Delhi Court September 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare & Anr vs.m/s Hosmac Projects Div ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:22. d August, 2019 Pronounced on:12. h September, 2019 O.M.P. (COMM) 244/2019, I.A. 8751/2019, I.A. 8752/2019 & I.A. 8753/2019 MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE & ANR...... Petitioners Through: Mr. Praveen Kumar Jain, Adv. With Ms. Akanksha Agrawal, Adv. with Dr. Yashwant singh/Addl. M. S., Mr. Pankaj Kumar Sinha/ DDA, Mr.Anil Bhatt/ O.S and Murari Kumar, LDC/ RML Hospital. M/S HOSMAC PROJECTS DIVISION OF HOSMAC INDIA PVT. LTD. versus Through: Mr. Nakul Dewan, Sr. Adv. With Mr. Himanshu Chaubey, Adv. ..... Respondent JUDGMENT SANJEEV NARULA, J I.A No 8750 of 2019 (U/Sec. 34(3) of the A&C Act, 1996, r/w Section 151 CPC for condonation of delay in filing) 1. The present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 has been filed against the Arbitral Award dated 20th November 2018, passed by the Sole Arbitrator, (hereinafter 'the Arbitrator'), whereby an amount of Rs. 22,05,09,651/- along with future in...
Gp Capt Tarun Saha vs.director General Border Security Force and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2019
$~21 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 10726/2018 GP CAPT TARUN SAHA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. S. C. Malhotra, Advocate. DIRECTOR GENERAL BORDER SECURITY FORCE AND ORS. versus ........Respondents Through: Mr. Vijay Joshi, Advocate with Mr. Sameer Dhasmana, Dy. Cmdt. and Mr. Vinod Kumar, Law Officer, BSF. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH % ORDER1209.2019 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. The... Petitioner, who is currently serving as Group Captain (GC) Timescale (TS) with the Indian Air Force (IAF), has filed the present petition challenging the rejection of his application for absorption in the post of Captain/Pilot (Deputy Inspector General) (DIG) in the Border Security Force (BSF). Background facts 2. The background facts are that the... Petitioner is with the IAF Flying Branch W.P.(C) 10726/2018 Page 1 of 20 since 14th June, 1989. While serving as Wing Commander (WC), the... Petitioner joined BSF Air Wing on 24th February, 2014 on deputation against ...
Dr. Shah Faesal vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2019
2 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 2295/2019 & CRL. M.A. 34468/2019 DR. SHAH FAESAL ........ Petitioner Through Ms. Warisha Farasat with Ms. Rudrakshi Deo, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Tushar Mehta, Solicitor General with Mr. Vikas Mahajan, CGSC, Mr. Aakash Varma, Mr. Prajesh V.S., Mr. Anil Kumar and Mr. Deepak Goyal, Advocates for UOI. Ms. Shashi Juneja, ASC for State of J&K with Mr. Ankur Talwar and Mr. Kanu Agrawal, Advocates. Mr. Lalit Mohan Negi, ACP/Spl. Cell with Insp. Kailash Singh Bisht/Spl. Cell. Date of Decision:12. h September, 2019 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present writ of Habeas Corpus has been filed by a Pairokar seeking the release of the petitioner-Dr. Shah Faesal. Page 1 of 2 W.P.(Crl.) 2295/2019 2. Today in Court, Ms. Warisha Farasat, learned counsel for the petitioner has handed over an affidavit of the wife of the...
Jagbir Singh & Ors. Vs.govt. Of Nct & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2019
$~47 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:12. 09.2019 + W.P.(C) 6728/2015 JAGBIR SINGH & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Ms. Annu Arora, Advocate. versus GOVT. OF NCT & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Naushad Ahmed Khan, ASC (Civil), GNCTD with Mr. Zahid Hanief and Ms. Manisha Chadhary, Advocates for R-1. Mr. Yeeshu Jain and Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates for LAC/L&B. Ms. Sakshi Popli and Ms. Samreen, Advocates for DJB. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA SANJEEV NARULA, J.(Oral):1. By way of the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,... Petitioners seek quashing of the notifications issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act (hereinafter as LAA) bearing No.F- 10(39)/2007L&B/LA/8430 dated 22.08.2012 and under Section 6 of the LAA No.F-10(39)/2007L&B/LA/1805 dated 06.05.2013 in respect of the land admeasuring 3 Bigha 6 Biswa in village Safipur Ranhola, Delhi (hereinafter as subject land)...
Competition Commission of India vs.m/s. Grasim Industries Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:29. h August, 2019 Decided on:12. h September, 2019 LPA137of 2014 + COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA ..... Appellant Through: Mr Samar Bansal, Ms Devahuti Pathak, Mr Manan Shishodia, and Mr Sachin Mishra, Advocates. M/s. GRASIM INDUSTRIES LTD. versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr Dhruv Mehta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ajit Warrier, Mr.Ashish Gupta and Mr Sharad Kharra, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH % JUDGMENT Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: Introduction 1.1 The Competition Commission of India (CCI) has filed this appeal against the impugned judgment dated 17th December, 2013 passed by the learned Single Judge disposing of W.P. (C) No.4159/2013 filed by the Respondent Grasim Industries Limited (GIL). 1.2 In the said writ petition, GIL had questioned an order dated 30th May, 2013 passed by the CCI, dismissing GILs application, seeking the quashing LPA1372014 Page 1 of 38 of a report dated 26th February 2013, sub...
Union of India and Ors vs.shiv Raj Singh Meena
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2019
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5288/2014 and CM APPL. 10516/2014 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Rashmi Malhotra and Kr. Prasoon Ranjan, Advocates. versus SHIV RAJ SINGH MEENA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. S. K. Dubey and Mr. Rajmangal Kumar, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH % ORDER1209.2019 Talwant Singh, J.:1. The present petition has been filed challenging the order dated 12th November, 2013 in OA No.1443/2012 passed by the Principal Bench of Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), New Delhi whereby the present... Petitioners were directed to reinstate the present Respondent with all his service benefits.2. The brief facts as mentioned in the petition are that the Respondent was initially appointed as a Booking Clerk in the Railway Department on 26th December, 1996. The Vigilance Department conducted a check on 25th May, 2004 in the Booking Office, Ambala Cantt where Respondent was handling Counter No.4 an...
Jai Prakash & Ors. Vs.dg. Of Works , Cpwd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2019
$~7 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 6161/2002 & CM APPL. 40742/2019 ........ Petitioners Through Mr. R.D. Iyer & Mr. Sameer Sharma, versus Advocates JAI PRAKASH & ORS. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH DG. OF WORKS , CPWD ..... Respondent Through Mr. R. V. Sinha & Mr. Amit Sinha, Advocates % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: ORDER1209.2019 1. Eight... Petitioners, originally appointed as Beldars in the Central Public Works Department (CPWD), filed the present petition challenging an order dated 20th September, 2002 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (Tribunal), Principal Bench, New Delhi in OA No.55/2002.2. By the impugned order, the Tribunal disposed of the OA, requiring the Respondent to consider creating posts of Enquiry Attendants within a period of four months and if it was so decided to create such posts, to frame rules for recruitment thereto. The further direction was that after framing such rules,... RESPONDENTS were to permit the... Petitio...
Iffco Tokio General Insurance Co Ltd. Vs.nirmala Devi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2019
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + MAC.APP. 724/2017, CM APPL. 29212/2017 & CM APPL. Decided on:12. 09.2019 38885/2019 IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Advocate. versus NIRMALA DEVI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate for R-1 & R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) 1. This appeal impugns the award of compensation dated 09.06.2017 passed by the learned MACT in MACT No.570on the ground that the learned Tribunal has erred in not considering the FIR which was lodged on the basis of a complaint to the police by PW-2, Kamram Rehman Khan, that one unknown vehicle had caused the fatal accident, whereas in his evidence before the learned Tribunal, the said witness had testified apropos the specific identity of the insured vehicle. It is argued that the two self- contradictory statements make testimony of the said witness unreliable, therefore, his entire testimony ought to have b...
Col. Ran Singh Dudee vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:3. d September, 2019 Decided on:12. h September, 2019 + W.P(C) 12681/2018 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Vivek Chandra Jaiswal, Advocate. COL. RAN SINGH DUDEE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Jasmeet Singh, CGSC with Mr. for Srivats Kanshal, Advocates... RESPONDENTS No.1 and 4. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH JUDGMENT Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. Col. Ran Singh Dudee has filed the present petition seeking three reliefs. The first is to direct the author of an order dated 20th November, 2013 issued by the Ministry of Defence (MOD), Government of India (Annexure P-1) to issue a clarification to the Controller of Defence Accounts (CDA) for remaining entitlement with information to the... Petitioner.2. The second relief is for quashing of an order dated 30th July, 2018 issued by the Adjutant General Army Headquarters, New Delhi which was in compliance with the orders dated 24th January...
Master Chankaya vs.state and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:1st July, 2019 Pronounced on:12. h September,2019 + TEST.CAS. 40/1999, I.A. 25066/2015, I.A. 25616/2015 & I.A. 6433/2019 MASTER CHANKAYA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Kuljeet Rawal, Advocate. STATE AND OTHERS versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ashish Virmani, Mr. Gollamudi Sri Harsha Datta and Mr. Saksham Grover, Advocates. for R-3 JUDGMENT SANJEEV NARULA, J1 The present petition under section 226 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 seeks grant of probate in respect of the document dated 10th January 1995, purported to be the validly executed last Will of deceased Shri Dharam Chand Sharma (hereinafter 'the Testator'), grandfather of the... Petitioner. The... Petitioner being a minor on the date of filing of the petition was represented through his father [Sh. Kapil Sharma].. It was averred in the Petition that Sh. Kapil Sharma, being the father of the beneficiary, shall act upon the probate, if so granted by the Court in favour ...
- ‹ Prev
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- Next ›
- Last »