Delhi Court August 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Nimitaya Properties Ltd & Anr. Vs.indian Oil Corporation & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-02-2019
$~30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:02. 08.2019 + W.P.(C) 1456/2008 & CM APPLN. 9004/2018 NIMITAYA PROPERTIES LTD & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Inder Bir Singh Alagh, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sumit Gehlawat, Mr. T. S. Thakraon, Mr. Jaitegn Singh, Mr. Abhishek Bhardwaj and Ms. Neetu Singh, Advs. versus INDIAN OIL CORPORATION & ORS ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. M. M. Kalara with Ms. Sonali Kumar, Advs. for IOCL Ms. Sonia A. Menon, Adv. for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) CM APPLN. 52141/2018 1. Vide the present application, the applicants/petitioners seek direction thereby rejecting the Valuation Report dated 16.10.2018 filed by valuer 'M/s Kapoor & Associates' before this court on 22.10.2018.2. Consequently, consider and rely the documents provided by both the parties to the valuer M/s Kapoor & Associates for assessment and W.P.(C) 1456/2008 Page 1 of 8 preparation of valuation report of the subject property and it shou...
Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd. Vs.mic Electronics Ltd and Another
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-02-2019
$~4 & 5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:2. d August, 2019 + O.M.P. 71/2012 DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. J.P. Singh, Advocate. (M:9868766655) versus MIC ELECTRONICS LTD AND ANOTHER ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Arun K. Sharma, Advocate. (M:9891685368) WITH O.M.P. 452/2012 + M/S MIC ELECTRONICS LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Arun K. Sharma, Advocate. (M:9891685368) versus M/S DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION LTD. & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. J.P. Singh, Advocate. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(oral) 1. The Court was informed on the last occasion that Mic Electronics Ltd. is in insolvency proceedings before the NCLT, Hyderabad Bench. It was made clear that the Section 34 petitions would not be affected by the moratorium which may be imposed in the said proceedings, as in the present case the objections to the award are to be heard and no recovery is being O.M.P. 71/2012 & 452/2012 P...
Vinod Chauhan vs.the State Govt. Of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-02-2019
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 2328/2017 Judgment delivered on:02. 08.2019 VINOD CHAUHAN THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Ashok Kumar Sherawat, Adv. For the Respondent : Mr. Hirein Sharma, Addl. PP for the State with SI Robin Singh CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.237/2016 under Section 420/5IPC at Police Station Saket.2. As per the allegations in the FIR, the complainant was interested in purchase of a property and respondent sold the property to him for a sum of Rs. 20,50,000/-. Subsequently, it transpired that the construction was illegal and the property was sealed by the MCD and further that the petitioner has no right to sell the property.3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated. He submits that t...
Man Singh vs.dda and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-02-2019
$~S-1 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI REV.PET.530/2012, C.M. APPL.11668/2012 IN W.P.(C) 6036/2010 MAN SINGH Through : Mr. Adarsh. B. Dail, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Iqbal Singh and Mr. Shekhar Kumar Bajaj, Advocates. ........ Petitioner versus DDA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Ms. Shobhana Takiar, Advocate, for DDA. Ms. Rachana Srivastava and Ms. Umme Salma, Advocate, for GNCTD. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % ORDER0208.2019 REV.PET.530/2012, C.M. APPL.11668/2012 (for condonation of delay in filing the review application) IN W.P.(C) 6036/2010 1. The present review application has been filed by the respondent No.1/Delhi Development Authority (DDA), stating inter alia that the order dated 08.02.2012, whereby the writ petition was disposed of, requires to be reviewed. Accompanying the review application is an application for seeking condonation of delay of 152 days in filing the said application.2. A brief glance at the facts of the case and the sequence of event...
Gajender & Ors vs.state, Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-02-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: August 02, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 3808/2019 & CRL.M.A. 32690/2019 GAJENDER & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Surya Nath Pandey, Advocate Versus STATE, NCT OF DELHI & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional Public Prosecutor with SI Madan Mohan Mr. Om Prakash, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.187/2014, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC, registered at Police Station Ranhola, Delhi is sought on the basis of settlement of 28th May, 2018 (Annexure-C colly). Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Madan Mohan on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the dispute between the parties has been amicably resolved vide...
V Balasubramanian vs.central Bureau of Investigation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-01-2019
* + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: July 25, 2019 Pronounced on:01. August, 2019 CRL.M.C. 2594/2012 & CRL.M.A. 13258/2012 SHANKAR ADAWAL ..Petitioner Through: Mr. N. Hariharan, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Siddharth Singh Yadav, Ms. Punya Rekha, Mr. Prateek Bhalla, Mr. Sharang Dhulia & Mr. Govind Venugopal, Advocates. Versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Prasanta Varma, Special Public Prosecutor with Ms. Prativa Varma & Ms. Chetna, Advocates CRL.M.C. 2595/2012 & CRL.M.A. 13259/2012 V BALASUBRAMANIAN ..Petitioner Through: Mr. Amit Desai, Senior Advocate with Mr. Gopal Krishna Shenoy, Mr. K.R. Saviprabhu, Mr. Vishnu, Mr. Rohit Chandra & Mr. Ved Prakash Sharma, Advocates Versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Prasanta Varma, Special Public Prosecutor with Ms. Prativa Varma & Ms. Chetna, Advocates CRL.M.C. 2594/2012 & connected matters Page 1 of 13 + + CRL.M.C. 2596/2012 & CRL.M.A. 13261/2012 A. N. SETHURAMAN...
Ifci Factors Limited vs.ramsarup Industries Limited & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-01-2019
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:23. d May, 2019 Date of decision:1. t August, 2019 IFCI FACTORS LIMITED CS (COMM) 752/2018 ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Anupam Srivastava and Mr. Dhairya Gupta, Advocates with Mr. Lalit Narayan Joshi, AR of Plaintiff (M. No.9811128170) versus RAMSARUP INDUSTRIES LIMITED & ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Dileep Tandon and Ms. Neha T. (M. for D-2 Phookan, Advs. No.9810939320) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT I.A. No.13840/2018 (seeking leave to defend) & I.A. No.13841/2018 (for delay) 1. Plaintiff IFCI Factors Limited has filed the present suit under Order XXXVII CPC against the Defendants - assignor/principal borrower, Ramsarup Industries Limited, and guarantor, Mr. Ashish Jhunjhunwala Defendant No.2. The suit was registered and summons were issued. Defendant No.1 Ramsarup Industries Limited filed I.A. No.7212/2018 under Section 151 CPC read with Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Cod...
d.r. Vadera & Sons (Huf) vs.mrs. Sita Nanda
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-01-2019
$~36 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:1. t August, 2019 D.R. VADERA & SONS (HUF) CS(OS) 650/2018, I.A. 17525/2018 & 830/2019 ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Sanjeev Anand, Mr. Shiv Chopra versus and Ms. Smriti Ravichandran, Advocates. MRS. SITA NANDA ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Ashwini K. Matta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vijay K. Sondhi, Mr. Faisal Sherwani, Mr. Shikher Deep Aggarwal, Mr. Achal Gupta,Mr. Shubham Saigal, Mr. Shubham Saigal & Mr. Karan, Advocates. (M- 9407223688). Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC with Mr. Dhruv Pande and Mr. Olson Nair, Advocates DO. (M9811191920) L & for CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. The present suit has been filed in respect of Unit-C, known as 20-C, Prithviraj Road, New Delhi. On 9th March, 1923, a perpetual lease deed (Ex. P-2) was executed in favour of Shri Tirath Ram Sawhney, for Plot No.10 in Block No.11 (now known as Plot No.20 and 20A). Only Plot No.20, Prithviraj Road, New Delhi, which is admeasurin...
Kadam Singh vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-01-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: August 01, 2019 CRL.M.C. 3748/2019 & CRL.M.A. 32522/2019 KADAM SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Nadeem Abbasi, Advocate. Versus STATE & ANR. Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional .....Respondents Public Prosecutor for State with SI Rampal. Mr. Tarun Goomber, Mr. Gaurav Goswam & Ms. Somya, Advocates with Mr. Montu Bargujar, Authorized Representative of respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR Quashing of ORDER (ORAL) FIR No.192/2014, under Sections 408/406/420/120B/34 of IPC, registered at Police Station Greater Kailash, Delhi is sought on the basis of Memorandum of Understanding of 29th May, 2019 reached between the parties and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR in question, now stands cleared between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that Mr. Montu Bargujar, Authorized Representative of respondent...
Basant Lal Memorial College of Education vs.national Council for Teach ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-01-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P. (C) 11699/2018 & CM APPL. 45258/2018 % 1. BASANT LAL MEMORIAL COLLEGE OF EDUCATION ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Sherawat, Advocate with Mr. Divyank Rana and Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocates. versus NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION AND ORS. ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Arunima Dwivedi, Standing Counsel for NCTE/R-1 & 2 with Ms. Preeti Kumra, Adv. Mr. Deepak Thukral, Adv. For R-3 with Ms. Anju, Legal Assistant CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR The present writ petition is essentially directed against (i) JUDGMENT01.08.2019 Order, dated 10th June, 2010, issued by the Northern Regional Committee (NRC) of the National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE), (ii) Order, dated 27th August, 2010 addressed to the petitioner-College, by the Director, State Council for Educational Research & Training (hereinafter referred to as the SCERT) Haryana, (iii) communication, dated 16th October, 2018, issued by the Regional Director, N...
- ‹ Prev
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 52
- 53
- 54
- Next ›
- Last »