Delhi Court August 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kamaljeet vs.state (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-02-2019
* % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:09. 04.2019 Judgment pronounced on:02. 08.2019 + CRL. A. 339/2004 DINESH ..... Appellant STATE Through: Mr. Mukesh Kalia, Mr. Manav and Mr. M.L. Yadav, Advocates. Versus .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Gupta, APP for State with Insp. Raman Kumar, ATO/Uttam Nagar and SI Govind Singh, P.S. Uttam Nagar. + CRL. A. 389/2004 SURENDER @ LAMBU ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Mukesh Kalia, Mr. Manav and Mr. M.L. Yadav, Advocates. STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through: Mr. Amit Gupta, APP for State with .....Respondent Versus Insp. Raman Kumar, ATO/Uttam Nagar and SI Govind Singh, P.S. Uttam Nagar. + CRL.A. 393/2004 JITENDER ALIAS KALA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Mukesh Kalia, Mr. Manav and Mr. M.L. Yadav, Advocates. Versus CRL.A3392004 (Connected Appeals) Page 1 of 28 STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through: Mr. Amit Gupta, APP for State with .....Respondent Insp. Raman Kumar, ATO/Uttam Nagar and SI Govind Singh, P.S. Uttam Nagar. + CRL.A. 481/2004 K...
The New India Assurance Co Ltd vs.dharam Pal & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-02-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:02. d August, 2019 $~57 * % + MAC.APP. 156/2018 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Anshum Jain, Mr.Kshitiz Garg, Advocates versus DHARAM PAL & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Nitin Yadav, Advocate for... RESPONDENTS No.1 to 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant has challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.43,42,000/- has been awarded to the claimants. The appellant is seeking reduction of the award amount.2. The accident dated 19th June, 2017 resulted in the death of Ajay Kumar. The deceased was aged 20 years at the time of the accident and was survived by his parents and an unmarried sister. The deceased was working as a Senior Executive and he was earning Rs.19,500/- per month at the time of the accident. The Claims Tribunal took the income of the deceased as Rs.19,500/- per month, added 50% towards future prospects, deducted 1/3rd to...
Raj Kumar vs.ram Bhaj Bansal & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-02-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:2. d August, 2019 CS(OS) 2665/2013, IA No.22130/2012 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC), IA No.654/2013 (u/O XXXIII r/w S151CPC), IA No.9087/2015 (u/O VII R-11 CPC) RAJ KUMAR Through: Ms. Shreya Rao, Adv. ..... Plaintiff Versus RAM BHAJ BANSAL & ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The plaintiff Raj Kumar instituted this suit against his father Through: Mr. S. Chaturvedi, Adv. ..... Defendants Ram Bhaj Bansal and against his fathers three brothers viz. Ram Kumar, Laxmi Narayan and Narayan Dass, for a) declaration, b) partition, and, c) permanent and mandatory injunction.2. The father of the plaintiff, defendant no.1, having died during the pendency of the suit, his heirs minus the plaintiff were substituted.3. The suit came up for admission before the undersigned on 8th January, 2013, when doubts were expressed as to the maintainability thereof and on request of the counsel for the plaintiff, hearing adjourned to 15th Janu...
Dinesh vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-02-2019
* % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:09. 04.2019 Judgment pronounced on:02. 08.2019 + CRL. A. 339/2004 DINESH ..... Appellant STATE Through: Mr. Mukesh Kalia, Mr. Manav and Mr. M.L. Yadav, Advocates. Versus .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Gupta, APP for State with Insp. Raman Kumar, ATO/Uttam Nagar and SI Govind Singh, P.S. Uttam Nagar. + CRL. A. 389/2004 SURENDER @ LAMBU ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Mukesh Kalia, Mr. Manav and Mr. M.L. Yadav, Advocates. STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through: Mr. Amit Gupta, APP for State with .....Respondent Versus Insp. Raman Kumar, ATO/Uttam Nagar and SI Govind Singh, P.S. Uttam Nagar. + CRL.A. 393/2004 JITENDER ALIAS KALA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Mukesh Kalia, Mr. Manav and Mr. M.L. Yadav, Advocates. Versus CRL.A3392004 (Connected Appeals) Page 1 of 28 STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through: Mr. Amit Gupta, APP for State with .....Respondent Insp. Raman Kumar, ATO/Uttam Nagar and SI Govind Singh, P.S. Uttam Nagar. + CRL.A. 481/2004 K...
Ram Chameli vs.the Sr. Divisional Finance Manager and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-02-2019
$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:2. d August, 2019 + W.P.(C) 7748/2019 and CM APPL. 32176/2019 1. RAM CHAMELI ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Naveen R. Nath, Mr. Rahul Jain and Mr. Siddarth Agarwal, Advs. from DHCLSC versus THE SR. DIVISIONAL FINANCE MANAGER AND ANR. Through Mr. Jagjit Singh and Mr. Preet Singh, ........ RESPONDENTS Advs. for R-1 Mr. R.S. Raju, Mr. Suman Kukrety with Mr. Amit Babbar, Chief Manager, Branch, Syndicate Bank, R-2 Mayapuri CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction to the... RESPONDENTS to release the family pension that the... Petitioner is entitled to from November, 2017 till date and for a further directions to the Respondent No.1 to issue appropriate instruction to Respondent No.2 to continue paying family pension at rates specified by law during her life time. She further WP (C) 7748/2019 Page 1 of 5 seeks directions thereby directing the responde...
Ashish Gaurav vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-02-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 3777/2019 ASHISH GAURAV Date of Order: August 02, 2019 .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Varun Chawla, Advocate versus STATE & ANR Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional .....Respondents Public Prosecutor for respondent- State with SI Manoj Kumar Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) + Quashing of FIR No.415/2016, under Sections 498A/4of IPC, registered at Police Station Sarita Vihar, Delhi is sought on the basis of mediated settlement of 12th December, 2018. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Manoj Kumar on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the dispute between the parties has been amicably resolved vide aforesaid mediated settlement of 12th December, 201...
Surender @ Lambu vs.state (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-02-2019
* % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:09. 04.2019 Judgment pronounced on:02. 08.2019 + CRL. A. 339/2004 DINESH ..... Appellant STATE Through: Mr. Mukesh Kalia, Mr. Manav and Mr. M.L. Yadav, Advocates. Versus .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Gupta, APP for State with Insp. Raman Kumar, ATO/Uttam Nagar and SI Govind Singh, P.S. Uttam Nagar. + CRL. A. 389/2004 SURENDER @ LAMBU ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Mukesh Kalia, Mr. Manav and Mr. M.L. Yadav, Advocates. STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through: Mr. Amit Gupta, APP for State with .....Respondent Versus Insp. Raman Kumar, ATO/Uttam Nagar and SI Govind Singh, P.S. Uttam Nagar. + CRL.A. 393/2004 JITENDER ALIAS KALA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Mukesh Kalia, Mr. Manav and Mr. M.L. Yadav, Advocates. Versus CRL.A3392004 (Connected Appeals) Page 1 of 28 STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through: Mr. Amit Gupta, APP for State with .....Respondent Insp. Raman Kumar, ATO/Uttam Nagar and SI Govind Singh, P.S. Uttam Nagar. + CRL.A. 481/2004 K...
Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation vs.harinder Singh and A ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-02-2019
$~5 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:02. 08.2019 CM No.26430/2019 & MAC.APP. No.468/2014 UTTAR PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Shadab Khan, Advocate. Versus HARINDEER SINGH AND ANR. ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rakesh Sherawat, Advocate for... RESPONDENTS No.1 and 2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) 1. The only ground on which this appeal is preferred is that the insured vehicle was not involved in the motor vehicular accident in which the kin of the claimant has lost his life. By the impugned order, the learned MACT has awarded a compensation to the respondent claimants.2. It was the claimants case that on 13.05.2012 while deceased Ankit Kumar Tokas was driving motorcycle bearing No.DL-3S-BX-3398, carrying his maternal aunt Rekha alongwith her minor daughter Chhavi as pillion riders and going to the house of his maternal uncle, his motorcycle was hit by a bus owned by the U.P. Roadways bear...
M/S Mic Electronics Ltd. Vs.m/s Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd. & An ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-02-2019
$~4 & 5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:2. d August, 2019 + O.M.P. 71/2012 DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. J.P. Singh, Advocate. (M:9868766655) versus MIC ELECTRONICS LTD AND ANOTHER ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Arun K. Sharma, Advocate. (M:9891685368) WITH O.M.P. 452/2012 + M/S MIC ELECTRONICS LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Arun K. Sharma, Advocate. (M:9891685368) versus M/S DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION LTD. & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. J.P. Singh, Advocate. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(oral) 1. The Court was informed on the last occasion that Mic Electronics Ltd. is in insolvency proceedings before the NCLT, Hyderabad Bench. It was made clear that the Section 34 petitions would not be affected by the moratorium which may be imposed in the said proceedings, as in the present case the objections to the award are to be heard and no recovery is being O.M.P. 71/2012 & 452/2012 P...
Pawandeep Singh & Anr vs.gurdeep Singh Virdi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-02-2019
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:07. 05.2019 Judgment pronounced on:02. 08.2019 + RFA (OS) 42/2018 AND CM APPL. 24353/2018 PAWANDEEP SINGH & ANR. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Vivek R. Mohanty and Mr.Puneet Parihar, Advocates. Versus GURDEEP SINGH VIRDI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Dinesh Garg, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL VINOD GOEL, J:1. The present appeal has been preferred by the appellants/defendants against the judgment dated 27.04.2018 passed by the Ld. Single Judge in CS(OS) No.43/2018, decreeing the suit for possession in respect of Flat no.2, 1st Floor, Property No.M-5, Greater Kailash-I, New Delhi instituted by the respondent/plaintiff, under Order VIII Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC). The appellants are the son and daughter-in-law of the respondent. The ld. Single Judge also granted mesne profits/damages in favour of the respondent for the use and occupation of the suit pre...
- ‹ Prev
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- Next ›
- Last »