Delhi Court August 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Eagle Infra India Limited vs.national Highway Authority of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-05-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:05. h August,2019 + FAO(OS) (COMM) 115/2018 EAGLE INFRA INDIA LIMITED ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Joy Basu, Senior Advocate with Ms.Nina Nariman, Mr. Bhaskar Vali, Mr. Tuhin, Mr. Abhishek and Mr. Kanak Bose, Advocates. versus NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Soumya Priyadarshinee, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Dismissal of objections filed in O.M.P. (C) 574/2016 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) by which an Award dated 1.9.2016 was impugned has led to the filing of the present appeal under Section 37 of the Act.2. The respondent issued a Notice Inviting Tender (NIT) dated 23.01.2013, inviting bids for collection of user fees at Gangapada Toll Plaza located at km(new at km 301/700) for the section from kmto km(new at kmto 279/222) of Sunakhala to Bh...
Mukesh Kumar Soni vs.state (Nct) of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-05-2019
$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:05. 08.2019 BAIL APPLN. 1856/2019 MUKESH KUMAR SONI versus STATE (NCT) OF DELHI ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent : CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Vikas Padora, Advocate. Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for the State. Inspr. Karuna Sagar with Inspr. Gursewak Singh, PS Tilak Nagar. JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks interim bail in FIR No.486/2013 under Sections 3IPC, Police Station Tilak Nagar on the ground of illness of his wife. Subsequently, Sections 302/201/120B/34 IPC and Sections 25/27/Arms Act have been added.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the wife of the petitioner has to undergo surgery and is admitted in Shakuntala Hospital. He submits that the surgery is to take place on 09.08.2019. BAIL APPLN. 1856/2019 Page 1 of 3 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that ea...
Surender Singh vs.national Insurance Co. Ltd. & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-05-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:05.08.2019 Through: Mr. Amarish Chandra Tiwari, Advocate. ..... Appellant MAC.APP. 709/2019 SURENDER SINGH $~27 * % + CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) CM APPL. 35095/2019 (for delay) & MAC.APP. 709/2019 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD & ANR. Versus Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate for Respondent No.1. .....Respondents 1. There is delay of 779 days in filing this appeal. The same is sought to be explained by a simple statement of the counsel that the case file had been misplaced in his office and the same was recovered just a couple of days prior to the filing. The said ground is flimsy and not believable. Furthermore, the application has not been signed by the appellant Surender Singh and has only been signed by the counsel. If Surender Singh knew that the file had been misplaced immediately after the counsel had been engaged by him, then he should have taken requisite remedial steps. There is nothing on reco...
Ghalib Zeyad vs.jawaharlal Nehru University & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-05-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P. (C) 9878/2018 & CM APPL. 38484/2018 GHALIB ZEYAD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Varma, and Mr. Ms.Mannat Mr.Akhil Kumar Gola, Advs. Vedanta Sandhu versus JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY & ORS..Respondents Through: Ms. Monika Arora, SC for JNU with Mr. Harsh Ahuja, Mr. Kushal Kumar and Mr. Praveen Singh, Advs. Mr. Ravinder Agarwal, Adv. for UGC CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR % 1. The petitioner is a student, who aspires to pursue the M.Phil. JUDGMENT0508.2019 programme with the Jawaharlal Nehru University (Respondent No.1 herein and referred to, hereinafter, as JNU). He is visually impaired, suffering from 100% blindness in his right eye and 50% blindness in his left eye. Facts 2. One may commence the recital of the relevant facts, in the present case, with the clearing, by the petitioner, of the first year of his W.P. (C) 9878/2018 Page 1 of 26 Bachelor of Arts (B.A.) Examination, from the Maulana ...
Francis Bizira & Ors. Vs.the State, Govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-05-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 3847/2019 Date of Order: August 05, 2019 FRANCIS BIZIRA & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Dalveer Kaur and Mr. Ashish Singh, Advocates versus THE STATE, GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional .....Respondents Public Prosecutor for respondent- State with W/ASI Minu Mr. Surendra, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR + ORDER (ORAL) CRL.M.A. 32835/2019 (Exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 3847/2019 Quashing of FIR No.312/2017, under Sections 498A/4of IPC, registered at Police Station Uttam Nagar, Delhi is sought on the basis of mediated settlement of 22nd December, 2018. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by W/ASI Minu on the basis of identity proof CRL.M.C. 3847/2...
Mohar Singh vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-05-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~3 * + Date of Decision:05. 08.2019 % W.P.(C.) No.7729/2019 MOHAR SINGH Through: Mr. Shrish Kumar Mishra and Ms. ........ Petitioner Versus Deepika Mishra, Advocates. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Kamal Kant Jha, Sr. Panel Counsel. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR RAJNISH BHATNAGAR, J.(ORAL) CM No.320Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CM No.35008/2019 Dismissed being meritless. W.P.(C) No.771. Issue notice. Counsel for the respondents accepts notice. We have heard learned counsels for the parties, perused the record, and we proceed to dispose of the petition at this stage itself. W.P.(C.) No.7729/2019 Page 1 of 9 2. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition with the prayer to issue Writ in the nature of Certiorari or any other appropriate Writ, quashing the Order dated 21.02.2018 passed by the Director General Border Se...
Jatinder Singh Anand & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-05-2019
$~ 5 & 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 400/2019 Decided on:-"5th August, 2019 + JATINDER SINGH ANAND & ORS. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Satyam Thareja, Adv. versus STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP for the State with W/SI Radha Sharma, PS CWC Nanak Pura. Mr. Aditya Singla & Mr. Pallav Gupta, Advs. for R-2 with R-2 in person. CRL.M.C. 401/2019 JATINDER SINGH ANAND & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Satyam Thareja, Adv. versus STATE & ANR. Through: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP ........ RESPONDENTS for the State with SI Parvesh Lamba, PS South Campus. Mr. Aditya Singla & Mr. Pallav Gupta, Advs. for R-2 with R-2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA Crl. M.C. No.400 & 401 of 2019 Page 1 of 8 ORDER (ORAL) 1. The second respondent in these petitions was married to the first petitioner, common to both the matters, as per Sikh Rites and Ceremonies on 08.09.2013. The marriage ran into rough weather, the second responden...
Naveen Tanwar vs.the State & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-05-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: August 05, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 3845/2019 NAVEEN TANWAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kuldeep Rana, Advocate versus THE STATE & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State with SI Suresh Kumar Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR CRL.M.A. 32828/2019 (Exemption) ORDER (ORAL) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 3845/2019 Quashing of FIR No.128/2018 under Sections 354D/509/506 of IPC, registered at Police Station Inderpuri, Delhi is sought on the basis of mediated settlement of 11th July, 2019 and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR in question, now stands cleared between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that respondent No.2 present in the Court, is the complainant/first informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Sure...
Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd. Vs.golf Technologies Pvt Ltd & Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-05-2019
$~45 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:5. h August, 2019 + CS (OS) 2111/2015 BSES RAJDHANI POWER LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Sunil Fernandes, standing counsel with Ms. Anju Thomas, Advocate. (M:96433. 4917) versus GOLF TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD & OTHERS ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Achal Gupta and Ms. Annie Rais, Advocates. (M:88607. 1919) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) O.A. 14/2019 (for setting aside the order dt. 10/12/2018) 1. This is an appeal filed against the order of the Joint Registrar dated 10th December, 2018 by which the Joint Registrar failed to delete the Directors of the company from the array of parties. The submission of the ld. Counsel for Defendant No.6 is that a Director cannot be made liable for the electricity dues of the company. Ld. Counsel relies upon Tristar Consultants v. M/s Vcustomer Services India Pvt. Ltd. & Anr., ILR (2007) 1 Delhi 1053 and certain other judgments following the said judgment, includ...
Ghulam Mohd. Bhat vs.national Investigating Agency
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-02-2019
# IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved On :11. 07.2019 Judgment Pronounced On :02. 08.2019 CRL.A.1264/2018 GHULAM MOHD. BHAT ..... Appellant versus NATIONAL INVESTIGATING AGENCY ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant For the Respondent : Mr. Amit Sharma, Special Public Prosecutor, NIA with Mr. : Mr. Manu Sharma and Ms. Ridhima Mandhar, Advocates Ahmed Zaid, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J1 The present appeal under Section 21(4) of the National Investigating Agency Act, 2008 (hereinafter referred to as the NIA Act) read with Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the Cr.P.C.) assails the order dated 26.11.2018 passed by the District & Sessions Judge, Special Judge CRL.A.1264/2018 Page 1 of 23 (NIA), Patiala House Courts, New Delhi, in case arising out of RC- 06/2011/NIA/DLI, registered by the NIA under Sections...
- ‹ Prev
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- Next ›
- Last »