Delhi Court August 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Wholesale Trading Services P Ltd vs.the Institute of Chartered Account ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-01-2019
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8071/2019 & C.M. APPLs 33381-83/2019 WHOLESALE TRADING SERVICES P LTD ........ Petitioner Mr Arnav Dash, Advocate. Through: versus THE INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA AND ORS. Through: ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER0108.2019 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner is a private company and its registered office is located in Chennai. The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning the order dated 26th February, 2018, passed by respondent no.2 (hereafter Board of Discipline). By the said order, the petitioner was informed that the Board of Discipline had concurred with the prima facie opinion of the Director (Discipline) of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (hereafter ICAI) recorded on 6th October, 2017, holding that respondent No.3 ( Mr. H. Anilhereafter HA) was not guilty of professional misconduct falling within the meaning of Clauses (5) to (9) of Part ...
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.seema Nahata & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-01-2019
$~10 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:01. 08.2019. MAC.APP. 450/2018 & CM No.19287/2018 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. R.K. Tripathi, Advocate. Versus SEEMA NAHATA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. P.C. Dogra, Advocate for R-1 to R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) 1. This appeal impugns the award of compensation on the ground that the learned Tribunal has taken the minimum wages applicable in Delhi, for computation of loss of dependency. It is the appellants case that PW-1, the widow of the deceased, had deposed that her husband was in a private job with M/s. Karunamai Creation in Kolkata and was earning an amount of Rs. 15,000/- per month. However, she was unable to bring on record any document to prove the said earning. The claimants have placed on record the statement of marks of Senior Secondary School Examination of the deceased proving that he had passed the examination. Accordingly, the minimu...
g.s. Agarwal vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-01-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:1. t August, 2019 TEST.CAS. 31/2006 & IA No.8131/2019 (u/O XXXIX R-2A CPC) G.S. AGARWAL ........ Petitioner STATE Through: Mr. T.S. Ahuja, Mr. Varun S. Ahuja & Mr. Braj Bhushan, Advs. Versus Through: Mr. Kunal Kalra, Adv. for R-5. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The petitioner, as the named executor in the document dated 17th October, 2001 purporting to be the validly executed Will of the deceased Sitaram Surekha who died at Delhi on 30th September, 2003, seeks probate thereof as the validly executed last Will of the deceased Sitaram Surekha and in the alternative, seeks letters of administration with copy annexed of the document dated 17th October, 2001 as the validly executed last Will of the deceased Sitaram Surekha with respect to the savings bank account no.528-1-013093-5 with Standard Chartered Bank (SCB), South Extension, Part-II, New Delhi in the name of the deceased.2. The petition c...
A. N. Sethuraman vs.central Bureau of Investigation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-01-2019
* + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: July 25, 2019 Pronounced on:01. August, 2019 CRL.M.C. 2594/2012 & CRL.M.A. 13258/2012 SHANKAR ADAWAL ..Petitioner Through: Mr. N. Hariharan, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Siddharth Singh Yadav, Ms. Punya Rekha, Mr. Prateek Bhalla, Mr. Sharang Dhulia & Mr. Govind Venugopal, Advocates. Versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Prasanta Varma, Special Public Prosecutor with Ms. Prativa Varma & Ms. Chetna, Advocates CRL.M.C. 2595/2012 & CRL.M.A. 13259/2012 V BALASUBRAMANIAN ..Petitioner Through: Mr. Amit Desai, Senior Advocate with Mr. Gopal Krishna Shenoy, Mr. K.R. Saviprabhu, Mr. Vishnu, Mr. Rohit Chandra & Mr. Ved Prakash Sharma, Advocates Versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Prasanta Varma, Special Public Prosecutor with Ms. Prativa Varma & Ms. Chetna, Advocates CRL.M.C. 2594/2012 & connected matters Page 1 of 13 + + CRL.M.C. 2596/2012 & CRL.M.A. 13261/2012 A. N. SETHURAMAN...
Chopra Marketing Pvt. Ltd. Vs.drishticon Properties Pvt. Ltd. & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-01-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on 03.12.2018 % + O.M.P. (COMM) 3/2016 Judgment pronounced on 01.08.2019 1. CHOPRA MARKETING PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajiv Talwar with Mr. Diwakar Singh, Advs. versus DRISHTICON PROPERTIES PVT. LTD. & ANR...... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanat Kumar, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Viyak Batta, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.: This is a Section 34 petition, which is directed against the award dated 27.5.2017. This award was passed pursuant to the appointment of Honble Mr. Justice (Retd.) S.C. Agrawal, former Judge, Supreme Court of India, as an arbitrator vide order dated 6.7.2009 passed in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.(s) 6717-6718/2009.2. As to how the matter was carried in an appeal will be adverted to by me in the course of narration of events. However, what is important to note is that at the heart of the dispute obtaining between the parties is the issue as to whether the learn...
Sudhir Kumar Mehrotra vs.punjab National Bank and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-01-2019
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:01. 08.2019 + W.P.(C) 366/2019 & CM APPL. 1712/2019 SUDHIR KUMAR MEHROTRA ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Chetan Sharma, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Avinash Sharma, Mr.Madhav Dadhich & Mr.Amit Gupta, Advs.1. versus PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Navin Kumar Jha, Adv. with Mr.Julimoni Saikia, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction directing the respondents to release the pension to the petitioner and the arrears of pension with effect from 27.11.2009 in terms of Circular No.06/2018 dated 07.06.2018 issued by the Respondent Bank.2. The case of the petitioner is that respondent bank compulsorily retired the petitioner from service in the year 2004 in public interest. On 07.06.2018, the Department of PF & Pension Fund of the respondent bank issued a circular bearing No.06/2018 regarding second Option of Pension for W.P.(C) 3...
Sh. Kamal Hasan & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-01-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: August 01, 2019 CRL.M.C. 3736/2019 SH. KAMAL HASAN & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. L.K. Passi, Dr. K.C. Rakesh & Mr. Sishupal Singh, Advocates. STATE & ANR. Versus Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional .....Respondents Public Prosecutor for State with SI Pritesh. Mr. Zahid Ali, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.492/2018, under Sections 498A/4of IPC, registered at police station Burari, Delhi is sought on the basis of Settlement of 21st January, 2019 reached between the parties and affidavit of 3rd July, 2019 of respondent No.2. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court is the complainant/first informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Pritesh on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits th...
Shankar Adawal vs.central Bureau of Investigation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-01-2019
* + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: July 25, 2019 Pronounced on:01. August, 2019 CRL.M.C. 2594/2012 & CRL.M.A. 13258/2012 SHANKAR ADAWAL ..Petitioner Through: Mr. N. Hariharan, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Siddharth Singh Yadav, Ms. Punya Rekha, Mr. Prateek Bhalla, Mr. Sharang Dhulia & Mr. Govind Venugopal, Advocates. Versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Prasanta Varma, Special Public Prosecutor with Ms. Prativa Varma & Ms. Chetna, Advocates CRL.M.C. 2595/2012 & CRL.M.A. 13259/2012 V BALASUBRAMANIAN ..Petitioner Through: Mr. Amit Desai, Senior Advocate with Mr. Gopal Krishna Shenoy, Mr. K.R. Saviprabhu, Mr. Vishnu, Mr. Rohit Chandra & Mr. Ved Prakash Sharma, Advocates Versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Prasanta Varma, Special Public Prosecutor with Ms. Prativa Varma & Ms. Chetna, Advocates CRL.M.C. 2594/2012 & connected matters Page 1 of 13 + + CRL.M.C. 2596/2012 & CRL.M.A. 13261/2012 A. N. SETHURAMAN...
P Sree Krishna vs.airports Authority of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-01-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:23. 05.2019 Pronounced on:01. 08.2019 + W.P.(C) 9149/2017 & C.M.APPLN. 3798/2018 P SREE KRISHNA ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Raj Singh Phogat, Adv. versus AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. K. K. Rai, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Dig Vijay Rai, Ms. Chetna Rai, Mr. Anshul Rai with Mr. Ram Krishana Veerendra, Advs. for AAI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT1 Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby quashing the impugned order No.C.14015/08/2012/-Disc/180 dated 10.05.2016 of punishments passed by the respondents by which the respondents had arbitrarily and illegally rejected the appeal of the petitioner against the assailed order dated 26-29.05.2015 passed by the Disciplinary Authority.2. The petitioner initially joined on 20.02.1991, the erstwhile National W.P.(C) 9149/2017 Page 1 of 28 Airport Authority of India as Assistant Executive Engineer (Group A) which wa...
Pushpa Vadera vs.mrs. Sita Nanda
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-01-2019
$~35 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:1. t August, 2019 CS(OS) 619/2018, I.As. 16469/2018 & 829/2019 PUSHPA VADERA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Sanjeev Anand, Mr. Shiv Chopra and Ms. Smriti Ravichandran, Advocates. (M:9711298808) MRS. SITA NANDA versus ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Ashwini K. Matta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vijay K. Sondhi, Mr. Faisal Sherwani, Mr. Shikher Deep Aggarwal, Mr. Achal Gupta,Mr. Shubham Saigal, Mr. Shubham Saigal & Mr. Karan, Advocates. (M- 9407223688). Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC with Mr. Dhruv Pande and Mr. Olson Nair, Advocates DO. (M9811191920) L & for CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. The present suit has been filed in respect of Unit-E, known as 20-E, Prithviraj Road, New Delhi. On 9th March, 1923, a perpetual lease deed (Ex. P-2) was executed in favour of Shri Tirath Ram Sawhney, for Plot No.10 in Block No.11 (now known as Plot No.20 and 20A). Only Plot No.20, Prithviraj Road, New Delhi, which is admea...
- ‹ Prev
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 53
- 54
- Next ›
- Last »