Delhi Court August 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Surendra Pal & Anr. Vs.true Zone Buildwell Pvt. Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-07-2019
$~26 to 40 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :07. 08.2019 + O.M.P. 11/2018 & IA69652018 SURENDRA PAL & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Niraj Singh, Mr.Deepak Jaiswal and Ms.Jyoti Nagpal, Mr.Gautam Kumar, Advs. versus TRUE ZONE BUILDWELL PVT. LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Amit Mahajan, Mr.Akshay Ringe, Mr.Siddharth Joshi & Mr.Dhruv Pandey, Advs. (27) O.M.P. 12/2018 & IA69782018 DHARAMVEER@KARAMVEER ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Niraj Singh, Mr.Deepak Jaiswal and Ms.Jyoti Nagpal, Mr.Gautam Kumar, Advs. versus TRUE ZONE BUILDWELL PVT. LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Amit Mahajan, Mr.Akshay Ringe, Mr.Siddharth Joshi & Mr.Dhruv Pandey, Advs. (28) O.M.P. 13/2018 & IA77192018 GUARDAYAL SINGH ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Niraj Singh, Mr.Deepak OMP Nos.11,12,13,14,15,20,21,22, 24/2018, 2/2019, 3/2019, 13/2019, OMP(COMM) Nos.295- 296-297/2019 Page 1 Jaiswal and Ms.Jy...
sh.amar Singh vs.true Zone Buildwell Pvt. Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-07-2019
$~34 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :07. 08.2019 O.M.P. 24/2018 & IAs 13666/2018, 5826/2019 SH.AMAR SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Niraj Singh, Mr.Deepak Jaiswal and Mr.Gautam Kumar, Ms.Jyoti Nagpal, Advs. versus TRUE ZONE BUILDWELL PVT. LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Amit Mahajan, Mr.Akshay Ringe, Mr.Siddharth Joshi & Mr.Dhruv Pandey, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. By a separate order passed today in OMP No.11/2018, the petition has been allowed and the Impugned Arbitral Award has been set aside.2. A copy of the order in O.M.P. No.11/2018 is placed below. AUGUST07 2019 RN NAVIN CHAWLA, J OMP No.24/2018 Page 1 $~26 to 40 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :07. 08.2019 + O.M.P. 11/2018 & IA69652018 SURENDRA PAL & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Niraj Singh, Mr.Deepak Jaiswal and Ms.Jyoti Nagpal, Mr.Gautam Kumar, Advs. v...
Balvir and Others vs.delhi Jal Board & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-07-2019
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Delivered on:07. h August, 2019 RSA1162018 & CM APPL No.33396/2018 BALVIR AND OTHERS ..... Appellants Through : Mr.Sunil Chauhan, Advocate. versus DELHI JAL BOARD & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr.Sumeet Pushkarna, Advocate with Mr.Sami, AE for DJB. Mr.Naushad Ahmed Khan, ASC for GNCTD with Mr.Zahid Harief and Ms.Manisha Chauhan, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. This Regular Second Appeal is preferred by the appellants against the judgment dated 11.04.2018 passed by the learned Additional District Judge-04/South-West District, Dwarka Courts, New Delhi/ (hereinafter as the First Appellate Court) in RCA No.121/2017 which upheld the order dated 18.04.2017 passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Dwarka Courts (hereinafter as learned Trial Court) in CS No.26956/2016.2. a) The brief facts which led to the filing of this second appeal are:-"in the year 1950-51 the consolidation proceedings took pla...
Uma Gayal vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-07-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~56 * + Date of Decision:07. 8.2019 % UMA GAYAL W.P.(C.) No.8580/2019 ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Shweta Rani, Advocate. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Shiva Lakshmi, Adv. with Mr. Abhishek Khanna, Adv. for R-1 to 4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition to seek direction to the respondents to grant compassionate appointment to her.2. The case of the petitioner is that her father died in harness on 4.3.1993, i.e. over 26 years ago. The petitioners mother did not make an application for compassionate appointment for herself soon after the demise of her husband. The application for compassionate appointment was made only in the year 2011 which was rejected since the petitioners mother had not passed class X. The petitioner states that she attained majority and completed her graduation in the year...
M/S. Nestle Sa vs.assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (International ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-07-2019
$~48 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 12643/2018 & and CM APPL. 49097/2019 M/s. NESTLE SA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Porus Kaka, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Prakash Kumar and Mr. Divesh Chawla, Advocates. versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), CIRCLE-2 (2) (2), NEW DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Raghvendra K. Singh, Sr. Standing Counsel. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH % ORDER0708.2019 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. Nestle SA, a company established under the laws of Switzerland and a tax resident of Switzerland, has filed this petition under Articleof the Constitution seeking the quashing of a notice dated 26th March, 2018 issued to it by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation), Circle-2 (2) (2), New Delhi (the Respondent) under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act) requiring it to file a return of income. The petition also challenges an order dated 23rd October, 2018 passed by the Resp...
Om Prakash Jain vs.smt. Pushpa Jain
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-07-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * % + OM PRAKASH JAIN ........ Petitioner CRL.L.P. 668/2017 Decided on:7. h August, 2019 SMT. PUSHPA JAIN Represented by: Tanya Goel, Advocate Represented by: ..... Respondent None. Versus CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A. 19068/2017 For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 130 days in filing the leave to appeal petition is condoned. Application stands disposed of. CRL.L.P. 668/2017 1. Aggrieved by the judgment dated 30th April 2016 whereby the learned Metropolitan Magistrate acquitted the respondent for the offences punishable under Section 500 IPC, the petitioner has preferred the present leave petition.1. Brief facts of the case as per the complaint of the petitioner are that the petitioner runs his business of paper merchant under the name and style of M/s OM PRAKASH SANJIV KUMAR JAIN in Chawri Bazar, Delhi-6. In his complaint he alleged that the respondent in connivance with the other accused pe...
Itd-Itd Cem Jv vs.commissioner of Trade & Taxes
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-07-2019
$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7842/2018 ITD-ITD CEM JV ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Rajesh Jain, Mr. Virag Tiwari Versus &Mr. Ramashish, Advocates COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES Through Mr. Satyakam, ASC for GNCTD with Mr. Satish Chauhan, VATO ..... Respondent CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH ORDER0708.2019 % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. The... Petitioner seeks a direction to the Respondent Commissioner of Trade and Taxes to grant refund of Rs.6,26,56,549/- for the fourth quarter of 2013-2014.2. The... Petitioner a joint venture group is engaged in executing works contracts for the Delhi Metro Rail Corporation (DMRC). It has been registered under the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 (DVAT Act) since 2007. The... Petitioner has been filing its returns in terms of Section 26 of the DVAT Act read with Rules 26 to 28 of Delhi Value Added Tax Rules, 2005 (DVAT Rules). W.P.(C) 7842/2018 Page 1 of 13 3. For the fourth quarter 2013-2014, the... Petition...
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-4, New Delhi vs.symphony Marketing Solu ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-07-2019
$~22 and 23 * + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ITA4142018 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4, NEW DELHI ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Raghvendra K.Singh, Sr. Standing Counsel. versus SYMPHONY MARKETING SOLUTIONS INDIA PVT. LTD. (NOW MERGED WITH GENPACT INDIA) Through: Mr.Sunil Agarwal with Ms.Akansha Aggarwal, Advocates. ..... Respondent ITA7172018 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4, NEW DELHI ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Raghvendra K.Singh, Sr. Standing Counsel. versus SYMPHONY MARKETING SOLUTIONS INDIA PVT. LTD. (NOW MERGED WITH GENPACT INDIA) Through: Mr.Sunil Agarwal with Ms.Akansha Aggarwal, Advocates. ..... Respondent % CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH ORDER0708.2019 ITA4142018 and ITA7172018 Page 1 of 7 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. These are two appeals by the Revenue against the impugned orders passed by the ITAT dated 4th April 2017 and 18th August 2017 raising the same issue. While ITA414of 2018 questions the order dated 4th April 2017 of the ITAT in IT (TP)A...
sh.suresh Pal vs.true Zone Buildwell Pvt. Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-07-2019
$~33 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :07. 08.2019 O.M.P. 22/2018 & IA117672018 SH.SURESH PAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Niraj Singh, Mr.Deepak Jaiswal and Mr.Gautam Kumar, Ms.Jyoti Nagpal, Advs. versus TRUE ZONE BUILDWELL PVT. LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Amit Mahajan, Mr.Akshay Ringe, Mr.Siddharth Joshi & Mr.Dhruv Pandey, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. By a separate order passed today in OMP No.11/2018, the petition has been allowed and the Impugned Arbitral Award has been set aside.2. A copy of the order in O.M.P. No.11/2018 is placed below. AUGUST07 2019 RN NAVIN CHAWLA, J OMP No.22/2018 Page 1 $~26 to 40 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :07. 08.2019 + O.M.P. 11/2018 & IA69652018 SURENDRA PAL & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Niraj Singh, Mr.Deepak Jaiswal and Ms.Jyoti Nagpal, Mr.Gautam Kumar, Advs. versus TRUE ZON...
Union of India & Anr. Vs.s.k. Jain & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-07-2019
$~6 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2932/2003 UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. A.S. Dateer, Advocate Date of Decision :07. 08.2019 versus S.K. JAIN & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. H.C. Kharbanda, Mr. T.N. Saxena & Mr. Vipin Kumar Saxena, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JUDGMENT JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) CM APPL. 32759/2019 (Early hearing) The application is allowed and the matter is taken up for final disposal today. C.M. stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 2932/2003 & CM APPL. No.5003/2003 (Stay) 1. The present writ petition filed by the Union of India through General Manager, Northern Railway and Chief Accounts Officer, Northern Railway, New Delhi assails the judgment dated 25.10.2002 passed by Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi, in OA No.814/2002. The learned Tribunal, by the impugned judgment, has allowed the OA and has quashed the order dated W.P. (C) No.2932/2003 P...
- ‹ Prev
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- Next ›
- Last »