Delhi Court August 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Raj Kumar Jain vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-28-2019
$~28 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:28. h August, 2019 LPA4652019 & CM APPLs. 32343/2019, 32344/2019, 32345/2019 & 38470/2019 RAJ KUMAR JAIN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Manoranjan Sinha, Adv. versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Shadan Farasat, ASC, GNCTD with Ms. Hafsa Khan & Ms. Rudrakshi Deo, Advs. for R-1. Ms. Vibha Mahajan Seth, Adv. for DMRC. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (Oral) LPA No.465/2019 1. This Letters Patent Appeal has been preferred by the appellant (original petitioner) whose W.P.(C) No.2897/2019 has been disposed of by the learned Single Judge by judgment and order dated 25.03.2019 (order at Annexure A to the memo of this LPA).2. Counsel appearing for the appellant (original petitioner) has drawn our attention to several reports which are at Page Nos. 110, 129 and 143 and pertaining to November 2017, July 2018 and January 2019, respectively. LP...
Shri Ashok Kumar Aggarwal vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-28-2019
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:28.08.2019 + W.P.(C) 9339/2019 AND CM APPL. 38521/2019 & 38522/2019 SHRI ASHOK KUMAR AGGARWAL ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Vikas Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Raktim Gogoi, Mr. Varun Singh, Mr. Kartikeya Singh, Mr.Sarvasa Chhajer, Mr. Ashutosh Dubey and Mr. S.K. Gupta, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG with Mr.Ravi Prakash, CGSC, Mr.Zoheb Hossain, Mr. Shahanulla, Mr.Vivek Gurnani Harshal Chowdhary, Advs. and Mr. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.CHAWLA JUDGMENT A.K. CHAWLA, J.By the instant petition preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has made two fold prayers. By the W.P.(C) 9339/2019 Page 1 of 6 first prayer, the petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated 10.06.2019 passed by the respondents in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (j) of Rule 56 of the Fundamental Rules, whereby, he has been retired from service with imm...
Dr Virendra Kumar Mathur vs.state & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-28-2019
$~46 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:28. h August, 2019 + FAO4522017 & CM No.41599/2017 DR VIRENDRA KUMAR MATHUR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Aly Mirza and Mr. Rishabh Pant, Advocates versus STATE & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Abhishek Narang, Advocate for R-7 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petitioner had approached the court of District & Sessions Judge with petition (registered as probate case no.14/2015 later 78/2016) praying for grant of letters of administration in respect of the estate of late Dr. (Mrs.) Usha Mathur, wife of Late Sh. Satish Saxena, daughter of late Mr. Shiam Narain Mathur, the estate particularly including a residential property described as flat bearing no.K-103, Shree Ganesh Apartments, 93, Patparganj, Delhi.2. Besides the first respondent / State, the other possible claimants / legal heirs of the deceased Mrs. Usha Mathur were shown in the fray as second to seventh respondents. It is stated that the petit...
Religare Finvest Limited vs.deputy Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-28-2019
$~59 & 60 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:28. h August, 2019 + W.P.(C) 9358/2019 RELIGARE FINVEST LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ajay Vohra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rohit Jain, Ms. Kavita Jha and Mr. VaibhavKulkarni, Advocates. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR...... Respondent versus Through: Mr. Raghvendra Singh, Senior Standing Counsel with Mr. Vipul Agrawal, Junior Standing Counsel. + W.P.(C) 9359/2019 RELIGARE ENTERPRISES LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ajay Vohra, Senior Advocate, Mr. Rohit Jain, Ms. Kavita Jha and Mr. Vaibhav Kulkarni, Advocates. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR......... RESPONDENTS versus Through: Mr. Raghvendra Singh, Senior Standing Counsel with Mr. Vipul Agrawal, Junior Standing Counsel. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA W.P.(C) 9358/2019 & W.P.(C) 9359/2019 Page 1 of 28 SANJEEV NARULA, J.(Oral) : C.M. No 38598/2019 in W.P.(C) 9358/2019 & C.M. No 38600/2019 i...
Narendra Singh & Ors vs.enforcement Directorate & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-28-2019
$~ * 4 & 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + NARENDRA SINGH & ORS LPA3392009 Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, ..... Appellants Senior Advocate with Mr Rajesh Batra, Ms Sonia Kukreja, Ms Smriti Sinha and Mr Rohit Chandra, Advocates. versus ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE & ANR + BRIJ MOHAN KHAITAN & ORS LPA4742014 ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Jasmeet Singh, CGSC with Mr. Saurabh Tiwari, Mr.Aditya Madan and Mr. Srivats Kaushal, Advocates. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Sudhir Nandarajog, Senior Advocate with Mr Rajesh Batra, Ms. Sonia Kukreja, Ms. Smriti Sinha, Mr. Rohit Chandra and Mr. Digvijay Singh, Advocates. versus ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE & ANR CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Jasmeet Singh, CGSC with Mr. Saurabh Tiwari, Mr.Aditya Madan and Mr.Srivats Kaushal, Advocates. LPA Nos. 339/2009 & 474/2014 Page 1 of 12 % ORDER2808.2019 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. These two appeals arise out of the similar set of facts and are accordingly bein...
Instagram Llc vs.surinder Malik & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-28-2019
$~41 & 45 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:28. h August, 2019 + + FACEBOOK INC CM(M) 1263/2019 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Parag Tripathi, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Richa Srivastava, Ms. Nayantara Narayan, Ms. Mishika Bajpai & Ms. Malikah Mehra, Advocates SURINDER MALIK & ORS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Vikas Khera, Mr. Vishal K. Sharma & Ms. Surabhi, Advocates (M-9971573450) INSTAGRAM LLC AND CM(M) 1267/2019 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Parag Tripathi, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Richa Srivastava, Ms. Nayantara Narayan, Ms. Mishika Bajpai & Ms. Malikah Mehra, Advocates SURINDER MALIK & ORS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Vikas Khera, Mr. Vishal K. Sharma & Ms. Surabhi, Advocates CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) CM APPL. 38450/2019 (for exemption) in CM(M) 1263/2019 CM APPL. 38535/2019 (for exemption) in CM(M) 1267/2019 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Applications are disposed of. CM(M) 1263/2019 & C...
Raj Kumar Chaudhary vs.the Financial Commissioner, Government of Nct o ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-28-2019
$~A-14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:28. 08.2019 + W.P.(C) 10063/2016 RAJ KUMAR CHAUDHARY ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Atul Nigam and Mr.Randhir Kumar, Advocates Versus THE FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER, GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Sapna Chauhan, Adv. for DDA Mr.Anil Tomar, Adv. for R1/GNCTD Mr.Naushad Ahmed Khan, ASC (Civil) with Mr.Zahid Hanief and Mr.Manish Chauhan, Advs. for GNCTD. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(Oral) 1. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking a writ of certiorari/mandamus or any other appropriate writ to quash the order dated 16.10.2015 passed by the Financial Commissioner. Other connected reliefs are also sought including directing the respondents No.l to 4 to forebear themselves from interfering in any manner with the petitioner's right, title and interest and peaceful occupation and possession of land bearing khasra No.13/1(0-2) &13/1(0-4) at Village Goela, D...
Union of India vs.savitha Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-28-2019
$~5 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:28. 08.2019 LPA2192019 & CM APPL.14636/2019 UNION OF INDIA ..... Appellant/original respondent in W.P.(C) 8455/2018 Through: Mr. Jasmeet Singh, CGSC versus SAVITHA KUMAR Through: ..... Respondent/original petitioner in W.P.(C) 8455/2018 CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) 1. This Letters Patent Appeal has been preferred by the original respondent in W.P.(C) 8455/2018. Though the notice was issued and served upon the respondent, but nobody has appeared in this appeal.2. We have heard the counsel for the appellant who has submitted that the original petitioner, who is respondent in this appeal, is an Overseas Citizen of India as defined under Section 2 (ee) of The Citizenship Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). It is further submitted by the counsel for appellant (original respondent) that his entry in India was prohibited/blacklisted and ...
Raj Kumar vs.bhupender Singh & Anr (United India Insurance Co Ltd.)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-28-2019
$~20 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:28. 08.2019 MAC.APP. 1050/2018 & CM No.49232/2018 RAJ KUMAR Through: Mr. S. N. Parashar, Advocate. ..... Appellant Versus BHUPENDER SINGH & ANR (UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD.) Through: Mr. Prashant Prakash, Advocate for ........ RESPONDENTS Insurance Company. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) 1. This appeal seeks enhancement of the compensation awarded on 19.04.2018 by the learned MACT in Petition No.77552/2016 to the injured- victim of a motor vehicular accident, on the ground that he has suffered a permanent physical disability of 48% in relation to both his lower limbs. The appellant was a driver by vocation and was driving the motor vehicle, which met with an unfortunate accident. It is argued that he will never be able to drive a motor vehicle again unless it is specially designed for disabled persons, i.e., for driving without the use of legs. He would never be able to obtain a driving lic...
Iffco Tokio General Insurance Co Ltd vs.jagjit Kaur & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-28-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~25 & 26 * % + MAC.APP. 679/2019, CM APPL. 31947/2019 Decided on:28. 08.2019 & CM APPL. 31948/2019 IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Versus + MAC.APP. 680/2019, CM APPL. 31956/2019 & CM APPL. JAGJIT KAUR & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS 31957/2019 IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Versus OM PRAKASH & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Suman Bagga, Advocate for appellant. Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate for caveator. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) CAV7152019 1. Since counsel enters appearance for the caveator, the caveat stands discharged.2. The application stands disposed-off. MAC.APP. 679/2019, CM APPL. 31947/2019, CM APPL. 31948/2019, MAC.APP. 680/2019, CM APPL. 31956/2019 and CM APPL. 31957/2019 MAC.APP. No.679/2019 & MAC.APP.No.680/2019 Page 1 of 6 3. This appeal impugns the award of compensation dated 03.05.2019 passed by the learned Tribunal in MACP No.1493/2016 & MACP No.1394/2...
- ‹ Prev
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Next ›
- Last »