Delhi Court September 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
P S G College of Education vs.national Council for Teacher Education & ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2019
$~44 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:30. h September, 2019 + LPA6472019 P S G COLLEGE OF EDUCATION ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Mayank Manish & Mr. Ravi Kant, Advs. versus NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION & ANR Through: Ms. Arunima Diwvedi, Standing Counsel (NCTE) ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT D.N. PATEL, Chief Justice (Oral) CM APPL.44014/2019 /2019 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. LPA6472019 1. This Letters Patent Appeal has been preferred by the original petitioner whose W.P.(C) 9932/2019 was disposed of by the learned Single Judge vide order dated 13th September, 2019 (Annexure P-1) whereby the learned Single Judge has directed the appellate forum, where the appeal of this appellant is pending, to decide the same in accordance with law. LPA6472019 Page 1 of 2 2. The order which was under challenge in the writ petition was also chal...
Avinash Kumar & Ors vs.state n.c.t of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2019
$~76 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:30. .09.2019. CRL.M.C. 5019/2019 AVINASH KUMAR & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Ajay Kumar, Adv. versus STATE N.C.T OF DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, APP for State. SI Kuldeep Singh, PS Subhash Place Mr. Vipin, Adv. for R-2 CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek direction thereby quashing FIR No.271/2016 dated 28/03/2016, registered at PS Subhash Place and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.2. 3. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2.4. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal. CRL.M.C. 5019/2019 Page 1 of 3 5. The present petition is filed on the ground that the parties have settled their disputes and the respondent No.2 has no objection if the present petition is allowed.6. Responde...
Sangeeta vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2019
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:24. h September, 2019 Judgment pronounced on:30. September, 2019 CRL.A. 257/2015 VIJAY KUMAR @ BABLOO ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Mr.M.L.Yadav, Advocate versus Through: Ms.Radhika Kolluru, APP for the ..... Respondent State alongwith Insp.R.K.Maan and SI Dinesh, PS Ashok Vihar STATE + CRL.A. 285/2015 ANOOP KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Sumeet Verma and Mr.Aman Chaudhary, Advocates, Advocates + STATE versus Through: Ms.Radhika Kolluru, APP for the ..... Respondent State alongwith Insp.R.K.Maan and SI Dinesh, PS Ashok Vihar CRL.A. 649/2015 SANGEETA ..... Appellant STATE Through: Ms. Saahila Lamba, Advocate versus Through: Ms.Radhika Kolluru, APP for the ..... Respondent State alongwith Insp.R.K.Maan and SI Dinesh, PS Ashok Vihar CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR Crl.A.257/2015 etc. Page 1 of 32 G.S.SISTANI, J.1. All the three appeals arise out of a common judgment dated 30....
All India Association of Central Excise Gazetted Executive Officers vs ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2019
$~59 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:30. 09/2019 + W.P.(C) No.10561/2019 ALL INDIA ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL EXCISE GAZETTED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Jasvinder Kaur, Advocate. versus THE CHAIRMAN, CENTRAL BOARD OF EXCISE AND CUSTOMS AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ravi Prakash, CGSC with Mr. Farman Ali, Advocate and Mr. Aditya Ajay, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI JUDGMENT G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) C.M. Nos.43709-10/2019 (exemption) Exemptions are allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Applications stand disposed of. W.P.(C) No.10561/2019 The challenge before us is to the order passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) dated 27.02.2019. WP(C) 10561/2019 page 1 of 3 2. We may note at the very outset that an O.A. was filed by one Sh. A.K. Gautam as applicant No.1 in which the All India Association of Central Excise Gazetted Executive Officers was impleaded as ...
Meghna Grover & Ors vs.amit Grover & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:30. h September, 2019. CS(OS) 509/2019 MEGHNA GROVER & ORS ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Shiv Charan Garg and Mr. Imran Khan, Advs. Versus ..... Defendants Through: None. AMIT GROVER & ANR CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW IA No.13725/2019 (for exemption) 1.2. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. The application is disposed of. CS(OS) 509/2019 & IAs No.13726/2019 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC), 13727/2019 (u/O XXXII R-2 CPC) & 13728/2019 (for condonation of 19 days delay in re-filing) 3. The three plaintiffs, namely (i) Meghna Grover, (ii) Shreya Grover and (iii) Rannveer Singh Grover, have instituted the suit for (a) declaration of the plaintiffs as lawful co-owners having share in property No.11/40, West Punjabi Bagh, New Delhi; (b) permanent injunction restraining the two defendants Amit Grover and Sumit Grover from alienating, encumbering or parting with the aforesaid property; (c) mandatory injunction directing the ...
Ashwini Khullar vs.dda & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2019
$~ * + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:17. h September, 2019 Decided on:30. h September, 2019 ASHWINI KHULLAR W.P. (C) 8469/2009 ...... Petitioner Through: Mr.Saurabh Kirpal, Mr.Pankaj Yadav, Ms. Varsha Yadav and Mr. Dubey, Advocates. Priyaranjan versus DDA & ORS. Through: Mr. Arun Birbal and Mr. Ajay ....... RESPONDENTS Birbal, Advocates for DDA. AMBUJ SOOD W.P.(C) 8479/2009 & CM APPL. 7948/2019 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Shanker Raju, Mr.Pankaj Yadav, Ms. Varsha Yadav and Mr. Dubey, Advocates. Priyaranjan versus DDA & ORS. Through: Mr. Arun Birbal and Mr. Ajay Birbal, Advocates for DDA. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 13931/2018 & CM APPL. 54517/2018, 27092/2019, 31896/2019 & Review Petition 331/2019 KANWAL KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Shanker Raju, Mr. Pankaj Yadav, Ms. Varsha Yadav and Mr. Priyaranjan Dubey, WP(C) No.8469/2009 & connected matters Page 1 of 38 Advocates. versus CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH UNION OF INDIA AND O...
Jaikaran & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2019
$~61 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:30. 09.2019 + CRL.M.C. 4965/2019 JAIKARAN & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Krishan Sharma, Adv. with... Petitioner No.1 in person versus STATE & ANR. Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, APP for State with ASI Jitender Singh, PS Kanjhawala Mr. Vimal Puggal, Adv. for R-2 ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL. M.A. 37210/2019 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 4965/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.464/2018 dated 19.11.2018 registered at PS Kanjhawala and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.4. Notice issued.5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the CRL.M.C. Page 1 of 3 respondent no.2.6. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.7. The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 14.07.2013 as ...
M/S Kss-Kssiipl Consortium vs.m/s Gail India Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:30. h August, 2019 Decided on:30. h September, 2019 CS(COMM) 198/2017 & I.A. 14017/2018 (u/O1R10CPC by P.) M/S KSS-KSSIIPL CONSORTIUM Represented by: Mr. Arun Kumar Varma, Sr. Adv. ..... Plaintiff with Mr. Abhay Raj Varma, Mr.Vishal Nautiyal, Advs. versus M/S GAIL INDIA LTD Represented by: Mr. Sacchin Puri, Sr. Adv. with ..... Defendant Mr.Yoginder Handoo, Mr. Kamil Khan, Mr. Navroop Singh, Mr.Sandeep Kumar, Mr. Dhananjay Grover, Mr. Dhan Singh, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA I.A.10585/2017 (u/O7R11CPC by D) 1. Plaintiff has filed the present suit claiming that it is a consortium of M/S JSC OGCC Kazstroyservices (KSS) as the leader and M/S Kazstroyservices Infrastructure India Pvt. Ltd. as its member. It is the case of the plaintiff that Engineers India Limited, a project management consultant and a Government of India undertaking, was appointed by the defendant as the Engineer in-charge of the project in question ...
Abhinandan Kumar Jain vs.mvl Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2019
$~J * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on:10. 05.2019 Judgment Pronounced on:30. 09.2019 versus versus versus ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner versus ..... Respondent ..... Respondent ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner CO.PET. 518/2013, CA. Nos.1415/2018 & 1416/2018 SICOM LTD. HANUNG TOYS & TEXTILES LTD. CO.PET. 987/2015, CA. Nos. 718/2018 & 1444/2018 CFSIT, INC SHAKTI BHOG FOODS LIMITED CO.PET. 668/2014, CA. Nos.1366, 1047 & 1048/2018 ABHINANDAN KUMAR JAIN MVL LIMITED CO.PET. 814/2016, CA. Nos.826, 980 & 984/2018 BRIJESH GUPTA & ANR. PREMIA PROJECTS LTD. + 1. + 2. + 3. + 4. Present: Mr.Nikhilesh Kumar, Adv. for the petitioner in CP6682014. Mr.Sanjeev Anand, Mr.Sjresh Khadav and Mr.Varun K.Bala, Advs. for applicant in CP6682014. Ms.Abha Sinha, Adv. in CA No.444/2019 in CP6682014. Mr.Anil Kumar Airi, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Abhinav Mishra, Mr.Siddhant Tripathi, Ms.Nivedita Chauhan, Mr.Karan Nagpal, Advs. for applicant/Intervener in CA1212019 in CP6682014. Mr....
m.c.d. Vs.shanti Devi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2019
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:30. h September, 2019 Through: Ms. Saroj Bidawat, Advocate. ........ Petitioner M.C.D. + W.P.(C) 8083/2008 & CM No.35974/2019 SHANTI DEVI versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Bankey Bihari, Advocate with respondent in person. Mr. Raavi Birbal, Advocate as amicus curiae.1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT The petitioner has challenged the award dated 11th February, 2005 whereby the learned Labour Court awarded reinstatement with 25% back wages with continuity of service to the respondent.2. The petitioner engaged the respondent as Mahila Beldar on daily wages on 14th July, 1997 and she was disengaged on 06th January, 1998 whereupon the respondent raised an industrial dispute which was referred to the Labour Court.3. The respondent alleged in her statement of claim that she was appointed as Mahila Beldar on daily wages on 14th July, 1997 and she worked till December, 1997. According to the respondent, her termi...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »