Delhi Court September 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Star Forms vs.directorate of Education, Govt. of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2019
$~62 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision :17. 09.2019 + W.P.(C) 10061/2019 & CM APPL. Nos. 41603-04/2019 STAR FORMS Through : Mr. Annirudh Sharma & Ms.Shriya ........ Petitioner Chanda, Advocates. versus DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION, GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Satyakam, ASC for GNCTD with Ms.Savita Drall, DDE (Exam) DOE. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI JUDGMENT G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for a writ/order or direction to the respondent for quashing the tender issued by Directorate of Education, Govt. of Delhi on 05.07.2019 for confidential printing and supply of question papers for classes III to XII for the academic year 2019-20 being tender No.(1)/P&SQP/19-20.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner submitted its technical and financial bids in the month of July, 2019 as per W.P.(C) 10061/2019 Page 1...
Land and Building Department , Govt of Nct of Delhi vs.pitam Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2019
$~4 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:17. 09.2019 LPA4232019 LAND AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT , GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI Through: Ms. Sapna Chauhan, Ms. Ruchika ..... Appellant Rathi & Mr. Sajan Singh, Advs. versus PITAM SINGH ..... Respondent Through: Mr. N.S. Dalal & Mr. D.P. Singh, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) CM APPL.29239 /2019 This application has been preferred under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay of 243 days in preferring this appeal. Having heard the counsel for the appellant and looking into the reasons stated in the application, there are reasonable grounds for condonation of delay. We hereby condone the delay of 243 days in preferring this appeal. The application is allowed and disposed of. LPA4232019 Page 1 of 5 LPA4232019 1. This appellant is the original respondent in W.P.(C) 1039/2018. The writ petition was allowed by the learned Single Jud...
Balesh Kumar vs.santosh Jain
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2019
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:17. 09.2019 RC.REV. 454/2019 & CM APPL. 34086/2019 BALESH KUMAR SANTOSH JAIN versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Dr. Sarbjit Sharma and Ms. Liza Taneja, Advocates For the Respondent: Mr. Kailash Vasdev, Senior Advocate with Mr. Anurag Jain, Ms. Limayonla Jamil, Ms. Nayantara and Mr. Umrao Singh Rawat, Advocates. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 05.03.2019, whereby the eviction petition filed by the respondent for bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 has been allowed after trial.2. Respondent had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of the petitioner on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 from a shop bearing No.4753, Plot No.8, Deputy Ganj, Sadar Bazar, Delhi 11...
Indcon Boiler Ltd. Vs.m/s Maeda Corporation India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2019
$~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :17. h September, 2019 + CM (M) 767/2019 & CM APPL. 23274/2019 INDCON BOILER LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Vikas Aggarwal, Advocate. versus M/S MAEDA CORPORATION INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Lalit Chauhan, Mr. Aditya Sharma and Ms. Swati Bhardwaj, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition challenges order dated 12th April, 2019 by which the application of the... Petitioner/Plaintiff (hereinafter, Plaintiff) seeking condonation of delay in filing the written statement to the counter-claim of the... RESPONDENTS/Defendants (hereinafter, Defendants) has been rejected by the ld. Trial Court.2. The Plaintiff had filed a suit for recovery against the Defendants. The same was filed as an ordinary suit prior to the enactment of the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Act, 2015 (Commercial Courts Act) Th...
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. Vs.narender Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :-"17.09.2019 + W.P.(C) 7029/2019 & C.M. No.29346/2019 (for stay) BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD Through: Mr.Deepak Thukral, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus NARENDER KUMAR ..... Respondent Through: Mr.S.P. Srivastava, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. The present petition under Articles 226/ 227 of the Constitution of India assails the order dated 13.03.2019 passed by the learned Labour Court, New Delhi whereby the respondent/workmans application seeking permission to amend his claim statement dated 20.07.2012 has been allowed by permitting him to incorporate the following additional submissions:-"State owned telecommunication 4A. That Bharat Sanchar Nigam-Limited (BSNL), is an Indian company incorporated under the Companies Act 1956 and is an industry as defined in Section 2(j) of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 and is having about 174216 employees in different category, having total assets of ...
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. Vs.vinod Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :-"17.09.2019 + W.P.(C) 7638/2019 & C.M. No.31856/2019 (for stay) BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD. Through: Mr.Deepak Thukral, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus VINOD KUMAR ..... Respondent Through: Mr.S.P. Srivastava, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. The present petition under Articles 226/ 227 of the Constitution of India assails the order dated 13.03.2019 passed by the learned Labour Court, New Delhi whereby the respondent/workmans application seeking permission to amend his claim statement dated 20.07.2012 has been allowed by permitting him to incorporate the following additional submissions:-"State owned telecommunication 4A . That Bharat Sanchar Nigam-Limited (BSNL), is an Indian company incorporated under the Companies Act 1956 and is an industry as defined in Section 2(j) of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 and is having about 174216 employees in different category, having total assets of R...
Neeraj Mahajan vs.central Bureau of Investigation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2019
$~3 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17. 09.2019. CRL.REV.P. 712/2019 & CRL.M.A. 13107/2019 NEERAJ MAHAJAN ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Sunil Dala with Mr. Harsh Khanna, Mr. Vivek Jain and Mr. Sandeep Khanna, Advs. versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Through Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, SPP ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks to set aside /Quash the Order and Judgment on charge dated 29.01.2019 and framing of charge and order dated 05.02.2019 passed by learned Special Judge CBI-011, Rohini Courts, Delhi, in CBI No.52/2016 (old No.64/2008) Chander Lok CGHS Ltd.2. Case of the petitioner is that after incorporation/registration of any CGHS, resignation by its members and joining of new members is permitted under law. No previous member has reported any illegality/ irregularity in CRL.REV.P. 712/2019 Page 1 of 9 the matter of their memberships. In any case any such irr...
Vedansh Pandey vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2019
$~54 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:17. 09.2019 + W.P.(C) 10057/2019 VEDANSH PANDEY versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner:... Petitioner in person. For the Respondent: Mr. J.P.N. Shahi, Standing counsel for respondent No.1. Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal with Mr. Hardik Rupal and Mr. Prang Newmei, Advocates for respondent Nos.2 to 4. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) W.P.(C) 10057/2019 & CM APPL.41593/2019 (for interim directions) 1.... Petitioner seeks a mandamus directing the respondents to re-conduct the Students Union Elections of the Delhi University.2. It is contended by the petitioner that he was an eligible voter duly admitted to the 3rd Semester of Law Centre I of Faculty of law, Delhi University and when he attempted to cast his vote, he was prevented from casting his vote. W.P.(C) 10057/2019 Page 1 of 3 3.... Peti...
Ms Ritu vs.state & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2019
$~16 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.L.P. 362/2017 and CRL.M.A. 10396/2017 MS RITU STATE & ORS Through: Mr Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus Through: Ms Meenakshi Chauhan, APP ........ RESPONDENTS for State. SI Sanjay Kumar, PS Prasad Nagar. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER1709.2019 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the present appeal impugning a judgment dated 14.12.2016 passed by learned ASJ 04 (Central), Delhi in Sessions Case No.27255/16. The said proceedings arose from the FIR No.190/2013 under Sections 308/323/354B/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), registered with PS Prasad Nagar. The FIR in question was registered at the instance of the petitioner (the complainant).2. In terms of the impugned judgment, the accused have been convicted of the offence under Sections 3of the IPC for causing injuries to the complainant, one Mr Brahm Prakash (the complainants father) and Vishal (the complainants brother). However, the ac...
Kavash Khanna vs.faculty of Management Studies & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~56 * + W.P.(C) 6814/2019 & CM APPLs. 28488/2019 & 37658/2019 Date of decision:17. h September 2019 KAVASH KHANNA FACULTY OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES & ORS.....Respondents Through: Mr. Manish Bhardwaj, Adv. versus Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal with ........ Petitioner Mr. Hardik Rupal and Mr. Prang Newmei, Advocates for University of Delhi. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL): Preface 1. At the heart of the matter is the dispute obtaining between the parties qua the issue as to whether the petitioner fulfils the eligibility criteria stipulated for gaining admission to the MBA Programme. 1.1 The eligibility criteria for the MBA Programme which is contained in the Information Bulletin, qua which there is no dispute, provides for the following: Eligibility Criteria for MBA Programme, Candidates applying for admission to the MBA programme must have pursued at least a Bachelor's Degree programme after twelve years of forma...
- ‹ Prev
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- Next ›
- Last »