Delhi Court September 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. Vs.ram Pal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :-"17.09.2019 + W.P.(C) 7632/2019 & C.M. No.31826/2019 (for stay) BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD. Through: Mr.Deepak Thukral, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus Through: Mr.S.P. Srivastava, Adv. ..... Respondent RAM PAL CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. The present petition under Articles 226/ 227 of the Constitution of India assails the order dated 13.03.2019 passed by the learned Labour Court, New Delhi whereby the respondent/workmans application seeking permission to amend his claim statement dated 13.07.2012 has been allowed by permitting him to incorporate the following additional submissions:-"That Bharat Sanchar Nigam-Limited (BSNL), is 4A . an Indian State owned telecommunication company incorporated under the Companies Act 1956 and is an industry as defined in Section 2(j) of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 and is having about 174216 employees in different category, having total assets of Rs.70...
Rajesh Aggarwal vs.om Prakash & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2019
$~25 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17. h September, 2019 CM(M) 768/2019 & CM APPL. 23330/2019 RAJESH AGGARWAL Through: Mr. Vikas Sharma, Advocate (M) ........ Petitioner versus OM PRAKASH & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Narender Vashishta, Advocate (M- CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH981110704) Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed challenging the order dated 16th March, 2019 by which an application for amendment has been allowed, permitting the Plaintiff/Respondent No.1 (hereinafter, Plaintiff) to incorporate a declaratory prayer and certain other paragraphs, in respect of the... Petitioners/Defendant No.2s (hereinafter, Defendant No.2) sale deed.2. The suit dates back to 1991. Plaintiff and Defendant No.1 are brothers. Defendant No.2 is a purchaser of the property from Defendant No.1. At the time of filing of the suit, the alleged sale deed in favour of Defendant No.2, dated 28th November, 1990, had already been exe...
Employee State Insurance Corporation vs.m/s G L Management Services (P ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2019
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:17. h September, 2019 + CM (M) 735/2018 & CM APPL. 26440/2018 EMPLOYEE STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. V. K. Singh, Ms. Nisha Hans and Ms. Komalpreet Kaur, Advocates. (M:9811645002) versus M/S G L MANAGEMENT SERVICES (P) LTD. & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Manish Malhotra, Advocate. (M:9911314422) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition challenges the impugned order dated 16th April, 2018 by which the evidence, which was to be recorded has been suddenly terminated and the following order was passed: that No evidence is being recorded today because it appears that this petition can be decided without recording of any evidence. In this context, it is noteworthy the respondent has no where explained the exact or rough basis of the amount of Rs. 1,29,33,203/-, sought from the petitioner by way of the impugned Order. List for consideration on th...
Ram Vishal Gupta & Ors vs.shokeen & Ors (Cholamandlam Gen Ins Co Ltd)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2019
$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + MAC.APP. 266/2019 Decided on:17. 09.2019 RAM VISHAL GUPTA & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Advocate. versus SHOKEEN & ORS (CHOLAMANDLAM GEN INS CO LTD) ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Advocate for Insurance Company. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) 1. The appellant impugns the award of compensation dated 11.05.2018 passed by the learned MACT in Suit No.503/2017, on the ground that it is on the lesser side. The deceased had attained a degree in Bachelor of Computer Applications (BCA) and was pursuing his Masters in Computer Application (MCA) from a private institute namely, Krishna Institute of Engineering and Technology, Ghaziabad. He had claimed to be earning Rs. 30,000/- per month by imparting tuition. This earning was not proven. The claimants had put forth documents to show that the students who passed out from the said institution would be getting approximately Rs. 4 ...
Kasani Gnaneshwar Mudiraj & Anr vs.a.c. Thangavel & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2019
$~37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17. h September, 2019 + LPA5582019 and CM Nos. 38964, 39031, 41321/2019 KASANI GNANESHWAR MUDIRAJ & ANR..... Appellants Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Ninad Laud, Mr. Gurmehar Sistani, Mr. Sahil Tagotra and Mr. Aditya Pratap Swan, Advs. versus A.C. THANGAVEL & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rahul Mehra, Mr. R.A. Iyer and Mr. Anand Thumbayil, Advs. for R-1 Mr. Dev P. Bhardwaj, CGSC for R-2/UOI with Mr. Jatin Teotia, Adv. Ms. Nandita Rao, Adv. for R-3 Mr. Kartik Rathi, Adv. for intervenor in CM No.41321/2019 CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR % ORDER1709.2019 D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) 1. This Letters Patent Appeal has been preferred by a third party in W.P.(C) 9287/2019. An interim order dated 27th August, 2019 has been passed by the learned Single Judge in the aforesaid writ petition, which is at annexure A-1 to the memo of this appeal. LPA5582019 Page 1 of 3 2....
Anuj Kumar Dwivedi vs.jawaharlal Nehru University and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2019
$~5 & 6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:17. 09.2019 + W.P.(C) 9707/2019 & CM APPL.40053/2019 ANSHUMAN DUBEY ........ Petitioner versus JAWAHAR LAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY ..... Respondent AND + W.P.(C) 9747/2019 & CM APPL.40244/2019 ANUJ KUMAR DWIVEDI ........ Petitioner versus JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY AND ORS...Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. Barun Kumar Sinha, Ms. Suman Kaushik and Mr. Jivesh Kr.Tiwari, Advocates For the Respondent: Ms. Monica Arora, Standing Counsel, JNU with Mr. Harsh Ahuja and Mr. Akashdeep, Advocates Mr. Abhik Chimni, Mr. Avanish Rathi and Ms. Priyal Agarwal, Advocates for the applicant in CM APPL.41551/2019 in W.P(C) No.9707/2019. Mr. Maanav Kumar, Advocate for R-2. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Learned counsel appearing for the Jawaharlal Nehru University 1. W.P(C)9707/2019 & 9747/2019 Page 1 of 6 has filed a preliminary affidavit in Court ...
Ircon International Ltd vs.union of India,through Secretary, Departmen ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2019
$~A-25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:17. 09.2019 + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 375/2019, I.A. No.12832/2019 IRCON INTERNATIONAL LTD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Anil Seth, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA,THROUGH SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH RESEARCH, MINISTY OF HEALTH & FAMILY WELFARE. ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Suparnana Sirivastava, CGSC, Ms. Suparna Srivastava, CGSC and Ms. Sanjana Dua, with Mr. Amit Kumar Dogra, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Vikas Sharma, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH % I.A. No.12832/2019 (Exemption) ORDER1709.2019 Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 375/2019 1. This is a petition under Section 29A (4) and (5) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, (Act), seeking extension of O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 375/2019 Page 1 of 3 time for completion of the arbitral proceedings and passing of the award.2. The parties had entered into four contracts in c...
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. Vs.krishan Lal Yadav
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :-"17.09.2019 + W.P.(C) 7033/2019 & C.M. No.29360/2019 BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD Through: Mr.Deepak Thukral, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus KRISHAN LAL YADAV ..... Respondent Through: Mr.S.P. Srivastava, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. The present petition under Articles 226/ 227 of the Constitution of India assails the order dated 13.03.2019 passed by the learned Labour Court, New Delhi whereby the respondent/workmans application seeking permission to amend his claim statement dated 20.07.2012 has been allowed by permitting him to incorporate the following additional submissions:-"State owned 4A . That Bharat Sanchar Nigam-Limited (BSNL), is an Indian company incorporated under the Companies Act 1956 and is an industry as defined in Section 2(j) of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 and is having about 174216 employees telecommunication Page 1 of 6 W.P.(C) 7033/2019 in different category, ...
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. Vs.ram Chander
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :-"17.09.2019 + W.P.(C) 7645/2019 & C.M. No.31854/2019 (for stay) BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD. Through: Mr.Deepak Thukral, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus RAM CHANDER ..... Respondent Through: Mr.S.P. Srivastava, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. The present petition under Articles 226/ 227 of the Constitution of India assails the order dated 13.03.2019 passed by the learned Labour Court, New Delhi whereby the respondent/workmans application seeking permission to amend his claim statement dated 13.07.2012 has been allowed by permitting him to incorporate the following additional submissions:-"State owned telecommunication 4A . That Bharat Sanchar Nigam-Limited (BSNL), is an Indian company incorporated under the Companies Act 1956 and is an industry as defined in Section 2(j) of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 and is having about 174216 employees in different category, having total assets of R...
Sh. Piyush Kataria vs.delhi Development Authority and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2019
$~74 to 76 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17. 09.2019 + W.P.(C) 11228/2017 DINESH JINDAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Daleep Dhyani, Advocate. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain and Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates. Ms. Shobhana Takiar and Ms. Shweta Anand, Advocates for DDA. + W.P.(C) 11584/2017 SH. PIYUSH KATARIA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Daleep Dhyani, Advocate. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS. ...... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain and Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates. Ms. Shobhana Takiar and Ms. Shweta Anand, Advocates for DDA. Ms. Anya Singh, Advocate for R-3 & R-5. + W.P.(C) 11607/2017 SMT. SUNITA KATARIA ........ Petitioner W.P.(C) 11228/2017, W.P.(C) 11584/2017 & W.P.(C) 11607/2017 Page 1 of 5 Through: Mr. Daleep Dhyani, Advocate. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS. ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain and Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates. Ms. Anya Singh, Advocate for R-3 ...
- ‹ Prev
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- Next ›
- Last »