Delhi Court August 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
New Millennium Education Society and Anr. Vs.guru Gobind Singh Indrapr ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-01-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WP (C) 8175/2019 & CM APPL.33856/2019, CM APPL.34372/2019 Judgment reserved on :31. 07.2019 Date of decision :01. 08.2019 NEW MILLENNIUM EDUCATION SOCIETY AND ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. H.S. Phoolka, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Deepak Vohra & Ms. Shilpa Dewan, Advocates. versus GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Ekta Sikri, Mr. Jasbir Bidhuri & Mr. Shashwat Sharma, Advocates for R-1. Mr. Anuj Aggarwal & Mr. Atul Goyal, Advocates for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.CM APPL.33856/2019 1. The petitioner no.1 New Millennium Education Society is the founder of the petitioner no.2/ Ideal Institute of Management & Technology, a private self-financing college which imparts education in various courses including the B.A.LLB Integrated Course of five years duration, seeks that for the academic year 2019-20, it be allowed WP (C) 8175/2019 Page 1 of 10 an intake ...
M/S Hotel Marina & Anr. Vs.vibha Mehta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-01-2019
$~4 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order:01. t August, 2019 %+ EFA(OS) 6/2018 & C.M.16806/2018 M/S HOTEL MARINA & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr.S.K.Maniktala, Mr.Udit Maniktala and Mr.Vinod Kumar, advts. VIBHA MEHTA versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Kirti Uppal, Sr.Adv. with Ms.Meenakshi Sood and Ms.Bhagya K.Yadav, Advts. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The present appeal is directed against the order dated 09.03.2018 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court whereby the learned Single Judge has adjourned the execution petition while imposing heavy cost of Rs.50,000/- upon the appellant, which now stands paid. The appellant is primarily aggrieved by certain observations, which have been made in the impugned order although it is not disputed that the execution petition is yet to be decided. The appellants filed an execution petition and sought execution of judgment and decree dated 03.03.200...
M/S Reliance Industries Limited vs.central Bureau of Investigation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-01-2019
* + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: July 25, 2019 Pronounced on:01. August, 2019 CRL.M.C. 2594/2012 & CRL.M.A. 13258/2012 SHANKAR ADAWAL ..Petitioner Through: Mr. N. Hariharan, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Siddharth Singh Yadav, Ms. Punya Rekha, Mr. Prateek Bhalla, Mr. Sharang Dhulia & Mr. Govind Venugopal, Advocates. Versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Prasanta Varma, Special Public Prosecutor with Ms. Prativa Varma & Ms. Chetna, Advocates CRL.M.C. 2595/2012 & CRL.M.A. 13259/2012 V BALASUBRAMANIAN ..Petitioner Through: Mr. Amit Desai, Senior Advocate with Mr. Gopal Krishna Shenoy, Mr. K.R. Saviprabhu, Mr. Vishnu, Mr. Rohit Chandra & Mr. Ved Prakash Sharma, Advocates Versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Prasanta Varma, Special Public Prosecutor with Ms. Prativa Varma & Ms. Chetna, Advocates CRL.M.C. 2594/2012 & connected matters Page 1 of 13 + + CRL.M.C. 2596/2012 & CRL.M.A. 13261/2012 A. N. SETHURAMAN...
National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs.dharmender @ Dharam Singh & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-01-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:01. 08.2019 MAC.APP. 666/2019 & CM No.31175/2019 $~3 * % + CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) 1. Through: Versus NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Shantha Devi Raman, Advocate. DHARMENDER @ DHARAM SINGH & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS The appellant impugns the award of compensation on the following grounds:-"(i) That there was no eye-witness to the accident which resulted in unfortunate amputation of the right arm of the victim. (ii) That injured Dharmender is admittedly an illiterate person, therefore, he could not have taken down the number of the offending vehicle. (iii) That since he was hit from behind by the offending vehicle, and having fallen down violently, he could not possibly have seen or noted the number of the offending vehicle. MAC.APP. No.666 -2019 Page 1 of 5 (iv) That the complaint was made to the police one whole day later and the evidence of the alleged pillion rid...
Mukesh Kumar vs.jai Bhagwan Mehra & Anr (United India Insurance Compan ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-01-2019
$~12 * % + MAC.APP. 542/2018 MUKESH KUMAR Versus IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:01. 08.2019 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Saurabh Kansal, Advocate. JAI BHAGWAN MEHRA & ANR (UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED) ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) 1. This appeal impugns the order dated 24.04.2018 dismissing the appellants claim for compensation under section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. He had claimed a compensation of Rs. 20,00,000/-., for the injuries suffered by the claimant on account of an accident of the insured motorcycle, whereon he was riding pillion on 29.12.2014 in a thick fog near Village Savda & Naya Gaon Bye-pass Road, Haryana, a motor car, being driven in a rash and negligent manner, suddenly came from the opposite direction without blowing any horn and the glare of its headlight blinded the motorcyclist, causing disbalancing of their motorcycle, result...
Mr. Moti Lal Daga and Anr. Vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-01-2019
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:1. t August, 2019 + W.P.(C) 8324/2019 MR. MOTI LAL DAGA AND ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Ms. Vineeta Bansal and Mr. Nitin Kumar Jain, Advocates. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Gautam Narayan, ASC for GNCTD with Ms. Shivani Vij and Ms Dacchita Shahi, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JUDGMENT % G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) C.M. Appl. No.34475/2019 (for exemption) 1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 8324/2019 and C.M. Appl. No.34474/2019 (for stay) 2. An e-tender was invited for procurement of costumes and other related items for National as well as State level Independence Day Celebrations, W.P.(C) 8324/2019 Page 1 of 4 2019 and Republic Day Celebrations, 2020 under two bid system from reputed agencies registered with GST Department, Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (GN...
M Rajamannar vs.vice Chancellor Ignou and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-01-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~28 * + W.P.(C) 7697/2016 M RAJAMANNAR Date of decision:01. 08.2019 ........ Petitioner Through Mr. A. K. Behera with Ms. Prabha Sharma and Mr. A. P. Singh, Advs. versus VICE CHANCELLOR IGNOU AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Saurabh Chauhan with Mr. Varun Jain, Advs. for R-1 Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr. Piyush Gaur, Adv. for UOI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks mandamus directing the respondent no.1 to give retrospective placement/promotion to petitioner w.e.f. 06.03.2005 and, thereby quashing the letter dated 04.07.2007 issued by the respondent no.1. W.P.(C) 7697/2016 Page 1 of 11 2. Consequently, direct the respondents to pay all benefits and consequential benefits including back salary w.e.f. 06.03.2005 to the petitioner.3. Further seeks direction thereby directing the respondents, thereby quashing letter dated 17.09.2012.4. The case of the petitioner i...
Anish Gupta & Ors. Vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-01-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: August 01, 2019 CRL.M.C. 3652/2019 & CRL.M.A. 32207/2019 ANISH GUPTA & ORS.. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Mukul Gupta & Mr. Ankur Gupta, Advocates. Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with ASI Rajbir Singh. Mr. Nitesh Singla, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.671/2014, under Section 498-A/4of IPC, registered Police Station South Rohini, Delhi is sought on the basis of settlement of 31st May, 2018 and affidavit of respondent No.2 of 16th July, 2019. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court is the complainant/first informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by ASI Rajbir Singh on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits...
- ‹ Prev
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- Next ›