Delhi Court September 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rajendra Singh vs.shabbo & Ors (Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co Ltd ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-18-2019
$~9 & 10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + MAC.APP. 411/2018 & CM APPL. 16739/2018 Decided on:18. 09.2019 RAJENDRA SINGH ..... Appellant versus SHABBO & ORS (BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD) ........ RESPONDENTS + MAC.APP. 713/2018, CM APPL. 31164/2018 & CM APPL. 31166/2018 RAJAN SINGH & ORS ..... Appellants versus SHABBO & ORS (BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ) Through: Mr. T.K. Mukherjee, Advocate for ........ RESPONDENTS appellants. Mr. A.K. Soni and Mr. Pavan Kumar, Advocates for insurance company. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) 1. These appeals impugn the order dated 03.02.2018 passed by the learned MACT in MACT No.422/17, wherein the appellant Rajendra Singh has been held liable to pay compensation apropos the fatal accident caused by the offending vehicle registered in his name. The learned counsel for the MAC.APP. No.411/2018 & 713/2018 Page 1 of 7 appellant relies upon the reply of the alleged subsequent owner of the ve...
Deepak Khanna vs.dr. Amrit Lal Shukla
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-18-2019
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:18. 09.2019 RC.REV. 198/2017 & Crl. M.A. 15542/2017 DEEPAK KHANNA versus DR AMRIT LAL SHUKLA ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. Piyush Jain, Adv. with petitioner in person. For the Respondent: Mr. Satish Sahai, Adv. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 26.12.2016, whereby the Leave to defend application of the petitioner has been dismissed by the Rent Controller and an eviction order passed.2. Respondent had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of the petitioner on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 from shop No.2 of property bearing 1372, Shastri Nagar, Delhi, more particularly as shown in red colour in the site plan attached to the eviction petition. RC.REV. 198/2017 Page 1 of 3 3. Learned counsel for...
Mahinder Singh & Ors. Vs.state n.c.t. Of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-18-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 851/2001 & CRL. A.01/2002 Reserved on Date of Decision :23. 08.20 18.09.2019 IN THE MATTER OF: CRL.A. 851/2001 RAJ SINGH & ANR. STATE Through: Ms.Rajdipa Behura, Advocate ..... Appellants with appellants in person Versus Through: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for State with Insp. Pradeep Kumar, P.S. Naraina. ..... Respondent AND CRL.A. 1/2002 MAHINDER SINGH & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Ms. Rajdipa Behura, Advocate with appellants in person STATE N.C.T. OF DELHI Versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for State with Insp. Pradeep Kumar, P.S. Naraina. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J.1. The above appeals are taken up together and disposed of vide this common judgment as both the appeals arise out of a common impugned judgment dated 11.10.2001 and order on sentence dated 31.10.2001 CRL A8512001 & CRL. A.01/2002 Page 1 of 24 arising out of FIR No.registered under Sect...
Court on Its Own Motion vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-18-2019
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 1585/2019 COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION STATE & ANR. ........ Petitioner versus Through: Mr.Rahul Mehra, SC(Crl.) with ........ RESPONDENTS Mr.Chaitanya Gosain, Adv for State ACP Baldev Raj Malhotra, Crime (CCTNS) and ACP Anil Kumar, Addl.PRO, Delhi Police Mr.Sumit Ganguli, Project Manager, M/s Tech Mahindra Ltd., System Integrator, CCTNS, Delhi Police Insp. Jaspal Singh and SI Pankaj Kumar, PS Mangolpuri Date of Decision:18. h September, 2019 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) On the last date of hearing Mr.Rajan Bhagat, DCP/CRO, Crime 1. Branch had given us screenshots of the proposed mobile and web applications which would allow online registration of reports of missing persons. He had also informed us of the actions to be taken by the police control rooms and police stations, in a time-bound manner, on lodgement of the report of a missing person. He had fur...
Govt of Nct of Delhi vs.suresh Kumar & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-18-2019
$~78 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:18. 09.2019 LPA6132019 GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Siddharth Panda, Adv. versus SURESH KUMAR & ORS ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ram Kumar & Mr. K.K. Nangia, Advs. for R-1 to R-3 Ms. Prabhsahay Kaur, Standing Counsel for DDA with Ms. Shruti Gala, Adv. for R-4 CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) CM APPL. No.41661/2019 (exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CM APPL.41659/2019 1. This application has been preferred under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay of 701 days in preferring this appeal.2. We have heard the counsel appearing for the appellant. It is submitted by the counsel for appellant that the present Letters Patent Appeal has been preferred by this appellant being aggrieved and dissatisfied by the judgment and order dated 25th August, 2017 passed...
National Council of Education Research & Training (Ncert) vs.m/s Skywi ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-18-2019
$~47 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:18. 09.2019 C.R.P. 233/2018 & CM APPL. 45507/2018 NATIONAL COUNCIL OF EDUCATION RESEARCH & TRAINING (NCERT) ........ Petitioner versus M/S SKYWING CARRIERS PVT LTD ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners: Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate. For the... RESPONDENTS: Mr. Sushil Kumar Kabra, Advocate. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 06.07.2018 whereby the petitioner has been directed to pay interest at the rate of 18% per annum on the awarded amount for the period post award till the date of payment of amount in terms of Section 31(7)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Arbitration Act) as it stood prior to the amendment of the Arbitration Act by Act 3 of 2016.2. Respondent had filed statement of claim before the Arbitral C.R.P. 233/2018 Page 1 of 4 Tribunal seeki...
Narsingoju Vishal & Ors. Vs.university of Delhi Through Chief Election ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-18-2019
$~48 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:18. 09.2019 + W.P.(C) 10134/2019 NARSINGOJU VISHAL & ORS ........ Petitioners versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI THROUGH CHIEF ELECTION ........ RESPONDENTS OFFICER & ORS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner:... Petitioners in person. For the Respondent: Mr.Mohinder J.S.Rupal with Mr.Prang Newmai, Advocates CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CM APPL.41871/2019 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 10134/2019 1.... Petitioners seek a mandamus directing the respondents to re- conduct the Students Union Elections of the Delhi University.2. It is contended by the petitioners that they were eligible voters duly admitted to the 3rd Year of Law Centre I of Faculty of law, Delhi University and when they attempted to cast their votes, they W.P.(C) 10134/2019 Page 1 of 3 were prevented from casting their votes.3.... Petitioners, who ...
Union of India and Anr. Vs.kuntesh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-18-2019
$~52 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment :18. h September, 2019 UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. Through Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC. ........ Petitioners + W.P.(C) 10013/2019 CORAM: KUNTESH versus Through Mr. S.K. Gupta, Advocate. ..... Respondent HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM APPL414362019 & 41437/2019 (exemptions) 1. Exemptions are allowed subject to all just exceptions.2. Applications stand disposed of. W.P.(C) 10013/2019 3. The present petition is directed against order dated 31.01.2018 passed by learned Central Administrative Tribunal by which O.A. 4226/2015 filed by a 39 year old widow seeking grant of family pension has been allowed.4. Notice to show cause as to why this petition be not admitted. Mr. S.K. Gupta, learned counsel for the respondent accepts notice.5. With consent of the parties, the present petition is taken-up for final hearing at the preliminary stage itself.6. In this case undispu...
Shri k.k. Saxena vs.secretary Directorate of Education & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-18-2019
$~8 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment :18. h September, 2019 + W.P.(C) 1582/2018 SHRI K.K. SAXENA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.D.K.Sharma and Ms.Supriti Roy, versus Advts. SECRETARY DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Avnish Ahlawat, standing counsel DoE with Mr.N.K.Singh, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The prayer made in the O.A. filed by the petitioner stands dismissed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (the Tribunal) vide order dated 12.07.2011 on the ground of delay and laches. The Tribunal has observed that the delay in approaching the tribunal is of more than seven years.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was prevented from approaching the Tribunal on account of the fact that his salary was fixed as per the report of 3rd Pay Commission and being from a modest financial background, with lots of responsibilitie...
Rajan Singh & Ors vs.shabbo & Ors (Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-18-2019
$~9 & 10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + MAC.APP. 411/2018 & CM APPL. 16739/2018 Decided on:18. 09.2019 RAJENDRA SINGH ..... Appellant versus SHABBO & ORS (BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD) ........ RESPONDENTS + MAC.APP. 713/2018, CM APPL. 31164/2018 & CM APPL. 31166/2018 RAJAN SINGH & ORS ..... Appellants versus SHABBO & ORS (BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ) Through: Mr. T.K. Mukherjee, Advocate for ........ RESPONDENTS appellants. Mr. A.K. Soni and Mr. Pavan Kumar, Advocates for insurance company. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) 1. These appeals impugn the order dated 03.02.2018 passed by the learned MACT in MACT No.422/17, wherein the appellant Rajendra Singh has been held liable to pay compensation apropos the fatal accident caused by the offending vehicle registered in his name. The learned counsel for the MAC.APP. No.411/2018 & 713/2018 Page 1 of 7 appellant relies upon the reply of the alleged subsequent owner of the ve...
- ‹ Prev
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- Next ›
- Last »