Delhi Court September 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Nasir Ali & Ors. Vs.mohd Yasin
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2019
$~45 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:12. 09.2019 RC.REV. 293/2019 & CM APPL. 22157/2019, 22224/2019 & 36145/2019 NASIR ALI & ORS MOHD YASIN versus ........ Petitioners ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. Rajneesh Vats, Adv. For the Respondent: Mr. Mohd. Faruq, Adv. with respondent in person. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 11.02.2019, whereby the Leave to defend application of the petitioner has been dismissed by the Rent Controller on the ground that same was filed beyond limitation.2. Respondent filed the subject petition seeking eviction of the petitioner under Section 14(1) (e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 from a shop on the ground floor of property bearing No.769, Suiwalan, Daryaganj, Delhi measuring 20.6 x 7.3 ft. more particularly as shown in red colour in the site plan attached to the eviction petition. RC.REV.29...
Lallan Prasad Mishra @ Jang Bahadur Mishra vs.m/s Jay Kay Die & Chemic ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2019
$~7 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:12. h September, 2019 + W.P.(C) 7219/2015 LALLAN PRASAD MISHRA @ JANG BAHADUR MISHRA ........ Petitioner 1. Through: Mr.J.K. Tiwari, Advocate versus M/S JAY KAY DIE & CHEMICALS & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Rakhshan Ahmed, Advocate for R-1(i), (iv) & (v) Mr.Vishnu Sharma, Advocate for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) The petitioner has challenged the award of the Labour Court whereby compensation of Rs.72,000/- has been awarded to the petitioner in lieu of the reinstatement and back wages. The petitioner is seeking enhancement of the compensation amount.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner worked with the respondents from 01st August, 1992 up to 02nd July, 2019 when he was terminated by respondent No.2.3. Learned counsel for respondent No.2 submits that the petitioner worked with respondent No.1 up to 1997 and thereafter he worked with respondent No.2.4. Learn...
Cholamandalam Ms General Insurance Co Ltd. Vs.sanjeev Kumar & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2019
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + MAC.APP. 146/2018, CM APPL. 4558/2018 & CM APPL. Decided on:12. 09.2019 4560/2018 CHOLAMANDALAM MS GENERAL INSURANCE CO TLD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Advocate for Ms. Suman Bagga, Advocate. versus SANJEEV KUMAR & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) 1. The appellant impugns the award of compensation dated 14.09.2017 passed by the learned MACT in MACT No.47on the ground that the non-pecuniary amounts totalling to a sum of Rs. 5,09,820/- for the minor, is same as the composite amount computed for pecuniary damages and includes the notional compensation for loss of future prospects. The learned Tribunal was of the view that in the facts of this case the grant of non- pecuniary amounts would be equivalent to the pecuniary amounts in order to ensure grant of just compensation. It holds as under:-" 23. Non-pecuniary damage:-"It was observed by Hon'ble Delhi High Cou...
Haji Banda Hasan vs.m/s Gupta & Gupta Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:24. h July, 2019 Pronounced on:12. h September, 2019 + O.M.P. (COMM) 237/2019, I.A. 8500/2019, I.A. 8501/2019, I.A. 8502/2019 HAJI BANDA HASAN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Chander Lall, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Aditya Swarup, Mr. Karan Bajaj, Ms. Nancy Roy, Mr. Amit Choudhry, Mr. Aman Dhyani, Mr. Sarthak Mannan, Ms. Kanchan S. Advs. M/S GUPTA & GUPTA PVT. LTD. versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sudhanshu Batra and Mr. Kirti Uppal, Sr. Advs. with Mr. Gurinder Pal Singh, Mr. Sidhant Borah, Ms.Ragini Anand and Mr. Aditya Mishra, Advs. CORAM: JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA JUDGMENT SANJEEV NARULA, J I.A. 8503/2019 (delay) 1. The present petition has been filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 (hereinafter referred to as Arbitration Act) challenging the Award dated 21st May 2019 (hereinafter the impugned award). The petition is accompanied with the present application [I.A. 8503/2019]. under Section 14 of the Limitatio...
M/S. Sheena Exports and Ors. Vs.m/s Assets Care and Reconstruction Ent ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2019
$~29 & 30 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 9554/2019 & CM APPL. 39256/2019 M/s. SHEENA EXPORTS AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr Tanmaya Mehta, Mr Sameer Rohtagi, Mr Pushpinder Singh and Mr Akshit Pradhan, Advocates. versus M/S ASSETS CARE AND RECONSTRUCTION ENTERPRISES LTD. AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Rajeev Mehra, Senior Advocate with Mr R.P. Agarwal, Mr Nitish Kumar and Mr Ratnesh Sharma, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 9563/2019 & CM APPL. 39305/2019 M/s. SHEENA EXPORTS AND ORS. ........ Petitioners M/S ASSETS CARE AND RECONSTRUCTION ENTERPRISES LTD. AND ORS. Through: Mr Tanmaya Mehta, Mr Sameer Rohtagi, Mr Pushpinder Singh and Mr Akshit Pradhan, Advocates. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Rajeev Mehra, Senior Advocate with Mr R.P. Agarwal, Mr Nitish Kumar and Mr Ratnesh Sharma, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH ORDER1209.2019 % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. These two petitions arise out of similar set of facts and seek sim...
Dharmendra Kumar Tandon vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2019
$~ * + STATE % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A10532018 DHARMENDRA KUMAR TANDON ..... Appellant Through Mr. Manu Sharma with Ms.Ridhima Mandhar, Mr.Kartik Khanna, Mr.Vijay Singh, Mr.Arjun Kakkar and Ms.Nishruta, Advocates. versus Through Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for the State. ..... Respondent Date of Decision:12. h September, 2019 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present appeal has been filed by the appellant-accused challenging the judgment as well as order on sentence both dated 4th September, 2017 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge (Central), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in Sessions Case No.12/2013 arising from FIR No.147/2012 under Sections 302/307/452 IPC and Sections 25/of Arms Act registered with PS Rajinder Nagar, whereby the appellant-accused has been convicted under Sections 302/307/452 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment under Page 1 of 49 CRL. A.1053/2018 Section 302 IPC and impriso...
Ajit Singh Yadav vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2019
$~60 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:12. h September 2019 + W.P.(C) 4932/2018 AJIT SINGH YADAV ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Ghanshyam Mishra, Ms. Sunaina Mishra and Mr. Rajesh Mishra, Advocates. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Ms. Kaomudi Kiran Pathak, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha and Mr. M.S. Akhtar, Advocate for R-LAC/L&B. Ms. Mrinalini Sen, Standing Counsel for DDA with Mr. Tanmay Yadav, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA SANJEEV NARULA, J.(Oral):1.... Petitioner has filed the present writ petition, seeking a declaration under Section 24(2) of The Right To Fair Compensation And Transparency In Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation And Resettlement Act, 2013(hereinafter as the 2013 Act) that, the land acquisition proceedings in respect of land at Khasra No.215, Ad-measuring 4 Bighas 16 Biswas, Khasra No.221, Ad-measuring 4 Bighas 16 Biswas, W.P.(C) 4932/2018 ...
Apeejay School vs.ved Prakash Lakhera & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2019
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:19. 08.2019 Pronounced on:12. 09.2019 + W.P.(C) 1929/2017 & CM APPL. 8573/2017 APEEJAY SCHOOL ........ Petitioner Through Mr.H.L. Tiku, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Yashmeet Kaur, Adv. versus VED PRAKASH LAKHERA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.S.N. Tripathi, Adv. for Mr.Ved Prakash Lakhera, Adv. for R-1. Mr.Mohit Agarwal, Adv. for R-2. Mr.Rajendra Prasad, OSD (Lit.) Zone 23, DoE, GNCTD. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT1 Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks setting aside the impugned order dated 18.01.2017 passed by the Delhi School Tribunal in Appeal No.07/2014.2. Case of the respondent is that he had joined the service of Respondent School as TGT (Physics) on 06.08.1984. He was confirmed w.e.f 01.07.1990 vide confirmation letter dated 01.07.1990 issued by the then W.P.(C) 1929/2017 Page 1 of 24 Chairman of the petitioners school. Since the day of appointment till his removal from the service, responden...
Beehive Ayurvedic Medical College and Hospital and Anr. Vs.union of In ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2019
$~49 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:12. 09.2019 W.P.(C) 8885/2019 & C.M. No.36655/2019 BEEHIVE AYURVEDIC MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL AND ANR. ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Saket Sikri, Mr. Vivek Singh, Ms. K. Gayatri and Mr. Abhinav Garg, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. Through Mr.Amit Anand, Adv for R-1. ........ RESPONDENTS Ms.Archana Pathak Dave, Adv for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER (ORAL):1. Via this writ petition, the challenge is laid to the order dated 30.07.2019 passed by respondent No.1 i.e. Union of India (in short UOI). 1.1 The petitioner had applied for permission to admit a third batch of students in the Bachelor of Ayurvedic Medicine & Surgery Under Graduate Course (in short BAMS UG Course) for academic sessions 2019-2020. 1.2 The petitioner was desirous of admitting 60 students for the aforementioned course. 1.3 Accordingly, an application in that behalf was filed with the concerned Ministr...
Harjinder Singh & Anr. Vs.hari Shankar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2019
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:12. 09.2019 RC.REV. 506/2019 HARJINDER SINGH & ANR versus HARI SHANKAR ........ Petitioners ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. S. Singh, Adv. For the Respondent: Ms. Gita Dhingra and Mr. R.S. Tiwari, Advs. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioners impugn order dated 24.01.2019 whereby the eviction petition filed by the respondent was allowed and an order of eviction passed.2. Respondent had filed the subject eviction petition under Section 14(1) (e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act 1958 seeking eviction of the petitioner from one shop bearing No.3, situated on the ground floor of property bearing No.B-309, Chowkhandi, J.J.Colony, Near Tilak Nagar, New Delhi more particularly as shown in red colour in the site plan annexed to the eviction petition.3. Learned counsel for the petitioner, under instructions from the RC.REV...
- ‹ Prev
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- Next ›
- Last »