Delhi Court September 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Vijay Pal vs.shobha Devi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-20-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.REV.P. 802/2018 & CRL.M.A. 32227/2018 * Judgment Reserved :18. 09.2019 Date of Decision :20. 09.2019 IN THE MATTER OF: VIJAY PAL ........ Petitioner SHOBHA DEVI Through: Mr. Satish Chand, Advocate (Mobile No.9810449859) Versus Through: Ms. A. Banerjee, Advocate ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI The present revision petition has been filed on behalf of the 1. petitioner under Section 397 read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. assailing the order dated 02.08.2018, passed by the Judge, Family Courts (West), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in MT No.316/17.2. The respondent Shobha Devi had filed an application under Section 125 Cr.PC before the Family Courts, seeking interim maintenance from the petitioner. The Judge, Family Courts, after considering the facts and circumstances, awarded a sum of Rs.7,500/- per month as interim maintenance to the respondent from the date of filing of the petition, i.e., 21.07.2017.3. Learned counsel for ...
Public Information Officer vs.mr. S. P. Goyal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-20-2019
$~A-11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:20. 09.2019 + W.P.(C) 11830/2018 & CM APPL. 45825/2018 PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Nitesh Kr.Singh, Adv. Versus MR. S. P. GOYAL ..... Respondent Through CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. The issue raised in this writ petition is as to whether a party to a case pending in a court can seek copies of documents which form part of the court record under the Right to Information Act, 2005.2. The grievance of the respondent who had filed an application under the RTI Act centres around a dispute with his brother, Hira Lal Goyal. It is stated that illegal raids were conducted by the Income Tax Department on the premises of the respondent in 1993 on tip off the said brother. A search was carried out based on the alleged information supplied by the brother under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act on the premises of the respondent, his firms and other relatives. It is stat...
Abhay Dewan Alias Gappy vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-20-2019
$~R-12-15 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:2nd August,2019 Judgment pronounced on:20th September,2019 CRL.A. 1175/2018 & CRL.M.(BAIL) 1815/2018 RUNEET GULATHI ..... Appellant STATE Through: Mr. Maninder Singh, Ms. Smriti Asmita and Mr.Sarthak Garg, Advs. versus Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State Insp. Madan Mohan, PS ..... Respondent with Maurya Enclave AND CRL.A. 1268/2018 & CRL.M.(BAIL) Nos.1997/2018, 536/2019 ..... Appellant ABHAY DEWAN alias GAPPY Through: Mr. Hrishikesh Baruah and Mr.Siddhant Kaushik, Advs. STATE versus Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State Insp. Madan Mohan, PS ..... Respondent with Maurya Enclave AND CRL.A. 27/2019 MAHIMA DEWAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Maninder Singh, Ms.Smriti Asmita and Mr.Sarthak Garg, Advs. versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State Insp. Madan Mohan, PS with Maurya Enclave CRL.A. 1175/2018 & other connected matters Page 1 of 159 AND CRL.A. 60/...
Sheila Gujral & Anr vs.joban Kaur Puri
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-20-2019
$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:20. 09.2019 RC.REV. 263/2018 SHEILA GUJRAL & ANR versus JOBAN KAUR PURI ........ Petitioners ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. Sanjeev Sindhwani, Senior Advocate with Mr. Varun Kapoor, Advocate For the Respondent: Mr. Akshay Makhija and Ms. Seerat Deep Singh, Advocates CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 13.03.2018, whereby the Leave to defend application of the petitioner has been dismissed by the Rent Controller and an eviction order passed.2. Respondent had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of the petitioner on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 from shop bearing No.43-A, Khan Market, New Delhi, more particularly as shown in red colour in the site plan attached to the eviction petition. RC.REV. 263/2018 Page 1 of 3...
M/S. Aadinath Industries & Anr. Vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-20-2019
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:-"20.09.2019 + W.P.(C) 9775/2019 M/S. AADINATH INDUSTRIES & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Lalit Gupta, Advocate with Mr. Siddhartha Arora, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ravi Prakash, CGSC with Mr. Farman Ali, Advocate for R-1 Harpreet Singh, Senior Standing Counsel with Ms. Suhani Mathur Advocate for R-2 to R-4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA SANJEEV NARULA, J.(Oral): C.M. No.40379/2019 (exemption) 1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The application stands disposed of. WP(C) No.9775/2019 3. The present writ petition has been filed seeking directions to the... RESPONDENTS to allow... Petitioner No.1 to file Form GST TRAN-1 for availing Input Tax Credit (ITC) and consequently, give Input Tax Credit to W.P.(C) 9775/2019 Page 1 of 5 the... Petitioner No.1.4. The case of the... Petitioner, as set out in the petition...
Kapil Kumar and Ors. Vs.union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-20-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:5. h September 2019 Decided on:20. h September, 2019 + W.P.(C) 1382/2018 & CM399552019 (stay) GAURAV AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Amit Dubey & Mr. Rajeev Ahuja, Advocates. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. versus Through: Mr. ........ RESPONDENTS Jagjit Singh, Ms. Rashmi Malhotra, Mr. Preet Singh & Mr. Vipin Chaudhary, Advocates for Railways. + W.P.(C) 8446/2018 & CM152042019 KAPIL KUMAR AND ORS. ........ Petitioners UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. Through: Mr. Soin Khan, Advocate. versus Through: Mr. ........ RESPONDENTS Jagjit Singh, Ms. Rashmi Malhotra, Mr. Preet Singh & Mr. Vipin Chaudhary, Advocates for Railways. + SUNIL AND ORS. W.P.(C) 8761/2018 Through: Mr. Shailendra Singh & Mr. Arush ........ Petitioners W.P.(C) 1382/2018 & connected matters Page 1 of 16 Kumar, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. Through: Mr. ........ RESPONDENTS Jagjit Singh, Ms. Rashmi Malhotra, Mr. Preet Singh & Mr. Vipin Chaudhary, Advocates for R...
Jatin vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-20-2019
$~R-12-15 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:2nd August,2019 Judgment pronounced on:20th September,2019 CRL.A. 1175/2018 & CRL.M.(BAIL) 1815/2018 RUNEET GULATHI ..... Appellant STATE Through: Mr. Maninder Singh, Ms. Smriti Asmita and Mr.Sarthak Garg, Advs. versus Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State Insp. Madan Mohan, PS ..... Respondent with Maurya Enclave AND CRL.A. 1268/2018 & CRL.M.(BAIL) Nos.1997/2018, 536/2019 ..... Appellant ABHAY DEWAN alias GAPPY Through: Mr. Hrishikesh Baruah and Mr.Siddhant Kaushik, Advs. STATE versus Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State Insp. Madan Mohan, PS ..... Respondent with Maurya Enclave AND CRL.A. 27/2019 MAHIMA DEWAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Maninder Singh, Ms.Smriti Asmita and Mr.Sarthak Garg, Advs. versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State Insp. Madan Mohan, PS with Maurya Enclave CRL.A. 1175/2018 & other connected matters Page 1 of 159 AND CRL.A. 60/...
Ranbir Singh vs.jiya Rani @ Jiya Joshi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-20-2019
$~47 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:20. 09.2019 RC.REV. 559/2019 & CM APPL. 42328-29/2019 RANBIR SINGH versus JIYA RANI @ JIYA JOSHI & ANR ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. M.K. Singh, Advocate For the Respondent: None. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 04.11.2016 whereby leave to defend application filed by the respondent No.2/tenant was dismissed and an eviction order passed.2. Subject eviction petition was filed by respondent No.1/landlady on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 seeking eviction of the respondent No.2 from the tenanted premises comprising of Shop No.T-428, , of 5090, Phatak Mishri Khan, Main Bazar, Pahar Ganj, New Delhi, more particularly as shown in red colour in the site plan annexed to RC.REV. 559/2019 Page 1 of 6 the evi...
State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) vs.pushpa Madaan
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-20-2019
#4 & 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Delivered on :20. 09.2019 CRL.L.P. 353/2019 STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) .... Petitioner versus SANDEEP MADAAN .... Respondent & CRL.L.P. 418/2019 STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) .... Petitioner versus PUSHPA MADAAN .... Respondent Advocates who appeared in these cases: For the... Petitioners For the... RESPONDENTS :Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for State with Insp. Usha Sharma and WSI/IO Sona, PS-Rohini North. :Mr. Shubham Asri, Mr.Vijay Khatri and Mr. Abhijeet Rai, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (OPEN COURT). JUDGMENT CRL.M.A. 31801/2019 (for delay in filing) in CRL.L.P. 418/2019 CRL.L.P. 353/2019 & CRL.L.P.418/2019 Page 1 of 11 1. The present application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, filed on behalf of the petitioner, seeks condonation of delay of 63 days in filing the leave petition.2. Issue notice.3. Mr. Shubham Asri, learned counsel accepts notice...
Gaurav and Ors. Vs.union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-20-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:5. h September 2019 Decided on:20. h September, 2019 + W.P.(C) 1382/2018 & CM399552019 (stay) GAURAV AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Amit Dubey & Mr. Rajeev Ahuja, Advocates. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. versus Through: Mr. ........ RESPONDENTS Jagjit Singh, Ms. Rashmi Malhotra, Mr. Preet Singh & Mr. Vipin Chaudhary, Advocates for Railways. + W.P.(C) 8446/2018 & CM152042019 KAPIL KUMAR AND ORS. ........ Petitioners UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. Through: Mr. Soin Khan, Advocate. versus Through: Mr. ........ RESPONDENTS Jagjit Singh, Ms. Rashmi Malhotra, Mr. Preet Singh & Mr. Vipin Chaudhary, Advocates for Railways. + SUNIL AND ORS. W.P.(C) 8761/2018 Through: Mr. Shailendra Singh & Mr. Arush ........ Petitioners W.P.(C) 1382/2018 & connected matters Page 1 of 16 Kumar, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. Through: Mr. ........ RESPONDENTS Jagjit Singh, Ms. Rashmi Malhotra, Mr. Preet Singh & Mr. Vipin Chaudhary, Advocates for R...
- ‹ Prev
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- Next ›
- Last »