Delhi Court September 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Manish Aggarwal vs.the State & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2019
$~75 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 5017/2019 Date of decision:30. 09.2019 MANISH AGGARWAL Through: Mr. M. Gupta, Adv. ........ Petitioner THE STATE & ANR versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Kamal Kumar Ghai, APP for State Ms. Geetanksha Dhingra, Adv. for R- 2 W/ASI Neeraj, PS Dabari CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL.M.A. 37353/2019 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.A. 37354/2019 3. In view of the reasons stated in the present application, the delay in filing the petition is allowed. CRL.M.C. 5017/2019 4. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.389/2013 dated 17.07.2013 registered at Police Station Dabri and consequent proceedings arising therefrom. CRL.M.C. 5017/2019 Page 1 of 3 5.6. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2.7. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is ...
Anoop Kumar vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2019
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:24. h September, 2019 Judgment pronounced on:30. September, 2019 CRL.A. 257/2015 VIJAY KUMAR @ BABLOO ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Mr.M.L.Yadav, Advocate versus Through: Ms.Radhika Kolluru, APP for the ..... Respondent State alongwith Insp.R.K.Maan and SI Dinesh, PS Ashok Vihar STATE + CRL.A. 285/2015 ANOOP KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Sumeet Verma and Mr.Aman Chaudhary, Advocates, Advocates + STATE versus Through: Ms.Radhika Kolluru, APP for the ..... Respondent State alongwith Insp.R.K.Maan and SI Dinesh, PS Ashok Vihar CRL.A. 649/2015 SANGEETA ..... Appellant STATE Through: Ms. Saahila Lamba, Advocate versus Through: Ms.Radhika Kolluru, APP for the ..... Respondent State alongwith Insp.R.K.Maan and SI Dinesh, PS Ashok Vihar CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR Crl.A.257/2015 etc. Page 1 of 32 G.S.SISTANI, J.1. All the three appeals arise out of a common judgment dated 30....
Hriday Kumar Chaturvedi vs.master Daksh & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2019
$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:30. 09.2019 C.R.P. 207/2017 & CM. APPL. 34545/2017 HRIDAY KUMAR CHATURVEDI versus MASTER DAKSH & ANR ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. Gaurav Bhatt, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. R.P.A. Jaiswal, Advocate for R-1 CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 03.08.2017 whereby application of the petitioner under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC has been dismissed.2. Respondent No.1 had filed the subject Suit for Partition and possession of suit property.... Petitioner is the father of Respondent No.1 and Respondent No.2 is the Aunt of the Respondent No.1 i.e. sister of the petitioner.3. It was contended by respondent No.1 in the plaint that he was RC.REV.207/2017 Page 1 of 5 the son of the petitioner and his paternal grandfather had died on 30.07.2013 and his paternal grandmother had d...
Smt. Sudhir Bala Sarine vs.shri Bhachha Thakur
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:30. h September, 2019 CS(OS) 218/2019 SMT. SUDHIR BALA SARINE ..... Plaintiff Represented by: Mr. Gagan Mathur, Adv. with Plaintiff in person. versus SHRI BHACHHA THAKUR ..... Defendant Represented by: Mr. Atul Kumar Sharma, Adv. with Baccha Thakur in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. The present suit has been filed by the plaintiff claiming to be the absolute owner and in possession of one-half portion of plot of land measuring 4 Bighas and 16 Biswas bearing khasra No.247 situated in village Khanpur, Tehsil Mehrauli, New Delhi (now renumbered and known as 66, East Avenue, Sainik Farm, New Delhi, in short the suit property) by virtue of a sale deed dated 28th November, 1979 duly executed in her favour and registered on the same date. It is claimed that in the year 1980 the plaintiff and her husband got a 8 feet high brick boundary wall constructed all around the aforesaid plot of land and als...
Mylan Laboratories Limited vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2019
$~42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:30. h September, 2019 + W.P.(C) 5571/2019 & CM APPL. 24540/2019 MYLAN LABORATORIES LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Rajeshwari H., Ms. Swapnil Gaur and Mr. Saif Rahman Ansari, Advocates. (M:9897905254) versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Gaurang Kanth, CGSC for R-1 & 2. (M:9999285585) Mr. Varun Sharma, Advocate for R-3. (M:8178551948) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed, challenging the order of the Deputy Controller of Patents & Designs (hereinafter, Deputy Controller) dated 14th March, 2019 as the Intellectual Property Appellate Board (hereinafter, IPAB) is not currently fully constituted and is not functional. The present writ petition was filed seeking setting aside of the impugned order as at that time, the technical member of IPAB had not been appointed. Thereafter, in view of judicial orders, the IPAB commenced its hea...
Ambuj Sood vs.dda & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2019
$~ * + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:17. h September, 2019 Decided on:30. h September, 2019 ASHWINI KHULLAR W.P. (C) 8469/2009 ...... Petitioner Through: Mr.Saurabh Kirpal, Mr.Pankaj Yadav, Ms. Varsha Yadav and Mr. Dubey, Advocates. Priyaranjan versus DDA & ORS. Through: Mr. Arun Birbal and Mr. Ajay ....... RESPONDENTS Birbal, Advocates for DDA. AMBUJ SOOD W.P.(C) 8479/2009 & CM APPL. 7948/2019 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Shanker Raju, Mr.Pankaj Yadav, Ms. Varsha Yadav and Mr. Dubey, Advocates. Priyaranjan versus DDA & ORS. Through: Mr. Arun Birbal and Mr. Ajay Birbal, Advocates for DDA. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 13931/2018 & CM APPL. 54517/2018, 27092/2019, 31896/2019 & Review Petition 331/2019 KANWAL KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Shanker Raju, Mr. Pankaj Yadav, Ms. Varsha Yadav and Mr. Priyaranjan Dubey, WP(C) No.8469/2009 & connected matters Page 1 of 38 Advocates. versus CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH UNION OF INDIA AND O...
Rinku @ Ram Prasad vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A.865/2019 & CRL.M.(BAIL)1312/2019 Judgment reserved on :16. 09.2019 Date of decision :30. 09.2019 RINKU @ RAM PRASAD ..... Appellant STATE Through: Mr. Amit S. Pujari, Advocate. versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for State with SI Shashi Kumar, PS Shalimar Bagh. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. The appellant namely Rinku @ Ram Prasad, vide the present appeal assails the impugned judgment dated 22.03.2019 and the impugned order on sentence dated 23.03.2019 of the learned ASJ-01, North West, Rohini, Delhi (Special Court POCSO) in Sessions Case no.44/2017 vide which the appellant herein was convicted for the offence punishable under Section 366 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (hereinafter referred to as POCSO Act, 2012) and was sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of seven years along Crl.A...
Ramesh Sharma & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2019
$~62 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:30. 09.2019 + CRL.M.C. 4974/2019 RAMESH SHARMA & ORS. Through: Mr. Santosh Kumar, Adv. ........ Petitioners versus STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Kamal Kr. Ghei, APP for State with ASI Geeta, PS Rani Bagh CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL. M.A. 37231/2019 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 4974/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek direction thereby to quash FIR No.397/2017 dated 24.10.2017, registered at Police Station Rani Bagh and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.4. Notice issued.5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and the counsel for CRL.M.C.4974/2019 Page 1 of 3 respondent no.2.6. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.7. The present petition is filed on the ground that the parties have settled their disputes and respond...
Frankfinn Aviation Services (Pvt.) Ltd. Vs.mr. Rahul Chauhan & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2019
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 866/2018 1.2. FRANKFINN AVIATION SERVICES (PVT.) LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Kapil Midha with Ms. Abhivandana Chaudhary , Advs. versus MR. RAHUL CHAUHAN & ORS Through: Mr. I.V.Raghav & ..... Defendants Mr. R.A. Sharma, Advs. for D-1 & 2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW % ORDER3009.2019 None appears for the defendant no.3. The plaintiff and the defendants No.1 to 3, in this suit for permanent injunction restraining infringement of trade mark, passing off and for ancillary reliefs, were vide order dated 25th April, 2019 referred to the Mediation Cell of this Court.3. Mediation has been successful and a Settlement Agreement dated 28th August, 2019 purporting to be signed by the plaintiff and the defendants no.1 to 3 namely (i) Rahul Chauhan; (ii) Fly High Academy; and, (iii) Ajay Sharma as well as their counsels and the Mediator has been received from the Mediation Cell of this court.4. I have perused the said Se...
Inderjeet Singh & Ors vs.the Govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2019
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:30. 09.2019 + CRL.M.C. 4537/2019 INDERJEET SINGH & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Mohit Mathur, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Gaurav Dua, Adv. versus THE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR Through: Mr.Hirein Sharma, APP for State. ........ RESPONDENTS Mr.Kirti Uppal, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Pramod Kumar, Adv. with Mr.Anurag Kasana, Mr.Arbind Yadav & Mr.Ravish Verma, Advs. for R-2. SI R.S. Pandit PS Kalyan Puri. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL. M.A. 35476/2019 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C.4537/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek direction thereby quashing FIR No.703/2013 dated 29.11.2013, registered at PS CRL.M.C.4537/2019 Page 1 of 3 Kalyanpuri, for the offences punishable under Sections 307/3IPC and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.4. 5. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »