Delhi Court September 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (Bsnl) vs.maharashtra Knowledge Corporati ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2019
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. (COMM) 364/2019 Date of Decision:25. 09.2019 BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED (BSNL) ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ajit Kumar Singh, Advocate versus MAHARASHTRA KNOWLEDGE CORPORATION LTD (MKCL) Through: Mr. Abhinav Mukerji, Mr. Bihu Sharma, Advocates ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.I.A. No.12475/2019 (Delay 14 days in re-filing) 1. This is an application seeking condonation of 14 days delay in re- filing the petition.2. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and the delay of 14 days in re-filing the petition is condoned.3. The application stands disposed of. O.M.P. (COMM) 364/2019 4. Present petition has been filed by the petitioner/BSNL under Section 34(2) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) for setting aside the award dated 09.10.2017 and the revised award dated 20.06.2019, passed by the learned Arbitrator. However, arguments have been addressed by the p...
Kashyap Smriti Shivaji Shiksha Samiti and Anr. Vs.national Council for ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~65 * + W.P.(C) 10412/2019 & CM No.42994/2019 Date of decision:25. September 2019 KASHYAP SMRITI SHIVAJI SHIKSHA SAMITI AND ANR. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Adv. versus NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION AND ANR. ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Arunima Dwivedi with Mrs. Preeti Kumar Nanda, Advs. . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL):1. Issue notice.2. Mr. Arunima Dwivedi accepts notice for the respondents.3. Ms. Dwivedi says that she would argue the matter on the basis of record presently available with the Court. 3.1 Given this position, with the consent of counsel for parties, matter is taken up for final disposal.4. The petitioner, in this case, is aggrieved by the decision taken by the Western Regional Committee (in short WRC) of the National Council for Teacher Education (in short NCTE) in its 310th Meeting held between 19th to 21st August, 2019. The decision that was taken qua the petiti...
Kusum Sharma vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2019
$~55 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:25. 09.2019 + CRL.A. 1009/2018 KUSUM SHARMA ..... Appellant Through Mr. Braham Singh with Mr. Rohit Vidhudi, Mr. M.S. Vidhudi and Ms. Manju, Advs. versus STATE & ANR. Through Mr.Hirein Sharma, APP for State. Adv. for R-2 (appearance not given) ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present appeal, the appellant seeks direction thereby to set aside the final judgment dated 07.10.2017 passed by the learned court of Additional Sessions Judge, Special, Fast Track Court, South-East, Saket Courts, New Delhi in Session Case No.1553/2016, Case FIR No.419/2014, punishable under sections 376/328/323 of Indian Penal Code, registered at Police Station- Jaitpur, New Delhi, whereby the accused/respondent no.2 has been acquitted by the learned Trial Court. CRL.A. 1009/2018 Page 1 of 19 2. Case of appellant herein is that the appellant is a house wife and is residing alongwith her hus...
Rajnish Gupta & Anr. Vs.brij Mohan Aggarwal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2019
$~A-28 * % + O.M.P. (COMM) 401/2019 RAJNISH GUPTA & ANR. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:25. 09.2019 ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Siddhant Nath, Mr. Bushra Waseem, Mr Rajnish, Advocates versus BRIJ MOHAN AGGARWAL Through: ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) I.A. No.13424/2019 (Exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. I.A. No.13425/2019 (delay application) 1. The present application has been filed seeking condonation of delay of 150 days in filing the present petition. The relevant paragaphs of the application are extracted hereunder: 3. That it is relevant to mention herein that the... Petitioners are in great financial trouble due to non- completion of certain projects and were unable to engage a counsel for filing the present petition.4. That more over the health of... Petitioner No.2 has also not been in a good possession which further refrained the... Petition...
Rakesh Goel vs.hira Lal (Now Deceased) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2019
$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + C.R.P. 118/2019 RAKESH GOEL Judgment delivered on:25. 09.2019 ........ Petitioner versus HIRA LAL ( NOW DECEASED) & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. Rajinder Pal Singh, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. Puneet Kumar Rai with Mr. Neeraj Kumar Shah, Advocate for respondent No.1 with respondent No.1 in person. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) C.R.P. 118/2019 & CM APPL.24052/2019 (stay) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 11.03.2019, whereby, the application of the petitioner/defendant under Order XII Rule 6 CPC has been dismissed.2. Subject Suit was filed by one Sh. Hira Lal, the predecessor of respondent No.1 and respondent No.2 for possession and injunction against the petitioner with regard to a piece of land measuring 52 sq. yards out of Plot No.R-137 situated in Abadi known as Rishab Nagari, Village Dhirpur.3. It was contended in the...
Nitesh Kumar Anand vs.university of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2019
$~22 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 9741/2019 NITESH KUMAR ANAND ........ Petitioner Date of decision:25. September 2019 Through : Mr. Sunil Mittal, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Rajiv Thukral and Mr. Sangeeta Dass, Advs. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Mr. Hardik Rupal, Mr. Prang Newmai, Mr.Kousik Ghosh and Ms. Aditi Shastri, Advs. for University of Delhi. Mr. T. Singhdev and Ms. Arunima Pal, Advs. for R-3/MCI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL):1. On 11.09.2019, after hearing learned counsel for the parties at some length, I had made the following observations : 2. Apart from anything else, what is curious and completely unexplained at least at this stage, is the contradiction between the contents of the opening sheet of the written test taken by the petitioner in respect of Paper No.IV (Surgery II) and what is apparent from a visual examination of the answer sheet enclosed therewith....
Harsh Shiksha Avam Samaj Kalyan Samiti and Anr. Vs.national Council fo ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2019
$~76 * + HARSH SHIKSHA AVAM SAMAJ KALYAN SAMITI AND ANR. NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION AND ANR. Through: Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Adv. versus ........ Petitioners IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 10441/2019 & CM APPL. 43124/2019 Date of decision:25. September 2019 ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Arunima Dwivedi with Mrs. Preeti Kumar Nanda, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL):1. Issue notice.2. Mr. Arunima Dwivedi accepts notice for the respondents.3. Ms. Dwivedi says that she would argue the matter on the basis of record presently available with the Court. 3.1 Given this position, with the consent of counsel for parties, matter is taken up for final disposal.4. Via this petition, the challenge is laid to the order dated 4.9.2019 passed by the Western Regional Committee (in short WRC) of the National Council for Teacher Education (in short NCTE).5. By virtue of this order, recognition given to the petitioner No.2 institute for in...
Rakshit Singh vs.tarlochan Singh & Anr (M/S United India Insurance Co ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2019
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + MAC.APP. 678/2019, CM APPL. 31934/2019 & CM APPL. Decided on:25. 09.2019 31935/2019 RAKSHIT SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.D. Baloni, Advocate alongwith appellant. versus TARLOCHAN SINGH & ANR (M/S UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD ) ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) 1. The award of compensation dated 11.04.2019 passed by the learned MACT in MACP No.230/2018 is impugned on the ground that the impugned order has erred in not considering the learners driving licence issued to the appellant on 03.01.2018. The fallacy in his contention is as evident, because the accident had happened on 26.11.2017 and on that date, the appellant admittedly did not hold any valid driving licence. Therefore, the document issued subsequent to it would have no relevance.2. The impugned order has dealt with this issue as under:-"57. The respondent No.1 has also exami...
North Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.mohd Rafi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2019
$~48 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:25. 09.2019 RC.REV. 571/2019 NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ....... Petitioner versus MOHD RAFI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Ms. Mini Pushkarna, Standing Counsel for North DMC with Ms. Swagata Bhuyan, Mr. Shiva Pandey and Ms. Khushboo Nahar, Advocates. Mr. Ashok Sharma, Dy. Director Education, North DMC. For the Respondent: None. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CM APPL.43112/2019 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CM APPL.43113/2019 (for condonation of delay in re-filing) 1. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the Revision petition was originally filed within time, however, there RC.REV. 571/2019 Page 1 of 7 were certain objections raised by the Registry and when the record was taken back for the purposes of removing the objections, there were change of of...
Seema Kumari vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2019
$~50 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 4859/2019 Date of decision:25. 09.2019 SEEMA KUMARI STATE & ANR ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Akanksha Chaudhary, Adv. versus Through: Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, APP for State ........ RESPONDENTS with SI Jay Kishan, PS Saket Mr. Sunil Fernandes, Standing Counsel for BSES with Ms. Anju Thomas, Adv. for BSES/R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL.M.A. 36807/2019 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 4859/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby for quashing of FIR No.331/2019, dated 12.08.2019 registered at Police Station Saket, for the offence punishable under Section 135 of The Electricity Act, 2003 and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom.4. 5. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent No.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the CRL.M.C. 4859/...
- ‹ Prev
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- Next ›
- Last »