Delhi Court September 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jawahar T and Ors. Vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2019
$~25 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 3671/2019 JAWAHAR T AND ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Ankita Patnaik, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rakesh Kumar, CGSC with Ms. Sheetal Raghuvanshi, Advocate respondent-UOI. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH % ORDER3009.2019 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. The present... Petitioners are aggrieved by the denial to them of the benefit of the Old Pension Scheme (OPS) which has admittedly been allowed to 463 employees, who were recruited against advertisement No.01/2002, while being denied to the remaining 839 employees (including the... Petitioners), for whom the... RESPONDENTS have chosen to apply the New Pension Scheme (NPS).2. The above fact has been confirmed in a response dated 15th November, 2010 from the General Reserve Engineer Force (GREF) Centre at Pune to one of the... Petitioners, pursuant to an application under the RTI Act, 2005. W.P.(C) 3671/2019 Page 1 of 4 3. A...
Brijesh Gupta & Anr. Vs.premia Projects Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2019
$~J * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on:10. 05.2019 Judgment Pronounced on:30. 09.2019 versus versus versus ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner versus ..... Respondent ..... Respondent ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner CO.PET. 518/2013, CA. Nos.1415/2018 & 1416/2018 SICOM LTD. HANUNG TOYS & TEXTILES LTD. CO.PET. 987/2015, CA. Nos. 718/2018 & 1444/2018 CFSIT, INC SHAKTI BHOG FOODS LIMITED CO.PET. 668/2014, CA. Nos.1366, 1047 & 1048/2018 ABHINANDAN KUMAR JAIN MVL LIMITED CO.PET. 814/2016, CA. Nos.826, 980 & 984/2018 BRIJESH GUPTA & ANR. PREMIA PROJECTS LTD. + 1. + 2. + 3. + 4. Present: Mr.Nikhilesh Kumar, Adv. for the petitioner in CP6682014. Mr.Sanjeev Anand, Mr.Sjresh Khadav and Mr.Varun K.Bala, Advs. for applicant in CP6682014. Ms.Abha Sinha, Adv. in CA No.444/2019 in CP6682014. Mr.Anil Kumar Airi, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Abhinav Mishra, Mr.Siddhant Tripathi, Ms.Nivedita Chauhan, Mr.Karan Nagpal, Advs. for applicant/Intervener in CA1212019 in CP6682014. Mr....
Vijay Kumar @ Babloo vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2019
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:24. h September, 2019 Judgment pronounced on:30. September, 2019 CRL.A. 257/2015 VIJAY KUMAR @ BABLOO ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Mr.M.L.Yadav, Advocate versus Through: Ms.Radhika Kolluru, APP for the ..... Respondent State alongwith Insp.R.K.Maan and SI Dinesh, PS Ashok Vihar STATE + CRL.A. 285/2015 ANOOP KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Sumeet Verma and Mr.Aman Chaudhary, Advocates, Advocates + STATE versus Through: Ms.Radhika Kolluru, APP for the ..... Respondent State alongwith Insp.R.K.Maan and SI Dinesh, PS Ashok Vihar CRL.A. 649/2015 SANGEETA ..... Appellant STATE Through: Ms. Saahila Lamba, Advocate versus Through: Ms.Radhika Kolluru, APP for the ..... Respondent State alongwith Insp.R.K.Maan and SI Dinesh, PS Ashok Vihar CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR Crl.A.257/2015 etc. Page 1 of 32 G.S.SISTANI, J.1. All the three appeals arise out of a common judgment dated 30....
Raj Kumar vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2019
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:30. 09.2019 + CRL.M.C. 4349/2019 RAJ KUMAR Through: Mr.Prem Kumar Chaudhary, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus STATE & ANR. Through: Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, APP for State. SI Rajender PS Malviya Nagar. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby quashing FIR No.75/2015 dated 19.01.2015, registered at PS Vasant Vihar, for the offences punishable under Sections 354 IPC and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.2. 3. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.4. The petitioner and respondent no.2 got married on 23.10.2015 as per Hindu rites and rituals. Two children were born out of the wedlock namely Khushi Kumari and Ayush Kumar. CRL.M.C.4349/2019 Page 1 of 2 5....
Manjit Kaur vs.guru Singh Sabha Khalsa
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2019
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:30. h September, 2019 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Vinay Sabharwal, Advocate MANJIT KAUR + W.P.(C) 3579/2003 versus GURU SINGH SABHA KHALSA ..... Respondent Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT The petitioner has challenged the award of the Labour Court whereby 1. the Labour Court rejected her claim on the ground that the petitioner is not a workman within the meaning of Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act.2. The petitioner worked with the respondent as an Assistant Teacher from 01st March, 1972 to 01st August, 1980. The respondent was an unrecognized school at the time of petitioners appointment. The respondent school subsequently applied for recognition whereupon the Education Department, MCD raised an objection that the petitioner does not have requisite qualification for the job of the Assistant teacher and was over-age. The respondent approached Education Department, MCD for relaxation of...
National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.synergy Steels Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2019
$~56 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:30. 09/2019 + FAO (OS) No.196/2019 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amit Kumar Singh, Advocate. versus SYNERGY STEELS LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ravi Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ankit Jain, Advocate, Mr. Sidhant Nath, Advocate, Ms. Diya Kapoor, Advocate and Mr. Akshay Pratap Singh, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI JUDGMENT G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) C.M.No.43697/2019 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. C.M. Nos.43698/2019 (condonation of delay in filing) & 43699/2019 (condonation of delay in re-filing) These are applications for condonation of delay of 81 days in filing and 7 days in re-filing the appeal. FAO(OS) 196/2019 page 1 of 9 For the reasons stated in the applications, delay is condoned. Applications stand disposed of. FAO (OS) No.196/2019 The present appeal is direc...
Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi vs.manohar Singh and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2019
$~8 & 9 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:30. h SEPTEMBER, 2019 + FAO1142017 & CM Nos.8808-8809/2017, 8812/2017, 45911/2018 and 46931/2018 GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Gautam Narayan, ASC with Ms. Shivani Vij and Mr. D. Shahi, Advocate versus MANOHAR SINGH AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Om Prakash Gupta, Adv. for R-1 with R-1 in person Mr. Dev P. Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr. Jatin Teotia, Advocate for UOI + FAO2412017 & CM Nos.19986-19987/2017, 20109/2017 and 45912-45913/2018 UNION OF INDIA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Dev P. Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr. Jatin Teotia, Advocate for UOI versus MANOHAR SINGH AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Om Prakash Gupta, Adv. for R-1 with R-1 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA1 ORDER (ORAL) These appeals arise out of the proceedings relating to civil suit (CS no.183/2015) which was instituted by the first respondent on FAO Nos.114/2017 & 241/2017 Page 1 of 6 30.06...
Rakesh vs.delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board (Dsssb) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2019
$~62 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 10570/2019 RAKESH Date of Judgment :30. h September, 2019 ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Ashok Agarwal, Mr. Kumar Utkarsh and Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Advocates DELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICES SELECTION BOARD (DSSSB) & ANR versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel with Mr. N.K. Singh, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM. APPL437492019 (Exemption) 1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The application stands disposed of. CM. APPL437502019 (additional documents) 3. The additional documents be taken on record, subject to all just exceptions.4. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 10570/2019 5. Aggrieved by an order dated 01.08.2019 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (the Tribunal), the petitioner has filed the present writ petition. W.P.(C) 10570/2019 Page 1 of 3 6. Notice. Mrs. Ahlawat, learned ...
Union of India vs.deep Chand Sharma (Retd.) and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-27-2019
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:18th September, 2019 Pronounced on:27. h September, 2019 UNION OF INDIA406252018, 5958/2019, 17370/2019, 17371/2019, 39667/2019 + W.P.(C) 2904/2014 & CM APPL. 8231/2015, 40624/2018, Through: Mr. R. V. Sinha, Mr. A.S. Singh, versus Mr. Amit Sinha and Mr. Sharanya Sinha, Advocates. ........ Petitioner DEEP CHAND SHARMA (RETD.) AND ORS CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH Through: Mrs. Harvinder Oberoi, Advocates for R-1 to 38. Mr. Purushottam Sharma Tripathi, Mr. Amit, Mr. Ravi C. Prakash and Mr. Mukesh K. Singh, Advocates for R-43 to 49. ........ RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT Talwant Singh, J.1. This petition filed by the... Petitioner Union of India (UOI) under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is directed against the order and judgement dated 12th November, 2013 in OA No.1709/2012 (Annexure P-1) (Impugned Judgment) passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Principal Bench at New Delhi. The case p...
Sanjeev Gupta vs.satish Kumar Aggarwal & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-27-2019
$~27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:27. 09.2019 RC.REV. 261/2018 & CM APPL. 34079/2018 SANJEEV GUPTA ........ Petitioner versus SATISH KUMAR AGGARWAL & ANR......... RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr.B.Venkataraman, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr.Puneet Mahajan, Advocate. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 24.04.2018, whereby, leave to defend application of the petitioner has been dismissed and an eviction order passed.2. Respondent had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of the petitioner, on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, from Property No.531, Ground Floor, Kucha Pati Ram, Bazar Sita Ram, Delhi- 110006, Delhi, more particularly as shown in red colour in the site RC.REV. 261/2018 Page 1 of 2 plan annexed with the petition.3. 4. Parties were referred...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »