APPL.23712/2018 APPL.36075/2018 (for directions) additional (for documents), (stay), CM CM1... Petitioner impugns order dated 11.07.2017, whereby, leave to defend application of the petitioner has been dismissed and an eviction order passed.... Petitioner also impugns order dated 02.04.2018, whereby review petition, filed by the petitioner, seeking review of order dated 11.07.2017, was dismissed.2. Subject eviction petition was filed by the respondent seeking RC.REV. 264/2018 Page 1 of 2 eviction of the petitioner on the ground of bon...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »