Delhi Court September 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ex-Constable Subhash Singh vs.government of India & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 11126/2005 EX-CONSTABLE SUBHASH SINGH Through: Ms. Avnish Ahlawat with Mr. N. K. Singh, Ms. Palak Rohmetra and Ms. Laveena Arora, Advocates versus ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Barkha Babbar, Advocate for Respondent/UOI GOVERNMENT OF INDIA & ANR CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH ORDER2509.2019 $~5 * + % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. The... Petitioner who was a constable with the Border Security Force (BSF) has filed this writ petition seeking the quashing of an order dated 7th April, 2004 passed by the Officiating Commandant (OC) of the 95th Battalion, BSF holding the... Petitioner guilty of the charges for which he was tried by the Summary Security Force Court (SSFC) of the offences under Sections 19 (a) and 22 (e) of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (BSF Act) and sentencing him to be dismissed from service. He has also challenged the order dated 13th December, 2004 passed by the Deputy Inspector Ge...
Kanha Education Society and Anr. Vs.national Council for Teacher Educa ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~66 * + W.P.(C) 10420/2019 & CM No.43021/2019 Date of decision:25. September 2019 KANHA EDUCATION SOCIETY AND ANR. Through: Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION AND ANR. Through: Ms. Arunima Dwivedi with Mrs. ..... Respondent . Preeti Kumar Nanda, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL): CM No.43019/2019 CM No.43020/2019 1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. W.P.(C) 10420/2019 & CM No.43021/2019 2. Issue notice.3. Mr. Arunima Dwivedi accepts notice for the respondents.4. Ms. Dwivedi says that she would argue the matter on the basis of record presently available with the Court. 4.1 Given this position, with the consent of counsel for parties, matter is taken up for final disposal.5. Via the instant writ petition, challenge is laid to the order dated 5.9.2019 passed by the Western Regional Committee (in short WRC) of the National Council for Teacher Education (...
Aalam @ M. Shamshad Alam vs.brijesh Shukla @ Manoj & Ors (Iffco Tokio ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2019
$~34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:25. 09.2019 ..... Appellant % + MAC.APP. 804/2019 & CM APPL. 43097/2019 AALAM @ M. SHAMSHAD ALAM versus Through: Mr. Ravi Sabharwal, Advocate. BRIJESH SHUKLA @ MANOJ & ORS (IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD) ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Shantha Devi Raman and Mr. Arihant Jain, Advocates for insurance company. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) CM APPL. 43096/2019 (for delay) 1.2. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the delay is condoned. The application stands disposed-off. MAC.APP. 804/2019 & CM APPL. 43097/2019 3. Issue notice.4. The learned counsel named above accepts notice on behalf of the 5.6. insurance company. At joint request, the appeal is taken up for disposal. The appellant impugns the award of compensation dated 08.02.2019 passed by the learned MACT in MACP No.153/14, on the ground that for amputation resulting in 60% disability in the right lower limb of the appellant, ...
Naresh Kumar & Anr. Vs.rehmat Elahi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2019
$~51 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:25. 09.2019 RC.REV. 573/2019 & CM APPL. 43189/2019 NARESH KUMAR & ANR REHMAT ELAHI versus ........ Petitioners ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. S.H. Nizami, Advocate with petitioner No.2 in person. For the Respondent: Mr. Anis Ahmed and Mr. Mohd Raafe Suhail, Advocates with respondent in person. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CM APPL. 43190/2019 (condonation of delay in re-filing) For the reasons stated in the application, the delay in re-filing the petition is condoned. The application is disposed. CAV. No.971/2019 In view of the appearance of the respondents, caveat stands discharged. RC.REV. 573/2019 1. Perusal of Memo of Parties shows that petitioner No.1 had expired RC.REV.573/2019 Page 1 of 3 prior to filing of the petition leaving behind only petitioner No.2 as the legal heirs. The name of petitioner No.1 is stru...
State vs.sandeep
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2019
$~48 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.L.P. 532/2019 STATE ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Amit Gupta, APP for State. SI Vineet Kumar, PS Narela. versus SANDEEP ..... Respondent Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER2509.2019 VIBHU BAKHRU, J CRL.M.A. 36804/2019 1.2. Exemption is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CRL.L.P. 532/2019 3. The State has filed the present petition seeking leave to appeal against a judgment dated 15.07.2019, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge. The said proceedings had commenced pursuant to the FIR bearing No.679/2016, under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), registered with P.S. Narela, on 13.09.2016. The said FIR was lodged pursuant to the complaint made by Ms 4. P (name withheld to avoid any ignominy). She has stated that she had developed a friendship with the accused (respondent herein) in the CRL.L.P. 532/2019 Page 1 of 7 year 2013. And, over a span of tw...
The Manager Mail Motors & Anr vs.manoj Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2019
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + MAC.APP. 937/2017 & CM APPL. 38612/2017, 38610/2017 Decided on:25. 09.2019 THE MANAGER MAIL MOTORS & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Dev. P. Bhardwaj, CGSC alongwith Mr. Jatin Teotia, Advocate. versus MANOJ KUMAR CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI Through: Mr. Arihant Jain, Advocate. ..... Respondent NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) 1. This appeal impugns the award of compensation dated 22.04.2017 passed by the learned MACT in MACP No.8A/16 on two grounds: (i) that the deceased did not have a valid driving licence and (ii) that since he was not duly licensed to drive a motor vehicle, he cannot presume to be competent or skilled to drive his motor vehicle, therefore, there would be a corollary contributory negligence apropos the motor-vehicular accident.2. On a query put to the learned counsel for the appellant whether this issue was raised before the learned MACT, the answer is in the negative.3. The impugned order shows that there is no ...
Ompal vs.chief Executive Officer & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2019
$~62 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment :25. h September, 2019 + W.P.(C) 10295/2019 OMPAL ........ Petitioner Through Mr. A.K. Bhardwaj with Ms. Jagriti Singh, Advocates versus CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Sumeet Pushkarna, Standing Counsel with Mr. Devanshu Lahiny, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM. APPL425012019 (Exemption) 1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 10295/2019 3. The present petition is directed against order dated 31.07.2019 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (the Tribunal), by which an OA filed by the petitioner herein stands dismissed.4. Notice. W.P.(C) 10295/2019 Page 1 of 6 5. Mr. Sumeet Pushkarna, learned counsel for the respondents accepts notice; and has handed-over written submissions in Court, which are taken on record.6. With the consent of the part...
Hong Kong & Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited vs.chetan Kandpal & A ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 9755/2017 Date of Decision:-"25.09.2019 HONG KONG & SHANGHAI BANKING CORPORATION LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Ms.Jagriti Ahuja with Mr.Ateev Mathur & Mr.Aditya Bakshi, Advs. Versus CHETAN KANDPAL & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Rajeev Saxena with Mr.Rachit Sahney & Mr.Manish Khurana, Advs. for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner/management assails the award dated 14.06.2017 passed by the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-II, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in ID No.233/2011, whereunder the Tribunal after holding that the services of the respondent/workman had been illegally terminated, directed the petitioner to reinstate him with all consequential benefits.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that W.P.(C)No.9755/2017 Page 1 of 11 the petitioner is willing to amic...
Gyanoday Shiksha Samiti and Anr. Vs.national Council for Teacher Educa ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~68 * + W.P.(C) 10424/2019 & CM No.43025/2019 Date of decision:25. September 2019 GYANODAY SHIKSHA SAMITI AND ANR. Through: Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION AND ANR. Through: Ms. Arunima Dwivedi with Mrs. ..... Respondent Preeti Kumar Nanda, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL):1. Issue notice.2. Mr. Arunima Dwivedi accepts notice for the respondents.3. Ms. Dwivedi says that she would argue the matter on the basis of record presently available with the Court. 3.1 Given this position, with the consent of counsel for parties, matter is taken up for final disposal.4. In the instant petition, challenge is laid by the petitioners to the decision taken by the Western Regional Committee (in short WRC) of the National Council for Teacher Education (in short NCTE) in its 310th Meeting held between 19th to 21st August, 2019.5. By virtue of the impugned decision, t...
Quazar Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs.national Agriculture Corporative Ma ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2019
$~A-35 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:25. 09.2019 + ARB.P. 547/2019 QUAZAR INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Faiyaz Hasan, Advocate versus NATIONAL AGRICULTURE CORPORATIVE MARKETING FEDERATION OF INDIA LTD. (SOCIETY REGISTERED UNDER THE MULTI STATE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT) .....Respondent Through: Mrs. Gouri K. Mohanti and Ms. Anu Gupta, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation At, 1996 (Act) for appointment of a Sole Arbitrator for adjudication of disputes between the parties related to a work order dated 14.02.2017.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the initial work under the work order was completed and in fact the petitioner had executed more work than what was to be executed. Not having received the payments for the extra work done, the petitioner invoked the Arbitration Clause on three occasions viz. 03.01.2017...
- ‹ Prev
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- Next ›
- Last »