Delhi Court August 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Saroj Bala Khurana vs.the Financial Commissioner, Government of Nct of ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-28-2019
$~A-18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 10071/2016 SAROJ BALA KHURANA Date of Decision:28. 08.2019 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Atul Nigam and Mr.Randhir Kumar, Advocates Versus THE FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER, GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Sapna Chauhan, Adv. for DDA Mr.Anil Tomar, Adv. for R1/GNCTD Mr.Naushad Ahmed Khan, ASC (Civil) with Mr.Zahid Hanief and Mr.Manish Chauhan, Advs. for GNCTD. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(Oral) 1. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking a writ of certiorari/mandamus or any other appropriate writ to quash the order dated 16.10.2015 passed by the Financial Commissioner. Other connected reliefs are also sought including directing the respondents No.l to 4 to forbear themselves from interfering in any manner with the petitioner's right, title and interest and peaceful occupation and possession of land bearing khasra No.13/1(2-10) and 1min (1-14) at Village Goel...
Brij Mohan Khaitan & Ors vs.enforcement Directorate & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-28-2019
$~ * 4 & 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + NARENDRA SINGH & ORS LPA3392009 Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, ..... Appellants Senior Advocate with Mr Rajesh Batra, Ms Sonia Kukreja, Ms Smriti Sinha and Mr Rohit Chandra, Advocates. versus ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE & ANR + BRIJ MOHAN KHAITAN & ORS LPA4742014 ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Jasmeet Singh, CGSC with Mr. Saurabh Tiwari, Mr.Aditya Madan and Mr. Srivats Kaushal, Advocates. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Sudhir Nandarajog, Senior Advocate with Mr Rajesh Batra, Ms. Sonia Kukreja, Ms. Smriti Sinha, Mr. Rohit Chandra and Mr. Digvijay Singh, Advocates. versus ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE & ANR CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Jasmeet Singh, CGSC with Mr. Saurabh Tiwari, Mr.Aditya Madan and Mr.Srivats Kaushal, Advocates. LPA Nos. 339/2009 & 474/2014 Page 1 of 12 % ORDER2808.2019 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. These two appeals arise out of the similar set of facts and are accordingly bein...
Narendra Sharma & Anr vs.veena Solanki & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-28-2019
$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:28. h August, 2019 + CM (M) 569/2017 and CM APPL. 19576/2017 NARENDRA SHARMA & ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Ajit Singh, Advocate (M:99905. 5091). versus VEENA SOLANKI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S.S. Jauhar, Advocate for R- 1 to 3. Mr. F.S. Chauhan, Advocate for R-2 to 5 (M:98710. 4777). CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition challenges the order dated 1st April, 2017 passed by the ld. Trial Court. Vide the said, order the Trial Court took the written statement of the... Petitioner who was the Defendant No.3 in the original suit off the record.2. The brief background is that a suit came to be filed on behalf of four of the Plaintiffs viz., Ms. Karuna Singh, Mr. Kailash Singh, Ms. Manju Singh and Smt. Kishori Devi against five Defendants viz., Veena Solanki, Jaiveer Singh Solanki, Narender Sharma, Moral Properties Private Limited and Shanti Mann seeking the ...
Kailash Devi Khanna & Ors vs.d D Global Capital Ltd & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-28-2019
$~1 * + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 34/2016 & IAs No.7958/2018 (u/O XIII-A CPC), 11181/2018 (of D-4 for modification of order dated 20th July, 2018), 1701/2019 (of D-1 seeking amendment of WS) & 1702/2019 (of D-4 seeking amendment of WS) KAILASH DEVI KHANNA & ORS ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Ashish Virmani & Mr. Gollamudi Sri Harsha Datta, Advs. with plaintiff no.2 Vivek Khanna in person. Versus D D GLOBAL CAPITAL LTD & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Diggaj Pathak, Ms. Shweta Sharma & Mr. Naved Ahmed, Advs. for D-1,2,4&5. Mr. Siddhanth Bambha, Adv. for D-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW % Application of the plaintiffs, for summary judgment in favour of the ORDER2808.2019 plaintiffs is pending consideration. The defendants no.1 and 4 have thereafter filed IA No.1701/2019 and 1702/2019 for amendment of their written statements. It is however the settled position in law, that an application for amendment of pleadings, even if filed subsequent to...
Kashi Ram (Deceased) Thr Lrs vs.gaon Sabha Nasirpur
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-28-2019
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:28. h August, 2019 + CM (M) 844/2019 & CM APPL. 25632/2019 KASHI RAM (DECEASED) THR LRS ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. J.K. Jain, Advocate (M:98110. 3456). versus GAON SABHA NASIRPUR ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Hetu Arora Sethi, ASC GNCTD (M:98103. 8590). Mr. Anil Tomor, Exaition Assistant (Agriculture) (M:88269. 3265). CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition challenges the impugned order dated 6th February, 2019 by which the application filed by the Plaintiff No.1/... Petitioner (hereinafter Plaintiff No.1) seeking demarcation of the land was dismissed. The brief background is that Plaintiff No.1 claims to be recorded as co-owner of the land measuring 4 bighas 14 biswas out of Khasra No.365 and 8 bighas 11 biswas out of Khasra No.366 in the revenue estate of village Nasiripur, Palam, Delhi, since 1948-49 (hereinafter suit property). However, it is further claimed that after ...
Iffco Tokio General Insurance Co Ltd. Vs.om Prakash & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-28-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~25 & 26 * % + MAC.APP. 679/2019, CM APPL. 31947/2019 Decided on:28. 08.2019 & CM APPL. 31948/2019 IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Versus + MAC.APP. 680/2019, CM APPL. 31956/2019 & CM APPL. JAGJIT KAUR & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS 31957/2019 IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Versus OM PRAKASH & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Suman Bagga, Advocate for appellant. Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate for caveator. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) CAV7152019 1. Since counsel enters appearance for the caveator, the caveat stands discharged.2. The application stands disposed-off. MAC.APP. 679/2019, CM APPL. 31947/2019, CM APPL. 31948/2019, MAC.APP. 680/2019, CM APPL. 31956/2019 and CM APPL. 31957/2019 MAC.APP. No.679/2019 & MAC.APP.No.680/2019 Page 1 of 6 3. This appeal impugns the award of compensation dated 03.05.2019 passed by the learned Tribunal in MACP No.1493/2016 & MACP No.1394/2...
Red Bull Ag vs.pepsico India Holdings Pvt Ltd & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-28-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:08. 07.2019 Judgment Pronounced on:28. 08.2019 CS(COMM) 1092/2018 RED BULL AG ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Sanjeev Sindhwani, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Naqeeb Nawab, Ms.Gunjan Paharia, Mr.Himanshu Deora and Mr.Sashwat Rakshit, Advs. $~J- * % + Versus PEPSICO INDIA HOLDINGS PVT LTD & ANR. .... Defendants Through Mr.A.S.Chandhiok, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Dheeraj Nair, Ms.Shruti Dass, Mr.Ritesh Singh and Mr.Tejashwi Chaudhry, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.1. By this judgment I will decide the objection raised by the plaintiff, namely, that the written statement of the defendants cannot be taken on record and the same be taken off the record. It was agreed that the issue as to whether the written statement is filed within the limitation period may be adjudicated upon on the basis of the submissions made in court. There is no formal application on record by the defendant for condonation of delay in filing the written s...
M/S. Vijay Nirman Company Pvt. Ltd. Vs.national Highways & Infrastruct ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-28-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:28. h August, 2019 CS(COMM) 707/2017 M/S. VIJAY NIRMAN COMPANY PVT. LTD. ..... Plaintiff Represented by: Ms. Pragya Ohri, Mr. Aayush Chandra, Ms. Aditi Soni, Advs. versus NATIONAL HIGHWAYS & INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED ..... Defendant Represented by: Ms. Suruchi Suri, Ms. Aasia Hasan, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. By this suit the plaintiff seeks recovery for a sum of 1 crore 98 lakhs along with the interest @ 24 % per annum from the defendant on the plea that the defendant illegally encashed its bank guarantee which was furnished by the plaintiff as bid security.2. Case of the plaintiff in the suit is that on the defendant issuing a notice on 15th April, 2015 inviting Request for Proposal (in short RFP) in respect of Two Laning of Pasighat Mariyang Yingkiang Road (now NH-513) from Singer river to Sijon river section from 19.880 km to 43.257 km (Length 23.377 km) in Ar...
Religare Enterprises Limited vs.deputy Commissioner of Income Tax & An ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-28-2019
$~59 & 60 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:28. h August, 2019 + W.P.(C) 9358/2019 RELIGARE FINVEST LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ajay Vohra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rohit Jain, Ms. Kavita Jha and Mr. VaibhavKulkarni, Advocates. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR...... Respondent versus Through: Mr. Raghvendra Singh, Senior Standing Counsel with Mr. Vipul Agrawal, Junior Standing Counsel. + W.P.(C) 9359/2019 RELIGARE ENTERPRISES LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ajay Vohra, Senior Advocate, Mr. Rohit Jain, Ms. Kavita Jha and Mr. Vaibhav Kulkarni, Advocates. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR......... RESPONDENTS versus Through: Mr. Raghvendra Singh, Senior Standing Counsel with Mr. Vipul Agrawal, Junior Standing Counsel. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA W.P.(C) 9358/2019 & W.P.(C) 9359/2019 Page 1 of 28 SANJEEV NARULA, J.(Oral) : C.M. No 38598/2019 in W.P.(C) 9358/2019 & C.M. No 38600/2019 i...
Ashwani Khurana and Anr vs.the Financial Commissioner, Government of N ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-28-2019
$~A-16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:28. 08.2019 + W.P.(C) 10069/2016 ASHWANI KHURANA AND ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Atul Nigam and Mr.Randhir Kumar, Advocates Versus THE FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER, GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Sapna Chauhan, Adv. for DDA Mr.Anil Tomar, Adv. for R1/GNCTD Mr.Naushad Ahmed Khan, ASC (Civil) with Mr.Zahid Hanief and Mr.Manish Chauhan, Advs. for GNCTD. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(Oral) 1. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking a writ of certiorari/mandamus or any other appropriate writ to quash the order dated 16.10.2015 passed by the Financial Commissioner. Other connected reliefs are also sought including directing the respondents No.l to 4 to forbear themselves from interfering in any manner with the petitioner's right, title and interest and peaceful occupation and possession of land bearing khasra No.10/2(0-12) at Village Goela, Delhi ...