Delhi Court September 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Delhi State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd vs.food & Allied Loading Un ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2019
$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:26. 09.2019. + W.P.(C) No.3359/2019 DELHI STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LTD...Petitioner Through Mr.Raj Birbal, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Raavi Birbal, Adv. versus FOOD & ALLIED LOADING UNLOADING MAZDOOR UNION AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Umesh Singh, Adv. for R-1. Mr.M.D. Habib, Adv. for R-3. Mr.Keshav Mohan, Adv. with Mr.Piyush Choudhary, Adv. for R-5. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) CM No.30085/2019 (for condonation of delay) 1. This application has been filed by the petitioner seeking condonation of two days delay in filing the affidavit.2. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. Delay of two days in filing the affidavit is condoned.3. The application is disposed of. W.P.(C) 3359/2019 & CM Nos.15416/2019 (for stay) 4. The present writ petition under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India, assails the order dated 10.01.2019 passed by the Central Governm...
M/S Gail (India) Ltd vs.m/s. Rathi Bars Limited & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2019
$~A-6 * % + ARB.P. 499/2019 M/S GAIL (INDIA) LTD Date of decision:26. 09.2019 ........ Petitioner IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Through: Ms. Sangeeta Bharti, Mr. Krishanu Adhikary, Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advocates versus M/S. RATHI BARS LIMITED & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anand Shankar Jha, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) for appointment of a Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes and differences between the parties pertaining to a long term Gas Sale Agreement (GSA) dated 24.10.2009.2. It is the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that though the GSA is valid till 30.04.2028, the respondent has unilaterally stopped off-taking Gas from 01.01.2014 which is illegal. She submits that as per clause 14.1 of the GSA, in respect of each contract year the respondent is liable to pay to the petitioner for the quantity of Ga...
Seema Pandey & Anr. Vs.ministry of Railways & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2019
$~55 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:26. 09/2019 + W.P.(C) No.10256/2019 SEEMA PANDEY & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Akshat Bajpai, Advocate with Ms. Kanika Sondhi, Advocate. MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS & ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Jagjeet Singh, Advocate with Mr. Preet Singh, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI JUDGMENT G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) Notice to show-cause as to why the petition be not admitted. Mr. Jagjit Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the Railways accepts notice. With the consent of the parties, we set down the petition for final hearing and disposal. The petitioners seek a direction to prohibit the respondents from awarding the tenders for allotment of Catering stalls (General Minor Units) reserved for women. The Tender Notice bearing No.23AC/SBD/GMU A-1/2018 was floated by respondents Nos.2 and 3 under the supervision of respondent No.1 on 13.08.2018. Another Tender ...
Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs.lata Punjani & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2019
versus LATA PUNJANI & ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) 1. Through: ........ RESPONDENTS $~17 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:26. 09.2019 + MAC.APP. 355/2018, CM APPL. 13956/2018 & CM APPL. 13957/2018 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate. This appeal impugns the award of compensation dated 30.11.2017 passed by the learned MACT in MACT No.3571& Suit No.684/2011, on the ground that instead of 1/3rd deduction towards personal expenses, only 1/4th has been deducted by the learned Tribunal. It is the appellants case that the parents had pre-deceased the award of compensation, therefore, only three dependants remained and in terms of Sarla Verma & Ors. vs. Delhi Transport Corporation & Anr., (2009) 6 SCC121 the deduction should have been 1/3rd towards personal expenses.2. The aforesaid argument is untenable for the reason that at the time of filing of the claim petition, there were five dependents...
Harpal Singh vs.narinder Kumar & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2019
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:26. 09.2019 RC.REV. 261/2019 & CM APPL. 19815/2019 & 34684/2019 HARPAL SINGH NARINDER KUMAR & ANR versus ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. Ratan K. Singh, Mr. Nikhilesh Krishnan, Ms. Priyanka Solanki and Ms. Sandhya Chawla, Advocates For the Respondent: Mr. Rajiv K. Garg, Mr. Rajeev Kapoor, Mr. Govind Singh and Mr. Harsh Nagar, Advocates CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 08.01.2019 whereby leave to defend application of the petitioner has been dismissed and eviction order passed.2. Subject eviction petition was filed by the respondent seeking eviction of the petitioner from Shop No.2 & 5 and Godown in property bearing No.3815-16, Gali No.22, Regharpura, Arya Samaj Road, Karol Bagh, New Delhi, more particularly as shown in red colour in the site plan annexed with th...
Prabhjot Singh & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2019
$~69 * + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 4901/2019 Date of decision:26. 09.2019 PRABHJOT SINGH & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Deepak Kumar Khushalani, Adv. versus STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Izhar Ahmed, APP for State Mr. Neeraj Thakkar, Adv. for R-2 with respondent no.2 in person Insp. Sudhir Kumar, PS Shalimar Bagh CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No 9/2018 dated 05/01/2018 registered at Police Station Shalimar Bagh instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 498A/4of the IPC and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.2. 3. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal. CRL.M.C. 4901/2019 Page 1 of 3 4. The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 12.02.2017 as per Hindu...
Anshul Somani & Anr. Vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2019
* % + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:26. h September, 2019 TEST.CAS. 69/2019 & IA No.13486/2019 (u/O VI R-17 CPC) ........ Petitioner ANIL SOMANI Through: Mr. Sanjiv Bahl, Ms. Apoorva Bahl and Mr. Pawan Agarwal, Advs. Versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None. STATE & ANR. TEST.CAS. 70/2019 & IA No.13487/2019 (u/O VI R-17 CPC) ANSHUL SOMANI & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Sanjiv Bahl, Ms. Apoorva Bahl and Mr. Pawan Agarwal, Advs. AND Versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None. STATE & ORS. TEST.CAS. 71/2019 & IA No.13485/2019 (u/O VI R-17 CPC) ........ Petitioners ANIL SOMANI & ORS. Through: Mr. Sanjiv Bahl, Ms. Apoorva Bahl and Mr. Pawan Agarwal, Advs. AND STATE & ANR. Versus Through: None. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 This order is in continuation of the following common order passed in these matters on 19th September, 2019: Test Cas.Nos.69/2019, 70/2019 & 71/2019 Page 1 of 9 All these three petitions seek L...
Kishore Kumar vs.naresh Kumar & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2019
$~9 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:26. 09.2019 MAC.APP. 675/2014 Through: Mr. Partap Singh, Adv. ..... Appellant KISHORE KUMAR versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NARESH KUMAR & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms Neerja Sachdeva, Adv. for R-3. NAJMI WAZIRI, J (Oral) This appeal impugns the award of compensation dated 26.02.2014 1. passed in MACT No.41/2013 on the ground that contributory negligence of 50% has been apportioned upon the victim-appellant. It is the appellants case that the impugned order itself notes that the offending vehicle had suddenly moved from one lane to the other and there was hardly any time for the injured motor-cyclist to apply the brakes of his vehicle and/or recover from the sudden appearance of the offending vehicle in his lane; that despite his best efforts he could not stop his vehicle from crashing into the offending vehicle. The appellant refers to the statement of the injured and the cross-examination which reads ...
Kulbhushan Kakkar vs.kawal Lal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2019
$~37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + RC.REV. 337/2019 & Crl. M.A. 25474/2019 Judgment delivered on:26. 09.2019 KULBHUSHAN KAKKAR KAWAL LAL versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. Maninder Jeet Singh, Advocate For the Respondent: Mr. Kamal Garg, Advocate. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 31.01.2019, whereby the Leave to defend application of the petitioner has been dismissed by the Rent Controller and an eviction order passed.2. Respondent had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of the petitioner on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 from shop/godown situated at the back portion of ground floor of property bearing No.2834, Gali Hanumanji Wali, Mohalla Peepal Mahadev, Hauz Qazi, Delhi-110006, more particularly as shown in red colour in the site RC.REV.337/...
Asheesh Chaudhary vs.sunit Suri & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2019
O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 177/2019 ASHEESH CHAUDHARY versus SUNIT SURI & ORS. O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 264/2019 MR. SUNIT SURI versus SDU TRAVELS PVT. LTD. & ORS. Counsel for the petitioner: ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS + + $~A-35 & 36 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:26. 09.2019 Mr. Jayant Mehta, Mr. Surendra Dube, Mr. S. Chakraborty, Ms. Harshita Verma, Advocates (Item35) Mr. B.B. Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vivek Singh, Ms. Mayanka Dhawan, Mr. Pranav Gambhir, Advocates (Item36) Counsel for the respondent: Mr. B.B. Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vivek Singh, Ms. Mayanka Dhawan, Mr. Pranav Gambhir, Advocates Mr. Darpan Wadhwa, Senior Advocate with Mr. Saurabh Seth, Advocate for respondent No.2, 3 and 4 Mr. Jayant Mehta, Mr. Surendra Dube, Mr. S. Chakraborty, Ms. Harshita Verma, Advocates for respondent No.11(Item36) O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 177/2019 & 264/2019 Page 1 of 6 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH...
- ‹ Prev
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- Next ›
- Last »