Delhi Court September 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sandeep Singh vs.ranjana Gawri
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-24-2019
$~55 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 4853/2019 Date of decision:24. 09.2019 SANDEEP SINGH ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Rajiv Bajaj, Adv. versus ..... Respondent Through Mr.Shivendra Singh, Adv. RANJANA GAWRI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) Crl. M.A. 36778-79/2019 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Applications are disposed of. Crl.M.C.4853/2019 & Crl.M.A. 36780/2019 3. Notice issued.4. Learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondent and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.5. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby to set aside the impugned order dated 05.08.2019 passed by the learned MM, West CRL.M.C. 4853/2019 Page 1 of 10 District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in Complaint Case No.7026 of 2017.6. Brief facts of the case are that the respondent herein has filed a complaint under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1...
Ramjivan Gupta vs.m/s Jagran Prakshan Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-24-2019
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:24. 09.2019 + W.P.(C) 10336/2017... Petitioner in person. ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Counsel for the respondent. versus Through RAMJIVAN GUPTA M/S JAGRAN PRAKSHAN LTD. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. Through The present writ petition under Articleof the Constitution of India, assails the Award dated 15.07.2016, passed by the learned Labour Court X, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi, in ID No.4607/2016, rejecting the petitioners/workmans claim after closing his evidence vide a separate order passed on the same date.2. The petitioner joined the services of the respondent/management as a Phototype Setting Operator on 15.10.1992 and was promoted as a Production Officer on 01.11.2003. While he was working as a Production Officer, the respondent on 15.05.2012, issued an order transferring the petitioner from Delhi to Jammu. After receipt of the transfer order, the petitioner submitted an applica...
Union of India vs.hari Ram
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-24-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~A-26 * % + W.P.(C) 7835/2011 UNION OF INDIA Date of Decision:24. 09.2019 ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Mahender Kumar Bharwaj and Mr.K.C.Dubey, Advs. versus HARI RAM Through Mr.Manoj Salim and Ms.Anita Saraswat, Advs. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(Oral) This Writ Petition is filed by the petitioner Union of India seeking to 1. impugn the order of Central Information Commission dated 24.6.2010 and 1.12.2010.2. The respondent herein retired as a Subedar from the Indian Army in the year 1994. He moved an RTI application on 12.07.2009 where he requested for a certified copy of the report from staff court of enquiry including its report conducted in the aforesaid unit in the year 1991-1992. Correspondence was exchanged between various functionaries. However, on 14.09.2009 copies of staff court of inquiry having 91 pages was sent to the respondent.3. The respondent was not satisfied and hence sought some of ...
Prof Mahabir Edcational Culturul & Welfare Society vs.girdhari Lal Dha ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-24-2019
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:19. h September, 2019 Pronounced on:24. h September, 2019 + RFA3712019 & CM APPL No.19363/2019, 41916/2019 PROF MAHABIR EDCATIONAL CULTURUL & WELFARE SOCIETY ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Jai Sahai Endlaw, Advocate. versus GIRDHARI LAL DHARA ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Neeraj Yadav and Ms.Aditi Sharma, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. This Regular First Appeal is preferred by the appellant against the judgment and decree dated 27.07.2018 passed by the learned Additional District Judge-04/East District, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi/ (hereinafter as the learned Trial Court) in Civil Suit No.125/2017 whereby the suit filed by appellant was dismissed.2. The brief facts which led to filing of this appeal are appellant filed the aforesaid Civil Suit for specific performance in respect of the agreement to sell dated 30.06.2006 pertaining to the property No.742, situated in revenue estate of Village...
The New India Assurance Co Ltd vs.azmati Khatoon & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-24-2019
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + MAC.APP. 703/2017 & CM APPL. 28452/2017 Decided on:24. 09.2019 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Salil Paul, Advocate. versus AZMATI KHATOON & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Advocate for R-1 to R-7. Ms. Pranjal Shekhar, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Amit Nehra, Advocate for R-9. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) CAV7092017 1. Since the learned counsel named above has entered appearance on behalf of the caveators, the caveat stands discharged. MAC.APP. 703/2017 & CM APPL. 28452/2017 2. This appeal impugns the award of compensation dated 16.05.2017 passed by the learned MACT in Smt. Azmati Khatoon vs. Satish Kumar & Ors., on the ground that the computation of compensation MAC.APP. No.703-2017 Page 1 of 4 is erroneous. The learned counsel for the appellant contends that the addition of 50% towards loss of future prospects is erroneous and the same should have been con...
National Highway Authority of India vs.rayalseema Expressway Private L ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-24-2019
+ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: September 24, 2019 % O.M.P. (COMM) 344/2019, I.As. 11958-11959/2019 NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Asha Gopalan Nair and Ms. Nivedita Nair, Advs. versus RAYALSEEMA EXPRESSWAY PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Priyabrat Tripathy, Mr. Sanjeevi Sheshdhari, Ms. Surabhi Pandey and Ms. Niharika Kaul, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.(ORAL) I.A. 11959/2019 Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. O.M.P. (COMM) 344/2019 1. The challenge in this petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short Act of 1996) by the National Highways Authority of India is, to an Award dated May 02, 2019 whereby the Arbitral Tribunal has allowed the claims of the respondent herein. OMP (COMM) 344/2019 Page 1 of 58 2. The brief facts, which are necessary for the adju...
Ramesh Kumar Bagga vs.kailash Makkar & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-23-2019
$~51 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:23. 09.2019 RC.REV. 285/2017 & CM APPL. 21056/2017 & 42185/2018 RAMESH KUMAR BAGGA KAILASH MAKKAR & ANR versus ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr.Praveen Suri, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr.Mayank Mohan, Advocate. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 04.05.2017, whereby the Leave to defend application of the petitioner has been dismissed and an eviction order passed.2. Subject eviction petition has been filed by the respondents on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 with regard to a shop No.1 in property No.WZ-113/1, Meenakshi Garden, Tilak Nagar, New Delhi, more particularly as shown in red colour in the site plan attached to the eviction petition. RC.REV. 285/2017 Page 1 of 6 3.... RESPONDENTS had filed the subj...
Gateway Impex Pvt. Ltd. Vs.tata Aig Life Insurance Co. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-23-2019
$~ * % + O.M.P. (COMM) 192/2016 GATEWAY IMPEX PVT. LTD. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:04. 09.2019 Pronounced on:23. 09.2019 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravi Shankar Nanda & Mr. Manish Verma, Advocates. versus TATA AIG LIFE INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Swati Sinha & Mr. Aman Bhatnagar, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (the Act) for partially setting aside the Award dated 20.11.2014, passed by the Arbitral Tribunal. The petition seeks to challenge the Award to the extent it has partially rejected the claim of the petitioner under Issue No.1 as also the claims under Issue Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7(f) and 7(g).2. It may be noted at this stage that when the matter was heard on 4.9.2019, learned counsel for the petitioner had at the outset stated on instructions, that he would not press the petition ...
Darshan Chadha vs.govt of Nct of Dlehi Through Its Chief Secretary & A ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-23-2019
$~43 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:23. 09/2019 + W.P.(C) No.10236/2019 DARSHAN CHADHA ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Amita, Advocate with Mr. Dev Bharti, Advocate and Ms. Shashi Bala, Advocate. versus GOVT OF NCT OF DLEHI THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECETARY & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ramesh Singh, Standing Counsel for GNCTD with Mr. Ishan Agrawal, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI JUDGMENT G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) C.M. No.42224/2019 (exemption) Exemption is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) No.10236/2019 Respondent had published a tender bearing No.02/PM (Hr. Edu.Proj.)/PWD/2019-20 for the work of construction of Synthetic WP(C) 10236/2019 page 1 of 6 Football Ground and Basketball Court (Indoor) at Sarvodaya Bal Vidyalaya, Anand Vas (Lok Vihar), Delhi. The petitioner submitted its bid for the project on 22.07.2019.2. The petitioner is aggrieved by co...
M/S Bishamber Dass Pran Nath & Anr vs.madhu Kapoor & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-23-2019
$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:23. 09.2019 RC.REV. 309/2016 M/S BISHAMBER DASS PRAN NATH & ANR ....Petitioner versus MADHU KAPOOR & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Ms. Richa Kapoor, Ms. Saloni Jain and Mr. Chaitanya Bansal, Advocates For the Respondent: Mr. Kamal Bansal, Advocate CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) RC.REV. 309/2016 & CM APPL.22066/2016 (for filing additional documents), CM APPL.22509/2016 (stay), CM APPL.37576/2017 (under Order 340 Cr.P.C.), CM APPL.48834/2018 (to bring on record the supplementary affidavit) 1.... Petitioners impugn order dated 04.02.2016, whereby, leave to defend application of the petitioner has been dismissed and an eviction order passed.2.... RESPONDENTS had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of the petitioners from a shop measuring 109 sq. ft. in a RC.REV. 309/2016 Page 1 of 7 property bearing ...
- ‹ Prev
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- Next ›
- Last »