Delhi Court September 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Central Bureau of Investigation vs.sanjeev Kumar & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-23-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.REV.P. 793/2019 Judgment Reserved :13. 09.2019 Date of Decision :23. 09.2019 IN THE MATTER OF CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION SANJEEV KUMAR & ANR. versus Through: Mr.Mridul Jain, Spl.PP. ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg, Advocate with R-2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI The present petition has been instituted challenging the impugned 1. order dated 15.07.2019 passed by the District & Sessions Judge-Cum- Special Judge (PC Act) (CBI) in CC No.04/2019. Vide impugned order, the petitioners application filed under Section 311 Cr.P.C. for recall of witnesses and filing additional documents was dismissed.2. Briefly, the facts necessary for disposal of present petition are that one Vijender Singh filed a complaint dated 02.02.2012 with the CBI wherein it was stated that he had applied to the Office of SDM-cum- Registrar of Societies, Geeta Colony, Delhi for registration of an NGO in the...
Paras Imports Pvt Ltd & Ors vs.m/s Runway Logistics Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-23-2019
$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO(OS) 35603/2019, 35604/2019 (COMM) Date of decision:23. 09.2019 126/2019, CM APPL. 34144/2019, PARAS IMPORTS PVT LTD & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Randhir Jain and Mr. Dhananjai Jain, Advocates. M/S RUNWAY LOGISTICS PVT LTD versus Through: None. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA SANJEEV NARULA, J.(Oral):1. The present appeal under Order 43 Rule 1 (r) CPC1908 read with, Section 13 of Delhi High Court Commercial Courts Act, is directed against the order dated 24th January 2019, passed by the learned Single Judge in CS (COMM.) 37/2019, whereby, the court while issuing summons, on an application of the Respondent under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC, 1908 granted ex-parte ad interim injunction in favour of the Plaintiff, restraining the Defendants (Appellants, herein) from alienating, encumbering or parting with possession of the goods that are the subject matter of the imported co...
Santosh Nayar vs.state & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-23-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:23. d September, 2019. TEST CAS No.74/2018 SANTOSH NAYAR STATE & ORS. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Manoj Chauhan & Ms. Babita, Through: Mr. M.A. Khan and Mohd. Jaid, Versus ........ RESPONDENTS Advs. Advs. for R-4 with R-4 in person. AND CS(OS) 212/2019 + VAISHALI KAPUR ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Manoj Chauhan & Ms. Babita, Versus Advs. SANTOSH NAYAR & ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. M.A. Khan and Mohd. Jaid, Advs. for R-4 with R-4 in person. Test.Cas. No.74/2018 has been filed by the widow of the deceased Satyapal Nayar, son of late Bishan Das, resident of property No.B-54, Sarvodaya Enclave, New Delhi-110017, seeking Letters of Administration on the basis of the document dated 7th June, 2006 stated to be the validly executed last Will of the deceased Satyapal Nayar. Test. Cas.74/2018 & CS (OS) 212/2019 Page 1 of 16 2. The petition was entertained and notice there...
Jes & Ben Groupo Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. Vs.hell Energy Magyarorzag Kft. (Hel ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-23-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:17. h July, 2019 Pronounced on:23. d September, 2019 + CS(COMM) 257/2019 JES & BEN GROUPO PVT. LTD. & ORS. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Mohit Chaudhary, Ms. Garima Sharma, Mr. Balwinder Singh and Mr. Kunal Sachdeva, Advocates. versus HELL ENERGY MAGYARORZAG KFT. (HELL ENERGY HUNGRY LTD.) & ANR. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Sachin Datta, Senior Advocate with Ms. Bindra Rana, Mr. Nihit Nagpal Jhawar, Advocates for D-1. Mr. Samir Malik, Ms. Iti Agarwal and Mr. Paritosh Goel, Advocates for D-2. and Mr. Anuj CORAM: JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA JUDGMENT SANJEEV NARULA, J.: I.A. 8948/2019 1. Defendant No.1 has filed the present application under Section 45 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter the Act) for the dismissal of the suit on the ground that the subject matter of the suit is covered by the arbitration agreement between the parties.2. Plaintiff No.2- Mr. Harpreet Sachdeva is an entrepreneur and is the promoter, dir...
Dr. Mohd. Arshad Malik vs.jamia Millia Islamia University & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-23-2019
$~ * + % 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P. (C) 2081/2018 & CM APPL. 8614/2018 DR. MOHD. ARSHAD MALIK ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Kirti Uppal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Ajit Dayal, Mr. Awijit Paliwal, Advocates versus JAMIA MILLIA ISLAMIA UNIVERSITY & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG with Ms. Zeba Khair, Mr. Sahil Sood, Mr. Harshul Choudhary and Mr. Viplav Acharya, Advs. Mr. Apoorv Kurup, Mr. A.C. Boxipatru and Ms. Isha Mittal, Adv. for UGC CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT2309.2019 The petitioner superannuated, as Associate Professor, in the Aligarh Muslim University, on 30th November, 2005, on attaining the age of 65. He, thereafter, applied for appointment as a Professor in Architecture, in the Department of Architecture and Ekistics in the Respondent No.1 University (hereinafter referred to as the JMIU), on 5th March, 2016. Consequent to the recommendations of the Selection Committee, which examined his case on 29th November, ...
Harbaksh Singh Rosha vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-23-2019
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:23. 09.2019 + CRL.M.C. 2074/2019 with CRL.M.A. 8249/2019 (Stay) and CRL.M.A. 32349/2019(Stay) HARBAKSH SINGH ROSHA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Adit S. Pujari and Ms. Tusharika STATE Mattoo, Advs. versus Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmed, APP for State with ..... Respondent SI Sunil Kumar, PS Tilak Marg Mr. Raj Kamal, DAG Punjab with Mr. Sunil Kumar, SDE, Water Supply & Sanitation Deptt., Punjab/ de facto complainant CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby quashing the Charge sheet in Case arising out of FIR No.536/1991 registered under Section 409 IPC, and all proceedings emanating therefrom pending before the Court of learned Metropolitan Magistrate-06, New Delhi District, Patiala House Courts, Delhi.2. Brief facts of the case are that on 25.11.1970, the... Petitioner came to CRL.M.C. 2074/2019 Page 1 of 7 be employed by the Public Healt...
Modicare Limited vs.gautam Bali & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-23-2019
* % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:23. d September, 2019. CS(COMM) 763/2016& IAs No.9555/2016 & 11189/2016 (both u/O XXXIX R-2A CPC) MODICARE LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Parag P. Tripathi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Tarun Singla, Mr. Srinivasan Ramaswamy and Mr. K.C. Joshi, Advs. GAUTAM BALI & ORS Versus ..... Defendants Through: Mr. AnurajTirthankar, Adv. for AND D-1&2. Mr. Sanjay Gupta and Ms. Naina Dubey, Advs. for D-3,7,9&10. CS(COMM) 764/2016& IA No.15325/2016 (u/O XXXIX R-2A CPC) MODICARE LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Parag Tripathi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. TarunSingla, Srinivasan Ramaswamy and Mr. K.C. Joshi, Advs. Mr. GAUTAM BALI & ORS Versus ..... Defendants Through: Mr. AnurajTirthankar, Adv. for D-1&2. Mr. Sanjay Gupta and Ms. Naina Dubey, Advs. for D-3&4. CS(COMM) 763/2016 & CS(COMM) 764/2016 Page 1 of 22 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW The adjudication hereunder is on the subject, whether to a claim 1. founded on tort of unlawfu...
Raj Kumari vs.seema Rani Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-23-2019
$~41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:23. 09.2019 RC.REV. 345/2019 RAJ KUMARI versus SEEMA RANI GUPTA ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. Vijay Datt, Advocate with petitioner in person. For the Respondent: Ms. Shalini Kapoor with Ms. Bindita Chaturvedi, Advocates. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) RC.REV. 345/2019 & CM APPL.26030/2019 APPL.29596/2019 (seeking two years time for vacating premises) (stay), CM1... Petitioner impugns order dated 29.11.2018, whereby, the leave to defend application of the petitioner had been dismissed and eviction order passed.2. Respondent landlord had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of the petitioner from a shop on ground floor of property No.1890, Gali Lehswa, Bazar Sita Ram more particularly, as shown in red colour in the site plain annexed with the eviction RC.REV. 345/2019 Page 1 of 3 pet...
Dr. r.b. Singh Gaya Homoeopathic Medical College and Hospital vs.union ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-23-2019
$~1 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 7811/2019 & CM APPL. 32453/2019 Date of decision:23. d September 2019 DR. R.B. SINGH GAYA HOMOEOPATHIC MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Kundan Kr. Mishra with Mr. Arpit Srivastava, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Amit Anand, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Sunil Narula, Advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL): CM APPL. 40304/2019 (for early hearing) 1. This is an early hearing application moved on behalf of the petitioner college.2. The petitioner college claims that the counselling for the academic session 2019-2020 will soon commence and therefore, the matter needs to be heard prior to the date already fixed in the matter.3. To be noted, the matter as of now has been posted for hearing on 25.11.2019.4. Counsel for the respondent says that he has no objection if the application is allowed and the wri...
Saminuddin & Ors. Vs.united India Insurance Co Ltd & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-23-2019
$~25 * % + MAC.APP. 90/2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:23. 09.2019 SAMINUDDIN & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Ashwini Kumar Mishra, versus Advocate. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. B. Raman and Mr. Rohish Arora, Advocates for R-2 & R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) CM APPL. 33916/2018 (for delay) 1. This application seeks condonation of delay of five days in filing the appeal.2. 3. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the delay is condoned. The application stands disposed-off. MAC.APP. 90/2017 4. This appeal seeks enhancement of the Award dated 28.07.2016 passed by the learned MACT in Suit No.607/2014 on the ground that: i) the compensation towards future prospects, in terms of the dicta of the Supreme Court in National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Pranay Sethi & Ors. (2017) 16 SCC680 has not been granted; ii) the deceased was 22 years of age at the time of his demise; iii) he was not ...
- ‹ Prev
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- Next ›
- Last »