Delhi Court September 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Liberty General Insurance Limited vs.vikas Chaudhary & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2019
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Decided on:17. 09.2019 MAC.APP. 444/2018 LIBERTY GENERAL INSURANCE LIMITED Through: Ms. Prerna Mehta, Adv. ..... Appellant versus VIKAS CHAUDHARY & ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J (Oral) MAC.APP. 444/2018 & CM APPL. 35707/2019 Through: Mr. Manu Shahalia, Adv. for R-1. ........ RESPONDENTS 1. This appeal impugns the Award dated 18.01.2018 passed by the learned MACT in Suit No.4845/2016, inter alia, on two grounds: (i) that the identity of the offending vehicle has not been established, and (ii) that the quantum awarded is erroneous. The claimant was injured in a motor vehicular accident near Jasola traffic signal, New Delhi at around 9.55 a.m. on 30.07.2016, while he was riding a motor-cycle. It is stated that some vehicle hit him from the rear side and fled from the place. It is the claimants case that he was first taken to Sanjivani Hospital and thereafter to Apollo Hospital within a span of 20-25 minutes.2...
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. Vs.jagdish
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :-"17.09.2019 + W.P.(C) 7031/2019 & C.M. No.29352/2019 (for stay) BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD. Through: Mr.Deepak Thukral, Adv. ........ Petitioner JAGDISH versus Through: Mr.S.P. Srivastava, Adv. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. The present petition under Articles 226/ 227 of the Constitution of India assails the order dated 13.03.2019 passed by the learned Labour Court, New Delhi whereby the respondent/workmans application seeking permission to amend his claim statement dated 20.07.2012 has been allowed by permitting him to incorporate the following additional submissions:-"State owned telecommunication 4A . That Bharat Sanchar Nigam-Limited (BSNL), is an Indian company incorporated under the Companies Act 1956 and is an industry as defined in Section 2(j) of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 and is having about 174216 employees in different category, having total assets of Rs.70...
M/S Permier Lpg Pvt. Ltd. Vs.union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2019
$~53 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17. 09.2019 + W.P.(C) 3101/2019 M/S PERMIER LPG PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Vipul Ganda, Mr.Vikas Yadav, Ms.Dipika Ganda and Mr.Aman Chaudhary, Advts. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Meenakshi Arora, Sr.Adv. with Ms.Mala Naryan, Ms.Neha Dawar, Mr.Rahul Narayan and Mr.Digvijay, Advts. for R-2/IOCL. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus against the respondents to quash decision dated 26.03.2019 of respondent No.2, whereby it is contended that the technical bid of the petitioner was rejected without giving justifiable reasons and with the sole motive to favour another bidder.2. Some necessary facts which are required to be noticed for disposal of this writ petition are that on 11.07.2018, a noti...
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. Vs.subhash
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :-"17.09.2019 + W.P.(C) 7641/2019 & C.M. No.31847/2019 (for stay) BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD. Through: Mr.Deepak Thukral, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus SUBHASH Through: Mr.S.P. Srivastava, Adv. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. The present petition under Articles 226/ 227 of the Constitution of India assails the order dated 13.03.2019 passed by the learned Labour Court, New Delhi whereby the respondent/workmans application seeking permission to amend his claim statement dated 13.07.2012 has been allowed by permitting him to incorporate the following additional submissions:-"State owned telecommunication 4A . That Bharat Sanchar Nigam-Limited (BSNL), is an Indian company incorporated under the Companies Act 1956 and is an industry as defined in Section 2(j) of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 and is having about 174216 employees in different category, having total assets of Rs.70...
The New India Assurance Co Ltd. Vs.guddi Devi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2019
$~18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Decided on:17. 09.2019 MAC.APP. 789/2019 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate. versus GUDDI DEVI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) MAC.APP. 789/2019, CM APPL. 41466/2019 & CM APPL. 41467/2019 1. The appellant impugns the award of compensation dated 30.05.2019 passed by the learned MACT in Petition No.122/2018 on the ground that the minimum wages of Jharkhand should have been taken into consideration because the claimants are all residents of Jharkhand.2. The aforesaid argument is ex-facie untenable because the case of claimants was that their deceased kin was plying a goods-carrying rickshaw in Delhi. It is in these circumstances that the learned MACT has taken the minimum wages applicable to an unskilled worker in Delhi. It has reasoned as under:-"PW-1 stated that the deceased was her husband. He was a rickshaw puller and used...
Anwar @ Karamat vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:7. h August, 2019 Decided on:17. h September, 2019 CRL.A. 925/2017 ANWAR @ KARAMAT ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Zeeshan Hashmi, Mohd. versus Adil, Advocate STATE ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP for the State with ASI Vijay Singh, PS Shastri Park CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 By the present appeal, Anwar @ Karamat challenges the impugned judgment dated 5th September 2017 convicting him for the offence punishable under SectionsIPC in FIR No.10/2013 registered at PS Shastri Park and the order on sentence dated 7th September 2017 directing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year and to pay a fine of `20,000/- and in default whereof to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of six months for offence punishable under Section 411 IPC and to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of three years and to pay a fine of `20,000/- and in default whereof to undergo simple impri...
Seema Khurana & Ors vs.united India Insurance Co Ltd. & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2019
$~7 & 9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + MAC.APP. 974/2015 & CM APPL. 30809/2015 Decided on:17. 09.2019 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant versus + MAC.APP. 370/2017 SEEMA KHURANA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS SEEMA KHURANA & ORS ..... Appellants versus UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Advocate for insurance company. Mr. A.P.S. Jadaun, Advocate for R-5 in item 7. Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate for R- 1 to R-4 in item 7 and for appellant in Item 9. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) 1. Both these appeals i.e. MAC APP No.974/2015 filed by the insurance company and the cross-objection thereto filed by the claimant, in MAC APP. No.370/2017, impugn the Award of Compensation dated 05.11.2015 passed by the learned MACT in MACT Case No.184/2014. MAC.APP. No.974/2015 & 370/2017 Page 1 of 9 The appellant- insurance company has impugned it on the ground that without discussing rashness and negligence o...
Vandana Sharma vs.dwarka Court Bar Associates & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2019
$~46 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:17. 09.2019 + W.P.(C) 9955/2019 & CM APPL. 41224/2019 VANDANA SHARMA ........ Petitioner versus DWARKA COURT BAR ASSOCIATES & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. D.K. Sharma, Mr. M.C. Premi and Mr. Sidharth, Advocates. with petitioner in person. For the... RESPONDENTS: CORAM: - HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Devendra Dagar, Advocate for R-3 Ms. Nishima Arora, Advocate for R-2 & 4 JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks a mandamus to the respondents to include the name of the petitioner in the final voters list and to re-schedule the election for the Dwarka Court Bar Association 2019-20 voting for which is scheduled on 21.09.2019 or in the alternative to permit the petitioner to contest the election for the post of Lady Member Executive in the said elections.2. The petitioner enrolled as an Advocate with the Delhi Bar Association and beca...
M/S Psa Nitrogen Limited vs.maeda Corporation & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2019
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :17. h September, 2019 + CM (M) 4/2019 M/S PSA NITROGEN LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Vikas Aggarwal, Advocate. (M:9811165656) versus MAEDA CORPORATION & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Lalit Chauhan, Mr. Aditya Sharma and Ms. Swati Bhardwaj, Advocates. (M:9178681904) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition challenges order dated 25th October 2018 by which the application of the... Petitioner/Plaintiff (hereinafter, Plaintiff) seeking condonation of delay in filing the written statement to the counter- claim of the... RESPONDENTS/Defendants (hereinafter, Defendants) has been rejected by the ld. Trial Court.2. The Plaintiff had filed a suit for recovery against the Defendants. The same was filed as an ordinary suit prior to the enactment of the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Act, 2015 (Commercial Courts Ac...
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. Vs.kishan Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :-"17.09.2019 + W.P.(C) 7030/2019 & C.M. No.29350/2019 (for stay) BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD Through: Mr.Deepak Thukral, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus KISHAN SHARMA ..... Respondent Through: Mr.S.P. Srivastava, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. The present petition under Articles 226/ 227 of the Constitution of India assails the order dated 13.03.2019 passed by the learned Labour Court, New Delhi whereby the respondent/workmans application seeking permission to amend his claim statement dated 13.07.2012 has been allowed by permitting him to incorporate the following additional submissions:-"State owned telecommunication 4A . That Bharat Sanchar Nigam-Limited (BSNL), is an Indian company incorporated under the Companies Act 1956 and is an industry as defined in Section 2(j) of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 and is having about 174216 employees in different category, having total assets of ...
- ‹ Prev
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- Next ›
- Last »