Delhi Court September 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
P. Chidambaram vs.central Bureau of Investigation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2019
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: Pronounced on:30. 09.2019 27.09.2019 + BAIL APPLN. 2270/2019 & Crl.M.A. 36692/2019 P. CHIDAMBARAM ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Kapil Sibal, Mr.Abhishek Manu Singhavi, Mr.Salman Khurshid, Mr.Vivek Tankha, Mr.A.S. Chandiok, Mr.N. Hari Haran, Mr.Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Advs. with Mr.Arshdeep Singh Khurana, Mr.Kunal Vajani, Mr.Varun K. Chopra, Mr.Amit Bhandari, Mr.Adit Pujari, Mr.Hitesh Rai, Mr.Akshat Gupta, Mr.Ayush Agarwal, Mr.Karan Gogna, Mr.Aamir Khan, Mr.Aman Singh Brar, Mr.Akshay Sahni, Ms.Anshu Kapoor, Mr.Bilal Khan & Mr.R.V. Prabhat, Advs. versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Through Mr.Tushar Mehta, Solicitor General, ..... Respondent Mr.Amit Mahajan & Mr.Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr.RajatNair & Mr.Kanu Agrawal, Spl. Counsels, for CBI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT Vide the present bail petition, the... Petitioner/accused herein Sh. P. BAIL APPLN. 2270/2019 Page 1 of 47 Chidambaram seeks bail i...
M/S Dhingra Auto Store vs.rohit Vedi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2019
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:30. 09.2019 RC.REV. 417/2019 & CM APPL.31264/2019 M/S DHINGRA AUTO STORE versus ROHIT VEDI ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr.Zorawar Singh, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr.Rajiv Bajaj, Advocate. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 03.10.2018, whereby, leave to defend application of the petitioner has been dismissed and an eviction order passed.2. Respondent had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of the petitioner on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, from shop at ground floor forming part of property No.1468, Gali No.24, Naiwala, Karol Bagh, New Delhi-110005, more particularly shown in red colour in the site plan annexed with the petition. RC.REV. 417/2019 Page 1 of 2 3. Learned counsel for the ...
Abhishek Jain vs.shri Manoj Kumar Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2019
% + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:13th September, 2019 Decided on:30. h September, 2019 CS(COMM) 473/2017 SHRI JAIPAL CHAND JAIN Represented by: Mr.K.K.Bhuchar, Adv. ..... Plaintiff versus SHRI MANOJ KUMAR SINGH ..... Defendant Represented by: Mr.Santosh Kumar, Adv. with Mr.M.P.Singh, Mr.Rajiv Mishra, Mr.Ajay Kumar, Ms.Simmi, Mr.Y.R.Singh, Advs. + CS(COMM) 474/2017 ABHISHEK JAIN ..... Plaintiff Represented by: Mr.K.K.Bhuchar, Adv. for the plaintiff with plaintiff in person versus SHRI MANOJ KUMAR SINGH ..... Defendant Represented by: Mr.Santosh Kumar, Adv. with Mr.M.P.Singh, Mr.Rajiv Mishra, Mr.Ajay Kumar, Ms.Simmi, Mr.Y.R.Singh, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA IA108242018 (u/O37Rule 3(5) CPC) in CS (COMM) 473/2017 IA108262018 (u/O37Rule 3(5) CPC) in CS (COMM) 474/2017 1. Plaintiffs have filed the two suits under Order XXXVII CPC seeking money decrees. CS(COMM) Nos. 473/2017 & 474/2017 Page 1 of 11 2. Case of the plaintiff in CS(COMM) 473/2017 is that...
Cfsit, Inc vs.shakti Bhog Foods Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2019
$~J * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on:10. 05.2019 Judgment Pronounced on:30. 09.2019 versus versus versus ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner versus ..... Respondent ..... Respondent ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner CO.PET. 518/2013, CA. Nos.1415/2018 & 1416/2018 SICOM LTD. HANUNG TOYS & TEXTILES LTD. CO.PET. 987/2015, CA. Nos. 718/2018 & 1444/2018 CFSIT, INC SHAKTI BHOG FOODS LIMITED CO.PET. 668/2014, CA. Nos.1366, 1047 & 1048/2018 ABHINANDAN KUMAR JAIN MVL LIMITED CO.PET. 814/2016, CA. Nos.826, 980 & 984/2018 BRIJESH GUPTA & ANR. PREMIA PROJECTS LTD. + 1. + 2. + 3. + 4. Present: Mr.Nikhilesh Kumar, Adv. for the petitioner in CP6682014. Mr.Sanjeev Anand, Mr.Sjresh Khadav and Mr.Varun K.Bala, Advs. for applicant in CP6682014. Ms.Abha Sinha, Adv. in CA No.444/2019 in CP6682014. Mr.Anil Kumar Airi, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Abhinav Mishra, Mr.Siddhant Tripathi, Ms.Nivedita Chauhan, Mr.Karan Nagpal, Advs. for applicant/Intervener in CA1212019 in CP6682014. Mr....
Dr. Anil Kumar Baranwal Cmo (Sg) vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2019
$~6 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 9642/2017 DR. ANIL KUMAR BARANWAL CMO (SG) Through Mr. Aditya Dewan, Advocate ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Ms. Santwana, Advocates with Mr. M.Viswakarma, Inspector, BSF versus CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH UNION OF INDIA & ORS % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: ORDER3009.2019 1. A medical officer serving with the Border Security Force (BSF) has filed the present petition challenging the proceedings, opinion and finding of the Staff Court of Inquiry (SCOI) dated 29th August, 2015 which held that the spinal injury suffered by the... Petitioner was during the Senior Medical Officer Management Course (SMOMC) at Tekanpur in January-February, 2009 and not in the course of his election duty at Chhattisgarh in November 2008. As a result, it was concluded that the injury sustained by the... Petitioner was not attributable to bonafide government duty.2. The facts in brief are that the... Petit...
M/S Jbm Industries Ltd vs.commissioner of Income Tax New Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:30. 09.2019 $~14 to 17 * + + ITA5192019 M/S JBM INDUSTRIES LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. R. Santhanam with Mr. Arujun Prasad Sinha, Advs. + versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX NEW DELHI..... Respondent ITA5202019 Through: Ms. Adeeba Mujahid for Mr. Ajit Sharma, Advs. M/S JBM INDUSTRIES LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. R. Santhanam with Mr. Arujun Prasad Sinha, Advs. versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX NEW DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Adeeba Mujahid for Mr. Ajit Sharma, Advs + ITA5242019 M/S JBM INDUSTRIES LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. R. Santhanam with Mr. Arujun Prasad Sinha, Advs. versus ITA5192019 & connected matters Page 1 of 17 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX NEW DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Adeeba Mujahid for Mr. Ajit Sharma, Advs + ITA5252019 M/S JBM INDUSTRIES LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. R. Santhanam with Mr. Arujun Prasad Sinha, Advs. versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX NEW DELHI ..... Respondent Through: M...
Sudhir Kumar Aggarwal @ Sudhir Kumar Garg vs.rohit Vedi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2019
$~59 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:30. 09.2019 RC.REV. 256/2018 & CM APPL. 22907/2018, 22910/2018, 39702/2018,51834/2018, 17810/2019, 17877-17878/2019 SUDHIR KUMAR AGGARWAL @ SUDHIR KUMAR GARG ........ Petitioner versus ROHIT VEDI ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Ms.Sumati Anand, Adv. For the Respondent: Mr.Shwetank Vedi, Advocate. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 27.11.2017, whereby, leave to defend application of the petitioner has been dismissed and an eviction order passed.2. Subject eviction petition was filed by the respondent seeking eviction of the petitioner, on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, from shop at Property No.1468, Ground Floor, Gali No.23, Naiwala, Karol Bagh, RC.REV. 256/2018 Page 1 of 3 New Delhi, more particularly shown in red colour in the ...
Hindustan Construction Company Limited. Vs.nhpc Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2019
$~A-45 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:30. 09.2019 + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 384/2019 HINDUSTAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LIMITED. NHPC LIMITED Through Mr. Ananya Kumar and Mr. Rajat Joneja, Advocates. versus ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Vivek Maragon Sharma, Advocate. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition filed under Section 29 A (4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) for extension of time in making the Award.2. 3. The Arbitral Tribunal was constituted on 09.03.2018. Statutory period of twelve months for making the Award expired on 08.03.2019.4. By mutual consent of the parties, time was extended by a further period of six months which expired on 08.09.2019.5. On 15.03.2019, the parties concluded their arguments and the Award was reserved by the Arbitral Tribunal. O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 384/2019 Page 1 of 2 6. It is the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the Arbi...
Asha Rathore vs.commissioner of Police& Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2019
#3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~ * + W.P.(CRL) 2558/2019 ASHA RATHORE ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Shahid Azad with Ms. Meenu Sharma, Advocates versus COMMISSIONER OF POLICE& ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel (Crl.) for State with SI Saurabh, PS Govind Puri. % Date of Decision:30. h September, 2019 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present writ of habeas corpus had been filed seeking a direction to the respondents to produce the petitioner-minor daughter, Ms. Jyoti.2. On the last date of hearing, this Court had held that Ms. Jyotis date of birth is 30th July, 2000 and she is a major.3. Today, learned counsel for the petitioner has sought to reargue that the petitioner is a minor. He submits that the principle enshrined in the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 (hereinafter referred to as Act, 2015) should not be applied to the present case as the...
P S G College of Education vs.national Council for Teacher Education & ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2019
$~44 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:30. h September, 2019 + LPA6472019 P S G COLLEGE OF EDUCATION ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Mayank Manish & Mr. Ravi Kant, Advs. versus NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION & ANR Through: Ms. Arunima Diwvedi, Standing Counsel (NCTE) ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT D.N. PATEL, Chief Justice (Oral) CM APPL.44014/2019 /2019 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. LPA6472019 1. This Letters Patent Appeal has been preferred by the original petitioner whose W.P.(C) 9932/2019 was disposed of by the learned Single Judge vide order dated 13th September, 2019 (Annexure P-1) whereby the learned Single Judge has directed the appellate forum, where the appeal of this appellant is pending, to decide the same in accordance with law. LPA6472019 Page 1 of 2 2. The order which was under challenge in the writ petition was also chal...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »