Delhi Court September 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Re-Attar Filte Limited Vs....
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-20-2019
$~C-91 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:20. 09.2019 + CO.PET. 216/2007 RE-ATTAR FILTE LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. D. Bhattacharya, Standing Counsel for Official Liquidator CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) Co. Appl. No.991/2019 1. This is an application filed by the Official Liquidator under Section 481, Companies Act, 1956, read with Rule 281 of the Company (Court) Rules, 1959 (hereinafter referred as CCR), seeking the following prayers: I. The Official Liquidator may kindly be permitted to release an amount of Rs.1,55,560/- to the Commissioner of Custom, Air Cargo Export, New Delhi, after deducting the necessary Government commissions, fee, liquidation expenses from the available company fund balance.; II. The Company may kindly be dissolved Under Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956 read with 9 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 and the Official Liquidator may be discharged as the Liquidator of the Company, and ...
Sunil and Ors. Vs.union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-20-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:5. h September 2019 Decided on:20. h September, 2019 + W.P.(C) 1382/2018 & CM399552019 (stay) GAURAV AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Amit Dubey & Mr. Rajeev Ahuja, Advocates. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. versus Through: Mr. ........ RESPONDENTS Jagjit Singh, Ms. Rashmi Malhotra, Mr. Preet Singh & Mr. Vipin Chaudhary, Advocates for Railways. + W.P.(C) 8446/2018 & CM152042019 KAPIL KUMAR AND ORS. ........ Petitioners UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. Through: Mr. Soin Khan, Advocate. versus Through: Mr. ........ RESPONDENTS Jagjit Singh, Ms. Rashmi Malhotra, Mr. Preet Singh & Mr. Vipin Chaudhary, Advocates for Railways. + SUNIL AND ORS. W.P.(C) 8761/2018 Through: Mr. Shailendra Singh & Mr. Arush ........ Petitioners W.P.(C) 1382/2018 & connected matters Page 1 of 16 Kumar, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. Through: Mr. ........ RESPONDENTS Jagjit Singh, Ms. Rashmi Malhotra, Mr. Preet Singh & Mr. Vipin Chaudhary, Advocates for R...
s.k.jain & Ors vs.the State & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-20-2019
$~28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:20. 09.2019 + CRL.M.C. 2158/2019 S.K.JAIN & ORS ........ Petitioners Through Mr.Rambir Singh, Advs. versus THE STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.M.S. Oberoi, APP for State. Mr.Anil Sharma, Adv. for R-2. SI Dhamveer PS Bindapur. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby quashing FIR No.352/2013 dated 04.08.2013, registered at PS Binda Pur, for the offences punishable under Sections 323/354/506/5IPC and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.2. 3. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.4. The present petition is filed on the ground that the parties have settled CRL.M.C.2158/2019 Page 1 of 2 their disputes and the respondent No.2 has no objection if the present pe...
Anil Chamola vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-20-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI BAIL APPLN. 2380/2019 Judgment reserved on :20. 09.2019 Date of decision :20. 09.2019 ANIL CHAMOLA ........ Petitioner STATE Through: Ms. Neha Garg and Mr. Nitin Garg, Advocates. versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for State with ASI Kishan Pal Singh, PS New Ashok Nagar. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. The applicant seeks the grant of anticipatory bail in relation to the FIR No.179/2019, PS New Ashok Nagar registered under Sections 420/120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 submitting to the effect that the applicant has been falsely implicated and is willing to join the investigation and there are no allegations of any kind against the applicant that he had ever duped the complainant in investing any money into M/s AES Cybernetics Pvt. Ltd and there in nothing on the Bail Appl. 2380/2019 Page 1 of 9 record to indicate any conversation between the applicant and the complainant as per av...
The New India Assurance Co Ltd. Vs.arjun Singh and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-20-2019
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + MAC.APP. 782/2018 & CM APPL. 35711/2018 Decided on:20. 09.2019 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. J.P.N. Shahi, Advocate. versus ARJUN SINGH & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Abhishek Jain and Mr. R.P. Kaushal, Advocates for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) 1. This appeal impugns the award of compensation dated 10.07.2018 passed by the learned MACT in MACT No.on three grounds that: (i) excess amounts have been reimbursed apropos medical bills; (ii) 50% disability apropos the right lower limb has been taken as 100% functional disability and; (iii) the injured himself was under the influence of alcohol at the time of the motor vehicular accident, therefore, he should be considered to have contributed to the accident.2. The aforesaid first contention is sound and valid for the reason that the amount of Rs. 2,29,970/- expended towards medical expenses, MAC.APP. No.782/2018 Pa...
Central Bureau of Investigation vs.vallalore Rangaswamy Natarajan
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-20-2019
$~57 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:20. 09.2019 + CRL.REV.P. 995/2019 CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Nikhil Goel, SPP, CBI with Ms. Naveen Goel, Mr. Dushyant Sarna and Mr. Piyo Harold, Advs. versus VALLALORE RANGASWAMY NATARAJAN ..... Respondent Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL.M.A. 36308-09/2019 (Exemptions) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Applications stand disposed of accordingly.1. 2. CRL.REV.P. 995/2019 and CRL.M.A. 36307/2019 (Stay) 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby to set aside the impugned order dated 01.08.2019 passed by the Ld. Special Judge, (PC Act) CBI-XIII, Rouse Avenue District Court in Case RC AC-1/2012 (A)/0004 to the extent that it requires the CBI to produce FR-I/Crime File. CRL.REV. PET. 995/2019 Page 1 of 3 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that FR-I can only be summoned under exceptional circumstances. ...
Shashi Sharma & Ors vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-20-2019
$~56 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:20. 09.2019 + CRL.M.C. 4753/2019 SHASHI SHARMA & ORS Through: versus Mr. Chetanya Kakar, Adv. ........ Petitioners STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. M.S. Oberoi, APP for State with ASI Yogesh Kumar, PS Rajouri Garden, New Delhi CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL.M.As. 36333-34/2019 (Exemption) 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Applications stand disposed of accordingly. CRL.M.C. 4753/2019 and CRL.M.A. 36332/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.203/2017 dated 22.04.2017 registered at Police Station Rajouri Garden, New Delhi, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 498A/4of the IPC and consequent proceedings arising therefrom. CRL.M.C. 4753/2019 Page 1 of 3 4. Notice issued.5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the pre...
r.s. Vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-20-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~7 * + W.P.(CRL) 2255/2019 & Crl.MA.Nos.33474/2019, 33943/2019, 35222/2019 R.S. ........ Petitioner Through Mr.K.K.Rai, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Anshul Rai, Mr.RamkrishnaVeerendra, Mr.S.K.Pandey and Mr.D.P.S.Rajesh, Advocates. STATE & ORS. versus Through Mr.Rahul Mehra, standing counsel for ........ RESPONDENTS the State with Mr.Chaitanya Gosain, Advocate. Mr. Siddharth Luthra, Senior Advocate with Mr. D. Abhinav Rao, Advocate for R-2 with R-2 in person. Mr.B.Shravanth Shanker, Advocate for R-3 with R-3 in person. Mr. Amit Sibal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rohit Bharadwaj, Advocate for S.D. DCP Joy N.Tirkey, ACP Surender Gulia and Inspector Amleshwar Rai, AHTU/Crime Branch. Date of Decision:20. h September, 2019 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL JUDGMENT Page 1 of 13 W.P.C. (Crl.) 2255/2019 MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present writ of habeas corpus had been filed by the petitioner-son Mr. R.S. seeking a declarat...
Ct/Wc Prem Singh and Ors. Vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-20-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:5. h September 2019 Decided on:20. h September, 2019 + W.P.(C) 1382/2018 & CM399552019 (stay) GAURAV AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Amit Dubey & Mr. Rajeev Ahuja, Advocates. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. versus Through: Mr. ........ RESPONDENTS Jagjit Singh, Ms. Rashmi Malhotra, Mr. Preet Singh & Mr. Vipin Chaudhary, Advocates for Railways. + W.P.(C) 8446/2018 & CM152042019 KAPIL KUMAR AND ORS. ........ Petitioners UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. Through: Mr. Soin Khan, Advocate. versus Through: Mr. ........ RESPONDENTS Jagjit Singh, Ms. Rashmi Malhotra, Mr. Preet Singh & Mr. Vipin Chaudhary, Advocates for Railways. + SUNIL AND ORS. W.P.(C) 8761/2018 Through: Mr. Shailendra Singh & Mr. Arush ........ Petitioners W.P.(C) 1382/2018 & connected matters Page 1 of 16 Kumar, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. Through: Mr. ........ RESPONDENTS Jagjit Singh, Ms. Rashmi Malhotra, Mr. Preet Singh & Mr. Vipin Chaudhary, Advocates for R...
Jaspal Singh & Ors. Vs.state of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-20-2019
$~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:20. 09.2019 + CRL.M.C. 2136/2019 ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Ram Narayan Singh, Adv. JASPAL SINGH & ORS. Versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR Through Mr.M.S. Oberoi, APP for State. ........ RESPONDENTS Respondent no.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby quashing FIR No.1dated 09.03.2014, registered at PS Nihal Vihar for the offences punishable under Sections 323,341,354,427,452 and 34 of IPC and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.2. 3. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and respondent no.2 who is present in person.4. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is CRL.M.C. 2136/2019 Page 1 of 3 taken up for final disposal.5. The present petition is filed on the ground that the parties have settled their disputes amicably and the respondent no.2 has no objecti...
- ‹ Prev
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- Next ›
- Last »