Delhi Court September 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Chandra Mohan Singh Bhandari vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:29. h August, 2019 Decided on:12. h September, 2019 + W.P.(C) 169/2017 Through Mr. K. C. Mittal, Ms. Ruchika Mittal and Mr. Amit P. Shahi, Advocates ........ Petitioner versus CHANDRA MOHAN SINGH BHANDARI CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Mr. Mukesh Kumar Tiwari, Mr. Sanjiv Kumar Saxena, Mr. Ramneek Mishra and Mr. Abhishek Rana, Advocates Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: JUDGMENT1 The... Petitioner, who joined the Border Security Force (BSF) as a Constable through direct recruitment on 24th April, 1991, was selected for deputation with the Intelligence Bureau (IB) (Respondent No.3) as Security Assistant with effect from 11th October, 2010. Aggrieved by the order dated 2nd November, 2016 by which his parent department, the BSF (Respondent No.2), declined to grant concurrence to the continuation of his deputation with the IB, the... Petitioner has approache...
Star India Pvt. Ltd. Vs.extramovies.host & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:12. h September, 2019 CS(COMM) 195/2019 STAR INDIA PVT. LTD. ..... Plaintiff Represented by: Mr. Sidharth Chopra, Mr. Yatinder Garg, Mr. Vivek Ayyagari, Advs. versus EXTRAMOVIES.HOST & ORS. ..... Defendant Represented by: Mr. Jivesh Tiwari, Sr. Ad.v. with Ms. Shikha Mishra, Mr. Yogender Chauhan, Adv. for D-91&92. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) I.A. 5449/2019 (u/S80CPC) 1. In view of the urgency in the suit the plaintiff is exempted from issuing statutory notice to the defendants particularly defendants No.91 & 92.2. Application is disposed of. CS(COMM) 195/2019 1. Learned counsel for the plaintiff submits that all the defendants have been served, however there is no appearance on behalf of any of the defendants except defendant No.91 & 92 who are the Department of Telecommunication and Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology respectively. CS(COMM) 195/2019 Page 1 of 4 2. Learned counsel fo...
Gopal vs.union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:-"12.09.2019 + W.P.(C) 1831/2015 GOPAL Through: Ms.Meghna De ........ Petitioner for Mr.Rajiv Agarwal, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Bhagwan Swarup Shukla, CGSC with Mr.Murari Prasad Shukla, Adv. for R-1. Mr.Arun Birbal, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated 05.02.2014 passed by the respondent no.1 declining to make a reference of the dispute raised by him through the workmans Union for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal under section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.2. The petitioner, who is an employee of the respondent no.2 since May, 1976 having been placed in the pay scale of Rs.3200-4900/- by way of financial upgradation under the ACP Scheme in accordance with office order dated 26.07.2008 raised an in...
Vinod Poddar vs.hari Shankar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2019
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:12. 09.2019 RC.REV. 504/2019 & Crl. M.A. 38443/2019 VINOD PODDAR versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent HARI SHANKAR Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. S. Singh, Adv. For the Respondent: Ms. Gita Dhingra and Mr. R.S. Tiwari, Advs. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 24.01.2019 whereby the eviction petition filed by the respondent was allowed and an order of eviction passed.2. The respondent had filed the subject petition under Section 14(1) (e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act 1958 seeking eviction of the petitioner from one shop bearing No.2, situated on the ground floor of property bearing No.B-309, Chowkhandi, J.J.Colony, Near Tilak Nagar, New Delhi more as particularly shown in red colour in the site plan annexed to the eviction petition.3. Learned counsel for the petitioner, under instructions from th...
Nirmala Devi & Ors. Vs.iffco Tokio General Insurance Co Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2019
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:12. 09.2019 MAC.APP. 189/2019 NIRMALA DEVI & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate. versus IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) 1. At joint request, the appeal is taken up for disposal alongwith MAC APP. 724/2017.2. This cross appeal impugns the award of compensation on the ground that the multiplier apropos the age of parents has been taken into consideration instead of age of the deceased. The latter was 24 years of age, therefore, multiplier of 18 ought to have been applied in terms of the dicta of the Supreme Court in National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Pranay Sethi & Ors. (2017) 16 SCC680 Furthermore, they are also entitled for the compensation towards future prospects @40% in terms of the same judgment. It is so ordered.3. As regards non-pecuniary compensation each of the claimants shall also be...
Joginder vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2019
$~A-6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:12. 09.2019 + W.P.(C) 3456/2014 & CMs. 7078/2014 & 4537/2015 JOGINDER Through Mr.N.S.Dalal and Mr.Pradeep Kumar ........ Petitioner Gupta, Advs. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Naushad Ahmed Khan, ASC (Civil) with Ms.Manisha Chauhan, Adv. for R-1 & 2/GNCTD. Ms.Anusuya Salwan, Mr.Abhishek Pundir and Ms.Nikita Salwan, Advs. for DSIIDC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking a writ of prohibition or any other appropriate writ, order or direction prohibiting respondent No.3/DSIIDC from entering into Gaon Sabha land situated in the Revenue Estate of Village Kanjhawala, Delhi. A writ of mandamus is also sought directing respondents No.1 and 2 to use the land of the Gaon Sabha for the benefit of the villagers and not for any other purposes.2. The case of the petitioner is that there is about 945 Bighas of land in...
Lawrence Messy vs.diocese of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-11-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P. (C) 8950/2014 % 1. LAWRENCE MESSY Through: ........ Petitioner Mr. Arvind Kr. Singh, Adv. versus DIOCESE OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sunil Kr. Singh, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT1109.2019 The order, dated 30th August, 2014, wherefrom the present writ petition emanates, adjudicated an application, preferred by the petitioner under Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as the ID Act).2. Before proceeding further, it would be proper to set out, at the outset, Section 33C(1) and (2) of the ID Act, thus: 33C. Recovery of money due from an employer- (1) Where any money is due to a workman from an employer under a settlement or an award or under the provisions of [Chapter VA or Chapter VB]. the workman himself or any other person authorised by him in writing in this behalf, or, in the case of the death of the workman, his assignee or heirs may, without prejudice to...
Managing Committee, Vidya Bhawan Girls Senior Secondary School vs.dire ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-11-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 899/2016 & CM Nos.3943/2016, 17872/2016, 35514/2017 MANAGING COMMITTEE, VIDYA BHAWAN GIRLS SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. D. Verma, Adv. versus DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Devesh Singh, ASC(Civil)- GNCTD with Ms. Sukriti Ghair, Adv. for R-1 Mr. Baldev Krishan, Secy.VBG Edu. Society in person Mr. Hitendra Nahata, Mr. Manish Gupta and Mr. Rohit Tomar, Advs. for R-7 Mr. Rajender Kr. Tyagi, OSD(DOE) + W.P.(C) 1239/2016, Cav.127/2016, CM Nos.5440-5441/2016, 17871/2016, 35515/2017 MANAGING COMMITTEE OF VIDYA BHAWAN GIRLS SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL THROUGH: ITS MANAGER AND ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Rakesh Tiku, Sr. Adv. with and Ms. Jyotsna Mehta Ms.Gayatri Misra, Advs. versus LT GOVERNOR OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Devesh Singh, ASC(Civil)- GNCTD with Ms. Sukriti Ghair, Adv. for R-1 W.P. (C) 899/2016 & W.P. (C) 1239/2...
Sh. Harvinder Pal & Ors. Vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-11-2019
$~25 * + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 4287/2019 SH. HARVINDER PAL & ORS. STATE & ORS. Date of decision:11. 09.2019 ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Anuj Kumar, Advocate. versus Through Mr. M.S. Oberoi, APP with SI Vinay, ........ RESPONDENTS PS Anand Parbat. Mr. Abhimanyu Sharma, Advocate for R-2 with R-2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek direction thereby quashing FIR No.182/2013 dated 24.09.2013, registered at PS Anand Parbat for the offences punishable under Sections 498A/4of the IPC and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.2. 3. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.4. The petitioners and respondent no.2 got married on 22.06.2008 as per Hindu rites and rituals. CRL.M.C. 4287/2019 Page 1 of 2 5. The petitione...
M/S Medicura Chemists & Ors. Vs.satwant Kaur
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-11-2019
$~54 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:11. 09.2019 RC.REV. 399/2019 & CM APPL. 29915-& 392M/S MEDICURA CHEMISTS & ORS. versus SATWANT KAUR ........ Petitioners ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. Akhil Sibbal, Sr. Advocate, with Mr.Neeraj Grover, Mr.Gaurav Bhardwaj, Mr.Nitya Gupta and Mr. Mahir Malhotra, Advocates with son of petitioner No.3. For the Respondent: Mr. Nidhesh Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Japneet Kaur, Advocate. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 08th March, 2019 whereby leave to defend application of the petitioner has been dismissed.2. Respondent-landlady had filed the subject eviction petition on the ground of bonafide necessity, under Section 14 (1) (e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, seeking eviction of the petitioner from one shop bearing No.2650/4, Bank Street, Karol Bagh, New Delhi, more particularly a...
- ‹ Prev
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- Next ›
- Last »