Delhi Court September 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kanwal Kumar vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2019
$~ * + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:17. h September, 2019 Decided on:30. h September, 2019 ASHWINI KHULLAR W.P. (C) 8469/2009 ...... Petitioner Through: Mr.Saurabh Kirpal, Mr.Pankaj Yadav, Ms. Varsha Yadav and Mr. Dubey, Advocates. Priyaranjan versus DDA & ORS. Through: Mr. Arun Birbal and Mr. Ajay ....... RESPONDENTS Birbal, Advocates for DDA. AMBUJ SOOD W.P.(C) 8479/2009 & CM APPL. 7948/2019 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Shanker Raju, Mr.Pankaj Yadav, Ms. Varsha Yadav and Mr. Dubey, Advocates. Priyaranjan versus DDA & ORS. Through: Mr. Arun Birbal and Mr. Ajay Birbal, Advocates for DDA. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 13931/2018 & CM APPL. 54517/2018, 27092/2019, 31896/2019 & Review Petition 331/2019 KANWAL KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Shanker Raju, Mr. Pankaj Yadav, Ms. Varsha Yadav and Mr. Priyaranjan Dubey, WP(C) No.8469/2009 & connected matters Page 1 of 38 Advocates. versus CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH UNION OF INDIA AND O...
M/S Psychotropics India Ltd. Vs.m/s Syncom Healthcare Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2019
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:30. h September, 2019 + CM (M) 1409/2019 & CM APPL. 42656/2019 M/S PSYCHOTROPICS INDIA LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ashok Mittal & Ms. Palak Arora, Advocates. (M:8218736895) versus M/S SYNCOM HEALTHCARE LTD. Through: None. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH ..... Respondent Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. The... Petitioner - M/s Psychotropics India Ltd. is aggrieved by the impugned order dated 30th August, 2019, by which an application seeking appointment of Local Commissioners in the execution proceedings has been rejected by the Trial Court.2. The background of the case is that the... Petitioner/Decree Holder (hereinafter Decree Holder) filed a suit for infringement of trademark against the Respondent/Judgment Debtor - M/s Syncom Healthcare Ltd. (hereinafter Judgement Debtor). The said suit was decreed vide order dated 22nd December, 2018. The operative portion of the decree reads as under: relief of permanent 8. Fo...
Flow Cool India Pvt. Ltd. Vs.flow Tech Air Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:30. h September, 2019. CS(COMM) 555/2019, IA No.13734/2019 (u/O XXXVIII R-5 r/w R-XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) FLOW COOL INDIA PVT. LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Ravi Gupta, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Naveen Sharma, Mr S.K.Sharma & Ms. Swati Bhushan Sharma, Advs. Versus ..... Defendants Through: None. FLOW TECH AIR PVT. LTD. & ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW IA No.13735/2019 (for exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.2. The application is disposed of. CS(COMM) 555/2019 3. The plaintiff has instituted this suit for recovery of balance price due of cooling towers sold, supplied and delivered to defendant no.1, not only against the defendant no.1 but also against the defendants no.2 and 3 both described as Directors of the defendant no.1.4. Ordinarily, the monies recoverable from a company, as the defendant no.1 is, would not be recoverable from the Directors of the company. To seek recovery, also from defendants...
Ravinder Kumar & Ors vs.the Govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2019
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:30. 09.2019 + W.P.(CRL) 2521/2019 RAVINDER KUMAR & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Kirti Uppal, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Pramod Kumar, Mr.Anurag Kasana, Mr.Arbind Yadav & Mr.Ravish Verma, Advs. versus THE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Amit Peshwani Adv. for Ms.Nandita Rao, ASC for GNCTD. Mr.Mohit Mathur, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Gaurav Dua, Adv. for R-2 to 6. SI R.S. Pandit PS Kalyan Puri. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL. M.A. 35490/2019 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. W.P.(Crl.) 2521/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby quashing FIR No.709/2013, registered at PS Kalyan Puri, for the offences W.P.(Crl.)2521/2019 Page 1 of 3 punishable under Sections 148/427/149/506/323/341 IPC and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.4. 5. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and...
Gupta Bros. (India) vs.gail India Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2019
$~A-37 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:30. 09.2019 + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 392/2019 GUPTA BROS. (INDIA) ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Gaurav Dudeja,Advocate and Mr. Sudhanshu Goel, Advocate. Versus GAIL INDIA LIMITED ..... Respondent Through Mr. Ratan K. Singh, Advocate with Nikhilesh Krishnan and Mr. Rajeev Gurung, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) I.A. 13714/2019 (Exemption). Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 392/2019 1. Issue notice.2. Mr. Ratan K. Singh, Advocate, enters appearance on behalf of the respondent and accepts notice.3. The present petition has been filed under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) seeking extension of time for completion of the arbitral proceedings and passing of the Award. O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 392/2019 Page 1 of 2 4. Disputes and differences having arisen between the parties, the Arbitrati...
Kunal Auto Industries vs.rohit Vedi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2019
$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:30. 09.2019 RC.REV. 204/2018 & CM APPL. 19232/2018, CM APPL.30254/2018, CM APPL. 42597/2019 & CM APPL.37372/2019 & CM APPL.37373/2019 KUNAL AUTO INDUSTRIES ROHIT VEDI versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr.Gaurav Barathi, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr.Rajiv Bajaj, Advocate. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 04.01.2018, whereby, leave to defend application of the petitioner has been dismissed and an eviction order passed.2. Subject eviction petition was filed by the respondent seeking eviction of the petitioner, on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, from shop at Property No.1468, Ground Floor, Gali No.23, Naiwala, Karol Bagh, RC.REV. 204/2018 Page 1 of 3 New Delhi, more particularly shown in red colour in t...
Union of India vs.manohar Singh and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2019
$~8 & 9 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:30. h SEPTEMBER, 2019 + FAO1142017 & CM Nos.8808-8809/2017, 8812/2017, 45911/2018 and 46931/2018 GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Gautam Narayan, ASC with Ms. Shivani Vij and Mr. D. Shahi, Advocate versus MANOHAR SINGH AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Om Prakash Gupta, Adv. for R-1 with R-1 in person Mr. Dev P. Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr. Jatin Teotia, Advocate for UOI + FAO2412017 & CM Nos.19986-19987/2017, 20109/2017 and 45912-45913/2018 UNION OF INDIA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Dev P. Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr. Jatin Teotia, Advocate for UOI versus MANOHAR SINGH AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Om Prakash Gupta, Adv. for R-1 with R-1 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA1 ORDER (ORAL) These appeals arise out of the proceedings relating to civil suit (CS no.183/2015) which was instituted by the first respondent on FAO Nos.114/2017 & 241/2017 Page 1 of 6 30.06...
Rashid vs.state & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * CRL.REV.P. 444/2018 Judgment Reserved :25.09.2019 Date of Decision :30. 09.2019 IN THE MATTER OF RASHID STATE Through: Mr. Tahir Ashraf Siddiqui, Advocate (DHCLSC) ........ Petitioner Versus ....Respondent Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for State with SI Anuj Yadav, P.S. Dwarka North CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI The present proceedings have been instituted challenging the 1. judgment dated 21.02.2018 passed by the Special Judge, Dwarka Courts, Delhi in CA No.240/2017,whereby the conviction of the petitioner was upheld, however, the sentence under Section 304A IPC was reduced to RI for 6 months.2. Earlier, vide judgment dated 05.05.2017 passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate-06, Dwarka Courts, Delhi, the petitioner was convicted in FIR No.397/2013 registered under Sections 279/337/304A IPC at P.S. Dwarka North. The petitioner was sentenced to RI for 3 months for the offence punishable under Section 279 IPC. He was also sentenced...
Union of India vs.g. L. Litmus Events Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2019
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on 12.03.2019 Judgment Pronounced on 30.9.2019 O.M.P. (COMM) 390/2018 UNION OF INDIA .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG with Ms. Archana Lakhotia, Mr. B.K. Zaidi, and Ms. Arpita Sharma, Advs. for UOI. Ms. Lakshmi Gurung, Adv. for the Income Tax Department. versus G. L. LITMUS EVENTS PVT. LTD. .....Respondent Through: Mr. P.V. Kapur, Sr. Adv with Mr.Vijay Phadka, Ms. Vinita Sasidharan, Mr. M. Chandra Sekhar, Mr. Deepak Singh Rawat, Mr. Siddhant Kapur, Mr. Vimal Nagrath, Ms. Kaveri Gupta, and Ms. Luvika J.Talloo, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J:1. This petition is directed against the original award dated 23.02.2018 and corrected award dated 14.05.2018. The petition has been filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short 1996 Act). OMP(Comm.) 390/2018 Page 1 of 29 1.1 The petitioner before the Court is the Union of India, Department of Sport...
Sanjeev Singh Ahluwalia vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:30. 09/2019 + W.P.(C) No.9540/2019 & CM Nos. 39178-79/2019 SANJEEV SINGH AHLUWALIA ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Samar Bansal, Advocate with Mr. Devahuti Pathak, Advocate, Mr. Sachin Mishra, Advocate and Mr. Manan Shishodia, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Nikhil Goel, CGSC with Mr. Aniruddha Deshmukh, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI JUDGMENT ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J.(ORAL) The present petition has been filed by the petitioner being aggrieved by the decision rendered by the Central Administrative Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as Tribunal) by order dated 26.03.2019, by which the O.A. filed stands dismissed.2. Counsel for the respondents enters appearance on advance copy. W.P.(C) No.9540/2019 page 1 of 12 3. We have heard the counsel for the parties and with their consent, we are deciding this writ petition at the admissi...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »