Delhi Court September 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Hospitech Management Consultants P. Ltd. Vs.director General Marri ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-18-2019
$~A-23 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:18. 09.2019 + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 379/2019, I.A. No.12955/2019 (Exemption) M/S HOSPITECH MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS P. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. P.S. Bindra, Mr. Bhuvneshwar, versus Advocates DIRECTOR GENERAL MARRIED ACCOMODATION PROJECT ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Vishal Mittal, Senior Panel Counsel with Mr. Rahul Arya, Mr. Nipun Katyal, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) I.A. No.12955/2019 (Exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 379/2019 1. This is a petition under Section 29A(5) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, (Act), seeking extension of time for O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 379/2019 Page 1 of 3 completion of the arbitral proceedings and passing of the Award.2. The Arbitral Proceedings between the parties commenced pursuant to order dated 25.08.2017 passed by this court appointing the Sole A...
s.k. Jasra vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-18-2019
$~56 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:18. 09/2019 + W.P.(C) No.10088/2019 S.K. JASRA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Setu Niket, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjeev Uniyal, Senior Panel Counsel with Ms. Sheetal Raghuvanshi, Government Pleader and Mr. Dhawan Uniyal, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 to 3 with Mr. Aditya Singh, Admin Officer, Ministry of Defence. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI JUDGMENT G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) C.M. No.41720/2019 (exemption) Exemption is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) No.10088/2019 The present writ petition is directed against the order passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal dated 17.09.2018. The writ petition is being disposed of at the admission stage itself. WP(C) 10088/2019 page 1 of 5 2. The case in hand has a long history. A charge-sheet was issued to the petitioner on 24.03.20...
M/S Tnm Services vs.ministry of Health and Family Welfare and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-18-2019
$~53 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment :18. h September, 2019 + W.P.(C) 10079/2019 M/S TNM SERVICES ........ Petitioner Through Dr. Amit George, Mr. S.P. Mukherjee, versus Mr. Rishabh Dheer & Mr. Bharat Rayadurgan, Advocates. MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE AND ANR. CORAM: ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Gaurang Kanth, CGSC for R-1. Mr. Ratan K. Singh, Ms. Priyanka Solanki & Mr. Nikhilesh Krishnan, Advocate for R-2. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM Appl. 41701/2019 (Exemption) 1. Exemption is allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 10079/2019 3. With the consent of the parties, the present writ petition is set down for final hearing at the admission stage itself.4. Some necessary facts required to be noticed for disposal of this petition are that on 29.06.2019, a global e-tender inquiry document was floated by respondent no.2 on behalf of r...
Hira Nand vs.smt. Shakun & Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :15.10.2018 Date of decision:17.09.2019 + RC.REV.567/2017 & CM No.45454/2017 & 5231/2018 & 5229/2018 HIRA NAND ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Gaurav Mitra, Ms.Rashmita Roy Chowdury, Advocates versus SMT. SHAKUN & OTHERS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Sukhbir Singh, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. The petitioner vide the present petition assails the impugned order dated 13.07.2017 of the learned Pilot Court, Central, THC, Delhi in Eviction Petition No.177/2017 whereby the application filed by the petitioner herein who was arrayed as the respondent no.1 to the eviction petition seeking leave to defend the eviction petition filed by the petitioners thereof arrayed as the respondents to the present petition seeking eviction of the petitioner herein from the tenanted premises i.e. the property bearing shop/municipal No.5167, Ward no.13, Mandi Rai (Sarai Haffiz Banna) Sadar Bazar, De...
Ambuja Cement vs.sethi Engineers & Foundry Ltd (Formerly Known as Kitt ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2019
$~A-24 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17. 09.2019 + ARB.P. 592/2019 AMBUJA CEMENT ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Anil Seth, Advocate SETHI ENGINEERS & FOUNDRY LTD (FORMERLY KNOWN AS KITTI STEELS LTD) ..... Respondent versus Through: Mr. Naveen Sharma, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) I.A. No.12845/2019 (Exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. ARB.P. 592/2019 1. This is a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) for appointment of a second Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties.2. The Arbitration Clause between the parties reads as under:"29.0 Arbitration: (in Contract No.PM/EC/002) 29.1 In case of any dispute or differences arising between the parties in respect of any matter of the contract, the matter shall be settled mutually. If the settlement is not reached, the matter will be referred to Arbitration. The Ar...
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. Vs.nackchad
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :-"17.09.2019 BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD + W.P.(C) 7048/2019 & C.M. No.29403/2019 (for stay) Through: Mr.S.P. Srivastava, Adv. NACKCHAD Through: Mr.Deepak Thukral, Adv. versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. The present petition under Articles 226/ 227 of the Constitution of India assails the order dated 13.03.2019 passed by the learned Labour Court, New Delhi whereby the respondent/workmans application seeking permission to amend his claim statement dated 13.07.2012 has been allowed by permitting him to incorporate the following additional submissions:-"State owned telecommunication 4A . That Bharat Sanchar Nigam-Limited (BSNL), is an Indian company incorporated under the Companies Act 1956 and is an industry as defined in Section 2(j) of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 and is having about 174216 employees in different category, having total assets of Rs.70...
Dr. Tarkeshwar Prasad vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2019
$~11 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 1131/2018 DR. TARKESHWAR PRASAD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr. T. P. Singh, Advocate along with Mr. Vinod Kumar, DC Law. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH % ORDER1709.2019 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. The... Petitioner, who joined the Border Security Force (BSF) as Medical Officer on 19th March 1987, has filed the present petition seeking the quashing of adverse remarks in his Annual Confidential Report (ACR) for the period 1st April 1998 to 31st March 1999, the letter dated 9th November 1999 communicating the adverse remarks and the order dated 28th August 2000 passed by the Additional Director General (Medical) Respondent No.3 rejecting his representation dated 18th January 2000 against such adverse remarks.2. The... Petitioner has also sought the quashing of an order dated 1st W.P. (C) 11...
Anshuman Dubey vs.jawahar Lal Nehru University
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2019
$~5 & 6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:17. 09.2019 + W.P.(C) 9707/2019 & CM APPL.40053/2019 ANSHUMAN DUBEY ........ Petitioner versus JAWAHAR LAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY ..... Respondent AND + W.P.(C) 9747/2019 & CM APPL.40244/2019 ANUJ KUMAR DWIVEDI ........ Petitioner versus JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY AND ORS...Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. Barun Kumar Sinha, Ms. Suman Kaushik and Mr. Jivesh Kr.Tiwari, Advocates For the Respondent: Ms. Monica Arora, Standing Counsel, JNU with Mr. Harsh Ahuja and Mr. Akashdeep, Advocates Mr. Abhik Chimni, Mr. Avanish Rathi and Ms. Priyal Agarwal, Advocates for the applicant in CM APPL.41551/2019 in W.P(C) No.9707/2019. Mr. Maanav Kumar, Advocate for R-2. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Learned counsel appearing for the Jawaharlal Nehru University 1. W.P(C)9707/2019 & 9747/2019 Page 1 of 6 has filed a preliminary affidavit in Court ...
Smt. Sunita Kataria vs.delhi Development Authority and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2019
$~74 to 76 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17. 09.2019 + W.P.(C) 11228/2017 DINESH JINDAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Daleep Dhyani, Advocate. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain and Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates. Ms. Shobhana Takiar and Ms. Shweta Anand, Advocates for DDA. + W.P.(C) 11584/2017 SH. PIYUSH KATARIA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Daleep Dhyani, Advocate. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS. ...... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain and Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates. Ms. Shobhana Takiar and Ms. Shweta Anand, Advocates for DDA. Ms. Anya Singh, Advocate for R-3 & R-5. + W.P.(C) 11607/2017 SMT. SUNITA KATARIA ........ Petitioner W.P.(C) 11228/2017, W.P.(C) 11584/2017 & W.P.(C) 11607/2017 Page 1 of 5 Through: Mr. Daleep Dhyani, Advocate. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS. ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain and Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates. Ms. Anya Singh, Advocate for R-3 ...
M/S Pvr Limited vs.m/s Mmr Saha Infrastructure Private Ltd. & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2019
$~A-3 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17. 09.2019 + ARB.P. 204/2019, I.A. No.8000/2019 (Delay 2 days in filing rejoinder) M/S PVR LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Tanuj Khurana, Mr. Jaskaran Singh, Mr. Hitesh Kaushik, Advocates M/S MMR SAHA INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LTD. & ANR. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. H.L. Raina and Mr. Shekhar Budakoti, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. This petition has been filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) seeking appointment of an Arbitrator for adjudicating the disputes that have arisen between the parties in relation to a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) dated 02.11.2016 executed between the petitioner and the respondent.2. The said MOU contains an Arbitration Clause which is reproduced hereinbelow: the first Any dispute or difference arising between the parties shall be resolved amicably at instance. Unresolved disputes, controversi...
- ‹ Prev
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- Next ›
- Last »