Delhi Court September 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Delhi Mercantile Co Operative Urban Thrift & Credit Society Ltd vs.the ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2019
$~9 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision :17. 09.2019 LPA2832019 & CM APPL. Nos. 19950-51/2019 DELHI MERCANTILE CO OPERATIVE URBAN THRIFT & CREDIT SOCIETY LTD Through : Mr. Gurdeep Chauhan, Advocate. ..... Appellant versus THE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC for GNCTD with Mr.Deepak Srivastava, Advocate for R1. Ms. Monika Kapoor, Advocate for R2 to R4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI JUDGMENT G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM APPL. No.19950/2019 (condonation of delay) This application has been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 read with Section 151 CPC, 1908 to condone the delay of 1231 days in filing the present appeal.2. Mr. Gurdeep Chauhan, learned counsel appearing for the applicant/appellant submits that the present application is bona fide and the delay has not occurred on account of any mala fides on the part of the LPA2832019 Page 1 of 4 appellant bu...
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. Vs.mohd Hasin
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :-"17.09.2019 + W.P.(C) 7032/2019 & C.M. No.29357/2019 (for stay) BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD Through: Mr.Deepak Thukral, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus MOHD HASIN Through: Mr.S.P. Srivastava, Adv. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. The present petition under Articles 226/ 227 of the Constitution of India assails the order dated 13.03.2019 passed by the learned Labour Court, New Delhi whereby the respondent/workmans application seeking permission to amend his claim statement dated 20.07.2012 has been allowed by permitting him to incorporate the following additional submissions:-"State owned telecommunication 4A . That Bharat Sanchar Nigam-Limited (BSNL), is an Indian company incorporated under the Companies Act 1956 and is an industry as defined in Section 2(j) of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 and is having about 174216 employees in different category, having total assets of Rs....
Glocal Medical College Super Speciality Hospital and Research Centre v ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2019
$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17. h September, 2019 + LPA6042019 and CM Nos. 41412-41413/2019 GLOCAL MEDICAL COLLEGE SUPER SPECIALITY HOSPITAL AND RESEARCH CENTRE Through: Mr. Neeraj Jain and Mr. Anupam Mishra, Advs. ..... Appellant versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mrs. Suparna Srivastava and Ms. Sanjna Dua, Advs. for R-1 Mr. T. Singhdev, Ms. Puja Sarkar, Ms. Michelle B. Das, Ms. Arunima Pal and Mr. Abijit, Advs. for R-MCI CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR % ORDER1709.2019 D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) CM No.41413/2019 (exemption) 1.2. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of. LPA6042019 3. This Letters Patent Appeal has been preferred by the original petitioner, whose W.P.(C) 6958/2019 was dismissed by the learned Single Judge vide judgment dated 5th September, 2019. LPA6042019 Page 1 of 14 4. This appellant had preferred a writ petition for quashin...
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. Vs.mast Ram
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :-"17.09.2019 + W.P.(C) 7643/2019 & C.M. No.31852/2019 (for stay) BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD. Through: Mr.Deepak Thukral, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus MAST RAM Through: Mr.S.P. Srivastava, Adv. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. The present petition under Articles 226/ 227 of the Constitution of India assails the order dated 13.03.2019 passed by the learned Labour Court, New Delhi whereby the respondent/workmans application seeking permission to amend his claim statement dated 29.08.2012 has been allowed by permitting him to incorporate the following additional submissions:-"State owned telecommunication 4A . That Bharat Sanchar Nigam-Limited (BSNL), is an Indian company incorporated under the Companies Act 1956 and is an industry as defined in Section 2(j) of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 and is having about 174216 employees in different category, having total assets of Rs.7...
Dinesh Jindal vs.delhi Development Authority & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2019
$~74 to 76 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17. 09.2019 + W.P.(C) 11228/2017 DINESH JINDAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Daleep Dhyani, Advocate. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain and Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates. Ms. Shobhana Takiar and Ms. Shweta Anand, Advocates for DDA. + W.P.(C) 11584/2017 SH. PIYUSH KATARIA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Daleep Dhyani, Advocate. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS. ...... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain and Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates. Ms. Shobhana Takiar and Ms. Shweta Anand, Advocates for DDA. Ms. Anya Singh, Advocate for R-3 & R-5. + W.P.(C) 11607/2017 SMT. SUNITA KATARIA ........ Petitioner W.P.(C) 11228/2017, W.P.(C) 11584/2017 & W.P.(C) 11607/2017 Page 1 of 5 Through: Mr. Daleep Dhyani, Advocate. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS. ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain and Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates. Ms. Anya Singh, Advocate for R-3 ...
Mohd. Khadim Hussain vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 837/2017 Reserved on:4. h July, 2019 Decided on:17. h September, 2019 MOHD. KHADIM HUSSAIN ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Krishan Kumar, Adv. versus ..... Respondent STATE Represented by: Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP for the State with SI Virendra Kumar PS Seelampur. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. By the present appeal, Mohd. Khadim Hussain challenges the impugned judgment dated 4th November 2016 convicting him for the offences punishable under Sections 394/411/458 IPC in FIR No.602/2015 registered at PS Seelampur and the order on sentence dated 10th November 2016 directing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of seven years and to pay a fine of 2,000/- and in default whereof to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of 30 days for the offence punishable under Section 394 IPC , rigorous imprisonment for a period of five years and to pay a fine of 2,000/- and in default whereof to undergo simple i...
Kusum Bhatt vs.central Information Commissioner (Cic) & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2019
$~A-2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 1179/2015 KUSUM BHATT Date of decision:17. 09.2019 ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Ayush Gupta and Mr.Daman Popli, Advs. versus CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSIONER (CIC) & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Ruchir Bhati, Sr. Standing Counsel for Income Tax. Mr.Sanjiv Kr.Saxena, Mr.R.Mishra, Mr.M.K. Tiwari and Mr.Abhishek Rana, Advs. for R-4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking quashing of the order dated 04.06.2014 passed by respondent No.1/Central Information Commission whereby the appeal filed by the petitioner was dismissed and the information sought was denied.2. The case of the petitioner is that one Sh. Prakash Nautiyal has filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 against the petitioner which is said to be pending in the District Court in Kanpur. In the said complaint Sh.Prakash Nautiyal has sought recovery of ...
Indian Association of Clinical Cardiologists vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P. (C) 11819/2016 INDIAN ASSOCIATION OF CLINICAL CARDIOLOGISTS ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Kapil Sibal and Mr. Raju Ramachandaran, Sr. Advs. with Mr. Amit Kumar, Mr. Shaurya Sahay, Mr. Chetan Joshi, Mr. Avijit Mani Tripathi, Mr. Kumar Abhishek, Ms. Rekha Bakshi and Ms. Hamsini Shankar, Advs. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anil Dabas and Mr. T. Praveen Kumar, Adv. for R- 1/UOI Mr. Vikas Singh, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Singhdev, Ms. Amandeep Kaur, Ms. Puja Sarkar, Ms. Manpreet Kaur, Ms. Michelle Biakthansangi Das, Mr. Tarun Verma and Ms. Arunima Pal, Advs. for R- 2/MCI Mr. Saurabh Chauhan and Mr. Varun Jain, Advs. for R- 3/IGNOU Mr. Bimlesh K. Singh, Mr. Ashutosh Bhardwaj and Mr. Ankit Dwivedi, Advs. for R- 4/UGC CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR W.P. (C) 11819/2016 Page 1 of 46 % 1. JUDGMENT1709.2019 Espousing the cause of holders of the Postgraduate Diploma in Clinical Cardiology (PGDCC) qualificati...
Pintu vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2019
$~47 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17. 09.2019. + CRL.M.C. 4684/2019 PINTU STATE & ANR. Through Mr. Vijay Kinger, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus Through Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, APP for State. ........ RESPONDENTS SI Niraj, PS Pandav Nagar Respondent no.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL.M.A. 35987/2019 Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 4684/2019 Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby quashing FIR No.558/2014 dated 15.07.2017, registered at PS Pandav Nagar for the offences punishable under Sections 3IPC and all other proceedings emanating therefrom. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and respondent no.2 who is present in Court. CRL.M.C.4684/2019 Page 1 of 2 With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal. The present petition is filed on the ground that the parties have...
Enarch Consultants pvt.ltd vs.chief Engineer, Employees State Insuranc ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2019
$~A-26 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 376/2019, I.A. No.12835/2019, 12836/2019 ENARCH CONSULTANTS PVT.LTD ........ Petitioner Date of decision:17. 09.2019 Through: Mr. Anil Seth, Advocate versus CHIEF ENGINEER,EMPLOYEE'S STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Wasim Qadri, Mr. Saeed Qadri, Mr. Tamim Qadri, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH % I.A. No.12835/2019 (Exemption) ORDER1709.2019 Exemption allowed subject to just exception. Application stands disposed of. I.A. No.12836/2019 (Condonation of delay) This is an application for condonation of delay of 2 days in re- filing the petition. Learned counsel for the respondent has no objection to the delay being condoned. For the reason stated in the application and in view of the no objection of the respondent, the application is allowed and the delay of 2 days in re-filing the petition is hereby condoned. Application stands disposed of. O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 376/2019 Page...
- ‹ Prev
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- Next ›
- Last »